Firebrand: Dispatches from the Front Lines of the MAGA Revolution
Page 1
A BOMBARDIER BOOKS BOOK
An Imprint of Post Hill Press
ISBN: 978-1-64293-764-0
ISBN (eBook): 978-1-64293-765-7
Firebrand:
Dispatches from the Front Lines of the MAGA Revolution
© 2020 by Congressman Matt Gaetz
All Rights Reserved
Cover photo by SG
Cover art by Cody Corcoran
No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means without the written permission of the author and publisher.
Post Hill Press
New York • Nashville
posthillpress.com
Published in the United States of America
This book is unapologetically dedicated
to my country—and the Firebrands everywhere
who love and protect her.
CONTENTS
One
Sex and Money
Two
Lighting the Torch
Three
The Russia Hoax
Four
A Perfect Call
Five
Enemy of the People
Six
Mar-a-Lago Magic
Seven
Two Parties, One Scam
Eight
Ending Endless Wars
Nine
China Is Not Our Friend
Ten
Sports Fan
Eleven
A Birthright Worth Defending
Twelve
Big Tech Hates America
Thirteen
Revenge Porn Chivalry
Fourteen
Uncanceled
Fifteen
Air Force One: Of Victories
and Quarantines
Sixteen
A Green Real Deal
Acknowledgments
CHAPTER ONE
SEX AND MONEY
I didn’t show up to sell out. Politicians almost always say the right things while campaigning. That’s not hard if you’re a halfway competent actor—and all politicians are actors.
Politics, they say, is show business for ugly people. The real question is who writes the scripts and produces the acts. You are governed by the theater geeks from high school, who went on to make it big booking guests on the talk shows. Ignore them and they’ll ignore you, and you’ll go nowhere fast. The hairdressers and makeup ladies and cameramen pick our presidents. As well they should. They are closer to the viewers and therefore the voters.
When Sen. Ted Cruz lost the 2016 Republican presidential nomination, he whined to his Black Gold backers that the media had given Donald Trump millions of dollars in free media exposure. You get “earned media” by earning it, Ted. And if they won’t have you on, don’t worry. Our generation doesn’t flick channels for its MTV but will do anything for “the Gram.” I grew up in the house Jim Carrey lived in in The Truman Show. I know that all the world’s a stage, especially when we all have cameras with phones. Stagecraft is statecraft.
Speaker of the House Paul Ryan once knocked me for going on TV too much, without considering that maybe his own failures as a leader stemmed from spending too much time in think tanks instead of in the green rooms where guests wait to appear on TV, and are thereby connected to the dinnertime of real Americans. I take his recent elevation to the board of News Corp., the parent company of Fox News, to be his very silent apology.
It’s impossible to get canceled if you’re on every channel. Why raise money to advertise on the news channels when I can make the news? And if you aren’t making news, you aren’t governing.
The Justice Democrats take it a step further, recruiting candidates through casting calls that look more like Hollywood auditions than politics, screening applicants from a given district who sound good delivering their pre-scripted talking points and then backing them. Through this system of political performance art, the rising socialist Left found their female lead in Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, now perhaps the most powerful member of the House. FDR, JFK, LBJ, AOC: the Left memorializes its best with their initials, which its allies in Big Tech are happy to turn into trending hashtags while they shadowban those of us getting the real truth out.
President Trump knows talent when he sees it. He knows AOC has star power, which is why he so effectively trolls her fellow New York Democrat Chuck Schumer with the prospect of an AOC primary for his Senate seat. The president knows AOC and I are friendly, and on more than one occasion he has checked on my progress in encouraging her potential Senate run.
Once the good talkers get to Washington, they don’t suddenly break bad. It’s more that Washington presents them with a lot of distractions that make it, shall we say, easy to forget the principles they touted on the campaign trail. You don’t drain the swamp; the swamp drains you. Of course, it’s even easier to be distracted if you never had any principles. The emptiest of vessels become the most corruptible of officials.
D.C. distractions take two forms—sex and money. Getting paid and getting laid. Now, those aren’t inherently bad things. In America, a bounty of both is to be honored and celebrated, not chastised. Congressmen shouldn’t betray their country for them, though—yet too many do. In our time, all the politicians want to be celebrities while the celebrities want to be politicians. It’s hard to party like a rock star when you’re living on a public salary, so others pick up the tab—at a very steep price. It’s just your soul—though no one really believes in that because it can’t be monetized.
Washington, unfortunately, can be a very sexy city. Kissinger said power is the ultimate aphrodisiac, and D.C. covets it like the opioids the country can’t seem to get enough of.
This town is full of celebrities making TV shows and movies, famous politicians, people gaining or losing power, scenic architecture, nubile coeds, embassy parties, and countless cosmopolitan fancies that stun those of us who show up as rural out-of-towners. It should both horrify and enlighten you that Bill Clinton said House of Cards wasn’t far off the mark.
D.C. is said to have the highest concentrations of spies and hookers on the planet. It is often difficult to tell which is which, and that is by design. Influence peddlers are usually attractive or willing, or both. It helps them achieve their goals. So even if you don’t think of D.C. as very tempting, you should stay on your toes here lest you get seduced for one purpose or another. A smiling face might not conceal a dagger, but it could hide someone’s hope of getting a rider added to an agriculture spending bill. And if they can’t seduce you, they’ll get your spouse or your kids—just to get to you. Daniel Golden recounts in his book The Price of Admission that when Congress sought to regulate the multibillion-dollar endowments of the top universities by forcing them to pay out 5 percent of their funds, the way private foundations already do, a disproportionate number of the children of members of Congress suddenly got acce
pted to their first choice of college. Curiously, that reform legislation then went away.
Nassim Taleb says we like our heroes free and unencumbered. Now, I ain’t no hero, but that’s through no fault of my own. I arrived in D.C. as a single man after a couple of long-term relationships that didn’t work out. I knew going in how many people had been brought down by sexual missteps in this town, so I set some rules to help me err on the safe(r) side. In Washington, safe sex means in part: no dating lobbyists, no dating your staff members, and I should have added no dating reporters, but I didn’t at first. One former member, Blake Farenthold of Texas, amazingly violated the first two rules in one fell swoop by propositioning a staffer to have a threesome with him and a lobbyist, leading to his resignation in 2018.
I’m stunned by those who do things like pen love letters to staff, such as Rep. Pat Meehan, Republican of Pennsylvania, who was elected in 2010 and, like Farenthold, ended up resigning in 2018 after declaring a staff member his “soulmate.” The amazing part is that Meehan was on the Ethics Committee. On paper, he sounded like a well-behaved family man, so why not? Meanwhile, if you’re a single guy like me, some people in D.C. get suspicious immediately.
One young fellow member told me he’s dating his scheduler. They’re happy. Blissfully in love, he says. I told him, keep in mind she’s no longer working for you—you’re working for her, not the public you swore on oath to serve. She’ll be hailed as a hero the moment she decides to call it off and publicly complain about it. I’m not preaching, just advising. It’s risky to date in a town where there’s potentially a thin line between love and blackmail, or at least love and bad PR.
But we’ve got a president now who doesn’t care for puritanical grandstanding or moralistic preening. He is a lot more direct, even visceral, open, and realistic about his likes and dislikes, so overall, this is a good time to be a fun-loving politician instead of a stick-in-the-mud. I have an active social life, and it’s probably easier in the era of Trump. We’ve had “perfect family man” presidents before, after all, and many of those men sold out our country, even if their wives were happy the whole time.
If politicians’ family lives aren’t what really matter to the voters, maybe that’s a good thing. I’m a representative, not a monk. The days in which candidates presented themselves in the agora wearing spotless white robes are behind us. I represent the Florida Men—and Women—who elected me. I hope to represent them at their best, but I also represent them at their worst—and I beg their forgiveness when I am at mine.
Now to money.
Nobody is really from Washington, but everyone there quickly forgets where they came from. The question everyone asks aloud is, “Who do you work for?” The one they ask silently is, “And what can I get from you?” The answers are never: “The American people,” and “Not a damn thing.” The sociopaths who descend on Washington learn to substitute the will of the people (or political bosses) for their own, and they usually hope to make a buck in the process.
I arrived in D.C. with a duty to 700,000 constituents back in Florida. I seek to represent their interests, but the people who run D.C., the ones who stage-manage you around as soon you arrive, would prefer you forget your obligations at home and instead sit around, occasionally going to their cocktail parties and collecting PAC checks. The unstated assumption is that your votes will at least sometimes reflect their sources’ pet causes when you aren’t just rubber-stamping the party bosses’ wants.
It’s not as if legislators spend most of their time legislating, from what I can see anyway. They spend most of their time fundraising, getting buttered up by well-connected constituents or special interest groups, and looking for dirt they can weaponize against political opponents.
The party apparatus showed little interest in me before my primary, but when they decide you’re already a winner—and will be able to bring more money into the party in the future—then they perk up. Once you’re in the “in” crowd, Washington lets you know it. But it has a weird way of showing its enthusiasm.
As soon as I got to Washington, I was whisked to a restaurant with a fancy chandelier, where I found myself surrounded by congressional leaders, lobbyists, and newly elected legislators. Carafes of wine danced around the tables like ladies in beautiful red dresses, the steaks probably cost more than my kidneys would fetch on the black market, and there were all the artistic desserts you could desire—impressive to a North Floridian whose idea of “fancy dining” had long been fish that gets grilled but not put on a bun.
Addressing the crowd was then speaker Paul Ryan, since retired, a man who in the mid-2010s went suddenly from an admired symbol of the free market movement to the deeply unpopular symbol of the Washington establishment. But at this gathering in 2016, Ryan was still a kingmaker, if not a king, and the assembled lobbyists were his court.
It was the first time I had ever met him, and the first thing I saw him do on that occasion was to introduce an odd group of people he described as the individuals he considered really responsible for getting us newcomers elected: an array of lobbyists. Now, he never said we had to obey these lobbyists, nor was anything quite that crass implied. Rather, his behavior was a case of congressional leadership fulfilling its obligation to demonstrate to the lobbyists that leadership could provide access to the newly elected members. Unfortunately, for those inclined to compromise principles or seek handouts, access is half the battle.
The people who have a legislator’s ear or who agree to give him donations don’t necessarily pull the strings, but they garner more attention—“face time” in the parlance. They make deals, forge alliances, and their pet issues get remembered, unless the booze makes everyone forget last night’s conversation, which is a very real occupational hazard in Washington. Those who attend these intimate gatherings get just a little more consideration than you do.
Even before the general election, those of us likely to be in the freshman class in Congress were told what the party’s legislative agenda would be—as my predecessor, effective eight-term Congressman and Southern gentleman Jeff Miller, had told me would happen. As he also told me, one of the first suggestions we got from the party was the strong hint we should donate to other candidates, even if donating this late in the race might make little practical difference. It was a show of mutual support. We would be beholden to each other, and to the party, in ways difficult to forget or ignore later on.
Donations to the party do not officially determine which committees you’ll sit on or how prestigious your spot will be, but unofficially money sure seems to make a difference. I won’t pretend I walked away from the game. On the contrary, I was playing to win, and I did. I was eager to meet with Leader McCarthy in hopes of getting a spot on the Armed Services Committee, which is very important to decisions that affect the lives of many military personnel and veterans in Florida’s First District. I expected that when I did meet with him, I’d have to explain the potential impact on my constituents, my relevant experience with military issues, and the ways in which I was (or was not) in sync with the rest of the party on military and foreign policy issues.
To my shock, he looked me straight in the eye and said it would be helpful if in the next ten days I could direct $75,000 “across the street,” which meant into the coffers of the National Republican Congressional Committee. I frankly told my supporters back home about how things apparently work in D.C., and they agreed I should try rolling the dice. I quickly ponied up $150,000, twice the ask, and ended up not only on Armed Services but the Judiciary Committee as well. They even asked if I wanted anything else. If you “moneyball” it out, it sure makes sense for an ambitious member to participate in the system, whether or not he likes the system as a whole. But there is a difference between being of the system and playing the system.
Once given, they’ll rarely take away your committee assignment, unless they really think you’re a troublemaker. I hope mine aren’t revoked whe
n this book is published!
The big annual March dinner becomes a first assessment of how much you, the new member of Congress, owe the party bosses. Fortunately, since I had donated that $150,000 on the way into office, the party assessed my likely future contributions at $490,000, which is what the parties call your “leadership potential” in coded D.C. parlance, just as in Congress “compromise legislation” and “stakeholder consensus” are often code for “special interests teaming up across the aisle to screw Americans.” I did bring in the expected amount that first term, but I’m unlikely to meet their expectations again, for reasons I’ll explain at the end of this chapter.
Once you’re in a position of prominence and power, there are always parties you can attend where you’ll rub elbows with movers and shakers from various industries and pressure groups. But I don’t know that I’d call those parties themselves much of a temptation for me. They’re no “reward” or “pot of gold” I’m looking for, not some big pleasure-orgy—more like a very awkward and phony speed-dating session. For many people, though, events where they can meet the money-givers and other power brokers are the alpha and omega of the whole D.C. experience. Tedious and boring for most people, these events become the great aspiration for certain Washingtonians. Some people really do sell out through their stomach and liver.
Arizona’s Rep. Andy Biggs, a great guy and chair of the House Freedom Caucus, does not have my anti-PAC rule but has his own balanced way of avoiding too much interaction with some of the people who surround them. He hosts his PAC fundraisers as concerts by his Mormon family band, in which he and some of his relatives sing, so you can attend those performances and not even talk to him. The donor types show up, pay, and leave. Hats off to him for making this excruciating process something where he doesn’t have to be too phony face to face. What Andy lacks in tone and pitch he more than makes up for in volume and enthusiasm.