Book Read Free

Fried & True

Page 2

by Fay Jacobs


  Graduating in the heart of the depression, Anyda took any job she could get—first as a law clerk, then working in the political science department of Johns Hopkins University, and in 1938, a job with the Library of Congress. “I was assigned the magnificent salary of $1,800 a year,” she says.

  In the meantime, her brother secured a job with the State Department back in Rio. Anyda joined him and their mother in Brazil for two years, just prior to the Japanese surrender in World War II.

  “Anyone dry?” Muriel interrupted, holding up her empty glass. That was a cue for Charlie and Betsy, porch regulars and great friends of the hostesses to collect the empties and tend bar.

  Anyda looked at me and said “I didn’t want to be a lawyer. I wanted to be a writer. I’d been writing since I was a child and finished my first novel at 17. But I got a scholarship for law school, so I went.

  “Who had the vodka and cranberry?” Charlie asked, returning from the kitchen. From there, the conversation turned to other things as guests filtered in and out. Dammit, I had a feeling we were just about to get to the juicy part of the story—how Anyda and Muriel found each other and fell in love. Fortunately that afternoon would not be our last salon with the ladies of Laurel Street….

  September 2003

  NOBODY ASKED, NOBODY TOLD

  I don’t know how many deviled eggs or Ritz crackers with saga blue cheese I nibbled or how many cocktails I sipped while getting to know Anyda and Muriel. Since Bonnie and I met them in 1994, there’s been a lot of scotch and water under the bridge. We cheered the day when we were invited to stop by anytime, not just for Saturday evenings on the front porch.

  Whether on the porch with a crowd, or just the two of us visiting in the ladies’ back sunroom, it was always a learning experience. We could tell from the living room, with its crammed bookshelves, baby grand piano, twenty year old stereo components and furniture representing several eras, this was a home well-lived and well enjoyed.

  As for that juicy part about how A&M met, Anyda insists she just looked out the window of her office one day, spotted Muriel crossing the street, and it was love at first sight. She remembers saying to herself, “That’s it.” But she couldn’t exactly figure out what ‘it’ was.

  At age 38, she had never had any kind of intimate relationship, although she had plenty of unrequited crushes on female teachers and friends. “Besides, there was no way to even picture a life where you would settle down with another woman. It was unheard of. At least to me, in my experience.”

  “But you knew that lesbians existed, didn’t you?” I asked.

  “Well, I knew of historical characters, I knew this kind of attraction existed, but absolutely no one talked about it.” At the time, over a half century ago, most gay men and lesbians were deeply closeted, feeling shame and furtively making contacts with those like themselves. Forget about books on the subject—the most heralded lesbian tale was The Well of Loneliness, and you know how that banned-in-Boston book came out (You don’t? Read it, if only to see how great it is to have zillions of lesbian novels and books to choose from these days—ones that don’t end in self-recriminations, suicide, murder and despair).

  It was Anyda’s beloved Virginia Woolf who gave her reason to hope. Woolf’s quote, “only women stir my imagination,” became her inspiration, and she showed me a book where she had underlined those words. Then she looked at me and said “I read it and I wondered if some kind of life with a woman might be achievable—although it seemed a rather remote possibility. But at some point I realized that it was what I wanted.”

  At the end of World War II, when Anyda returned to the U.S. from Brazil, she went to work for an attorney in New York City and then received an offer to join the large Washington, D.C. law firm headed by former Secretary Of State Dean Acheson. There, she was one of four female attorneys on a staff of 75 and Muriel was a crackerjack executive secretary. Amid manual typewriters, secretarial stenography, and carbon paper, workplace intrigue came to life.

  Muriel had been clandestinely “seeing” another one of the female attorneys. Office romances are always tricky, but I imagine that a same sex liaison in those post-war days was absolutely perilous.

  Anyda and Muriel began to enjoy an innocent lunchtime friendship at work as they got to know each other. Soon, Muriel suspected that Anyda’s attention was more than just friendly, and Anyda realized that there could be no one for her but Muriel.

  But how would she know if Muriel was “that way” also?

  “I didn’t make it easy,” Muriel admits. She had been in the relationship with the other female attorney, on and off, for more than five years. “And I was even dating a man then, because it was the thing to do. Besides, I was told by the woman I was involved with that women could not be together permanently. It was a very confusing time for me. But Anyda was there to lean on.”

  Sorry to say, I don’t know much more information straight from the mares mouths about what happened next. But it’s not for lack of prying! But both Anyda and Muriel quickly clam up when discussing their initial attraction and decision to be together.

  “But it was the best decision we ever made,” says Muriel, smiling.

  One clue came from their appropriation of Thanksgiving as their own private holiday; one they always celebrated quietly with each other and later took as an anniversary. Shortly after Thanksgiving 1948, Muriel asked Anyda, who was living in a rooming house at the time, to move into the house she shared with her aunt. Muriel was taking care of her elderly relative and Anyda joined her.

  Muriel always says how “very circumspect we had to be. We didn’t go to bars. We didn’t do anything that would shatter the illusion we were just friends.” Actually, it may have been easier to disguise the nature of their relationship at that time—there was a terrible post-war housing shortage and lots of women wound up sharing lodging because of the crunch.

  If others suspected, they certainly didn’t talk about it. “But if they didn’t know, they were stupid,” says Anyda, stealing a glance at Muriel, who blushed bright pink.

  September 2003

  SUNNY DAYS, PARTY NIGHTS AT CARPENTER BEACH

  The phrase “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” might have been coined in 1992, but the policy was alive and well in Rehoboth Beach as far back as the 1930s.

  Talking to folks who’ve been in Rehoboth for twenty years or more, you begin to learn just how far back our gay history goes. People who started coming here in the late 1970s learned from their elders of a gay mecca—“although we weren’t called gay then. We were still homosexuals,” jokes one Rehoboth senior.

  Lore has it that the Dupont property, which sat ocean front at Rehoboth’s Silver Lake, was where it all began. According to old timers, Louisa Dupont Carpenter, while married to a prominent businessman, was a flamboyant and very independent woman, perhaps even, as Muriel would say, “a shush.”

  An aviatrix and adventurer, Carpenter was a great friend of the Broadway and Hollywood star Tallulah Bankhead—whose family lived on the Eastern Shore of Maryland off Chesapeake Bay. Louisa, Tallulah, singer Libby Holman and many of their male friends gathered in Rehoboth in the late 1930s and 40s at the family estate.

  A large field on the periphery of town doubled as a small airfield to allow celebrities to swoop in and out for private gay weekends. According to reports from those who were there, it was a very cultured, very sophisticated scene and the tradition continued for years. Hundreds of older men would gather at what became known as Carpenter Beach to relax on the sand, set up chess and backgammon boards and play volleyball.

  In the 1950s, and well into the 60s and early 70s, since there were no specifically gay bars to frequent, gay life moved exclusively between the beach and private house parties. Even if there was a welcoming bar, liquor laws prevented anyone, gay or straight, from walking around carrying a drink. Under those circumstances, even if gays gathered at a gay-tolerant establishment “it was almost impossible to meet anyone other than the fellow sittin
g right beside you” says one veteran.

  As Rehoboth honed its reputation as the Nation’s Summer Capitol, with Washington D.C. legislators and government workers vacationing here with their families, so too were the hundreds of gay government employees seeking anonymity on a beach vacation.

  With the hideous threat of exposure that could mean loss of jobs and even prison time, most of the gay people kept strictly to their area of the beach and partied only at their closest friends’ homes.

  The traditions continued almost unchanged through the early 1970s. Louisa Dupont Carpenter was a fixture here during much of that time, until she flew her plane into a local airport field, with a fatal result, in the early 1970s.

  Rehoboth’s early gay life was rich and famous.

  Muriel, her aunt, and Anyda often came to the beach for weekends. “But if there was gay life here, we certainly didn’t know about it,” Anyda says.

  Anyda handed me a square black and white photo with scalloped white edges. It was a picture of the couple, maybe in their early 40s, standing on the sand at the edge of the water.

  “We’d stay at the Dinner Bell Inn and have breakfast at The Robin Hood Restaurant at 3 or 4 in the morning with local fishermen,” Anyda remembered.

  “It’s still there, isn’t it, Bouddie?” Muriel asked, addressing Anyda with one of the pet names, origin unknown, she had for her partner.

  “Oh, yes, it’s still right in the same place.”

  In those days, the ladies spent mornings on the beach, afternoons fishing off the old bridge over the Indian River inlet and evenings strolling the boardwalk, soaking up the freedom they felt here. I loved to hear their stories.

  And as wonderful as it must have been to be in quiet mid-1950s Rehoboth Beach, it’s also sad that the couple had to hide their great love for each other.

  But being in the closet didn’t mean they kept to themselves. They found full acceptance with their families and neighbors all without saying a word about their relationship. “There was an old style of society, where people just accepted things,” says Muriel. “Anyda’s mother called me ‘Muriel-my-love.’ It didn’t make a difference. There wasn’t the kind of religious bigotry we see today.”

  On another afternoon with the ladies, while Bonnie was out spraying the backyard roses, I was talking with Anyda about the need to prune the tree on the side of the sprawling single story cottage. I learned that it was under that full-canopied tree that the first of the cocktail salons began.

  “Before we had the porch built,” Anyda said. “We’d put out some chairs, and the neighbors would spy us and walk up to say hello. We’d offer cocktails and it turned into a lovely tradition. That’s how we met Betsy.”

  They bought their current house in 1965. It was their second Rehoboth cottage, the first being a tiny weekend place on the outskirts of town, surrounded by farmland—where today there are McMansions. When Anyda and Muriel bought that first house in the 1950s, their real estate agent was the mayor’s wife and one of Rehoboth’s first female agents—which thrilled fervent feminist Anyda.

  It was not so thrilling that the local bank refused to grant the two women a loan despite their stellar professional credentials. Muriel, still annoyed, remembers that the bank worried that the women “weren’t connected in any way,” and it was shocking for two females to purchase a home.

  “They thought women were a bad risk even if we had careers. We might have gotten pregnant, you know,” Anyda explained, with a wink.

  So the couple went to a more progressive bank in town, got their mortgage and headed east to their weekend retreat.

  In 1965, still commuting from Washington on weekends, Anyda and Muriel sold their little home and bought their present in-town cottage. But it took a while to come up with the $32,000 price tag. “It was a leap for us at the time,” Anyda says, of a property that’s worth millions today.

  IF THEY ASKED ME I COULD WRITE A….

  Now, more than thirty years later, Anyda, dressed in brown corduroy pants and a blue plaid flannel shirt, with green slippers on her feet, is standing on her porch, a box of crackers in her hand asking me, somewhat impatiently, if I’ve thought any more about her next publishing project.

  With her last novel released a whole six months before, and negotiations with lesbian author Ann Allen Shockley about her new manuscript still in the talking stages, Anyda had to have a new project. Time for some new challenge for the 92 year old. Never mind that she already had me busy writing promotional brochures and press packets, running to the post office and helping with A&M Books distribution. Of course, I loved being part of our local publishing empire. But a book under my byline?

  “Tell me again exactly what you had in mind?” I asked.

  “A book of your columns. We will publish it. You’ll have to get them all together. Just do it.” She sounded like a Nike commercial.

  “But I have a column due tomorrow, and…well, press releases for your book and…”

  “You can do it,” she said and turned around to arrange a vase of flowers plucked from her own garden.

  Anyda had spoken. There would be a book of my essays. But my deadline for Letters was only 18 hours away. First priority would be finishing that column. And with our discussion of the threat of imprisonment for the rich, famous and bureaucratic homosexual crowd back in the 1940s Rehoboth, I find it ironic that we haven’t come all that far today. In fact, Delaware is going backward. To wit, my next column….

  September 2003

  LETTERS FROM CAMP REHOBOTH

  WE DID THE CRIME. WILL WE DO THE TIME?

  Frankly, I’m stunned. I hardly believe myself what you are about to read. But it’s true, I saw it with my own eyes and I herewith report the following:

  I’m a common criminal. Actually, an uncommon criminal, since I’m guilty of a charge that few can claim (so far) and of which no one has ever been convicted. I am guilty of this crime in the State of Delaware and what’s more, I am subject to a $100 fine or 30 days in the slammer.

  And I’m oh-so-guilty as charged.

  My infraction? I married my same-sex partner last month in Canada and then went on a glorious Alaskan honeymoon.

  But wait, you say! That was Canada. Delaware does not permit same-sex marriage. For pity’s sake they can’t even get anti-discrimination legislation onto the Senate floor. So what’s your Vancouver marriage got to do with Delaware?

  Holy matrimony, Batman, not only is it illegal to conduct and recognize same-sex marriage in Delaware, but anybody who resides in the state and goes some place else (Boston, New Paltz, NY, Canada) to tie the same-sex knot may be subject to jail when they get home. If I’d known this in August I could have been worrying about it for the past six months. I’m astounded that there was something to worry about and I missed it.

  Not only is this provision on the Internet in the Delaware Code, but it’s sandwiched between all kinds of other punishable offenses. Did you know that two paupers can’t marry either? Hell, now there are two counts against me.

  I’m so shocked that I qualify for an all expenses paid vacation to the hoosegow I might now be eligible for felon-ness under “unsoundness of mind”—another bridal infraction. Oh, in Delaware it’s perfectly alright to marry a lunatic, habitual drunkard, confirmed narcotic user or a diseased person, but lucky for any unsuspecting bride or groom, those marriages are “void from the time its nullity is declared” whatever the heck that means. No jail time, though.

  If Bonnie and I are brought in on charges, too bad we’re not habitual drunkards or Cuckoo’s Nest residents, or we could be annulled and avoid the nasty fine. Don’t quote me on this. I’m not a lawyer, I just slept at a Holiday Inn Express on my trip to Florida last week.

  Now I don’t know if I’m the first person to sound the journalistic alarm about this situation, but I probably won’t be the last.

  Title 13—Domestic Relations—Chapter 1. Marriage

  101. Void and voidable marriages.

  (a)
A marriage is prohibited and void between a person and his or her ancestor, descendant, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, niece, nephew, first cousin or between persons of the same gender.

  (d) A marriage obtained or recognized outside the State between persons prohibited by subsection (a) of this section shall not constitute a legal or valid marriage within the State.

  102. Entering into a prohibited marriage; penalty.

  The guilty party or parties to a marriage prohibited by § 101 of this title shall be fined $100, and in default of the payment of the fine shall be imprisoned not more than 30 days.

  104. Entering into prohibited marriage outside the State; penalty.

  If a marriage prohibited by this chapter is contracted or solemnized outside of the State, when the legal residence of either party to the marriage is in this State, and the parties thereto shall afterwards live and cohabit as spouses within the State, they shall be punished in the same manner as though the marriage had been contracted in this State.

  Yipes. Now this is pretty scary. While the numbers are not huge, there are several folks I know who have traveled to Canada to get married, both as a symbolic gesture of commitment and, in my case, the logical conclusion to a 21 year engagement. Do we have to pay up or go up the river? If so, do we have to return the wedding gifts? Does Miss Manners even cover these questions?

  And if we are jailed, will both marital criminals be in the same cell? If there are more than four of us in a cellblock will it be a tea dance?

  I suppose I could work a plea bargain, what with the state trying to save money and all, and get house arrest. I’d be willing to wear a clunky ankle bracelet and be confined to the house for a month. In fact, given my current crazy schedule and obligations, that sounds heavenly. Oh wait, would the Delaware Humane Society step in, call us unfit parents and remove our Schnauzers from the home? This is a question that needs an answer.

 

‹ Prev