SS Brotherhood of the Bell: The Nazis’ Incredible Secret Technology
Page 29
5. Oscillation of Plasma and ZPE Coherence
Thus one arrives at one possible reason behind the Bell itself:
If the abrupt motion of a single nucleus can activate the vacuum energy, what if we move a large number together? This is exactly what happens during ion-acoustic resonance of plasma.23
That is to say, if the Germans had managed to discover the low-energy transmutation phenomenon – and the Farm Hall Transcripts suggest that they did – and if they coupled this idea to spin-cohered or charge-polarized plasma, as the research of Gerlach would consistently suggest, then it is a very short step to the idea that the way to maximize the phenomenon would be via a large aggregate of matter – in a plasma – and to further stimulate that activity through pulsing of a radioactive substance, as the previous accounts of the Mossbauer effect demonstrate.
All these factors suggest that the Germans were experimenting with the very structure and fabric of matter, energy, gravity and spacetime with the Bell, and for various purposes: propulsion, weaponry, and so on.
6. Gray’s Scalar Compression Tube
Yet another device examined in King’s book that bears strong conceptual parallels with the Bell is E. V. Gray’s “Scalar Compression Tube.”
The conceptual resemblance to the Bell may be gleaned from a comparison of King’s comments with the diagram above:
In 1986 (and again in 1987) Gray patented a circuit and a tube. The tube is the critical element and it exhibits characteristics similar to hollow cathode switches and the tubes of Correa and Moray. The thin anode, down the central axis of the tube, contains a spark gap. The anode is surrounded by a cylindrical, double grid cathode with the two grids electrically shorted together. The double grid behaves like a hollow cathode and contains glow plasma. This is the key component….The cold current pulses originate from the glow plasma within this cathode.24
The principle of Gray’s “Scalar Compression Tube” then becomes evident in the following diagram:
King states that the surrounding cylindrical double cathode grid
Supports a radial, inward ion surge. This could manifest a “scalar compression” pulse where a positive polarization wave is symmetrically directed inwardly to surround the anode. The phrase “scalar” means scalar potential, which results when opposite electric field vectors cancel. Because of symmetry, the radial electric field vectors from the ions are in perfect opposition, which creates a spiking, scalar potential transient when they surge inwardly.
The similarities to Witkowski’s own reconstruction of the Bell’s operating principles is quite obvious, as is the conceptual similarity to Witkowski’s own drawing of the Bell, which has a small lead or cable coming from the top of the device, as if it were a very large version of Gray’s tube.
7. CounterRotating Electromagnetic Fields, ZPE Coherence, and Kontrabary
The physicist Wheeler thought that fluctuations in the zero point energy – or if one prefers the terminology, “oscillations in the aether” – was the “foundation for all matter and energy in our universe.”25 When this “fluctuation in the aether” is spin cohered – that is, when a “vortex in the nothingness appears” – then it is detected in normal space as an elementary particle.26
In this respect, King offers his own summary on the engineering principles involved not only in cohering the Zero Point Energy, but also in the crucial key area of stimulating a glow plasma, the necessary “ingredient” in the alchemy of aether physics:
(a) Abrupt motion of glow plasma nuclei is needed; this glow plasma needs to be in the maximum possible state of charge polarization (spin coherence);
(b) The glow plasma needs to be appropriately shaped and symmetrically compressed;
(c) The glow plasma should be caught between bucking electromagnetic fields, that is to say, vector-zeroed fields; this is best accomplished by,
(d) Counterrotation and “vortical forms.”27
Of these elements, three in particular are crucial to the stimulation of the glow plasma. First there is the abrupt electrical pulse (which one must assume is rapidly repeated, if the plasma is to be maintained in the necessary state; hence, one has another explanation of the “beehive” buzzing sound Witkowski reports was associated with the Bell, since the sound is typical of rapidly opening and closing DC switches). The second crucial element is the “bucking electromagnetic fields”, and the third is the counterrotating electromagnetic fields, achieving symmetric compression through rotation.28
If one considers this list very carefully, it will be readily apparent that the Bell’s design and operation, as described by Witkowski, contains all of these elements except that of abrupt and repeated pulsing. Even on Witkowski’s description and speculative reconstruction of its operation and design parameters, one is in the presence of an intentionally designed quantum coherence device. If one adds in my own speculation of abrupt and repeated shocks to the vortices – delivered by rapid and repeated DC pulses29 - then the picture of the device and its operation is very nearly complete.
C. The Vorticular Mechanics of the Aether: The Theories of O.C. Hilgenberg and Carl F. Krafft
There are three laws of any adequate theory of the mechanics of the aether, or of any genuine “hyperdimensional” physics based upon it. These are:
1. Rotation;
2. Rotation; and,
3. Rotation.
Perhaps this humorous point is overstated, but nonetheless, if there is any single concept that has run as a consistent theme in the previous chapters, from Witkowski’s reconstruction of the Bell in chapter four, to Bearden’s weaponized scalar physics and our simple schematic explanation of the non-translational, internal stresses of “scalars” versus “vectors” in chapter five, it is rotation, or, if one prefer the more accurate term: vortex mechanics.
But is there any corroboration of any German wartime focus on such a physics, beyond the work and interests of the great Gerlach himself?
There is indeed, and, as we shall see, this vortex model of nuclear physics is a fully developed theory, though not, certainly, the mainstream theory. And not surprisingly, the Germans are in the thick and center of it. Two scientists – names carefully expunged from physics textbooks along with that of Nikola Tesla – in particular are involved: O.C. Hilgenberg, and Carl Friedrich (or Frederick) Krafft.
The theory may be called “the vortex aether theory”.
In essence, a full theory of a vorticular aether was worked out by Dr. Hilgenberg before the war, complete with alternative explanations of phenomena often adduced as support for relativity. Hilgenberg worked these ideas out in a series of booklets published in Berlin: Über Strömungsversuche mit Senken und Quellen, die das Wesen der Schwerkraft grundlegend erklären(1939, “Essay Concerning Flux with Sinks and Sources, clarifying the fundamental substance of the Force of Gravity”), Über Gravitation, Tromben, und Wellen in bewegten Medien(1931, “Concerning Gravity, Pulses, and Waves in Moving Media”), Über den Magnus-Effekt und seine Umkehrung(1933, “Concerning the Magnus Effect and its Reversal”). These were followed by a thorough exposition of the vortex aether model of atomic structure in an important postwar booklet called Quantenzahlen, Wirbelring-Atommodelle und Helium-Sechserring-Aufbauprinzip des Periodensystems der chemischen Elemente (1959, “A Quantum Number Vortex Atom Model and Helium-Hexagonal Construction Principle of the Periodic System of the Chemical Elements”).30
Here we shall rely principally on the less technical presentation of Krafft, since in his book Ether and Matter Hilgenberg’s ideas are presented in their main substance.31
Included in the vortex theory are some criticisms of relativity theory, as one might expect of a theory under development prior to and during the Nazi period. Like others, Krafft criticizes the dogmatic mathematical formalism of relativity by pointing out its tautological nature:
Regardless of whether the velocity of light is actually constant, it is rendered constant in the Einsteinian equations by the use of variable units of measu
rement. It is therefore not surprising that the equations of special relativity have met all the so-called “experimental tests”, because they are in substance nothing more than mathematical trueisms, and any violation of a mathematical trueism is unthinkable.32
German physicist Hermann Fricke was even more unsparing of relativity’s mathematical formalism and the new dogmas it imposed on physics:
Instead of the ether we now have formulas and equations according to which some stars are millions of times more dense and others millions of times less dense than the sun, although composed of the same chemical elements. We are now supposed to be able to ascertain (via mathematics) the diameter of the entire world, and also the number of protons and electrons in it. And finally we are supposed to be able to calculate the exact time when the world (including space and time themselves) began with the explosion of a point. As to all this, the 20th century physicist may harangue as much as he pleases. All of this is accepted as well-nigh certain. It is only the mechanics of the ether and the vortex atom theory which he may not write about or take up for serious study – that is anathema.33
But perhaps the dogmatism came from the fact that, “as O.C. Hilgenberg explained in detail in his recently published booklets,” the oft-touted “proofs of relativity” – Doppler Red Shift, the progression of Mercury’s perihelion, and, of course, the failure of the Michelson-Morley experiment to detect the aether wind – “can be accounted for under the hydro-mechanical ether theory as well as, and even better than under Einsteinian relativity.”34
Pause and consider what this means. At least one scientist in Germany, Hilgenberg – and there were in fact many others – evolved a theory, based on a vortex model of the aether, that was not only a comprehensive explanation of gravity, that not only gave satisfactory explanations of “relativistic phenomena,” but, as we shall see, gave satisfactory accounts of atomic structure as well, and in some cases did so more satisfactorily than the “nuclear” theory. This, basically, was the theoretical milieu in which physicists in Nazi Germany worked, a peculiar blend of the avante garde notions of quantum mechanics and vortices, with the older idea of an underlying substrate common to mind, energy, and matter: the aether.35
As Krafft points out, one of Hilgenberg’s trenchant criticisms was of relativistic interpretations of the Red Shift effect. Positing an aether, Hilgenberg stated a law, in 1931, in opposition to Einstein’s emerging “expanding universe” theories that were beginning to emerge,36 which Krafft summarizes as follows:
The following is therefore universally true for all media: Whenever a train of waves traverses a medium that has currents flowing across it, an observer who is at rest relative to the source of radiation will observe a diminution of frequency, and a simultaneous refraction of the ray in a direction opposite to the direction of the current it traverses.37
The assumption of a vorticular structure in the aether as constituting the basis of observable particles and energy also bridges conveniently to the idea of a flux in the vacuum, or zero point energy, for “if the elementary or subatomic particles are vortices in the ether, then it would be reasonable to assume that such vortices keep the ether in a turbulent and streaming condition.”38
As Krafft points out, the vortex model also has another powerful explanatory function in accounting for the persistence of the individuality of any given particle.
The most outstanding characteristic of all elementary particles of matter is their localized persistence of individuality, and it is inconceivable how this can be explained on any other basis than vortex motion, wave motion, or motion into or out of a center functioning as a sink or source.
If the ether is incompressible, then it can have only two forms of motion which are dynamically self-sustaining, namely vortex motion and wave motion. The stability of these two forms of motion is not due to any unique property of the medium, but is inherent in the form of motion itself.39
Moreover, the model assumes another important feature, one pregnant with implications not only for “scalar physics” and the Bell, but also for any true appreciation of the work of Nikola Tesla:
A vortex atom for example may be assumed to carry an array of standing waves along with it in the form of nodes and loops in the streamlines of the circulating ether, as is evidenced by electron diffraction patterns, but this is something very different from the usual concept of “wave atom.”40
Again, consider what this means: a basic theory had been worked out connecting vorticular structures in the aether, not only with elementary particles and vacuum flux, but that flux is now connected to structures of standing waves in the medium itself, structures which give rise to “nodes and loops” in the medium, making it resemble a crystal lattice.
Krafft uses the following diagrams to illustrate the basic vorticular structure of electrons and protons.
Krafft’s Vortex Model of a Neutron(Left) and Hydrogen Atom (Right)
A further consequence results from this conception, one with obvious implications for the Bell:
The mass of a proton must have its origin in the gyrostatic effect of the circulating or rotating ether, either inside or outside the vortex rings. The greater mass of the proton as compared with the electron may then be attributed either to a greater speed of circulatory movement of the ether, or to a greater volume of circulating ether, or to the difference in geometric structures.41
Altering, or cohering the rotation of a particle or aggregate of particles will thus in turn affect the circulation of the ether and consequently affect the mass of that aggregate.
Krafft then makes a stunning series of statements whose similarities to the Bell and the type of physics it implies are obvious:
If one proton and one electron produces the system of ether current shown in the diagram of the hydrogen atom (above), then many protons and many electrons should produce a similar system of ether currents, but on a larger scale. In order to test for the presence of such ether currents, the arrangement of apparatus shown (below) may be used. An interferometer of approximately square form has hollow metal spheres or cylinders placed over two of the corners. These spheres or cylinders are then charged electrostatically as shown so that there will be an electrostatic potential gradient along one of the bifurcated beams. If there is a flow of ether along electrostatic lines of force as indicated by the short straight arrows, then there should be a shift of the interference fringes when the electrostatic field then is applied, provided the ether flows with sufficient velocity to produce an observable effect.42
From there it is a short step to the idea that the two cylinders could be counterrotated both mechanically and electrically, producing vector cancellation and a “rotational bubble” of localized space around the Bell, to study any mass anomalies.
Krafft’s Interferometer
In any case, Hilgenberg, by the time of his “Quantenzahlen” paper, was able to re-model almost the entire periodic table, including the properties of the super-heavy elements not even discovered.
Hilgenberg’s Neon Model (Number 10, Mass 22)
Hilgenberg’s Krypton Model (Number 26 , Mass 82)
Hilgenberg’s Xenon Model (Number 54, Mass 132)
Hilgenberg’s Model of Element 118, Mass 336
What emerges from this?
Basically, that during the crucial years leading up to and during
World War Two, the Nazi Reich possessed the outlines of a theory
- some of which had been worked out prior to the Nazi assumption of power - of matter, of gravitation, of the atomic and subatomic structure of matter, and of the fluctuations of the vacuum or zero point energy. Moreover, this theory was based on a very different and very simple conceptual foundation from relativity. And notably, one significant prediction of this theory is that local curvature of space is engineerable and that mass displacement effects are achievable by counterrotation of plasma. In short, the theory is in radical disagreement with relativity which predicts space curvature only in the presence
of very large masses.
Additionally, if we assume that the Bell was a pulsed device, then it is reasonable to assume that in the process the Nazis, in their experiments on the Bell, discovered quite deadly field effects resembling the Mossbauer Effect, effects that betoken the scalar physics of Tom Bearden.