Slave Species of god
Page 17
I must tell you that I am not making any of this up in a moment of fictional insanity. As ridiculous as these tales may sound, they are no more ridiculous than what is happening in the world today. But you can be the judge of the evidence presented, and you can decide whether you want to remain a slave species, or whether you want to begin exploring the new options presented to us as we unearth more and more prehistoric artefacts which tell us a completely different story about our human ancestry to the one we have all been told.
Let us go back to the obsession with gold. The ‘slave species’ were toiling in the mines oblivious of their exact place in the greater scheme of things. They knew that this was the only thing required of them. They lived in compounds not dissimilar to those used on South African mines even today. Everything was provided for the slaves, but they had no choice, no freedom, no future other than toiling in mines. They were born into mining slavery and they died as slaves on the mines. But there must have been slaves who rebelled and escaped into the dense African bush, to form small family units, learning to survive as hunter gatherers. The Khoi-San people were most likely some of those. There came a time when some slaves were allowed to leave the mine compounds and live in the African wild, probably when they became old and fragile, not able to do the hard labour they were intended for. These groups of early humans formed small units and tribes, developing their own distinct African cultures which were filled with mythological gods and tales that are difficult for historians to understand. But when seen from this new perspective it makes perfect sense why African mythology and their religions are so different from the rest to the world. Because it was here in Africa where the first humans were created, they lived and slaved in isolation from the other emerging human communities, and they established their own unique cultures, highly influenced by their master ‘gods’. There was very little contact between these early humans in Africa and the rest of the world, where interbreeding was taking place between humans and the offspring of the Anunnaki, giving rise to the Aryans of the north. It is possible that there may even have been a mutiny by the ‘slave species’ against their enslavement, after some 100,000 years of toiling.
After the mutiny of the slave species, when many were allowed to leave their mining compounds, the mining continued while many of the slaves tried to live in newly-formed communities and survive without the help of their gods. Could this relationship between the slaves and Anunnaki be echoed in the religious structures of today? Could the Anunnaki still be holding a firm grip on human activity especially around the production of gold in modern times? Many of the secret societies throughout history have been traced way back to the origin of humanity and the so-called ‘Brotherhood of the Snake’. And the conspiracy theories keep coming. The great thing about conspiracy theories is that that's exactly what they remain. But the fact that our human origin is in question; that the role of gold in the world has dubious origins; the questionable role which the church and its priests have played in the hording of gold and wealth, all point to possible conspiracies so deep that there may be more to them than meets the sober mind. Just to demonstrate how confused historians are about the origins of gold and its possible meaning to early humans, here are some random extracts of what has been said about the origins of gold:
“Gold was probably the first metal known to the early hominids that, on finding it as nuggets and spangles in the soils and stream sands, were undoubtedly attracted by its intrinsic beauty, great malleability, and virtual indestructibility.”
I find this statement utterly ridiculous. Why would a soft metal have any value to primitive hominid, ape-like creatures, when their preoccupation was with survival, food and shelter? But the Anunnaki needed gold and they needed a worker to get the gold from the ground.
“During the stone ages the metal appears to have taken on a sacred quality because of its enduring character and immortality, being worn initially probably as amulets and later fashioned into religious objects and idols.”
All very well, but why would gold, rather than any of the other metals or precious stones take on such an importance? There is no justifiable reason for such behaviour by primitive early humans, unless they were imitating someone, placing value on the metal for some reason.
“By the time of the early Indus, Sumerian, and Egyptian civilisations (3000-2000 BC) gold had not only retained its sacred quality but had become the symbol of wealth and social rank.”
Exactly! By this time humans were given civilisation by their gods and gold was established as the ‘property of the gods’. This is very well documented by the Conquistadores in Mesoamerica. They were repeatedly told by the natives that all the gold ‘belonged to the gods’. In biblical times god would reward his obedient human followers in various ways. Gold was one of those rewards, because it was revered by humans, as a divine metal. Any human who was allowed to keep gold or given gold by the gods as a form of reward, was admired by everyone. They would be in possession of something ‘godly’ and ‘divine’, which was a huge social privilege, increasing the desire and demand for gold.
“Homer (circa 1000 BC) writes in the Iliad and Odyssey, the epic poems of ancient Greece, describing gold repeatedly both as a sign of wealth among mortals and as a symbol of splendour among the immortals.”
There we have it. Homer had similar views on the issue with gold. Why did he know these things, which our modern intellectuals have reduced to mythological mumbo-jumbo not to be taken seriously? The following statement immediately supports my disillusion with modern teachers of human history. This seems to be a commonly accepted view among scholars, which I find extremely arrogant, short-sighted and outright ignorant. They should read more, open their eyes and stop filling the minds of our children with half-truths and utter rubbish, which is mostly regurgitated historical rhetoric not worthy of the paper it is written on.
“Early references to the first discovery of gold are essentially legendary or mythical. The Chronicum Alexandrinum (AD 628) ascribes its discovery of gold to Mercury, the Roman god of merchandise and merchants, the son of Jupiter, or to Pisus. Similar legends and myths concerning the initial discovery of gold are referred to in the ancient literature of the Hindus (the Vedas) as well as in that of the ancient Chinese and other peoples.”
What more do we need in the form of support for what we read in the Sumerian tablets? Obviously Alexander's historians knew more than our historians do today, and they must have been familiar with the extensive library at Alexandria with its millions of books, lost to our modern historians. They did not hesitate calling the deities ‘gods’ while today's historians very quickly reduce them to ‘mythological’ figures.
Here is a little more of what history sources have to say about gold: “The discovery of the element we call gold is lost in antiquity.” This is not true. Here is an extract from a Sumerian tablet translated by Zecharia Sitchin: “Let gold from the waters be obtained, let it for salvation on Nibiru be tested.”
This was the first ever reference to gold in our ancient prehistory. Words spoken by Anu, the king of Nibiru, before they dispatched the Anunnaki to Earth to retrieve the gold. Do we just ignore these scripts and regard them as nonsense? Why would prehistoric men be so obsessed with gold that they wrote such elaborate stories about the metal? I contest that it would have been relevant, only if gold played a crucial role in their survival, and so it did. It was the main reason and the only reason why the Anunnaki were on Earth, and the only reason Humankind was created.
“The principal source of gold in primitive times was undoubtedly stream placers, although there is considerable evidence in certain gold belts in Egypt, India and other places. The Eluvial and alluvial placers were worked in the crudest manner by panning or the simplest form of sluicing. Exposed parts of friable veins were simply dug out, trenched, or pitted with the crudest of tools, stone hammers, antler picks, bone and wooden shovels. Only rarely were simple shafts, and drifts attempted and then only in the soft rocks of the zone o
f oxidation. Fire-setting was probably employed by the ancient Egyptians, Semites, Indians, and others to break up the hard quartz veins.”
Why would early humans want to break up gold-bearing rock, if they did not know how to extract gold from ore? They must have known the procedure otherwise they would not even have recognised gold deposits in ore. And we have evidence that they did use fire to break up the ore, so they must have known the rest of the complex procedure, including smelting at above 700° Celsius. But why be so surprised, the Sumerian tablets tell us exactly how they went about obtaining gold from ore and how they smelted it. “How a new metal from stones was extracted… to a place of melting and refining metals… ” the gold was taken.
Throughout the history of Humankind, where there was evidence of gold, new settlements erupted, bringing prosperity to some and desperation to others. In fact, it seems that if there was no evidence of gold from the earliest days of antiquity, civilisation would only show signs of development much later. All the earliest human settlements seem to go hand-in-hand with gold.
“Both small and large deposits that showed free gold visibly or in the pan were worked by slaves, convicts, and prisoners of war who were assigned by those in authority to the gold placers and mines.”
The term ‘mine’ is very relevant here, as most mine shafts are dug for the purpose of ore mining. And why would they have dug mine shafts like the ones in southern Africa 50,000 years ago and more, if they had no knowledge of ore mining?
“Early references to gold mining appear in ancient Egyptian codes, on stelae, in pictograms and inscriptions in the tombs of the Pharaohs. The most ancient geological map known, is from about the time of Seti I (circa 1320 BC) It shows roads, miners' houses, gold mines, quarries, auriferous mountains, and so on. The ancient Sumerian, Akkadian, Assyrian, and Babylonian civilisations utilized gold extensively, but their sources of the precious metal are relatively uncertain.”
This is not true! The clay tablets give us many references to gold, outlining the mining operations, processing, smelting and usage. But the historians who write such tripe about the history of gold are probably the same people who give the Egyptians credit for mining gold, but in the same sentence discredit that which the Egyptians held so dear… their gods… who gave them all the knowledge and wisdom, including that of mining for gold.
“References to gold and gold mining are numerous in the Old Testament of the Hebrews. Six sources of gold are mentioned in the Old Testament. They are Havilah, Ophir, Sheba, Midian, Uphaz, and Parvaim. The exact locations of all six have given rise to much speculation. Some authorities claim that all six sources are Arabian; others have suggested locations much farther afield.”
If only they would pay attention to those mystical ancient scriptures left behind for us to assimilate. But unfortunately those had been classified as mythology, so no sober historian could possibly admit that such fiction had influenced their professional opinion. There are very clear and detailed references to southern Africa or the “Abzu” as the place where the first gold in the world came from. It also happens to be where the first ‘primitive worker’ was put to work to mine the gold, and it also happens to be the Cradle of Humankind. Is this all not a little too coincidental?
There has been much speculation as to the location of Ophir, the fabulously rich land, filled with gold from which King Solomon's navy brought more than 34 metric tons of the metal to his kingdom. Kings 10:22 in the Old Testament mentions cargoes of sandalwood trees, precious stones, ivory, apes, and peacocks, suggesting the circumnavigation of Africa. Various references to Tarshish suggest that the gold may have come from Tharsis, a mining town in Spain.
Other favourite spots are East Africa and southern Africa, principally Zimbabwe, especially the ruins of Great Zimbabwe. The whole layout, design of the main residence, staff quarters, the art of building a stone structure without mortar, would have made a perfect master's residence for the ‘god’ Enki in the ‘Abzu’, as the clay tablets call it. Could this have been the head office of King Solomon's mines? Who occupied it thousands of years after Enki “built his place in the Abzu”. There is no shortage of mines in southern Africa and over the past 200 years of exploration over 500 ruins have been discovered in what was called the land of Monomotapa. This ancient land stretched from the coast of Mozambique, inland and included modern-day Zimbabwe. Various authorities such as Bruce, Huet, Quartremere and Guillain, as well as the great majority of later writers on the Zimbabwe ruins, favour the claims that Monomotapa (Zimbabwe) was the Ophir of scripture. There is also a clear distinction between a much ‘older’ Great Zimbabwe and all the newer structures which were built in much later times. Could this be a repetition of the Pyramid symptom? The original structures were built by the prehistoric Anunnaki under the leadership of Enki, as his home in the Abzu (southern African mining region). Thousands of years later, just as in the case of the pyramids, kings of the biblical times, Phoenicians and Himyarites built their own new structures, which do not quite meet the style and quality of the original? In the ‘Adapted Excerpts’ from The Ancient Ruins of Rhodesia by R.N. Hall and W.G. Neal, 1904, we read about a “first or older” Zimbabwe and a more recent one. The scholars write that “massive structures which, while following generally the first Zimbabwe type, have been built in three or more high-terraced tiers rising to the summit of the hills, surrounding them, and sometimes completely covering them.” They tell us that "this ‘wedding cake" feature, as it has been termed, is absent in all Zimbabwe ruins built in the first period. Yet all these later Zimbabwe ruins present all the evidence of having been erected by nature-worshippers, and contain the orientated temple “open to heaven,” the sacred circle, the conical towers “the high places”, the monoliths, and every evidence of Phallic worship. This class of Zimbabwe is represented, among many others, by Dhlo-dhlo, Regina, Meteme, and Khami people.