The Randall Garrett Omnibus: Eleven SF Classics

by Randall Garrett

  "Your Effulgence may sit at my right hand,” said the commander pleasantly.

  CHAPTER XIV

  As MacDonald said of Robert Wilson, “This is not an account of how Boosterism came to Arcadia.” It's a devil of a long way from it. And once the high point of a story has been reached and passed, it is pointless to prolong it too much. The capture of the Greatest Noble broke the power of the Empire of the Great Nobles forever. The loyal subjects were helpless without a leader, and the disloyal ones, near the periphery of the Empire, didn't care. The crack Imperial troops simply folded up and went home. The Greatest Noble went on issuing orders, and they were obeyed; the people were too used to taking orders from authority to care whether they were really the Greatest Noble's own idea or not.

  In a matter of months, two hundred men had conquered an empire, with a loss of thirty-five or forty men. Eventually, they had to execute the old Greatest Noble and put his more tractable nephew on the throne, but that was a mere incident.

  Gold? It flowed as though there were an endless supply. The commander shipped enough back on the first load to make them all wealthy.

  The commander didn't go back home to spend his wealth amid the luxuries of the Imperial court, even though Emperor Carl appointed him to the nobility. That sort of thing wasn't the commander's meat. There, he would be a fourth-rate noble; here, he was the Imperial Viceroy, responsible only to the distant Emperor. There, he would be nothing; here, he was almost a king.

  Two years after the capture of the Greatest Noble, he established a new capital on the coast and named it Kingston. And from Kingston he ruled with an iron hand.

  As has been intimated, this was not Arcadia. A year after the founding of Kingston, the old capital was attacked, burned, and almost fell under siege, due to a sudden uprising of the natives under the new Greatest Noble, who had managed to escape. But the uprising collapsed because of the approach of the planting season; the warriors had to go back home and plant their crops or the whole of the agriculture-based country would starve-except the invading Earthmen.

  Except in a few instances, the natives were never again any trouble.

  But the commander-now the Viceroy-had not seen the end of his troubles.

  He had known his limitations, and realized that the governing of a whole planet-or even one continent-was too much for one man when the population consists primarily of barbarians and savages. So he had delegated the rule of a vast area to the south to another-a Lieutenant commander James, known as “One-Eye,” a man who had helped finance the original expedition, and had arrived after the conquest.

  One-Eye went south and made very small headway against the more barbaric tribes there. He did not become rich, and he did not achieve anywhere near the success that the Viceroy had. So he came back north with his army and decided to unseat the Viceroy and take his place. That was five years after the capture of the Greatest Noble.

  One-Eye took Center City, the old capital, and started to work his way northward, toward Kingston. The Viceroy's forces met him at a place known as Salt Flats and thoroughly trounced him. He was captured, tried for high treason, and executed.

  One would think that the execution ended the threat of Lieutenant commander James, but not so. He had a son, and he had had followers.

  CHAPTER XV

  Nine years. Nine years since the breaking of a vast empire. It really didn't seem like it. The Viceroy looked at his hands. They were veined and thin, and the callouses were gone. Was he getting soft, or just getting old? A little bit-no, a great deal of both.

  He sat in his study, in the Viceregal Palace at Kingston, chewing over the events of the past weeks. Twice, rumors had come that he was to be assassinated. He and two of his councilors had been hanged in effigy in the public square not long back. He had been snubbed publicly by some of the lesser nobles.

  Had he ruled harshly, or was it just jealousy? And was it, really, as some said, caused by the Southerners and the followers of Young Jim?

  He didn't know. And sometimes, it seemed as if it didn't matter.

  Here he was, sitting alone in his study, when he should have gone to a public function. And he had stayed because of fear of assassination.

  Was it—

  There was a knock at the door.

  "Come in."

  A servant entered. “Sir Martin is here, my lord."

  The Viceroy got to his feet. “Show him in, by all means."

  Sir Martin, just behind the servant, stepped in, smiling, and the Viceroy returned his smile. “Well, everything went off well enough without you,” said Sir Martin.

  "Any sign of trouble?"

  "None, my lord; none whatsoever. The—"

  "Damn!” the Viceroy interrupted savagely. “I should have known! What have I done but display my cowardice? I'm getting yellow in my old age!"

  Sir Martin shook his head. “Cowardice, my lord? Nothing of the sort. Prudence, I should call it. By the by, the judge and a few others are coming over.” He chuckled softly. “We thought we might talk you out of a meal."

  The Viceroy grinned widely. “Nothing easier. I suspected all you hangers-on would come around for your handouts. Come along, my friend; we'll have a drink before the others get here."

  * * * *

  There were nearly twenty people at dinner, all, presumably, friends of the Viceroy. At least, it is certain that they were friends in so far as they had no part in the assassination plot. It was a gay party; the Viceroy's friends were doing their best to cheer him up, and were succeeding pretty well. One of the nobles, known for his wit, had just essayed a somewhat off-color jest, and the others were roaring with laughter at the punch line when a shout rang out.

  There was a sudden silence around the table.

  "What was that?” asked someone. “What did—"

  "Help!” There was the sound of footsteps pounding up the stairway from the lower floor.

  "Help! The Southerners have come to kill the Viceroy!"

  From the sounds, there was no doubt in any of the minds of the people seated around the table that the shout was true. For a moment, there was shock. Then panic took over.

  There were only a dozen or so men in the attacking party; if the “friends” of the Viceroy had stuck by him, they could have held off the assassins with ease.

  But no one ran to lock the doors that stood between the Viceroy and his enemies, and only a few drew their weapons to defend him. The others fled. Getting out of a window from the second floor of a building isn't easy, but fear can lend wings, and, although none of them actually flew down, the retreat went fast enough.

  Characteristically, the Viceroy headed, not for the window, but for his own room, where his armor-long unused, except for state functions-hung waiting in the closet. With him went Sir Martin.

  But there wasn't even an opportunity to get into the armor. The rebel band charged into the hallway that led to the bedroom, screaming: “Death to the Tyrant! Long live the Emperor!"

  It was personal anger, then, not rebellion against the Empire which had appointed the ex-commander to his post as Viceroy.

  "Where is the Viceroy? Death to the Tyrant!” The assassins moved in.

  Swords in hand, and cloaks wrapped around their left arms, Sir Martin and the Viceroy moved to meet the oncoming attackers.

  "Traitors!” bellowed the Viceroy. “Cowards! Have you come to kill me in my own house?"

  Parry, thrust! Parry, thrust! Two of the attackers fell before the snake-tongue blade of the fighting Viceroy. Sir Martin accounted for two more before he fell in a flood of his own blood.

  The Viceroy was alone, now. His blade flickered as though inspired, and two more died under its tireless onslaught. Even more would have died if the head of the conspiracy, a supporter of Young Jim named Rada, hadn't pulled a trick that not even the Viceroy would have pulled.

  Rada grabbed one of his own men and shoved him toward the Viceroy's sword, impaling the hapless man upon that deadly blade.

  And,
in the moment while the Viceroy's weapon was buried to the hilt in an enemy's body, the others leaped around the dying man and ran their blades through the Viceroy.

  He dropped to the floor, blood gushing from half a dozen wounds.

  Even so, his fighting heart still had seconds more to beat. As he propped himself up on one arm, the assassins stood back; even they recognized that they had killed something bigger and stronger than they. A better man than any of them lay dying at their feet.

  He clawed with one hand at the river of red that flowed from his pierced throat and then fell forward across the stone floor. With his crimson hand, he traced the great symbol of his Faith on the stone-the Sign of the Cross. He bent his head to kiss it, and, with a final cry of “Jesus!” he died. At the age of seventy, it had taken a dozen men to kill him with treachery, something all the hell of nine years of conquest and rule had been unable to do.

  And thus died Francisco Pizarro, the Conqueror of Peru.

  TO BE READ AFTER YOU HAVE FINISHED “DESPOILERS OF THE GOLDEN EMPIRE."

  Dear John,

  It has been brought to my attention, by those who have read the story, that “Despoilers of the Golden Empire” might conceivably be charged with being a “reader cheater"-i.e., that it does not play fair with the reader, but leads him astray by means of false statements. Naturally, I feel it me bounden duty to refute such scurrilous and untrue affronts, and thus save meself from opprobrium.

  Therefore, I address what follows to the interested reader:

  It cannot be denied that you must have been misled when you read the story; indeed, I'd be the last to deny it, since I intended that you should be misled. What I most certainly do deny is any implication that such misleading was accomplished by the telling of untruths. A fiction writer is, by definition, a professional liar; he makes his living by telling interesting lies on paper and selling the results to the highest bidder for publication. Since fiction writing is my livelihood, I cannot and will not deny that I am an accomplished liar-indeed, almost an habitual one. Therefore, I feel some small pique when, on the one occasion on which I stick strictly to the truth, I am accused of fraud. Pfui! say I; I refute you. “I deny the allegation, and I defy the alligator!"

  To prove my case, I shall take several examples from “Despoilers” and show that the statements made are perfectly valid. (Please note that I do not claim any absolute accuracy for such details as quoted dialogue, except that none of the characters lies. I simply contend that the story is as accurate as any other good historical novelette. I also might say here that any resemblance between “Despoilers” and any story picked at random from the late lamented Planet Stories is purely intentional and carefully contrived.)

  Take the first sentence:

  "In the seven centuries that had elapsed since the Second Empire had been founded on the shattered remnants of the First, the nobles of the Imperium had come slowly to realize that the empire was not to be judged by the examples of its predecessor."

  Perfectly true. By the time of the Renaissance, the nobles of the Holy Roman Empire knew that their empire was not just a continuation of the Roman Empire, but a new entity. The old Roman Empire had collapsed in the Sixth Century, and the Holy Roman Empire, which was actually a loose confederation of Germanic states, did not come into being until A. D. 800, when Karl der Grosse (Charlemagne) was crowned emperor by the Pope.

  Anyone who wishes to quibble that the date should be postponed for a century and a half, until the time of the German prince, Otto, may do so; I will ignore him.

  A few paragraphs later, I said:

  "Without power, neither Civilization nor the Empire could hold itself together, and His Universal Majesty, the Emperor Carl, well knew it. And power was linked solidly to one element, one metal..."

  The metal, as I said later on, was Gold-197.

  By “power,” of course, I meant political and economic power. In the Sixteenth Century, that's what almost anyone would have meant. If you chose to interpret it as meaning “energy per unit time,” why, that's real tough.

  Why nail the “power metal” down to an isotope of gold with an atomic weight of 197? Because that's the only naturally occurring isotope of gold.

  The “Emperor Carl” was, of course, Charles V, who also happened to be King of Spain, and therefore Pizarro's sovereign. I Germanicized his name, as I did the others-Francisco Pizarro becomes “Frank,” et cetera-but this is perfectly legitimate. After all, the king's name in Latin, which was used in all state papers, was Carolus; the Spanish called him Carlos, and history books in English call him Charles. Either Karl or Carl is just as legitimate as Charles, certainly, and the same applies to the other names in the story.

  As to the title “His Universal Majesty,” that's exactly what he was called. It is usually translated as “His Catholic Majesty,” but the word Catholic comes from the Greek katholikos, meaning “universal.” And, further on in the story, when the term “Universal Assembly” is used, it is a direct translation of the Greek term, Ekklesia Katholikos, and is actually a better translation than “Catholic Church,” since the English word church comes from the Greek kyriakon, meaning “the house of the Lord"-in other words, a church building, not the organization as a whole.

  Toward the end of Chapter One, I wrote:

  "Throughout the Empire, research laboratories worked tirelessly at the problem of transmuting commoner elements into Gold-197, but thus far none of the processes was commercially feasible."

  I think you will admit that the alchemists never found a method of transmuting the elements-certainly none which was commercially feasible.

  In Chapter Three, the statement that Pizarro left his home-Spain-with undermanned ships, and had to sneak off illegally before the King's inspectors checked up on him, is historically accurate. And who can argue with the statement that “there wasn't a scientist worthy of the name in the whole outfit"?

  At the beginning of Chapter Four, you'll find:

  "Due to atmospheric disturbances, the ship's landing was several hundred miles from the point the commander had originally picked...” and “...the ship simply wasn't built for atmospheric navigation."

  The adverse winds which drove Pizarro's ships off course were certainly “atmospheric disturbances,” and I defy anyone to prove that a Sixteenth Century Spanish galleon was built for atmospheric navigation.

  And I insist that using the term “carrier” instead of “horse,” while misleading, is not inaccurate. However, I would like to know just what sort of picture the term conjured up in the reader's mind. In Chapter Ten, in the battle scene, you'll find the following:

  "The combination [of attackers from both sides], plus the fact that the heavy armor was a little unwieldy, overbalanced him [the commander]. He toppled to the ground with a clash of steel as he and the carrier parted company.

  "Without a human hand at its controls, the carrier automatically moved away from the mass of struggling fighters and came to a halt well away from the battle."

  To be perfectly honest, it's somewhat of a strain on my mind to imagine anyone building a robot-controlled machine as good as all that, and then giving the drive such poor protection that he can fall off of it.

  One of the great screams from my critics has been occasioned by the fact that I referred several times to the Spaniards as “Earthmen.” I can't see why. In order not to confuse the reader, I invariably referred to them as the “invading Earthmen,” so as to make a clear distinction between them and the native Earthmen, or Incas, who were native to Peru. If this be treachery, then make the most of it.

  In other words, I contend that I simply did what any other good detective story writer tries to do-mislead the reader without lying to him. Agatha Christie's “The Murder of Roger Ackroyd,” for instance, uses the device of telling the story from the murderer's viewpoint, in the first person, without revealing that he is the murderer. Likewise, John Dickson Carr, in his “Nine Wrong Answers” finds himself forced to deny that he has li
ed to the reader, although he admits that one of his characters certainly lied. Both Carr and Christie told the absolute truth-within the framework of the story-and left it to the reader to delude himself.

  It all depends on the viewpoint. The statement, “We all liked Father Goodheart very much” means one thing when said by a member of his old parish in the United States, which he left to become a missionary. It means something else again when uttered by a member of the tribe of cannibals which the good Father attempted unsuccessfully to convert.

  Similarly, such terms as “the gulf between the worlds,” “the new world,” and “the known universe” have one meaning to a science-fictioneer, and another to a historian. Semantics, anyone?

  In Chapter Ten, right at the beginning, there is a conversation between Commander Frank and Frater Vincent, and “agent of the Assembly” (read: priest). If the reader will go back over that section, keeping in mind the fact that what they are “actually” talking about are the Catholic Church and the Christian religion as seen from the viewpoint of a couple of fanatically devout Sixteenth Century Spaniards, he will understand the method I used in presenting the whole story.

  Let me quote:

  "Mentally, the commander went through the symbol-patterns that he had learned as a child-the symbol-patterns that brought him into direct contact with the Ultimate Power, the Power that controlled not only the spinning of atoms and the whirling of electrons in their orbits, but the workings of probability itself."

  Obviously, he is reciting the Pater Noster and the Ave Maria. The rest of the sentence is self-explanatory.

  So is the following:

  "Once indoctrinated into the teachings of the Universal Assembly, any man could tap that power to a greater or lesser degree, depending on his mental control and ethical attitude. At the top level, a first-class adept could utilize that Power for telepathy, psychokinesis, levitation, teleportation, and other powers that the commander only vaguely understood."

  It doesn't matter whether you believe in the miracles attributed to many of the Saints; Pizarro certainly did. His faith in that Power was as certain as the modern faith in the power of the atomic bomb.