Book Read Free

Hannibal's Dynasty

Page 16

by Dexter Hoyos

Hasdrubal surely found this gratifying. By sending the envoys to him in

  Spain, and not to the authorities at Carthage, the Romans were plainly recog-

  nizing his pre-eminence over Punic affairs. This in turn could only enhance

  his pre-eminence, especially if he struck a successful agreement with his visi-

  tors. Since he obviously harboured none of the schemes they seemed to fear,

  an agreement was easy to make. All he had to do, in fact, was promise that

  ‘the Carthaginians are not to cross the river called Iber in warfare’.

  Why the Ebro and not, rather, the Pyrenees which were a much more obvi-

  ous barrier? Perhaps because it was precisely southern Gaul, on the other side

  of those mountains, that the Romans wished him to abstain from. Moreover

  they were probably already friends with the little Greek port of Emporiae in

  north-eastern Spain, a potentially useful observation post, and wanted to pre-

  serve it from Punic hegemony. At the same time the Ebro at its nearest was

  more than 220 miles (350 kilometres) from his new city and there was plenty

  of intervening Spain to occupy him. Hasdrubal had no trouble agreeing.

  The envoys promptly left for home; and in due course—and the nick of

  time—the consul sent to Sardinia sailed back with his legions and helped his

  colleague entrap the Gauls into annihilation in Etruria.

  Both sides could congratulate themselves on an accord well made. The

  Romans had been relieved of their Punic worries: Hasdrubal, attractive in

  personality and subtle in diplomacy, no doubt contributed greatly to this in

  his talks with the envoys. He in turn had Roman acquiescence in treating the

  great bulk of Spain as free range for further expansion: for the accord plainly

  implied—and the envoys surely discussed this face to face with him too—

  that the Romans would complain only if he were ‘to cross the river called

  Iber in warfare’. Given their intermittent sensitivity to potential Punic

  initiatives, it was an implication worth having. They in turn could feel

  reassured that Carthage was under sensible government, with no inclination

  to get involved in Rome’s regional affairs, while he could feel not only

  82

  H A S D RU BA L’ S C O N S O L I DAT I O N

  correspondingly reassured over Spain but also domestically strengthened

  thanks to this proof of Roman recognition and respect.

  Neither side paid the other diplomatic attention after this. The Romans

  went on to conquer Cisalpine Gaul, Hasdrubal to consolidate the Punic

  dominion in southern Spain. They had no more dealings with each other

  during his lifetime.19

  VI

  According to Appian, Hasdrubal conquered Spain ‘up to the river Iber,

  which divides Iberia more or less through the middle, five days’ journey from

  the Pyrenees, and flows to the northern ocean’. This Appianic mélange of

  precision and confusion suggests that he really means the Tagus but—either

  by his own effort or thanks to his source—has worked in a careless recollec-

  tion of the Ebro, which does lie about five days’ distance (on foot) from the

  Pyrenees and, as we have just seen, did mark the limit of Hasdrubal’s poten-

  tial expansion after 225. That the Tagus was the furthest north of Punic

  control under the second Barcid is confirmed by Hannibal’s campaign of

  220, launched into the lands beyond its middle reaches.

  Just what such a frontier meant is a rather different question. Hasdrubal

  left behind a reputation as both a military man and, even more emphatically, a

  supple and appealing diplomat. Just as Hamilcar had done, but apparently

  more often, he used persuasion and alliances in lieu of armed might to

  extend Punic dominance. Such links would be most prevalent in the outer

  reaches of his province, though not there alone. The Tagus then would not

  be a patrolled border strictly marking off Punic from non-Punic territory, but

  rather would mark the furthest zone (so far) of communities friendly with—

  or in some cases firmly subjected to—the Carthaginians.

  Punic dominance extended across southern Lusitania to the Atlantic coast.

  Hamilcar had secured the lower reaches of the river Anas, and during the

  Second Punic War we find Punic armies wintering comfortably among the

  Conii in the Algarve and by the mouth of the Tagus. The gold washed down

  in some Lusitanian rivers, notably again the Tagus, may also have drawn

  Punic notice.20

  East of the Toletum district the Tagus flows from the north-east, rising as

  it does in the mountains of the Cordillera Ibérica or ancient Mons Idubeda.

  In these upper Tagus lands—the nearer parts of Celtiberian Spain—

  Hasdrubal may well have enjoyed friendly relations with what communities

  there were, but nothing suggests Punic dominance or any need, strategic or

  commercial, for it. The Carpetani, who dwelt on the plains by the Tagus with

  Toletum as their strongest town, may have maintained friendly or at least cor-

  rect relations, but were outside any real control, as they showed in 220 and

  still later. In Polybius’ roster of subject or allied troops under Hannibal’s

  command at the start of 218, the most northerly contingents (apart from the

  83

  H A S D RU BA L’ S C O N S O L I DAT I O N

  pro-Punic Ilergetes beyond the Ebro) are Oretani and Olcades, both cer-

  tainly or probably dwelling south of the river. And though Hannibal

  campaigned across central Spain in 220 and in theory imposed control up to

  the Ebro and Duero, many Celtiberian communities switched support to the

  Romans during the Second Punic War. Those who served in the Punic army

  did so, it seems, for pay as professional mercenaries.

  But friendly contacts and commerce did not stop in central Spain. The

  accord with Rome had no bearing on these. The little Greek colony of

  Emporiae on the coast well beyond the Ebro used a Punic standard for its

  coins although, as noted earlier, it was very probably on good terms with

  Rome too. The Ilergetes in the middle Ebro region not only had a small con-

  tingent in Hannibal’s forces at the start of 218 but fought against the Romans

  in most stages of the ensuing war (even after Punic Spain itself had been

  overrun). They, and especially their energetic chieftains the brothers Indibilis

  and Mandonius, must have formed strong bonds with Barcid Spain a good

  while before Hannibal took command.21

  On the east coast the Saguntines, at least, had a different view. Small but

  prosperous, their town traded with the Punic province as with other regions,

  but in diplomacy and policy they stayed at arm’s length. At some date—

  hardly earlier than 225—they in fact struck up friendly contacts with the

  Romans. This link was one-sided in practice. The Saguntines every so often

  sent word to Rome about developments in Punic Spain, obviously with an

  eye to their own interests, but were paid no attention apart from (presum-

  ably) a polite acknowledgement. Not that they were in any danger, for

  Polybius indicates that down to 220 the Carthaginians maintained peaceable

  relations. Nor did Punic dominance otherwise extend as far as the Ebro

  before 220, as Polybius also makes clear. On the
other hand the Saguntines

  did have disputatious neighbours (as we shall see) and, on the principle that

  your enemies’ enemies or potential enemies may as well be your own friends,

  these very likely kept up good relations with New Carthage. When they

  became Punic subjects is not clear, though Hannibal described them as such

  in late 220: probably during 221 or 220 when with torrential speed he spread

  his hegemony across Spain up to the Duero and Ebro.22

  The northern bounds of Hasdrubal’s province, then, stretched seemingly

  along the Tagus to about the centre of Spain, and from there roughly along

  the ranges separating the middle Tagus and upper Anas; next eastwards

  across the southern plains of La Mancha, either to the lower reaches of the

  river Sucro and along this to the coast, or else turning south-eastwards to

  meet the coast around Cape de la Nao. He may not have directly controlled

  the eastern regions of the Tagus (the Toletum district was independent-

  minded Carpetanian territory, as mentioned earlier, and beyond it the

  river-line turned to the north-east), but Hasdrubal thus had a grip on the

  routes from the south and south-east into the interior. Only the east coast up

  to the Ebro remained outside his control.

  84

  H A S D RU BA L’ S C O N S O L I DAT I O N

  Expansion in that direction could wait, or so he might reckon. By 221 he

  had charge of nearly half the Iberian peninsula: on a rough estimate, over

  90,000 square miles (or 240,000 square kilometres). This was an area greater

  than Punic territory at home, even including the subject Libyans. Administra-

  tion, exploitation and political relations—between the inhabitants and the

  Carthaginians, and no doubt among the variegated communities them-

  selves—needed constant attention. Mineral exploitation continued, not only

  in the area of New Carthage but in other districts like the Sierra Morena.

  Hannibal pushed it forward energetically, according to Pliny the Elder. Pliny

  adds that the great mine of Baebelo—its shafts running up to a Roman mile

  and a half into the mountain—yielded 300 pounds of silver a day to Hanni-

  bal, the one such statistic surviving from Barcid times. Despite Pliny, this

  mine was probably not first opened during Hannibal’s governorship, which in

  Spain lasted only two and a half years. It more likely dated from Hasdrubal’s

  time, though Hannibal may well have improved it to that impressive level.23

  Affairs at Carthage needed supervision too, though in detail they could be

  left to Barcid kinsmen and allies to look after. Steady progress in Spain and

  the successful accord with the Romans can only have enhanced Hasdrubal’s

  dominant position over both these allies and the republic as a whole. Such

  criticism as there was came, as usual, from Hanno the Great and his friends,

  but their influence was now at a nadir. Livy tells a story of Hasdrubal sending

  to Carthage in 224 for a ‘hardly yet adult’ Hannibal, and Hanno opposing it

  on the moral ground that Hasdrubal had the same homosexual designs on his

  brother-in-law that Hamilcar allegedly had once had on him, and the political

  ground that Hannibal was being groomed for virtual monarchy. In reality

  Hannibal had been in Spain since 237 and in any case was a man of 23 by

  224. At some stage Hasdrubal appointed him commander of the cavalry, and

  effectively his deputy: this quite likely happened in 224. The kernel of truth

  in Livy’s tale then may be that Hanno objected emphatically to the promotion

  and claimed that the republic was becoming a de facto monarchy. True as this

  might be, it would hardly be news to his hearers. The Hannonites remained

  mired in impotence.24

  VII

  In Spain, whatever Hasdrubal’s later reputation as a lover of peaceful solu-

  tions, warfare did not fully cease. There may have been less fighting than in

  Hamilcar’s time, but Hasdrubal’s military strength grew. From 50,000

  infantry and 6,000 cavalry in 228, he commanded 60,000 and 8,000 respec-

  tively during his later years according to Diodorus, and the 200-strong corps

  of elephants continued in service at least for a time. Hannibal’s appointment

  to be cavalry commander was a far from ornamental post, as Livy’s glowing

  description of his military prowess shows, not to mention Appian’s remark

  that ‘where force was needed he [Hasdrubal] made use of the young man’.

  85

  H A S D RU BA L’ S C O N S O L I DAT I O N

  Polybius confirms the picture obliquely: he mentions how Hannibal and

  his friend Mago each captured cities in Spain (never together, to avoid dis-

  putes over booty), and given Hannibal’s age this can only point to exploits in

  Hasdrubal’s time. Again, as soon as Hannibal became general late in 221 he

  launched and won a lightning war against a hostile Spanish people—showing

  that Hasdrubal’s military machine was in first-class condition, perhaps too

  that the Olcades had been the murdered leader’s next war-target.

  Nor was Hasdrubal’s treatment of his Spanish followers always mild. He

  had shown his harsh side in dealing with Hamilcar’s slayers (not to mention

  the rebel Numidians years earlier). The poet Silius may not just be inventing

  that he wished to be feared, even if Silius overdoes it into caricature. In 221 a

  particular act of sternness rebounded fatally. He put to death a Spanish chief-

  tain for some offence, only for one of the man’s loyal followers to break into

  his quarters and murder him in his sleep. This may have happened in the

  palace at New Carthage, or a country villa since Appian has it done on a

  hunting expedition.

  Hasdrubal had been general for nearly eight years. The season was autumn

  221, for Hannibal on becoming general still had time for a first campaign. In

  southern Spain, warfare could run until quite late in the year, as Hamilcar’s last

  campaign showed; if Hannibal spent six to eight weeks on his fighting and

  ended it sometime in November or even early December, we can put Has-

  drubal’s death in September or October. He was probably still in his forties.25

  The Carthaginian state and empire that he left behind was at least as strong

  and rich as it had been in 264—in some ways stronger and richer. At home

  Punic territory had been enlarged, and relations with the Numidian princes

  seem to have been more peaceable than for a long while past. Overseas, for

  the first time in the republic’s history it controlled sizeable continental terri-

  tories, whose tribute and trade very likely outclassed the returns garnered

  before 264 from Punic trading-stations and island possessions. The still

  uncertain Punic predominance over southern Spain in 229 had become

  firmly established by 221, while trade with other lands no doubt continued as

  before, including Italy and Sicily and probably even Africa’s Atlantic coast-

  lands.

  Finally, the republic had large, highly trained armed forces, whose use of

  cavalry and resulting mobility—tactical and strategic—were superior to virtu-

  ally any other Mediterranean military establishment, a corps of officers who,

  as the future would show, were probably the ablest of any army
of that age,

  and leadership of the same order. In sum, what Hamilcar had aimed at, Has-

  drubal achieved. The Carthaginians were again a first-class power whom no

  one could browbeat or victimize, not even the Romans. The new general and

  leader would put this regained strength to its utmost test.

  86

  V I I

  H A N N I BA L I N S PA I N

  I

  The same procedure for replacing Hasdrubal was followed as for Hamilcar.

  ‘The forces’ in Spain—Polybius assures us, and so do later sources—

  unanimously chose Hannibal as their new general. As before, this choice was

  most likely made by the Carthaginian troops and officers, under arrange-

  ments equally unknown. Then, when the events in Spain were reported at

  Carthage, the citizen assembly ratified the appointment. Of course there was

  no question of other candidates or any competition. Thus a third Barcid took

  control of the city and the empire, confirming the de facto monarchy into

  which the republic had evolved. If Hanno the Great protested this time, it

  went unrecorded.

  Livy draws a famous and biased character portrayal of the new leader, sup-

  posedly at the time he became Hasdrubal’s subordinate. Hannibal’s vividly

  described warlike qualities are convincing enough, partly because they fit

  many of his recorded doings. To the old soldiers (Livy writes) he recalled his

  father Hamilcar in looks and energy, he showed superb qualities of leadership,

  bravery and endurance, and yet—the Roman historian insists—he was a tissue

  of cruelty, treachery and atheism. The alleged vices are briefly listed and gen-

  eralized, nor does Livy mention a failing that Polybius later stresses, greed for

  money. Even at this point to accuse Hannibal of atheism reads oddly when,

  just a couple of chapters earlier, the historian has told the story of his boy-

  hood oath and plainly means us to take it seriously. A few pages later he then

  tells how the general went to Gades to make vows at the temple of Hercules,

  meaning Melqart, in preparation for his expedition to Italy. The vices in the

  portrayal obviously owe more to Roman tradition than to accurate reportage,

  even though there is no reason to imagine that Hannibal was a saint.1

  Hannibal in a real sense was entering on his inheritance. Having accompa-

  nied his father and brother-in-law to Spain he had seen every stage in the

 

‹ Prev