The Black World of UFOs: Exempt from Disclosure
Page 17
There are very few details available on this device and most of the questions were answered with, “That’s classified.” As mentioned earlier, we believe this device makes use of H5 which is then used as a catalyst to extract energy from the vacuum thereby providing an energy output for the ED.
H5 is very unstable, but reportedly not for Alpha Team 7. Regarding HOL-3, our source wouldn’t say, and added it was highly classified and the same for Da-4, or classified.
The Cash-Landrum Case Revisited
Figure 7: Artist James Neff’s rendition of the Cash-Landrum incident.
In December 1980, Betty Cash, Vickie Landrum and her grandson Colby Landrum, were driving along a road in Huffman, TX, when they saw a bright light in the sky. After driving a little more along the road, they came across a large diamond shaped UFO hovering over the road belching fire out of the bottom. Since the flames were blocking the road, they had to stop the car about 65 yards away from the craft and the three of them got out. Vickie and Colby stayed by the car while Betty went on to get a closer look. She spent a long time gazing at it, but then her skin began to burn because of the heat from the flames (Heat and flames generated by an air -cooled nuclear reactor and/or Doppler shifting of the radiation due to the anti-gravity field?). She returned to the car as the object began to rise and then a large number of unmarked black helicopters chased. When they got home, they started suffering from sunburn, diarrhea and vomiting.
Rick Doty and others have stated that the Cash-Landrum (CL) case of December 29, 1980 was one of our reverse-engineered craft gone out of control (7). From what has been learned it seems this craft was a very primitive attempt by the US government to find a fast track, secret way to get us into space and off to the stars using anti-gravity as the propulsion mechanism (part of Project Snowbird?). But, according to the LANL contact, nothing worked and they had to start all over again. As the contact had said, there were problems with the materials, propulsion system, and understanding the alien’s power system. Edward Teller had supposedly identified the power system as far back as 1957. But as to how it really works–other than the use of H5– is still a mystery according to that DIA document in Figure 2.
However, that plus the other DIA documents must be real enough for an FBI investigation in 2004:
http://www.ufoconspiracy.com/reports/doty-green-fbi.htm
And, according to certain sources there is a top secret astronaut corps at Area 51 that flies these reverse-engineered craft. Donald Rumsfeld (ex Secretary of Defense under Bush II) who is a former Naval Aviator has a reported keen interest in this corps.
The story these documents and drawings tell is stunning and shocking if true. We have no way of verifying much of this material except for the shuttle astronauts. Because so much of the material appears to remain highly classified and sensitive, it is extremely hard for these authors to explain much more than what has been presented. From what we are hearing it would take an “act of god” to force the government to declassify anything like what the readers have learned in these chapters.
Having focused here, let us pursue the ideas of reverse-engineering even further by venturing out to Area 51-S4 and attempt to separate fact from fiction.
References/Footnotes
(1) End of a War: Beginning of a Laboratory, 2 /DIVISION, 1945-1949:
http://www.sandia.gov/recordsmgmt/zdiv.html
(2) BCS (Bardeen, Cooper, and Schnetter) theory of electron pairs:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooper_pair
(3a) “Experimental Detection of the Gravitomagnetic London Moment,” 2006. By-- Martin Tajmar, Florin Plesescu, Klaus Marhold & Clovis J. de Matos.
(b) Gravity/Antigravity “Forces”
Strictly speaking, in the GR point of view there are no gravitational “forces,” but rather (in the words of GR theorist John Wheeler) “Matter tells space how to curve, and space tells matter how to move [21].”
As a result, Newton’s law of gravitational attraction to a central mass is therefore interpreted in terms of the space-time structure as expressed in terms of the metric tensor coefficients, in this case as expressed in Eq. (4) above. Therefore, in terms of the metric coefficients gravitational attraction in this case derives from the condition that g00 < 1 , g11 > 1.
As to the possibility for generating “antigravitational forces,” it was noted that in equation (5) inclusion of the effects of charge led to metric tensor contributions counter to the effects of mass, i.e., to electrogravitic repulsion. This reveals that conditions under which, say, the signs of the coefficients g00 and g11 could be reversed would be considered (loosely) as antigravitational in nature.
Advanced Space Propulsion Based On Vacuum (SpaceTime Metric) Engineering, JBIS, Vol. 63, pp.82-89, 2010
Harold E. Puthoff, Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin, 11855 Research Blvd., Austin, Texas 78759, USA
puthoff_jbis.pdf (application/pdf Object)
(4) “The Day the Earth Stood Still:”
http:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Day_the_Earth_Stood_Still
(5a) “A super heavy isotope of hydrogen that has four neutrons and a proton in its nucleus has been detected for the first time. Physicists have been attempting to create hydrogen-5–which is thought to exist inside stars–for over 40 years.”
http://physicsweb.org/article/news/5/8/15
(b) Spherical reactor (hydrogen isotope type, H5?) connected to the propulsion motors.
http://www.ufoconspiracy.com/reports/flyingSauceranalyticalreportsept-47.pdf
(6a) List of astronauts on the shuttle fights:
http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/Bios/htmlbios/mcarthur.html
http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/Bios/htmlbios/tanner.html
http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/Bios/htmlbios/wilcutt.html
(b) Was it a classified communications device or (Energy Device) found in the Columbia Shuttle wreckage?
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1247.htm
(7) "Diamond in the Sky: The Betty Cash and Vickie Landrum,” December 29, 1980 UFO incident:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cash-Landrum_incident
Chapter 4
AREA 51 (WATERTOWN, THE RANCH), S4 (SHADY REST, THE DESERT DISNEYLAND)
A Secret Desert Mythology
According to the conventional history, the origin of the Groom Lake test facility can be traced to the Central Intelligence Agency’s Project “AQUATONE” that encompassed the development of the Lockheed U-2 (1). It was capable of flying at high altitudes while carrying sophisticated cameras and sensors; the U-2 was equipped with a single jet engine and long, tapered straight wings. The CIA did not want to test fly the new aircraft at Edwards AFB or Palmdale (A.F. Plant 42) in California. For security reasons, a more remote site was required. At the request of U-2 designer Clarence L. “Kelly” Johnson of Lockheed Skunk Works, project pilot Tony LeVier scouted numerous locations around the southwestern United States for a new test site. The other rumored reason, not officially acknowledged, was to eventually test and fly recovered alien craft.
Richard M. Bissell Jr., who was director of the AQUATONE program, reviewed 50 potential sites with his Air Force liaison, Col. Osmond J. “Ozzie” Ritland. None of the sites seemed to meet the stringent security requirements of the program. Ritland, however, recalled “a little X-shaped field” in southern Nevada that he had flown over many times during his involvement with nuclear weapons tests.
The airstrip, called Nellis auxiliary field No.1, was located just off the eastern side of Groom Dry Lake, about 100 miles north of Las Vegas. It was also just outside the Atomic Energy Commission’s (AEC) nuclear proving ground at Yucca Flat.
In April 1955, LeVier, Johnson, Bissell, and Ritland flew to Nevada on a two-day survey of the most promising lake beds. After examining Groom Lake, it was obvious that this was an ideal location for the test site. It offered excellent flying weather and unparalleled remoteness. The abandoned airfield that Ritland had remembered was totally overgrown and unusable, but the l
ake-bed was a different story. Bissell later described the hard-packed playa as “a perfect natural landing field ... as smooth as a billiard table without anything being done to it.”
Kelly Johnson had originally balked at the choice of Groom Lake because it was farther from Burbank than he would have liked, and because of its proximity to the Nevada Proving Ground (later renamed the Nevada Test Site). Johnson was understandably concerned about conducting a flight test program adjacent to an active nuclear test site. In fact, Groom Lake lay directly in the primary “downwind” path of radioactive fallout from aboveground shots. Johnson obviously didn’t understand the full reasoning behind the choice for Groom Lake meaning the research and development on recovered alien craft and artifacts.
Johnson ultimately accepted Ritland’s recommendation because AEC security restrictions would help shield the operation from public view. Bissell secured a presidential action adding the Groom Lake area to the AEC proving ground.
During the last week of April, Johnson met with CIA officials in Washington, D.C., and discussed progress on the base and the AQUATONE program. His proposal to name the base “Paradise Ranch” was accepted. It was an ironic choice that, he later admitted, was “a dirty trick to lure workers to the program.” The U-2 became known as “The Angel from Paradise Ranch.” The base itself was usually just called “The Ranch” by those who worked there.
In May, LeVier, Johnson, and Skunk Works foreman Dorsey Kammerer returned to Groom Lake. Using a compass and surveying equipment, they laid out a 5,000-foot, north-south runway on the southwest corner of the lake-bed. They also staked out a general area for buildings and then flew back to Burbank.
On May 18, 1955, Seth R. Woodruff Jr., Manager of the AEC Las Vegas field office, announced that he had “instructed the Reynolds Electrical and Engineering Co., Inc. [REECo] to begin preliminary work on a small, satellite Nevada Test Site installation.” He noted that work was already underway at the location “a few miles northeast of Yucca Flats and within the Las Vegas Bombing and Gunnery Range.”
Woodruff stated that the installation would include “a runway, dormitories, and a few other buildings for housing equipment.” The facility was described as “essentially temporary.” The press release was distributed to 18 media outlets in Nevada and Utah including a dozen newspapers, four radio stations, and two television stations. This, in effect was Area 51’s public birth announcement.
Watertown, the U-2 and Exotic Technology
CIA, U.S. Air Force, and Lockheed support personnel for the U-2 began arriving in July 1955, and the test site soon acquired a new name. During the 1950s, the site appeared in all official documents as “Watertown.” The site was named after Watertown, NY, the birthplace of CIA Director Allen Dulles (Section 2, Chapter 2). To this day, Watertown is listed as a member of Alamo Township in Lincoln County, NV. Dulles also reportedly picked Watertown to do reverse engineering and testing on recovered UFO artifacts like those recovered in the New Mexico desert during July 1947. Tim Cooper’s mother related a story from a chemist friend who said she saw none other than Allen Dulles and Albert Einstein together at Area 51 in 1954. Area 51 before, ‘55? See last section.
In October 1955, a reporter from the Las Vegas Review-Journal requested a progress report on the Watertown project. On 17 October, Col. Alfred D. Starbird at AEC headquarters issued a statement through Kenner F. Hertford of the Albuquerque Operations Office.
“Construction at the Nevada Test Site installation a few miles north of Yucca Flat which was announced last spring were continuing. Data secured to date has indicated a need for limited additional facilities and modifications of the existing installation. The additional work which will not be completed until sometime in 1956 is being done by the Reynolds Electrical and Engineering Company, Incorporated, under the direction of the Atomic Energy Commission’s Las Vegas branch office.”
So, publicly there was nothing really secret about the existence of Area 51 in 1955 and immediately there after. What was secret were the details of testing and development of exotic technology and then there were those technologies that “didn’t exist.” But, by September 1978, Area 51 had disappeared from maps of the NTS produced by the Department of Energy (DOE), but why? Was there a sudden need to test “don’t exist” hardware? We can only speculate.
In 1961, it became more apparent that the U-2 would soon be vulnerable to hostile missiles, so the CIA sought a successor that could fly higher and faster and be less visible to radar. Once again, Lockheed was selected to build a new reconnaissance aircraft. The CIA ironically named the project “OXCART.” Lockheed’s new airplane was designated the “A-12,” with the “A” standing for “Archangel.”
All 15 A-12 aircraft were initially based at Groom Lake, although some were later deployed to Japan to perform reconnaissance flights over Southeast Asia. While the aircraft were operated by the CIA’s 1129th Special Activities Squadron, Lockheed pilots conducted most of the test flights (“Roadrunners”).
In that same year, new hangars and housing units were erected. Facilities in the main cantonment area included workshops, buildings for storage and administration, a commissary, control tower, and fire stations. By early 1962, a fuel tank farm was ready for use. Recreational facilities included a gymnasium, movie theatre, nine-hole golf course, and a softball diamond.
Starting in November 1977, there was a succession of what would eventually be publicly acknowledged programs. These included the YF-117A STARS aircraft, the Lockheed SENIOR PROM stealthy cruise missile, Northrop AGM-137 Tri-Service Standoff Attack Missile (TSSAM), McDonnell Douglas/Boeing “Bird of Prey” manned technology demonstrator, and various unmanned air vehicles and all operational low-observable U.S. aircraft, to include the F-117A, B-2, and F/A-22A.
Those Saucer Men?
The secret nature of the base has bred rumor and speculation among die-hard UFO believers that the U.S. government was hiding captured extraterrestrial spacecraft, or even aliens (dead and alive) at the site. Such stories have been circulating since at least the late 1970s or the same time frame Groom Lake had disappeared from government maps. Starting in 1989, groups of UFO believers began to camp out near the Nellis Range boundaries near Groom Lake to watch for “flying saucers.” The thinking was that if all the rumors about stealth technology and exotic hypersonic aircraft turned out to be true, why not crashed saucers and alien bodies?
By extension, we believe NASA was involved in reverse engineering propulsion work at Watertown (Area 51) since the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 allowed NASA officials and technician’s access to restricted data (Atomic Energy Act of 1954). The SOM1-01 document suggests (2) that alien hardware and propulsion items were studied at Site 4, Groom Lake in the 1950s, see page 190. We know NACA (3) cooperated with the CIA projects at Area 51, and in 1958 Eisenhower signed into law the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 reconstituting NACA (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics) authorizing the AEC, DOD, and NASA to share restricted data. The Tonopah test range (Nellis AFB) and Papoose Lake range area became part of Groom Lake Area 51 facility (part of the AEC Indian Springs, Nevada Proving Ground) sometime in the late 1950s.
In the reverse engineering of these reported recovered UFOs, the Air Force and others were reportedly required to design our own control systems around the “alien” technology. It was said that the “alien” control and power systems (i.e., Crystal Rectangle) were so far advanced that we had no hope of understanding them even if we were to get a working device within a reasonable amount of time (reference Chapter 3). The power plants were reported to be nuclear because we didn’t understand the alien’s power system. The Cash Landrum case of December 1980 (last chapter), was said to have been one such reverse-engineered device which had all sorts of problems (4), (5).
Comments were made that a few of these reverse-engineered prototypes had been lost in the Gulf of Mexico due to problems with the “black boxes.” The black boxes controlled the “anti-gravity force
fields” around the device or craft. This is probably one good reason why we still fly space shuttles and their forecasted updates which are still on the drawing board. Each reverse-engineered craft is said to have cost up to $5 billion with a reported total cost for 17 each of ~ $85 billion all in “black funds,” quite a hefty hunk of change (6). But, after what our confidential LANL source said in Chapter 3, was it all a waste of money?
Albert Einstein, Robert Oppenheimer and Theodore von Karman were reported to be members of the Scientific Advisory Group who dealt with reverse engineering efforts (See Twining’s “White Hot” report (7) and Air Accident Report). Is this is the same “Advisory Group” mentioned by others today in connection with reverse engineering? What’s more interesting is a draft report written by Albert Einstein and Robert Oppenheimer in June of 1947 (same month the ED was reportedly recovered, see previous Chapter) (8). This document establishes a UFO connection for both Einstein and Oppenheimer weeks before the reported Roswell crash of July 1947 (refer back to Section 1, Chapter 2). Also, there are reportedly thousands of pages of unreleased notes, letters and papers that belonged to Albert Einstein which are now kept by the Einstein family. Publicly available documents are also available from the Einstein archives online (9).