Snapping

Home > Other > Snapping > Page 37
Snapping Page 37

by Flo Conway; Jim Siegelman


  to Personal Choice was described in an article in Woman's Day,

  "Why Kids Join Cults," by David Black [23]. Our own research

  included in-depth interviews with one member of RPC and a number

  of former cult members around the country who had worked with or

  been treated by various members of the group.

  101 Verifiable links have been discovered: Again, see Black [23].

  103... animal response to the techniques of hypnosis is almost exactly

  opposite: See Estabrooks [27], p. 43. "The accepted way to

  hypnotize a sheep, for example, is suddenly to pull its legs out

  from under it, hold the animal firmly on the ground, then gradually

  relax the pressure. . . . [Man] simply does not respond to these

  methods. . . . For example, that sheep will show no 'practice

  effect.' It is just as easy to hypnotize him the first time as

  it is the fiftieth time. . . . This is directly contrary to what

  we would expect in human hypnotism."

  The techniques employed by cult and group leaders bear no

  resemblance to the classical induction of hypnosis: An excellent

  example of the classical method of inducing hypnosis can be found

  in Marcuse [37], p. 52.

  Chapter 10: INFORMATION

  110 Cybernetics, succinctly defined as the study of "communication

  and control in the animal and the machine: See Wiener [85], p. 11,

  for the derivation and definition of the term.

  ... the vital element of "feedback" . . . he identified as "information":

  Wiener likened steering mechanisms, automatic antiaircraft guns,

  and human and animal reflexes to "This method of control, which

  we may call control by 'informative feedback.'" In Wiener [85],

  p. 113.

  ... their British counterparts preferred . . . "variety": British

  engineer W. Ross Ashby, in An Introduction to Cybernetics

  [49], p. 126, defines "variety" in the same terms as Shannon

  defines "information" in The Mathematical Theory of Communication

  [79], p. 32. Both concepts leaned heavily upon earlier notions of

  information introduced in the 1920s by two Bell Labs scientists,

  H. Nyquist and R.V.L. Hartley.

  ... the simple on-off, heads-or-tails choice: It is important to note

  that Wiener's concept of information appeared to be much less

  discrete and more fluid than Shannon's. These varying views do

  not necessarily contradict each other, however, but represent a

  dualism which can be as helpful (and, at times, confusing) as the

  complementary wave and particle models of light. Wiener's approach,

  as described in his autobiography, has received little attention in

  the engineering world, but his concept may be more applicable than

  Shannon's as a model of information flow in living things. Wrote

  Wiener, "I approached information theory from the point of

  departure of the electric circuit carrying a continuous current,

  or at least something which could be interpreted as continuous

  current. At the same time, Claude Shannon . . . was developing a

  parallel and largely equivalent theory from the point of view of

  electrical switching systems. . . . As I have said before, Shannon

  loves the discrete and eschews the continuum." Wiener [89], p. 263.

  111 Wiener himself repeatedly voiced his concern over the impact of

  this new technology on human beings: See Wiener's classic popular

  works, The Human Use of Human Beings [88] and God & Golem,

  Inc. [87], which received the National Book Award.

  Even as the new sciences were developing: See Embodiments of Mind

  [70] by McCulloch, a pioneer in the application of communication

  principles to the workings of the nervous system. A concise

  discussion of the subject appears in The Physical Foundation of

  Biology [60] by Elsasser, beginning on p. 71.

  112 "chunking": The notion of "chunks" of information (as opposed to

  single "bits") was introduced by George A. Miller in a

  now-famous article, "The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus

  Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information"

  (in Psychological Review, March, 1956, and reprinted in The

  Psychology of Communication [72]), which dealt with black box

  experiments in memory and learning.

  ... by the early sixties, cybernetics and information theory were no

  longer being acclaimed: See "Information Theory After Eighteen

  Years," in Science [62].

  113 Human beings . . . are not electrical circuits: This remark was

  made to us in personal conversation with Dr. John R. Pierce, a

  former director of Bell Labs known for his work in the development

  of communication satellites.

  114... the brain's only known function is one of information processing:

  See Elsasser [60], p. 75, " . . . the only known function of the

  nervous system and brain is the transmission and circulation of

  messages containing information."

  118... the 'hologram.' A recent invention of the science of optics:

  Basic principles and recent advances in holography are covered

  in Gabor [61], Leith and Upatnicks [68], and Pennington [73].

  Pribram's application of the model is clearly explained in his

  articles in Psychology Today [75] and Scientific American [77].

  121 In 700 operations, Dr. Paul Pietsch: See Pietsch's article in

  Harper's, "Shuffle Brain" (May, 1972).

  122... introduced . . . by a mathematician named Dennis Gabor: See Gabor,

  Holography, 1948-1971 [61].

  Chapter 11: THE LAW OF EXPERIENCE

  126... information mixes freely: See Pribram [76], p. 16, " . . . finer

  nerve fibers lack an insulating fatty coating (the myelin sheath)

  which in large fibers prevents interaction among impulses. The

  slow potentials which occur in fine fibers . . . find therefore

  no obstacle for actual local interaction."

  127... the brain can be said to metabolize experience: The concept of

  the metabolism of information, which we think of as a holographic

  process of distribution and reorganization, has been suggested

  previously in more technical terms by a number of important

  physicists and biologists. Perhaps the best known statement on the

  subject was made by the eminent physicist Erwin Schrödinger in his

  historic 1943 lecture, "What Is Life?" [78]. "How does the living

  organism avoid decay?" asked Schrödinger (p. 75). "The obvious

  answer is: By eating, drinking, breathing. . . . The technical term

  is metabolism [his italics]. The Greek word . . . means change or

  exchange. Exchange of what? Originally the underlying idea is, no

  doubt, exchange of material. . . . That the exchange of material

  should be the essential thing is absurd. Any atom of nitrogen,

  oxygen, sulphur, etc., is as good as any other. . . . What then

  is that precious something contained in our food that keeps us

  from death? . . . What an organism feeds upon is negative entropy.

  [Authors' note: Shannon, Wiener, et al. equate information, i.e.,

  order, with the negative of randomness -- called "entropy" in

  physics.] . . . Thus the device by which an organism maintains

  itself stationary at a fairly high level of orderliness . . .

  really consists in conti
nually sucking orderliness from its

  environment."

  In sensory deprivation tests: Toffler discusses the recognized

  effects and dangers of sensory deprivation in Future Shock

  [113], pp. 513-16. A more positive view is taken by Lilly in The

  Center of the Cyclone [7] (chapter 3), although the duration

  of his separate isolation tank experiments is not stated. (More

  on sensory deprivation can be found in A Study of Thinking

  by Jerome Bruner, with Goodnow and Austin [New York: Science

  Editions, 1962]; in Sensory Deprivation: A Symposium, P. Solomon,

  ed. [Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965]; and in Sensory

  Deprivation, 15 Years of Research, John P. Zubek, ed. [New York:

  Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969].)

  128 The fundamental workings of the mind . . . are determined by

  experience: The precise role of experience in brain development

  is still being researched and debated within the scientific

  community. Many psychologists, among them Hebb [65], hold that

  experience is essential for the proper development of even the

  most elementary perceptual faculties. Our talks with a number

  of bio-information scientists revealed that much of the latest

  research in the field confirms and extends this point of view.

  ... genius has been shown to be as much as 90 percent a product of

  experience: This figure, highly controversial in the continuing

  "nature vs. nurture" debate, was established in a series of

  experiments conducted during World War II and has been roughly

  confirmed in more recent experiments involving identical twins

  raised under separate circumstances.

  129... fundamental patterns of thought and feeling . . . are forged in

  the intimate relationships between parent and child: See Piaget,

  The Construction of Reality in the Child [74]; also his

  Psychology of Intelligence (Totowa, N.J.: Littlefield, Adams &

  Co., 1966), p. 158: "During the sensori-motor period the infant

  is, of course, already subject to manifold social influences

  . . . people gather round him, smile at him, amuse him, calm him;

  they inculcate habits and regular courses of conduct."

  ... this organic . . . shaping process is ongoing throughout the

  lifelong course of personal growth: Most scientists agree that,

  up to the age of five, the brain is in a particularly fluid and

  adaptable state. In later years, however, significant portions

  of the brain are constantly reforming themselves. At a recent

  conference, even those scientists who hold that the brain is

  as much as 90 percent "prewired" agreed that the remaining part

  "never stays still but constantly changes its structure to meet

  new stimuli and new perceptions." (From "4,000 Scientists in

  California Find the Universe in the Brain," the New York Times,

  November 13, 1977.)

  131 "Perhaps something of this sort occurs . . . original individualities":

  Ashby [49], p. 139.

  ... he acknowledged that consciousness was "the most fundamental fact

  of all": See Design for a Brain [48], p. 12, "Vivid though

  consciousness may be to its possessor, there is as yet no known

  method by which he can demonstrate his experience to another. And

  until such a method or its equivalent is found, the facts of

  consciousness cannot be used in scientific method."

  132 Science has only begun to understand . . . memory molecules:

  A survey of the latest thinking on this subject can be found

  in Pribram [76], chapter 2, Neural Modifiability and Memory

  Mechanisms. See also Shepherd [80], p. 57, "Within the brain

  itself, synapses are, of course, modifiable during the

  differentiation and growth of neurons in embryonic and early life;

  the processes concerned, however, remain among the most profound

  unsolved problems of biology. In the adult brain, there is more

  and more experimental evidence of the modifiability of synapses."

  Chapter 12: THE SNAPPING MOMENT AND CATASTROPHE THEORY

  136... in the aftermath of this shattering break, the brain's

  information-processing capacities may literally become

  "disorganized": Although there is at present no scientific data

  available on the snapping moment, we know from studies of epilepsy

  and electroshock therapy that an intense electrical "experience"

  may cause the complete severing of synaptic connections in the

  brain. "When strong electric currents are sent through the brain,

  momentarily all neural activity is disrupted and disorganized. When

  the excess currents stop at the end of the convulsion, there is

  a tendency for the old and normal neuronal interconnections to

  be reestablished because of their greater stability" (Wooldridge

  [90], p. 111 ).

  ... may become firmly convinced that he is a chicken: The annals of

  hypnosis abound with stories of the feats of imagination the

  mind can perform -- and rationalize -- in even ordinary states

  of vulnerability and suggestibility. "The operator hypnotized a

  subject and told him that when the cuckoo clock struck he was to

  walk up to Mr. White, put a lamp shade on his head, kneel on the

  floor in front of him and 'cuckoo' three times . . . when the

  cuckoo clock struck, the subject carried out the suggestion to

  the letter.

  " 'What in the world are you doing?' he was asked.

  " 'Well, I'll tell you. It sounds queer but it's just a little

  experiment in psychology. I've been reading on the psychology

  of humor and I thought i'd see how you reacted to a joke in

  very bad taste'" (Estabrooks [27], pp. 80-81).

  143 The most ambitious and promising applications . . . have been made

  by Professor E. Christopher Zeeman: Some of Zeeman's other

  applications of catastrophe theory include models of stock market

  crashes, prison riots, barking-dog attacks, and buckling steel

  girders. In contrast to the application we present here, many of

  these catastrophe representations have come under heavy criticism

  from the mathematical community, particularly where they have been

  used as tools of prediction, as they have in some British prisons.

  144 In an article in Scientific American: See Zeeman [91].

  147 Thom's theory has come under heavy fire: See "Catastrophe Theory:

  The Emperor Has No Clothes" (Science, April 15, 1977), Kolata [67].

  148 Bremermann . . . in his review of Thom's book: See Bremermann [54].

  Chapter 13: VARIETIES OF INFORMATION DISEASE

  153 "Psychopathology has been rather a disappointment . . . secondary

  disturbances of traffic": Wiener [85], pp. 146-47.

  156... the Love Family or Love Israel: Ted Patrick discusses the Love Family

  at length in "Let Our Children Go!" [40], beginning on p. 127.

  161... the "applied philosophy" . . . It now claims to be the largest

  "self-betterment organization" in the world": See Hubbard [31], p. 165.

  ... an estimated 3.5 million followers: In Time magazine, April 5, 1976.

  ... Dianetics, employs a technique called "auditing" ostensibly to

  raise an individual to higher levels of being: The theory and

  practice of Dianetics and the auditing process have been fully

  expounded upon b
y Hubbard in his voluminous printed works,

  most of which have been published in the United States by the

  American Saint Hill Organization in Los Angeles. See Hubbard

  [30], Dianetics Today; also Dianetics: The Modern Science of

  Mental Health (1950); Dianetics: The Original Thesis (1970);

  Handbook for Preclears, 7th ed. (1974); Introduction to

  Scientology Ethics (1974); Scientology 0-8: The Book of Basics

  (1970); and Advanced Procedure and Axioms, 3rd ed. (1957).

  168 Psychodrama takes the imagination one step further than fantasy:

  See Moreno [10] for the original thinking behind this technique.

  There have been documented instances of est graduates . . . feats

  in defiance of nature: See the New York Times, April 24, 1977,

  and the article in American Journal of Psychiatry, March, 1977,

  cited earlier.

  169... the Jews of Europe wanted to die: Marin discusses this famous est

  claim in The New Narcissism, Harper's, October, 1975 [38].

  176 Perhaps most disturbing of all . . . TM called on alleged scientific

  facts to prove . . . "severely deleterious effects": See, for

  example, Harold H. Bloomfield, M.D., Michael P. Cain, Dennis

  T. Jaffe, Robert B. Kory, TM: Discovering Inner Energy and

  Overcoming Stress [24]. In chapter 2, "Transcendental Meditation:

  The Technique of Contacting Pure Awareness," on p. 19, the authors

  (two of whom are expressly connected with the TM organization)

  write that: "some self-styled 'experts' of relaxation or other

  meditative techniques have been indiscriminately advocating their

  own makeshift mantras, unaware that severely deleterious effects

  can be experienced by their unsuspecting practitioners."

 

‹ Prev