SS Brotherhood of the Bell: The Nazis’ Incredible Secret Technology

by Joseph P. Farrell

  Soviet science was scouring the forgotten or discarded and in some cases even the exotic and esoteric avenues of Western science. Soviet physics in particular was, due to Russia’s isolation and communist ideology, in almost the same situation as physics had been in the Nazi Reich.

  Bearden’s argument now takes a decidedly speculative turn, but one that is very convincing. Arguing that the Soviet have scalar weapons because certain events and physical anomalies in postwar history bear the clear signature of scalar physics, he then poses the question of how and why the Soviets were led to develop such weapons. The answer is the scenario already outlined. Bearden then inquires what specifically they might have found as the “scientific scavenger teams” sifted through scientific journals. Was there anything in the scientific, peer-reviewed literature that would serve as the theoretical foundations for the development of a “superweapon” more powerful than Russia’s or America’s own hydrogen bombs?

  His answer is astonishing. The Russian physicists discovered not only a basis for the unification of physical fields that was pre-relativistic, but they found one that could be reconciled with quantum mechanics that would allow them to tap into, or “cohere,” the limitless “Zero Point Energy” or “quantum potential.”28 It was thus practical and weaponizable. Moreover, as will be seen below, it was a very flexible weapons platform, capable of a variety of uses and effects, and capable of use in varying degrees of destructive power, up to and including gigantic regional devastation and, as we shall see, even capable of planet-busting potential.

  But what exactly is scalar, or “quantum potential”, physics? To answer that question, one must look at Bearden’s examination of classical electromagnetic theory and the implicit assumptions that have been the basis of “public consumption” physics since Maxwell in the nineteenth century. His examination is another component of the history of scalar physics.

  1. Bearden on the State of Electromagnetic, or Electrodynamic, Theory, and the Elements of Scalar, or Quantum Potential, Physics

  a. Classical Electromagnetic Theory as a Perpetual Motion Machine

  According to Bearden, contemporary theoretical and experimental physics has been on the wrong track since at least the nineteenth century since Heaviside editted the brilliant work of James Clerk Maxwell in unifying the magnetic and electric fields. In fact, physics has been so wrong that electromagnetic theory itself is the single best example of a fundamental violation of one of the foundational laws of physics: the conservation of energy. This is because, unbelievably, standard electromagnetic theory, as it is taught to this day in universities in the West, has no solid explanation for the origin of electric charge in two of the most fundamental particles in nuclear physics and quantum mechanics: the proton, and the electron:

  Let us put it bluntly: Every charge in the universe already freely and continuously pours out (electromagnetic) energy in (three dimensional space) in all directions, without any observable energy input. That is the well-concealed source charge problem, known but ignored by the leaders of the scientific community for a century. All (electromagnetic) fields and potentials and their energy come from those source charges, according to electrodynamics itself. Either we must give up the conservation of energy law entirely, or else we must accept the fact that unobservable virtual (electromagnetic) mass and energy are continuously absorbed from the vacuum by the source charge, transduced into real observable (electromagnetic) energy, and then re-radiated in (three dimensional space) in all directions as observable (electromagnetic) energy, creating the associated fields and potentials reaching out across the universe. 29

  The result of this absurd situation is that the engineering models and devices based on this standard electrodynamics continue to assume “that the charge freely creates real (electromagnetic) energy out of nothing at all, in total violation of the conservation of energy law.” Thus, physics faculties, government grant and funding agencies, and corporate research laboratories “unwittingly advocate perpetual motion machines on a scale unparalleled in history. They continue to support an electrical engineering model and a classical electrodynamics model which do not even model the active vacuum and its exchange with every charge, much less a broken symmetry in that exchange.”30

  In case this is not clear enough, Bearden, who has a bachelor of science degree in mathematics, a master of science degree in engineering, and a PhD in science, puts the miserable state of “public consumption physics” and its electrodynamics in no uncertain terms:

  There is not now, and there never has been, a single electrical engineering department, electrical engineering professor, or electrical engineering textbook that teaches what powers an electrical circuit. Yet the basis for it has clearly been in particle physics since 1957, as certified by the award of the Nobel Prize to Lee and Yang. What powers every electrical circuit and system is the broken symmetry of the primary power system’s source charges and source dipole (i.e., the broken symmetry of the opposite charges on the ends of the dipole) in its fierce energy exchange with the seething vacuum, once that dipole has been made. … Further, any dipole will freely extract (electromagnetic) energy from the vacuum, convert it into real, usable, observable (electromagnetic) energy, and pour out real, usable (electromagnetic) energy continuously and indefinitely, so long as the dipole remains intact. 31

  Or to put it more simply, all electromagnetic devices and circuits “are already powered – though in an inappropriate fashion – by (electromagnetic) energy freely extracted from the vacuum.”32 All electrical circuits, in other words, are already “zero point energy” or “quantum potential” devices.33 They are just massively inefficient ones for reasons that will be seen shortly.

  Since classical electrodynamics viewed charge in a most unscientific manner as a “perpetual motion machine” getting energy from literally nowhere, the next error inevitably followed: electrical circuits and electromagnetic systems were closed systems.

  But how, then, would classical electrodynamics explain the Coler coil, the curious circuit reproduced in Reich of the Black Sun?34

  The Coler Coil

  As mentioned there, this odd hexagonal arrangement of coils and magnets had absolutely no source of power and yet it managed to produce power.

  Clearly, this circuit, understood in the wider context of the other issues examined in this chapter, would have spurred the German scientists to seek an explanation within the context of the ideologically approved physics of the Nazi regime, i.e., in quantum mechanics and its prediction of a vacuum flux, or “zero point energy.” In understanding such a circuit, in understanding any circuit, one will thus find it necessary – if one is to avoid the “perpetual motion machine” of standard electrodynamics – “to think in terms of the supersystem, defined as having three components, which are (i) the physical power system itself, (ii) the active local vacuum, and (iii) the active local curvatures of spacetime.”35 Any electrical circuit is thus not a closed system but an open system.36

  We now have the first three fundamental components of scalar physics and technologies:

  (1) the medium, aether substrate, or “active local vacuum”,

  (2) the local curved dynamic of space,37 and

  (3) an understanding of circuits as open systems, rather than closed perpetual motion machines.

  Moreover, as the Coler Coil seems to imply, some circuits are more efficient at transducing this “active vacuum” energy than others, and one may reasonably assume, therefore, that this efficiency is a function of its circuit parameters, i.e., of its geometry and “electrical topology,” of its shape.

  b. What the Soviets (and Nazis) Found in their Scavenger Hunt: E.T. Whittaker’s Decomposition of Scalar Potentials into Bi-Directional Longitudinal Waves

  So, with these observations in mind, it is time to ask the important question: What exactly did the Soviets find during their scavenger hunt? And more to the point, what might the Germans have concluded and carefully classified from their examination of
the Coler Coil? To answer this, it is necessary to take up Bearden’s reconstruction of the history of scalar weapons where we left it off.

  Bearden maintains that in scouring the West’s scientific journals the Soviets would have come across three relatively obscure, highly mathematical, entirely pre-relativistic, and immensely unusual papers. Two of them were by the well-known mathematician and theoretical physicist E.T. Whittaker, and one was by a physicist named Barus. Of the three, the Whittaker papers are breathtaking in their implications, not the least of which because they can be made to work within the context of the later-developed quantum theory.

  The first paper, a lengthy and highly mathematical tome, is a masterpiece whose full implications – in spite of its benign and somewhat intimidating title “On the partial differential equations of mathematical physics” – are spelled out by Whittaker in the conclusion of the paper(I have italicized the significant portions that bear directly on Bearden’s analysis which follows):

  It is clear from the foregoing that the field of force due to a gravitating body can be analyzed, by a “spectrum analysis” as it were, into an infinite number of constituent fields; and although the whole field of force does not vary with time, yet each of the constituent fields is of an undulatory character, consisting of a simple wave-disturbance propagated with uniform velocity…. In each of these constituent fields the potential will be constant along each wave-front, and consequently the gravitational force in each constituent field will be perpendicular to the wave-front, i.e., the waves will be longitudinal. 38

  The significance of this short paragraph may be missed unless one remembers that E.T. Whittaker was also a physicist who believed ardently in the aether, i.e., in a medium or mechanism of electromagnetic energy propagation. Indeed, he is the same Whittaker who wrote a classic history of the concept of the aether. Note also that this paper was originally published in Germany, and therefore, the Germans could hardly have been unaware of its existence or of its importance as a non-relativistic physics as they sought to explain the curious anomalies of the Coler Coil or their late war radar experiments. Indeed, their experiments with radar, and even the Bell itself, are evidence that they were pursuing this “scalar physics” with a vengeance.

  To understand what Bearden means by “scalar” waves in the medium or vacuum, we must now go further into the history of where public consumption physics went wrong. According to Bearden, it began to make its first massive wrong turn after Maxwell. Maxwell first formulated his equations in a mathematical language all but extinct today, a mathematical language called quaternion geometry. This mathematical language differs significantly from the standard “linear algebra,” “tensor calculus” and “vector analysis” in which the standard electromagnetic theory is usually couched in textbooks and physics lectures. In short, the equations one learns in physics textbooks and physics courses today as Maxwell’s equations are not Maxwell’s original equations! They are edited equations. But to understand what effect this simple change of mathematical language – from quaternions to vector analysis – had on physics, we need to understand a few simple concepts.

  First, there are two type of effects that electromagnetic fields can have on charged particles: (1) translation, and (2) stress. There are two types of translation, or movement. The first type is simple translation in a straight line, producing the electrical, or “E” field itself. The second type of movement is that of a spiral, mathematically symbolized as the “B” field. We will not be dealing with the “B” field immediately.

  Now let us assume there are two vectors, E1 and E2, acting upon a particle as shown:

  The result is a translation in the direction of vector E3 as the two vectors are added together to get a result, which is called aptly enough, a “resultant” vector. Thus, in systems where a large number of translation vectors are involved, “the entire system can be replaced by a single vector,” the resultant, which describes the actual translation that results from the original vectors.39

  Now observe that if no translation occurs, the resultant is a “zero vector.” However, one must always recall that one is dealing with geometry and not simply mathematics or numbers. One can therefore envision a multitude of multivector systems resulting in a zero translation vector, and yet which have profoundly different internal stresses and geometries:

  If one were trained to think only in terms of the conventions of linear algebra to replace multivector systems with a resultant vector, then in each of the three cases or systems above, one will replace the entire system with a zero resultant vector. This means that the internal stresses of the systems and their rotational characteristics – each obviously quite different – are all replaced by a zero vector, and thus the three systems are erroneously reduced to physical equivalence by a mathematical convention!

  Now we are in a position to see what a scalar is, and why Maxwell deliberately chose quaternion geometry to write his equations, for he had in mind when he did so precisely the types of physical stress situations that are simply represented by the vortices in the above diagram.

  In standard linear algebra, each of the arrows in the above system would be mathematically represented like this:

  v(vector) = ai + bj + ck.

  Thus, if the total sum of all such vectors is no translation, then one will replace all such mathematical expressions with a zero vector. But as we have seen, each of these systems contains an internal rotation or stress, so something remains. The question is, how to represent it mathematically?

  In quaternion geometry, a quaternion is simply a “scalar” plus a “vector,” and a “scalar” is simply a pure magnitude, a “number” that has no direction. It simply “is.” Thus, a quaternion (q) is a scalar(s) plus a vector (v):

  q = s + v

  Substituting our previous expression of a vector into this, we get

  q = s + ai + bj + ck.

  Thus, for the hexagonally shaped system above, one would have six different expressions resembling q = s + ai + bj + ck. Now imagine we multiply each of these vectors. According to the special rules in linear algebra for multiplying such things, we know that zero times zero is zero. So in linear algebra one would end up with nothing once again, a zero vector, since no translation has occurred. But in quaternion geometry the scalars, which are not zero, all multiply, and give – according to the rules of quaternion multiplication – the following result:

  q x q = s2 + t2 + u2 + w2 + x2 + y2 + 0v,

  where 0v is the zero vector and the squared quantities are the multiplied scalars. Thus, in quaternion geometry the internal stress is preserved even though there is zero translation occurring. The scalars thus represent pure magnitudes of force “locked within” a structure possessing no “direction” or “translation.”

  Now we are in a position to understand what scalar physics is: it is not standard vector or “linear” physics in any sense, but is the nonlinear physics of internal stresses in the local medium.

  We are likewise now in a position to understand the enormous implications of the end of Whittaker’s paper quoted above, implications that Bearden’s analysis makes quite clear:

  (The) interference of scalar potentials – each of which is actually a set of longitudinal (electromagnetic) waves, and not a scalar entity at all, but a multivectorial entity – produces (electromagnetic) fields and waves and their dynamics. Hence we hypothesize that the Whittaker interference of the propagating reordered (electromagnetic) energy entities, continuously occurring at any point in space, generates the zero-point (electromagnetic) field energy fluctuations of the vacuum itself. Indeed, (a) paper by Evans…has already shown that just such “scalar interferometry” produces transverse (electromagnetic) fields and waves in the vacuum at a distance. 40

  In other words, one must imagine each of the scalar entities accompanying the vectors in the diagrams above as being composed of bi-directional longitudinal or “acoustic” waves in the medium. Thus, Whittaker “decomposes” the scalar entit
ies into pairs of such pressure waves or “stresses” in the medium. Combining, or “interfering” such waves thus causes the standard electromagnetic fields and waves observed in standard physics. And most importantly, this can be done “at a distance.”

  But what does this mean?

  Simply put, since every atom and every type of atom consists of particles with charge and/or mass, then every atom has its own peculiar “scalar signature” or “resonance” (recall the diagrams above and imagine the mathematical notations that would describe each in quaternion geometry). Thus, to produce an effect on any one of these systems, one simply has to “work backwards” as it were, and configure its scalar signature, decomposing each of the scalars into its own pair of bi-directional longitudinal pulses and waves.

  One may thus envision the innumerable types of “zero sum vector systems” like the diagram above as also being a kind of template for action, or what Bearden calls a “causal system robot,” or CSR, a template for producing a desired outcome in a system at a distance by means of configuring resonance to its “scalar signature”:

  With sufficient theoretical development, one can “work backwards” to obtain a desired causal system…corresponding to some physical system…. One thereby creates a deterministic set of spacetime curvatures and impressed dynamics, which we call an “engine.”...By building in scalar interferometry functions, the CSR can be given “weapons” capabilities, etc. 41