Sarajevo

Home > Other > Sarajevo > Page 17
Sarajevo Page 17

by R W Seaton-Watson


  stated that he had applied for help to the secretary of the

  Odbrana, Major Vasic, and that the latter, finding a

  1 A Serb from Croatia who threw up his commission in the Austro-Hungarian

  army and entered the Serbian army. His brother Svetozar was one of the

  leading Serb deputies in the Serbo-Croat Coalition and was from 1923 to 1925

  Minister

  of Education

  in

  the

  Pasid Cabinet. His

  other two brothers,

  Adam

  and Valerijan, were the two foremost victims of the Zagreb Treason Trial, in

  which a " Revolutionary Statute " ascribed to Milan's authorship served as an

  incriminating document. Not unnaturally Milan was a special bugbear to the

  Austro-Hungarian

  authorities,

  who

  also

  hoped

  through

  him

  to

  compromise

  Svetozar and his colleagues in the Coalition.

  2 See infra, pp. 138 and 147.

  3 Austro-Hungarian Rotbuch (1915), No. 19, p. 78.

  4 Pharos, Process gegen die Attentäter von Sarajevo, p. 8.

  121

  volume of Maupassant in his possession, took it away,

  saying that it was not for him, and supplied him with

  other more edifying literature and a little money.1 This

  tiny

  incident

  illustrates

  the

  difference

  in

  mentality

  between the Narodna Odbrana and the terrorist group.

  That these young emigres should have applied to the

  former society is the most natural thing in the world, for

  it was known to be specially interested in Bosnia and in

  the fate of its émigrés.

  That is probably hardly a mere accident that the memo-

  randum only cites the names of six conspirators, three

  of whom had come from Serbia. In reality, proceedings

  were taken by the Sarajevo Court against twenty-five

  persons, all Bosnian subjects. Of these, sixteen were

  eventually

  sentenced

  and

  nine

  acquitted.

  The

  three

  chief criminals, Princip, Cabrinovic and Grabez, were

  condemned

  to

  twenty

  years'

  imprisonment,

  Austrian

  law not allowing the death sentence for persons under

  the age of twenty'; but Ilié, Veljko Cubrilovic and

  Jovanovic were actually executed.8 Of the remainder,

  one was sentenced to sixteen, one to ten, one to

  seven and two to three years' imprisonment. To have

  admitted before Europe that as many as twenty-five

  persons were implicated in the plot, would have been

  to stress the spontaneous character of the conspiracy

  and

  correspondingly

  to

  diminish

  the

  probable

  share

  of Serbia.

  In effect, however, this is exactly what Austria did

  during the early months of 1915, though Europe was

  then far too absorbed in other things to realise the implica-

  tions. A whole series of treason trials was instituted

  against the youth of Bosnia-Herzegovina. At Travnik

  1 ibid., p. 5.

  2 All three were in an advanced stage of consumption and died during the war —

  Cabrinovic in the prison of Theresienstadt in January 1916, Grabez in February,

  and Princip early in 1918. Mitar Kerovié, whose death sentence had been

  commuted to twenty years' imprisonment, also died in prison at Möllersdorf.

  3 On 2 February, 1915.

  122

  Borivoje Jevtic 1 was sentenced to three years, and six

  of his comrades to two years each. At Sarajevo ten

  other students were sentenced to one year each. At

  Tuzla Todor Ilic was sentenced to death (though after-

  wards reprieved), while six comrades received sentences

  of ten to sixteen years, and others again of "one to five

  years. Finally at Banjaluka 151 of the ringleaders of

  " Young Bosnia " were the victims of a monster trial,

  which ended in 98 convictions, the deputies, Vasilj

  Grdjic and Popovic and 14 others being sentenced to

  death, 52 others to terms of imprisonment varying

  from 10 to 20 years, and the remainder to terms varying

  from 8 to 2 years.2 Needless to say, proceedings were

  only instituted against those who had in one way or

  another become marked men; the great mass were

  simply mobilised at the outbreak of war and used as

  " cannon fodder " for the Central Powers. But the large

  numbers involved in these trials, and the wholesale

  internments of Jugoslav patriots of all ages — nine-tenths

  of whom had never been in any contact whatever with

  Serbia — provide overwhelming proof of the spontaneous

  and universal character of the national movement among

  the Jugoslavs of the Monarchy, and in particular of the

  revolutionary tendencies in Bosnia.

  One point seemed to be definitely established by the

  Memorandum — namely, that the hand-grenades came

  originally from the Serbian State Arsenal at Kragujevac.

  This again need cause no surprise, for it was notorious

  that large numbers of these had been distributed to the

  irregular bands employed by Serbia during the Balkan

  Wars. Thus there were still many available in private

  hands, and Tankosic, as the former chief of a band, can

  have had little or no difficulty in procuring some, without

  the authorities being any the wiser.

  1 Author of Sarajevski Atentat (1924).

  2 For details, see Austro-Magyar Judicial Crimes (1916).

  123

  The most serious charge in the memorandum — and one

  which has since been substantiated — is the implication

  of two officers of the Serbian Frontier Guards, at Sabac

  and Loznica, in smuggling the young men across to

  Bosnia.

  This

  was

  from

  the

  very

  first

  virtually

  unchallenged, and the details would very quickly have

  been established if the whole question had been referred

  to the Hague Tribunal, as the Belgrade Government

  suggested.

  While investigations proceeded at Sarajevo behind a

  strict veil of official secrecy, there were growing polemics

  in the press of Vienna and Budapest on the one hand

  and of Belgrade on the other. In neither case would it

  be just to regard them as symptomatic of normal public

  opinion in the two countries, but their continuance had

  an

  irritating

  and

  inflammatory

  effect.

  One

  essential

  distinction must, however, be emphasised at the very

  outset. The Serbian press had always been violent, and

  often scurrilous; subject under the Obrenovic to unjust

  and illicit pressure, it had attained since the change of

  regime in 1903 a liberty which, in the absence of any law


  of libel, swiftly degenerated into licence, but which was

  generally tolerated as a safeguard against any possible

  return to the old system. No Government since 1903,

  however powerful in other respects, possessed the power

  to restrain the press, or had the courage to attempt a

  remedy by introducing a stringent press law; and to

  impose restrictive measures by ministerial decree would

  have been a violation of the Constitution. At the moment

  of the murder Serbia was absorbed by party feuds of a

  specially acute kind, and opponents of the Government

  took a positive delight in embarrassing it still further by

  provocative language, even in the delicate sphere of

  foreign politics.

  In Vienna and in Budapest the position was entirely

  différent. Not merely the official and semi-official

  organs, but the entire press, with very rare exceptions,

  124

  was amenable to the influence of the Ballplatz in matters

  of foreign policy, and could be mobilised, or muzzled,

  almost at a moment's notice, despite the existence in

  both Austria and Hungary of press laws drafted on

  approved European lines. Of this, such incidents as

  the Prochaska affair in the winter of 1912 provide

  eloquent proof. In a word, while the two Governments

  of the Dual Monarchy, and above all the Joint Ministry

  for Foreign Affairs, had most of the press in both capitals

  at its disposal, the press of Belgrade — save a few personal

  organs, which were not necessarily the most influential

  — was all the more uncontrollable because so many of

  its

  writers

  were

  inexperienced

  and

  unbalanced,

  and

  was often ready to defy the Government on the most

  trifling excuse. Undoubtedly one reason of the contrast

  was that among the two ruling races of the Monarchy

  journalism had become very largely a monopoly of the

  Jews,

  whose

  natural

  subservience

  to

  authority

  was

  supplemented by anti-Slav bias, whereas in Belgrade

  the journalistic trade, being poorly paid and still in its

  infancy, attracted a number of very second-rate indi-

  viduals. Nor would it be fitting to overlook the rôle

  played in envenoming Austro-Serbian relations by a

  group of Jewish " revolver journalists " living at Zemun,

  the little frontier town facing Belgrade across the river,

  and unscrupulously feeding Vienna and Budapest with

  a never failing supply of scandalous gossip about Serbia.

  Moreover, among the Southern Slavs there has always

  been a class of " Hochstapler," highly intelligent but

  unprincipled to a degree, and possessed of a lively imagina-

  tion which takes the form of feeding the credulous or

  spitefully-disposed

  foreigner

  with

  yarns

  of

  a

  highly

  sensational character. The all-pervading system of police

  espionage

  which

  the

  Austro-Hungarian

  Ministries

  of

  Foreign

  Affairs

  and

  War

  had

  organised

  throughout

  Bosnia and the other Southern Slav provinces provided

  these adventurers with great opportunities; and obscure

  125

  individuals like George Nastic, Vasic, Steinhardt and

  others came to play a really important rôle, thanks to

  the infinite gullibility of the authorities and their blind

  hatred of everything Serb. The virulent pamphlets of

  Leopold Mandl were accepted as gospel, not merely by

  historians of the calibre of Friedjung, but by all the

  chief statesmen of Central Europe.

  In the fierce polemics which followed the murder,

  considerable excuses may be made for the Viennese

  clerical organs, to whose hopes and ambitions the removal

  of Francis Ferdinand dealt the deadliest of blows. But

  no such plea can be advanced for the Liberal Jewish

  press of both capitals, which had always hated and

  feared the Archduke, while the attitude of the official

  and semi-official organs was of course due to the direct

  initiative oî the Ballplatz itself. Specially unrestrained,

  and hence specially worthy of notice, was the language

  of the Pester Lloyd, which on all matters of foreign policy

  had, ever since the 'sixties, been a recognised mouth-

  piece of the Hungarian Premier and of the Joint Foreign

  Minister of the day. Its first leader after the murder

  (29 June) roundly declared that " the threads of this

  bloody web are still not laid bare, but there is already

  certainty as to whither they lead. . . . Ten years ago

  they butchered their own King and Queen by night;

  they have now murdered the Austro-Hungarian heir in

  open daylight on the street. In technique and boldness

  there has in the interval been a notable improvement.

  Such are the cultural products which the world has to

  procure

  from

  this

  quarter."

  And

  again

  next

  day,

  Panserb crime has already been branded on the fore-

  head. To render it harmless by pitiless extermination

  as the task of the future." (30 June.) As must have

  been foreseen, the first of these articles of course provoked

  reminders in the Belgrade press that the crime was due

  bosnian

  discontent

  and

  Austrian

  repression;

  and

  of this the Pester Lloyd replied on 1 July with over three

  126

  columns of violent comment, in which it was claimed

  that those who dared to speak of " the fable of oppres-

  sion of their kinsmen " laid themselves open to the

  countercharge

  of

  "

  incitement

  to

  murder."

  Instead

  of regretting the excesses perpetrated against the Serbs

  of Bosnia, it simply treated Potiorek's proclamation of

  martial law as " a revelation of facts which the Belgrade

  gentry with their big talk can no longer juggle away."

  After these calculated outbursts it established a daily

  rubric entitled: " Serbian whitewash," or " From the

  Serbian Witches' Cauldron," and containing the most

  violent rejoinders to its own abuse. Finally, when the

  Serbian Press Bureau issued a statement regretting the

  crime and its effect upon relations between the two

  countries, the Pester Lloyd replied by declaring that a

  country where " assassination was the national gospel "

  and "regicide an article of exportation, had no right to

  be counted as part of the civilised world."

  Under such provocation Belgrade was not slow to

  retort,

  and

  exaggerated

  t
he

  already

  grave

  anti-Serb

  excesses into a veritable "St. Bartholomew's Night."

  As an example of the lengths to which certain revolver

  journalists went, may be quoted the article of Zvono

  (16 July), which describes Principas the son of the former

  Crown

  Princess

  Stephanie,

  charged

  with

  avenging

  Rudolf's death upon his murderer, Francis Ferdinand! »

  Matters were not improved by an interview in Novoye

  Vremya, in which the Serbian Minister in St. Petersburg,

  Mr. Spalajkovic, referred to Vienna's reprisals against the

  Bosnian Serbs.» The fact that the Minister had first

  become known by a pamphlet on Austro-Hungarian rule

  in Bosnia, and that his wife came of a prominent Bosnian

  family, made his intervention all the more indiscreet and

  1 First Austro-Hungarian Red Book (1915), No. 19, app. ix.

  2 An interesting commentary on this incident is to be found in Sazonov's

  frank reference to Spalajkovic" as déséquilibré. (Szâpâry to Berchtold, 21 July

  1914, D.A., I, No. 45.)

  127

  highly incensed the Ballplatz. Almost equal offence was

  riven by an interview of Pasic himself in the Leipziger

  Neueste Nachrichten, which he soon found it advisable to

  deny in several particulars, and which Baron Giesl may

  have been right in regarding as really addressed to his own

  electors at home.

  Perhaps the most singular contribution to this press

  feud was made by Mr. Horatio Bottomley, who on 11

  July placarded London with the phrase, " To Hell with

  Serbia," and published an article in John Bull accusing

  the Serbian secret service of plotting the murder through

  its London Legation. The incriminating document —

  reproduced in facsimile — was a half-burnt cipher on the

  notepaper of the Legation, procured by John Bull,

  " never mind how," to use its own words. It decodes

  " into crude Spanish," and contains a promise of £2,000

  " for the total elimination of Francis Ferdinand."1 Now

  it so happens that this " crude Spanish " is really the

  dialect employed by the Jews of Salonica, and that the

  man who hawked this document round several London

  newspaper offices and was eventually accepted by the

  sensation-loving Mr. Bottomley was a Salonican Jew.

  This suggests some connection with the Committee of

  Union and Progress, which had centred in the Jewish

  Lodges of Salonica until the expulsion of the Turks

  eighteen months previously, and which was of course

  actively hostile to Serbia. Needless to say, no one in

 

‹ Prev