The Cosmic War: Interplanetary Warfare, Modern Physics and Ancient Texts

by Joseph P. Farrell

  As I observed in chapter seven, this gives us the following elements:

  1. The Edfu accounts, by maintaining a creation by the utterance of “magic spells” is paralleling yet another famous account of a similar concept of creation, that of Genesis 1. Both maintain that sound is somehow involved;

  2. These “spells” were, however, unlike the Genesis account, uttered over certain objects which then created the various “earths” desired;

  3. If one adds in the Hermopolitan tradition, the use of (solar) radiation or energy is also a component.

  So we have:

  1. Sound

  2. Objects

  3. Energy, or radiation.

  But now we also have a “book” describing the names of specific places, in other words, along with the above three items, the “book” of “sacred place names” constitutes the final essential element in this scalar technology. It is analogous to the “templates” or gratings discussed previously in respect to the Tablets of Destinies. In short, the Edfu texts indicate a similar if not identical technology that was associated with the “creation” and the subsequent conflict, and that these very same technologies describe the mythical “Sound Eye” that wrought such destruction during that conflict. It would thus appear that both the Mesopotamian “Tablets of Destinies” and the Edfu “Sound Eye” are two traditions that reflect a common and remote technological ancestor.

  c. A Summary

  We are now in a position to summarize the whole conceptual complex within mythology that surrounds the Tablets of Destinies by adding to our familiar formula. Here, however, we make one significant modification to it based on the findings of this chapter; here we replace the term “Planets” in the formula, with the term “Celestial Bodies:”

  “Mountains” ≈ “Celestial Bodies” ≈ “Pyramids” ≈ “Tablets”

  As before, I define the symbol ≈ to mean “are closely associated, but not identical, with.”

  All the above relationships are summarized in the following table on the next page.

  Table of Associations of the Tablets of Destinies

  We now have a rational basis upon which to speculate what the Tablets of Destinies were:

  Grounded both in the ancient texts and a modern physics interpretation of them, the Tablets of Destinies were most likely crystals of some sort through which light or other electromagnetic energy was beamed, and these crystals contained information. This information was the “holographic” interferometric “grating” or “interference pattern”, Bearden’s quantum potential “template of action,” the scalar signatures, of almost every celestial body considered important in, to, and by the civilization of the “gods.” These priceless catalogues were, moreover, compiled relative to our own solar system as their physical frame of reference. Additionally, they included within their catalogue of “gratings” or “templates” the “subtle influences” — as an impressed dynamic — of consciousness.490 They most likely worked best, therefore, when interfaced — by means now lost and unknown to us — with an intelligent and conscious user. This catalogue of interferometric gratings, based on longitudinal waves in the medium, was thus the central component of any communications system that held together their vast and interstellar empire, since only the gratings themselves allowed one to select the system with which one wished to communicate. Similarly, these interferometric gratings were the central components in any weapon system designed to target celestial bodies from a great distance. Finally, the catalogue which was the Tablets of Destinies also likely included numerous gratings or templates of emotional states, which could also be impressed into targets from a great distance.

  If this speculative hypothesis concerning the Tablets of Destinies is true, then it constitutes an explanation that explains why their theft at various times

  • Broke down communications between the solar system and other parts of their empire;

  • Caused the “gods’” extreme concern that they would no longer be able to rule because of their lack of ability to continue to manipulate their subjects mentally and emotionally;

  • Conferred hegemony to whomever possessed them not only for the above reasons, but because they allowed the targeting of scalar weapons of mass destruction at great distance.

  In short, The Tablets of Destinies were the “software”491 gratings of phase onjugate mirrors for almost every celestial body that was considered important to them, that held their empire together, and made their scalar- and “electro-acoustic”- based communications and weapons systems work.

  As has been outlined here, one aspect of this paleophysics involves consciousness and mind manipulation by means of impressed electrodynamics on targeted biological systems and intelligent life. This is, perhaps, an enduring legacy of the war, for if as I have argued in the Giza Death Star trilogy, the Great Pyramid was a component in some ancient scalar weapons system of vast power, then its shell still stands at Giza, perhaps maintaining some partial functioning of this nature.

  While it is highly speculative, it is nonetheless worth pointing out here that there might be a technology - a very ancient technology - that lies behind the phenomena of “channeled messages from ‘extraterrestrials’” and so on that have been with humanity throughout most of its history, down to, and including the modern obsession with them and with their dubious messages of coming “peace and enlightenment.” One researcher, with whom the present author has been privileged to share a stage during conferences, and whom the present author highly respects, seriously suggested that if the Great Pyramid was a weapon, then perhaps its usage was entirely benign, being one of beaming feelings of love, harmony, and peace, and thus preventing wars. Beyond the moral questions this raises about the interference with the individual will, it begs the obvious question of why that particular region seems throughout its history to be the home not only of “revelations” but of rivers of blood spilt in countless wars. Far from supporting such a contention, the bloody barrenness of the region would seem to argue against my friend’s speculation. Indeed, his speculation would not seem to be the best way of dodging the bullet that there might be a malign aspect and influence at work, one attested to time and again in the texts from that part of the world.

  In this connection it is interesting to note that Thorkild Jacobsen’s translation of the Lugal-e refers to some of the stones as warriors, a theme that was clearly recognizable in the previous chapter, in Dalley’s translations of the same epic:

  The Basalt, the Diorite, the Dolerite,

  the “Duck”-stone, the Haematite,

  and the warrior Alabaster, its warriors

  constantly come raiding the cities,

  for them a monster’s tooth has grown up...492

  While the “monster’s tooth” could be a reference to a pyramid, a little further on the text states that “daily the Azag is turning the border (district) over to its side!”493 These references suggest that the Tablets were being used to manipulate the emotions of whole populations to take up arms in the revolt, and tend to confirm our hypothesis that consciousness was a primary component of the manipulation both of the Tablets by their possessors, and in turn of individuals by the Tablets.

  So what happened to the Tablets of Destinies? As we already know, some of their components were destroyed by Ninurta. Others, as we also know, were adapted to other use, and some, which could not be destroyed, were, like Thoth’s emerald tablets, secreted away. The truly sobering reality is not only what the Tablets of Destinies were, but that some of them, the most malign components in fact, may still exist.

  A clue perhaps, if afforded by Marduk’s own admission in the Erra/Nergal and Ishum text that he “changed the location of the mesu-tree (and of) the elmesu-stone, and did not reveal it to anyone.”494 If, as seems likely, these objects were components of the Tablets, then it would appear that some of them were deliberately hidden by Marduk long before their subsequent theft from Enlil by (An)Zu. A little later on in the same story, it ap
pears that Nergal convinced Marduk to reveal to him the location of these objects:

  He made his voice heard and spoke to prince Marduk

  495 The gap in the text suggests that this is what Nergal was up to, for a short while later, Nergal reveals his intentions to Marduk, who approves of his plan:

  I shall make Anu and Ellil lie down like bulls, to right and left

  of your gate.”

  Prince Marduk listened to him,

  And the speech that Erra (Nergal) made was pleasing to him.496

  This gives us not only some insight into the genocidal characters of Nergal and Marduk, but a clue as to the possible whereabouts today of these missing components of the Tablets of Destinies.

  Careful consideration of the details of this and the previous chapter will reveal that their possible locations are tied to a very few locations, far beneath the sands and rock of the deserts of Mesopotamia and Egypt: Giza, Babylon and Nimrud or Nippur - site of Ninurta’s temple - in Iraq,497 and possibly Baalbek in Lebanon. But as we shall also discover, there is a certain body of evidence that suggests that some of them also made their way... elsewhere.

  But whatever their location, the texts and legends associated with them, from Thoth’s Emerald Tablets to Ninurta’s missing stones of power, all indicate that something of the original Tablets of Destiny survived.

  10.

  ME‘S, MER’S, AND MARS: MORE WHO’S AND WHAT’S, AND (AT LAST) SOME WHERE’S

  “There is nothing connected to the many supposed superstitious funerary rituals of Egypt that cannot also be interpreted as pertaining to space travel or some more advanced scientific accomplishment. ”

  Bruce Rux498

  A. Introductory Pemarks

  There are, according to alternative researcher Bruce Rux, essentially three ways to view the similarities in ancient myths from around the world:

  One, each myth cycle is indigenous to a given people, beginning with features unique to them that then become influenced by invaders or assimilated tribes; two, myths are all psychological projections (called by Jung “archetypes”) of man’s innermost psyche, showing the universality of the human soul; or, three, they are all the same myth from great antiquity, becoming individually corrupted in various ways over the ensuing centuries. The first two theories are the prevailing ones today, being the anthropological and psychological schools of thought. The latter is generally dismissed without much consideration, since it brings to mind Atlantis (and other seemingly fabulous theories), which has become excluded from the accepted canon of theories though there is a tremendous amount of evidence to suggest it once existed.499

  How else would one explain, for example, the myth among the Omaha Indians of North America of the burning cedar tree which was not consumed, and from which the animals had worn four trails, each of which led in one of the four cardinal compass points?500 The similarity to Moses’ theophany at the burning bush in Sinai is at least as remarkable as the differences between the two accounts.

  And this “similar-dissimilar” pattern is one that can be encountered time and again when one examines the myths of the world. It is not the fact that there are such similarities that is so arresting, it is rather their sheer quantity, and the extent to which these similarities extend to details. But equally arresting are the dissimilarities. All too often one encounters in parallel myths not only the same details, but new ones, at times seemingly contradictory to what is assumed to be the “original” story.

  So one must modify Rux’s “third alternative” method of explaining the commonalities of ancient myths to include the possibility that not all details of a mythological “archetype” will be included in any given culture’s retelling of a particular myth. Details might be missing in one account that might be preserved in another. And this makes any task of reconstructing the “original” myth that much more difficult. It is like trying to assemble a massive four-dimensional jigsaw puzzle, matching the edges of motifs from one account with those of another. The situation is rendered all the more complex given that so many of these myths evidence the same kind of “sacred punning” and multi-tiered layers of meaning that we have called the “Unified Intention of Symbol” in our encounters with the rich mythological traditions of Egypt and Mesopotamia. The details preserved in one account might be found in a completely different context in another account, and thus, one or the other, or both, might be garbled versions of the “original.” On any account, if the pursuit of the first two alternatives mentioned by Rux be viewed as a kind of “mythological liberalism” or Jungian “deconstruction,” then by the same token the third alternative is a kind of “mythological higher criticism” seeking to recover the lost originals from textual clues and external evidences.

  But clues nonetheless there are, and ignoring them by the standard academic anesthetic of deconstruction, Jungian or otherwise, will not make them go away. They are still there, a throbbing and nagging symptom in our perceptions that the anesthetic has only dulled but not eradicated. It is time then to allow the anesthetic to wear off and die of its own dead weight, and confront the headache head-on.

  Perhaps the most painful aspect of this mythological migraine is the persistent, and detailed association of Egypt, Mesopotamia, and Mars. In The Giza Death Star Destroyed I speculated on a connection between the Red Planet and the Giza plateau by way of the curious correspondences that exist between the Mesopotamian god Nergal - god of Mars, fire, rebellion, and war - and the whole concept of a chimerical creature such as the Sphinx.501 But there are many, many more such peculiar connections...

  B. MEs, MERs, and Mars

  Bruce Rux, to whom we have already referred, points out that the word “mer”, meaning “place of ascension” is one term that ancient Egyptians gave to their pyramids, a meaning associating them, once again, with the heavens.502 The same, Rux notes, can also be said of the Sumerian MEs, or power objects. But Rux adds one of those “details” referred to earlier. “The Sumerian Enoch’s name, ‘Enmeduranki,’” contains the root DUR-AN-KI, which as noted previously, means the “bond heaven-earth,”, and thus the Sumerian Enoch’s name “meant ‘Ruler whose Me connects Heaven and Earth.’”503 But this is not all. There are peculiar, and detailed, connections to the Red Planet, to Mars, and to the god of war who rules it. To see how, one must journey away from Mesopotamia and Egypt, out across the Atlantic, to North and South America and to some very intriguing native American Indian traditions.

  1. Native American Indian Connections

  One tale that concerns us is that of the Chiapas Indians of Guatemala, whose language, notes Rux, “has always confused scholars because of its strong resemblance to Hebrew.”504 The Chiapas had a legend

  about an exiled king come came to stay with them, a white man-god who lived among them, traveling frequently, teaching them civilization and all their knowledge. His name was “Votan,” and his people were called the Chivim, “Serpents.” Not only is the name quite obviously the same as that of “Wotan” (which, in the German tongue, would be exactly pronounced “Votan”) and “Odin,” but it also cannot help but call to mind the great god of the American Indian Creation epic, the Chon-oopa-sa, named “Wo-kon.” Votan told them the story of the Tower of Babel, as “a great city where a magnificent temple was under construction which was intended to reach to heaven, but was doomed by a confusion of languages. ” He was associated with snakes, and with healing. Before his departure, he wrote a book in the Quiche language describing his travels and hidden treasures, which was burned by Bishop Nunez de la Vega in 1691.505

  More will be said about the connection of this “civilizing god” with snakes at a subsequent point. Here what must command one’s attention is the fact that the Guatemalan version of the story is almost identical with that of the biblical, and yet no explanation exists for it! It is, nonetheless, there.

  Consider the magnitude of the problem that this presents. On the standard theory of Indian migration from Asia to North America via a land
bridge some tens of thousands of years ago, prior to all physical connection between the two great world islands being lost, the story could not possibly have come by this route, unless one posits that it took place much earlier than standard biblical histories will allow, or that communication between the two world islands was maintained by a high seafaring culture, which standard theory likewise discountenances to some extent, in spite of some considerable evidence that such was precisely the case.

  The Tower of Babel, however, is not the only such case to be explained. In Australia, aboriginal peoples recount a legend of a sun god who comes down from heaven, and conquers the earth with “intense heat after a mighty and terrifying conflict.”506 This reference to a sun god, to a kind of heat-based weapon, and to an obvious war, resonates with the Egyptian sun-god Ra, and with his “eye” weapon, as we shall see in a moment. But how would Egyptian and Australian aboriginals recount almost the same war, in the same terms? “Jungian archetypes” might be able to explain the coincidences of “war legends” across various cultures, but it seems to stretch their explanatory power to assume that they explain the detailed similarities in weapons used and in the personages involved in wielding them.