“We do not deny,” Kasher concedes, “that a state can act for the purpose of killing persons in order to terrorize a population with the goal of achieving some political or ideological goal.” However, he adds, when such acts are performed on behalf of a state, or by some of its overt or covert agencies or proxies, we apply to the ensuing conflict moral, ethical and legal principles that are commonly held to pertain to ordinary international conflicts between states or similar political entities. In such a context, a state that killed numerous citizens of another state in order to terrorize its citizenry would be guilty of what is commonly regarded as a war crime.
Kasher’s caveat – “a state that killed numerous citizens of another state in order to terrorize its citizenry” – does not relate at all to a state that terrorizes its own citizens, and lets Israel off the hook, since the terrorized population of Gaza are not citizens of another state.
This, again, is serious stuff. Just as Israel exports its occupation – its weaponry and tactics of suppression – to such willing customers as US and European militaries, security agencies and police forces, so, too, does it export its legal expertise in manipulating IHL (International Humanitarian Law) and its effective PR/hasbara techniques. Gaza itself represents little more than a testing ground for these varied instruments of suppression of Gaza. It is the globalization of Gaza that is a key Israeli export. Exports, however, need local agents to package the product and create a market for it in the local economy. Thus, B’nai Brith in the US spawned “The Lawfare Project” under the slogan “Protecting Against the Politicization of Human Rights” (www.thelawfareproject.org), whose main strategy is to enlist prominent legal experts to delegitimize attempts to hold Israel accountable for its crimes under IHL. Globalizing Gaza in both military and legal terms raises the slogan “we are all Palestinians” from one of political solidarity to literal accuracy. Its corollary also highlights a key element of international politics of which we must be keenly aware: our governments are all Israel. (Jeff Halper, head of The Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions ICAHD), Counterpunch, August 18, 2014)
“… we should prepare to go over to the offensive with the aim of smashing Lebanon, Trans-jordan and Syria… The weak point in the Arab coalition is Lebanon [for] the Moslem regime is artificial and easy to undermine. A Christian state should be established… When we smash the [Arab] Legions strength and bomb Amman, we will eliminate Transjordan, too, and then Syria will fall. If Egypt still dares to fight on, we shall bomb Port Said, Alexandria, and Cairo.” (David Ben-Gurion May 1948, to the General Staff. From Ben-Gurion, A Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar, Delacorte, New York 1978)
One outstanding characteristic of the Jewish race is its persistence. What it cannot attain this generation, it will attain next. Defeat it today, it does not remain defeated; its conquerors die, but Jewry goes on, never forgetting, never deviating from its ancient aim of world control in one form or another (Henry Ford, The International Jew, November, 1920)
To be fair, it is almost impossible for the average person, no matter how intelligent, to accept—to “get his head around,” to use the modern slang—the notion of a self-perpetuating conspiracy that extends backwards over five hundred years, or, some would say, a great deal longer. Those who have discovered it are, more often than not, dismissed as conspiracy-theorists. Even the word “conspiracy” evokes feelings of embarrassment and shame among people who have been conditioned to reject it. The point is that there is a conspiracy; it is no theory. One reason this is hard to swallow is that such time spans inherently imply that the fulfilment of the plan is not halted by the death of its instigators, or by that of their descendants. In a world often led by America, with its hopelessly ignorant and uneducated population and its company report based three-month attention span, such aeons are inconceivable.
Under normal circumstances such incredulity might be justified. Yet it is the American government itself, totally subordinated to and infiltrated by the Jewish Lobby and supported by innumerable “think tanks” and innocuously named but subversive non-governmental organizations that, through military and commercial might, imposes the changes that will ultimately enable the Jewish plan to succeed. Furthermore, one must recall that this movement and its credo are based on tomes as ostensibly idolized by Jews as the Bible is by the Christian Church. When members of a family die, that is no reason for the next generation to leave the church of its ancestors; when a Pope dies, there is no discontinuity in Rome.
Just so is it with the Torah and the Talmud. These instructions have supposedly formed the determining principle for Jewish ambitions since they were concocted (yes “concocted”: the Bible was concocted too, as in “made up of mixed ingredients”). However, the symbol of Mammon is more cheerful than that of Christ, whose icon is a man suffering on a cross. It is also more efficient: while the cross is removed from schoolrooms and courts of law, the Star of David is almost inviolable. Jewish continuity is ensured at its base by the remorseless rabbinical drumming of the Talmudic (self-) Chosen People ideology, which, mirabile dictu, bestows universal ownership on Jews, and at its heights by an estimated three hundred families –”The meaning of the history of the last century is that today 300 Jewish financiers, all Masters of Lodges, rule the world” (Jean Izoulet, prominent member of the Jewish Alliance Israelite Universelle) -- grown so wealthy during the past couple of centuries that they could actually appropriate whatever seems useful or necessary to achieving their goals. In any case, they are doing their utmost to make this insolent assertion come true.
“The union which we desire to found will not be a French, English, Irish, or German union, but a Jewish one, a Universal one! Other peoples and races are divided into nationalities; we alone have no co-citizens, but exclusively co-religionaries…....Scattered amongst other nations, we desire primarily to be and remain immutably Jews. Our nationality is the religion of our fathers and to recognize no other nationality. We are living in foreign lands and we cannot trouble about the ambitions of countries entirely alien to us...The day is not distant when all the riches and treasures of the earth will become the property of the Children of Israel.” (James Rothschild III: Manifesto to all the Jews of the Universe, The Morning Post of London, Sept. 6, 1920)
Given Jewish ascendancy over most of the world’s leaders, it is no coincidence that a parallel interest and development should exist between the actions of the U.S. and its client states –more precisely “vassals” -- on the one hand, and the typical Jewish modus operandi on the other, so that they could be said to work in tandem. Recent events in Ukraine bear this out. First, Jewish oligarchs looted the country. Then US/NATO interests funded groups of insurgents to infiltrate the righteous protests of citizens on the Majdan Square against these oligarchs and to upset the elected government, with the goal of placing their puppets in power and driving the country towards EU membership and acceptance of IMF/EU loans, the farmland into the hands of American agribusiness, and of course of placing missile bases on Russia’s borders.
A Russian Internet news site Iskra (“Spark”) based in Zaporozhye, eastern Ukraine, reported on March 7, that ”Ukraine’s gold reserves (variously reported as 33-40 tons) had been hastily airlifted to the United States from Borispol Airport east of Kiev.” This alleged airlift and confiscation of Ukraine’s gold reserves by the New York Federal Reserve has not been confirmed by the Western media. “...just like Germany, Ukraine will have to wait a very long time, and very likely will never see that gold again. Meaning, that gold is gone.” (KingsWorldNews, March 10, 2014)
Both Iraq and Libya (allegedly 144 tons) had their gold reserves confiscated by the US (and their countries turned into chaotic, polluted wastelands), after the latter decided that Saddam and Gaddafi had outlived their usefulness.
By late 2014, Eastern Ukraine was written off by the Kiev usurpers. Much of its infrastructure has been destroyed and its economy rendered inoperative, its coal mines flooded. This near razing to the ground is an acknow
ledgement that the ethnic Russian citizens of the region cannot be indoctrinated by U.S./EU propaganda into accepting the colonisation of their country and so must be deprived of their subsistence.
Such nebulous terms as “fascist,” to describe the gang in power, are irrelevant. The subversive forces or those with money will use whatever opposition is to hand to engineer “regime change.” First, the international oligarchs will be helped to ownership, then their political guidance will be used to enforce the country’s new political direction. By April 2015, the civil war had cost an estimated 6,000 lives, according to the U.N. There are similarities between Putin’s situation today, in which he seeks to protect Russians in Eastern Ukraine (former Russian territory), and Hitler’s in 1939, when he was trying to protect Germans in Western Poland (former German territory).
After three visits to Ukraine in five weeks, Victoria Nuland explains that in the past two decades, the United States has spent five Billion dollars ($5,000,000,000) to subvert Ukraine, and assures her listeners that there are prominent businessmen and government officials who support the US project to tear Ukraine away from its historic relationship with Russia and into the US sphere of interest (via “Europe”). Victoria Nuland (Nudelman) is the wife of Robert Kagan, leader of the younger generation of “neo-cons.” After serving as Hillary Clinton’s spokesperson, she is now undersecretary of state for Europe and Eurasia. (Diana Johnstone/Global Research, February 7, 2014)
In the course of this spontaneous uprising of the people, on which the U.S. had spent $5billion, an estimated 100 members of the police and protesters (Global Research) were murdered by anonymous snipers, who subsequently were identified as belonging to the putchist elements.
Kiev authorities turned a blind eye to Estonian Foreign Minister Urmas Paet’s comments. On February 25, he and EU foreign policy Catherine Ashton spoke. They were monitored. They didn’t know it at the time. Their discussion was leaked. Paet commented on what he heard in Kiev. He confirmed putschist involvement in sniper shootings. He said “there is now stronger and stronger understanding that behind the snipers, it was not Yanukovich, but it was somebody from the new coalition.” “All the evidence shows” they were shooting at people from both sides. They targeted police and protesters. (Global Research, April 5, 2014)
***
On March 12, former Ukrainian Security Service head Aleksandr Yakimenko confirmed Paet’s assessment. He blamed putschist official Andrey Parubiy. He’s a neo-Nazi Svoboda party leader. “Shots came from the Philharmonic Hall,” he said. “Maidan Commandant Parubiy was responsible for this building...Snipers and people with automatic weapons were ‘working’ from this building on February 20. They supported the assault on the Interior Ministry forces on the ground who were already demoralized and had, in fact, fled,” he added. “When the first wave of shootings ended, many have witnessed 20 people leaving the building.”
They were carrying military-style bags used for sniper and assault rifles with optical sights. Many witnesses saw them. Foreign elements may have been involved. Perhaps CIA, US special forces, and secret service operatives. What happened was well planned in advance.
“These were the forces that carried out everything that they were told by their leadership - the United States,” Yakimenko stressed. Maidan leaders practically lived at Washington’s embassy, he added. As security chief, he was ready to order Ukrainian troops to enter the building and remove the snipers, he said. (Stephen Lendman, April 5, 2014)
***
Whoever wants to hear hymns of praise can turn to Chief Rabbi Schmuel Kaminezki. Kaminezki will recount in the highest tones how Kolomojskij (the new governor of his district) who is also of Jewish ancestry, has enabled the estimated 50,000 members of the Jewish community of Dnipropetrowsk, one of the largest in Europe, through generous donations over the last twenty years , to become one of the cultural and economic initiators of the city..
However Kolomojdkij has another side: he is not only reputed to be one of the richest oligarchs in Ukraine, but one of the most dangerous. The ruthlessness with which he has treated competitors and partners since the change in the political system two decades ago, is only exceeded by Achmetow from the Donezk region, the greatest survivor of the gangster wars of the Nineties. (Frankfurter Allgemeine, May 9, 2014)
Ukraine, officially the most corrupt state in Europe (Transparency International) is, as of January 2015, being managed by a trio of implanted foreigners with new Ukrainian passports: Natalia Jaresko (American), Minister of Finance; Aivara Abromavicius (Lithuanian), Minister for Trade and Industry; Alexander Kwitaschwili (Georgian), Minister of Health. All trained in the U.S. Ukraine also possesses a Ministry of Propaganda (“Information”), run by the man previously in charge of television station “Kanal 5,” which belongs to President Poroschenko.
Here is the nub of the matter. Conquest of the Ukraine and Crimea not only grants multinationals access to natural resources including agriculture, and allows NATO (U.S.) to encircle Russia further through domination of this key country, but it offers Jews who settled there in Khazarian times the opportunity to return and colonize a “Second Israel.”
Jewish settlements in Ukraine can be traced back to the 8th century. During the period of the Khazar kingdom, Jews lived on the banks of the River Dnieper and in the east and south of Ukraine and the Crimea. (www.jewishvirtuallibrary.com)
***
At an empty Chabad school near the banks of the Dnieper River here in Ukraine’s capital city, six uniformed Jews with handguns and bulletproof vests are practicing urban warfare. The men, who belong to Kiev’s newly formed Jewish Self-Defense Force... all have some combat skills from the Israeli or Ukrainian armies. (Times of Israel, May 24, 2014) (http://www.timesofisrael.com/shaken-by-ukraines-turmoil-kiev-jews-form-self-defense-force/#ixzz3OQZAsuk3)
Reverse Migration
Leaked report: Israel acknowledges Jews in fact Khazars; Secret plan for reverse migration to Ukraine. ...it is now revealed, Israel will withdraw its settlers from communities beyond the settlement blocs—and relocate them at least temporarily to Ukraine. Ukraine made this arrangement on the basis of historic ties and in exchange for desperately needed military assistance against Russia. This surprising turn of events had an even more surprising origin: genetics, a field in which Israeli scholars have long excelled.
A Warlike Turkic People—and a Mystery
It is well known that, sometime in the eighth to ninth centuries, the Khazars, a warlike Turkic people, converted to Judaism and ruled over a vast domain in what became southern Russia and Ukraine. What happened to them after the Russians destroyed that empire around the eleventh century has been a mystery. Many have speculated that the Khazars became the ancestors of Ashkenazi Jews.... In 2012, Israeli researcher Eran Elhaik published a study claiming to prove that Khazar ancestry is the single largest element in the Ashkenazi gene pool....Israel seems finally to have thrown in the towel. A blue-ribbon team of scholars from leading research institutions and museums has just issued a secret report to the government, acknowledging that European Jews are in fact Khazars. An aide... explained, “We first thought that admitting we are really Khazars was one way to get around Abbas’s insistence that no Jew can remain in a Palestinian state. Maybe we were grasping at straws. But when he refused to accept that, it forced us to think about more creative solutions. The Ukrainian invitation for the Jews to return was a godsend. Speaking on deep background, a well-placed source in intelligence circles said: “We’re not talking about all the Ashkenazi Jews going back to Ukraine. Obviously that is not practical. The press as usual exaggerates and sensationalizes; this is why we need military censorship.”
All Jews who wish to return would be welcomed back without condition as citizens, the more so if they take part in the promised infusion of massive Israeli military assistance, including troops, equipment, and construction of new bases. If the initial transfer works, other West Bank settlers would be encouraged to relocate to Ukraine, as well.
/>
After Ukraine, bolstered by this support, reestablishes control over all its territory, the current Autonomous Republic of Crimea would once again become an autonomous Jewish domain. The small-scale successor to the medieval empire of Khazaria (as the peninsula, too, was once known) would be called, in Yiddish, Chazerai. ...”We’d like to think of it as sort of a homeland-away-from-home,” added the anonymous intelligence source. “Or the original one,” he said with a wink.
“After all, Herzl wrote about the Old-New Land, didn’t he? In retrospect, we should have seen this coming, said a venerable State Department Arabist, ticking off the signs on his fingers: a little-noticed report that Russia was cracking down on Israeli smuggling of Khazar artifacts, the decisions of both Spain and Portugal to give citizenship to descendants of their expelled Jews, as well as evidence that former IDF soldiers were already leading militias in support of the Ukrainian government. And now, also maybe the possibility that the missing Malaysian jet (N.B. MH370) was diverted to Central Asia. (The Times of Israel, March 18, 2014) (http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/leaked-report-israel-acknowledges-jews-in-fact-khazars-secret-plan-for-reverse-migration-to-ukraine/#ixzz3OQJJcXaf)
The “International Community”/U.S.-led interests were frustrated in their attempts to capture the Crimea too by Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, not necessarily for patriotic reasons, but perhaps because supposedly opposing sides must be kept in play for a while longer. (Many, including myself, would like to believe that Putin is a Russian patriot and not part of the plan. However, if he is a Russian patriot, why visit Israel in 2005 and consent to wear a silly little cap, and why go fishing with George Bush in 2007-- surely neither trip necessary nor congenial for a genuinely independent leader—why release Khodorkovsky?) However, I would still like to preserve the hope that Putin’s Russia may be the bulwark and saviour against the monstrous force which threatens to engulf the entire planet.
Tell the Truth & Shame the Devil Page 31