Book Read Free

International GAAP® 2019: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards

Page 18

by International GAAP 2019 (pdf)

(see 7.1.1 above); and

  • if a contract modification both eliminates existing rights or obligations and adds

  new rights or obligations, it is necessary to consider both the separate and the

  combined effect of those modifications. In some such cases, the contract has been

  modified to such an extent that, in substance, the modification replaces the old

  asset or liability with a new asset or liability. In cases of such extensive

  modification, the entity may need to derecognise the original asset or liability, and

  recognise the new asset or liability. [CF 5.33].

  9

  CHAPTER 6: MEASUREMENT

  As discussed at 8 above, elements recognised in financial statements are quantified in

  monetary terms. This requires the selection of a measurement basis, which is defined in

  the Framework as an identified feature (for example, historical cost, fair value or

  fulfilment value) of the item being measured. Applying a measurement basis to an asset

  or liability creates a measure for that asset or liability and for related income and

  expenses. [CF 6.1].

  The Framework does not provide detailed guidance on when a particular measurement

  basis would be suitable. Rather, it describes various measurement bases, the information

  they provide and the factors to consider in their selection (discussed further at 9.1

  below). [CF BC6.1]. This approach reflects the belief of the Board that that in different

  circumstances:

  • different measurement bases may provide information relevant to users of

  financial statements; and

  • a particular measurement basis may be:

  • easier to understand and implement than another;

  • more verifiable, less prone to error or subject to a lower level of measurement

  uncertainty than another; or

  • less costly to implement than another. [CF BC6.10].

  Consideration of the qualitative characteristics of useful financial information and of the

  cost constraint is likely to result in the selection of different measurement bases for

  different assets, liabilities, income and expenses. [CF 6.2].

  80 Chapter

  2

  A standard may need to describe how to implement the measurement basis selected in

  that standard. That description could include:

  • specifying techniques that may or must be used to estimate a measure applying a

  particular measurement basis;

  • specifying a simplified measurement approach that is likely to provide information

  similar to that provided by a preferred measurement basis; or

  • explaining how to modify a measurement basis, for example, by excluding from

  the fulfilment value of a liability the effect of the possibility that the entity may fail

  to fulfil that liability (own credit risk). [CF 6.3].

  The contents of Chapter 6 of the Framework are discussed in this section as follows:

  • Measurement bases (such as historical cost and current value) – discussed at 9.1

  below.

  • Information provided by different measurement bases – discussed at 9.2 below.

  • Factors to consider in selecting measurement bases – discussed at 9.3 below.

  • Measurement of equity – discussed at 9.4 below.

  • Cash-flow-based measurement techniques – discussed at 9.5 below.

  9.1 Measurement

  bases

  9.1.1 Historical

  cost

  Historical cost measures provide monetary information about assets, liabilities and

  related income and expenses, using information derived, at least in part, from the price

  of the transaction or other event that gave rise to them. Unlike current value, historical

  cost does not reflect changes in values, except to the extent that those changes relate to

  impairment of an asset or a liability becoming onerous. [CF 6.4].

  The historical cost of an asset when it is acquired or created is the value of the costs

  incurred in acquiring or creating the asset, comprising the consideration paid to acquire

  or create the asset plus transaction costs. The historical cost of a liability when it is

  incurred or taken on is the value of the consideration received to incur or take on the

  liability minus transaction costs. [CF 6.5].

  When an asset is acquired or created, or a liability is incurred or taken on, as a result of

  an event that is not a transaction on market terms, it may not be possible to identify a

  cost, or the cost may not provide relevant information about the asset or liability. In

  some such cases, a current value of the asset or liability is used as a deemed cost on

  initial recognition and that deemed cost is then used as a starting point for subsequent

  measurement at historical cost (see 9.3.4 below). [CF 6.6].

  The IASB’s Conceptual Framework

  81

  The historical cost of an asset is updated over time to depict, if applicable:

  • the consumption of part or all of the economic resource that constitutes the asset

  (depreciation or amortisation);

  • payments received that extinguish part or all of the asset;

  • the effect of events that cause part or all of the historical cost of the asset to be no

  longer recoverable (impairment); and

  • accrual of interest to reflect any financing component of the asset. [CF 6.7].

  The historical cost of a liability is updated over time to depict, if applicable:

  • fulfilment of part or all of the liability, for example, by making payments that

  extinguish part or all of the liability or by satisfying an obligation to deliver goods;

  • the effect of events that increase the value of the obligation to transfer the

  economic resources needed to fulfil the liability to such an extent that the liability

  becomes onerous. A liability is onerous if the historical cost is no longer sufficient

  to depict the obligation to fulfil the liability; and

  • accrual of interest to reflect any financing component of the liability. [CF 6.8].

  One way to apply a historical cost measurement basis to financial assets and financial

  liabilities is to measure them at amortised cost. The amortised cost of a financial asset

  or financial liability reflects estimates of future cash flows, discounted at a rate

  determined at initial recognition. For variable rate instruments, the discount rate is

  updated to reflect changes in the variable rate. The amortised cost of a financial asset

  or financial liability is updated over time to depict subsequent changes, such as the

  accrual of interest, the impairment of a financial asset and receipts or payments. [CF 6.9].

  9.1.2 Current

  value

  Current value measures provide monetary information about assets, liabilities and

  related income and expenses, using information updated to reflect conditions at the

  measurement date. Because of the updating, current values of assets and liabilities

  reflect changes, since the previous measurement date, in estimates of cash flows and

  other factors reflected in those current values. Unlike historical cost, the current value

  of an asset or liability is not derived, even in part, from the price of the transaction or

  other event that gave rise to the asset or liability. [CF 6.10].

  Current value measurement bases include:

  • fair value (discussed at 9.1.2.A below);

  • value in use for assets and fulfilment value for liabilit
ies (discussed at 9.1.2.B below); and

  • current cost (discussed at 9.1.2.C below). [CF 6.11].

  82 Chapter

  2

  9.1.2.A Fair

  value

  Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a

  liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

  [CF 6.12].

  Fair value reflects the perspective of market participants; that is, participants in a market

  to which the entity has access. The asset or liability is measured using the same

  assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability if

  those market participants act in their economic best interest. [CF 6.13].

  In some cases, fair value can be determined directly by observing prices in an active

  market. In other cases, it is determined indirectly using measurement techniques, for

  example, cash-flow-based measurement techniques (discussed at 9.5 below), reflecting

  all the following factors:

  (a) estimates of future cash flows;

  (b) possible variations in the estimated amount or timing of future cash flows for

  the asset or liability being measured, caused by the uncertainty inherent in

  the cash flows;

  (c) the time value of money;

  (d) the price for bearing the uncertainty inherent in the cash flows (a risk

  premium or risk discount). The price for bearing that uncertainty depends on

  the extent of that uncertainty. It also reflects the fact that investors would

  generally pay less for an asset (and generally require more for taking on a

  liability) that has uncertain cash flows than for an asset (or liability) whose

  cash flows are certain; and

  (e) other factors, for example, liquidity, if market participants would take those

  factors into account in the circumstances. [CF 6.14].

  The factors mentioned in (b) and (d) above include the possibility that a counterparty

  may fail to fulfil its liability to the entity (credit risk), or that the entity may fail to fulfil

  its liability (own credit risk). [CF 6.15].

  Because fair value is not derived, even in part, from the price of the transaction or other

  event that gave rise to the asset or liability, fair value is not increased by the transaction

  costs incurred when acquiring the asset and is not decreased by the transaction costs

  incurred when the liability is incurred or taken on. In addition, fair value does not reflect

  the transaction costs that would be incurred on the ultimate disposal of the asset or on

  transferring or settling the liability. [CF 6.16].

  The IASB’s Conceptual Framework

  83

  9.1.2.B

  Value in use and fulfilment value

  Value in use is the present value of the cash flows, or other economic benefits, that an

  entity expects to derive from the use of an asset and from its ultimate disposal.

  Fulfilment value is the present value of the cash, or other economic resources, that an

  entity expects to be obliged to transfer as it fulfils a liability. Those amounts of cash or

  other economic resources include not only the amounts to be transferred to the liability

  counterparty, but also the amounts that the entity expects to be obliged to transfer to

  other parties to enable it to fulfil the liability. [CF 6.17]. Value in use and fulfilment value

  cannot be observed directly and are determined using cash-flow-based measurement

  techniques (see 9.5 below). [CF 6.20].

  Because value in use and fulfilment value are based on future cash flows, they do not

  include transaction costs incurred on acquiring an asset or taking on a liability. However,

  value in use and fulfilment value include the present value of any transaction costs an

  entity expects to incur on the ultimate disposal of the asset or on fulfilling the liability.

  [CF 6.18].

  Value in use and fulfilment value reflect entity-specific assumptions rather than assumptions

  by market participants. Nonetheless, they do reflect the factors set out in (a)-(e) at 9.1.2.A

  above. In practice, there may sometimes be little difference between the assumptions that

  market participants would use and those that an entity itself uses. [CF 6.19, 6.20].

  9.1.2.C Current

  cost

  The current cost of an asset is the cost of an equivalent asset at the measurement date,

  comprising the consideration that would be paid at the measurement date plus the

  transaction costs that would be incurred at that date. The current cost of a liability is the

  consideration that would be received for an equivalent liability at the measurement date

  minus the transaction costs that would be incurred at that date. Current cost, like

  historical cost, is an entry value: it reflects prices in the market in which the entity would

  acquire the asset or would incur the liability. Hence, it is different from fair value, value

  in use and fulfilment value, which are exit values. However, unlike historical cost,

  current cost reflects conditions at the measurement date. [CF 6.21].

  In some cases, current cost cannot be determined directly by observing prices in an

  active market and must be determined indirectly by other means. For example, if prices

  are available only for new assets, the current cost of a used asset might need to be

  estimated by adjusting the current price of a new asset to reflect the current age and

  condition of the asset held by the entity. [CF 6.22].

  84 Chapter

  2

  9.2

  Information provided by different measurement bases

  When selecting a measurement basis, it is important to consider the nature of the

  information that the measurement basis will produce in both the statement of financial

  position and the statement(s) of financial performance. The Framework summarises that

  information in a table which is reproduced in figure 2.3 below. [CF 6.23]. This is followed

  by some further discussion at 9.2.1 and 9.2.2 below.

  Figure 2.3

  Summary of information provided by particular measurement bases

  Assets

  Statement of financial position

  Historical cost

  Fair value

  Value in use

  Current cost

  (market-participant

  (entity-specific

  assumptions)

  assumptions)(a)

  Carrying amount

  Historical cost

  Price that would be

  Present value of future

  Current cost

  (including

  received to sell the

  cash flows from the

  (including

  transaction costs), to

  asset (without

  use of the asset and

  transaction costs), to

  the extent

  deducting

  from its ultimate

  the extent

  unconsumed or

  transaction costs on

  disposal (after

  unconsumed or

  uncollected, and

  disposal).

  deducting present

  uncollected, and

  recoverable.

  value of transaction

  recoverable.

  costs on disposal).

  (Includes interest

  accrued on any

  financing

  component.)

  Statement(s) of financial performance

/>   Event

  Historical cost

  Fair value

  Value in use

  Current cost

  (market-participant

  (entity-specific

  assumptions)

  assumptions)(a)

  Initial recognition(b)

  – Difference

  between

  Difference between

  –

  consideration paid

  consideration paid

  and fair value of the

  and value in use of

  asset acquired.(c)

  the asset acquired.

  Transaction

  costs

  on Transaction costs on

  acquiring the asset.

  acquiring the asset.

  The IASB’s Conceptual Framework

  85

  Sale or consumption

  Expenses equal to

  Expenses equal to

  Expenses equal to

  Expenses equal to

  of the asset(d), (e)

  historical cost of the

  fair value of the

  value in use of the

  current cost of the

  asset sold or

  asset sold or

  asset sold or

  asset sold or

  consumed.

  consumed.

  consumed.

  consumed.

  Income received.

  Income received.

  Income received.

  Income received.

  (Could be presented

  (Could be presented

  (Could be presented

  (Could be presented

  gross or net.)

  gross or net.)

  gross or net.)

  gross or net.)

  Expenses for

  Expenses for

  Expenses

  for

  transaction costs on

  transaction costs on

  transaction costs on

  selling the asset.

  selling the asset.

  selling the asset.

  Interest income

  Interest income, at

  Reflected in income

  Reflected in income

  Interest income, at

  historical rates,

  and expenses from

  and expenses from

  current rates.

  updated if the asset

  changes in fair

  changes in value in

  bears variable

  value.

  use.

  interest.

 

‹ Prev