B004BDOJZ4 EBOK

by Susanna GREGORY

  ‘Yes,’ agreed Thurloe. ‘You should. The man was a spy, after all.’

  Leybourn looked suitably chastened. ‘I owe you an apology for declining to visit gaols when you asked, too, Tom. Thurloe tells me you have a better reason than most for wanting to avoid them.’

  ‘Why did you refuse?’ asked Chaloner curiously.

  ‘Rats,’ replied Leybourn in a low voice. He shuddered. ‘I cannot abide them, and the ones in Newgate are notoriously bold.’

  Chaloner went back to his analysis. ‘I did not kill May, though, no matter what Williamson thinks. I hoped to resolve our differences without bloodshed.’

  ‘That would have been impossible,’ said Thurloe. ‘May’s hatred of you was fanatical, as attested by this ridiculous business with stolen corpses.’

  ‘Why did Scot kill him?’ asked Leybourn. ‘I still do not understand. Was it to save you?’

  ‘No – I had already disarmed him when Scot fired his dag. May had to die because he had just threatened to expose Scot and Eaffrey’s plans to defraud Behn.’

  ‘How did he know what they intended to do?’ asked Leybourn doubtfully. ‘He was a dismal spy, and could never have learned such a closely guarded secret.’

  ‘I cannot prove it, but I believe the man with the scarred neck – who was one of Williamson’s officers – found out by chance,’ said Chaloner. ‘Like Eaffrey, he had also been charged to monitor Behn’s activities by worming his way into his confidences, and he must have overheard a conversation between Scot and Eaffrey in Behn’s house. He told May about it, so Scot killed them both.’

  Leybourn blew out his cheeks in a sigh. ‘Tell me again what happened in Chyrurgeons’ Hall last week. I should not have tested so many of Prynne’s strong wines that day, because I still do not understand how the murder of Webb was connected to what those surgeons were doing.’

  ‘It was not connected,’ said Chaloner. ‘Or not significantly so. It all started when Silence Webb insulted Bristol at the Guinea Company dinner. Bristol immediately decided to avenge himself. He baulked at harming a woman, but her unpleasant husband was fair game, so he ordered Dillon and Fanning to oblige. He wrote a note, spitefully signing it with Clarendon’s name.’

  ‘Then he had second thoughts, and sent Scot to stop them,’ said Thurloe, who had not been drunk when Chaloner had arrived to tell them how the case had been resolved. ‘But Scot decided to enact a little vengeance of his own – on Williamson for keeping his brother in the Tower.’

  ‘Scot witnessed Webb’s murder,’ continued Chaloner. ‘And then he wrote Bristol a letter, naming not only Dillon and Fanning as the culprits, but exposing several of Williamson’s best agents.’

  ‘Why did Scot pick your Garsfield alias for his letter?’ asked Leybourn. ‘Why not Heyden?’

  ‘He was being clever,’ said Chaloner. ‘Or thought he was. He chose that name – which I have only ever used in Ireland – to strengthen the apparent links between Webb’s death and the Castle Plot. That was probably why he included Fitz-Simons, too – like Dillon, he was a rebel. He had stressed the Irish connection in his letter, but it was suppressed – too politically sensitive, I suppose. Fortunately for me, Eaffrey intervened.’

  ‘Why did she do that?’ asked Leybourn.

  Chaloner looked away, and it was Thurloe who answered. ‘Because she was fond of Thomas, and was determined that nothing bad should happen to him.’

  ‘She was complicit in trying to have him accused of murdering Willys,’ Leybourn pointed out. ‘That is not keeping him out of harm’s way.’

  ‘That came later, when Thomas’s enquiries were coming too close for comfort. But even then, I do not think she would have left him to stew for long. She was a true friend and would have organised some kind of rescue or release.’

  ‘And Scot?’ asked Leybourn. ‘Was he a true friend, too?’

  ‘No,’ said Chaloner softly. ‘I misjudged him badly. I think he might well have shot me, had Eaffrey not grabbed the gun. Killing came easily to him, after all.’

  ‘Who did he kill?’ asked Leybourn. ‘Other than May and the scarred spy?’

  ‘Fitz-Simons, for a start,’ replied Thurloe. ‘Because he recognised Scot’s distinctive blue ink. The ink was a stupid mistake on Scot’s part, and shows he was losing his touch.’

  ‘No wonder he was keen to resign from the intelligence services,’ said Leybourn. ‘The release of his brother was probably a factor, but self-preservation played a role, too.’

  ‘Sarsfeild was another of his victims,’ continued Thurloe. ‘He dressed as a priest and killed him in Ludgate when he learned Thomas and I were investigating his alibi. He knew we would discover that Sarsfeild’s arrest was a case of mistaken identity, which would raise awkward questions about the rest of the letter. He strangled Sarsfeild in the hope that it would bring an end to our investigation.’

  ‘And the deaths of Fanning and Sarsfeild in their cells – for reasons unrelated to Webb – made Dillon think his master was tying loose ends,’ said Chaloner. ‘The reality was quite different, but it served to make Dillon more confident of his master’s power. He was deceived.’

  ‘He was deceived by the name of his master, too,’ said Leybourn, recalling one fact that was not lost in the drunken haze. ‘He thought it was Lord Clarendon, but it was actually Bristol.’

  ‘Then Scot killed Willys,’ said Thurloe. ‘He had discovered that Willys had sold guns to Irish rebels, but Willys tried to blackmail him by threatening to say Thomas was involved – a mistake of monumental proportion.’

  ‘Did he kill Holles, too?’ asked Leybourn.

  ‘That was Eaffrey,’ replied Thurloe. ‘In a ridiculous and pathetic misunderstanding, each was trying to probe the loyalty of the other. Eaffrey wanted to know whether Holles was going to be a danger to Thomas in the future – to find out whether he really had defected to Bristol. And Holles wanted to know whether Scot and Eaffrey would try to harm Clarendon by depriving him of a valued servant.’

  ‘It all happened so fast,’ said Chaloner unhappily. ‘Guns were out, and they both jumped to the wrong conclusions without giving themselves time to think. I keep running through the scene in my mind, trying to see if there was a way I could have averted the slaughter.’

  ‘There was nothing you could have done,’ said Thurloe gently. ‘Do not dwell on it.’

  ‘Meanwhile,’ said Leybourn, after a few minutes of silence, ‘all the barber-surgeons are guilty of is making themselves rich from conducting these Private Anatomies.’

  ‘Hardly!’ said Thurloe with a shudder of distaste. ‘Not only did they murder people for their corpses, but they were willing to accept any cadaver in good condition with no questions asked.’

  ‘Behn and Temple are innocent of everything, though,’ said Leybourn.

  ‘They promote slavery,’ said Chaloner. ‘Plus there is the fact that Behn is a foreign spy. He sends dispatches to his government every Tuesday, which he writes in cipher. Furthermore, he gave money to the Irish rebels, to help the Castle Plot succeed.’

  Thurloe glanced sharply at him. ‘How do you know that?’

  ‘Because, despite what Eaffrey believed, it was obvious that there was something suspect about the man. Maude saw him with Fanning once, and Fanning – like Dillon – was a committed insurgent. I intercepted and decoded one batch of messages and passed the information to Williamson.’

  ‘Behn is arrested for spying?’ asked Leybourn.

  ‘Unfortunately, he somehow learned the game was up, and escaped. Williamson is furious.’

  ‘I have a confession to make,’ said Thurloe sheepishly, when the Inn’s cat approached and wound around his legs. Chaloner was pleased to see it recovered. ‘It involves a certain tonic.’

  ‘I already know,’ said Chaloner. ‘It was you who poisoned me.’

  Leybourn gaped, while Thurloe looked reproachful. ‘I would not have put it quite like that. It makes it sound deliberate, and I assure you it was not. How did you guess
?’

  ‘First, we suspected Prynne, but Will disproved that by drinking his wine. Then it seemed obvious that Yates had done it, but his remit was to spy, not to kill. You, however, are very interested in cures and strong medicines, and you are always willing to try new ones. I suspect your manservant stops you from doing yourself too much harm, but Yates had sent him away. You added a new cure-all called Goddard’s Drops to one experiment, but those contain volatile oil of silk among other powerful ingredients. Wiseman says they are toxic in any quantity.’

  Thurloe nodded unhappily. ‘He was appalled when he knew what I had done. Still, I have learned my lesson and shall mix no more potions. I hope you bear me no grudge.’

  ‘No,’ said Chaloner. He sighed and looked up at the leafy branches swaying over his head. ‘I am not sure I want to work for Lord Clarendon any more. I cannot help him in his spat with Bristol, and it is only a matter of time before their followers start killing each other.’

  ‘He is still a powerful man, so do not abandon him just yet,’ advised Thurloe. ‘However, the Queen has noticed you at White Hall, and she has a spot of bother she wants investigated. Clarendon happened to mention that you know Portuguese, and she would like you to visit her tomorrow.’

  Chaloner regarded him uneasily. ‘I hope she does not ask me to spy on the King’s mistress. Lady Castlemaine is more dangerous than Williamson, May, Scot, Behn, Temple and Bristol put together.’

  A few miles away, a ship was sailing down the Thames on the Early tide. It was bound for Surinam, and carried a number of passengers, as well as a cargo of wool for the new colony. Eaffrey Johnson stood at the rail, arm-in-arm with Johan Behn. Behn was wearing warm clothes against the stiff breeze, and he looked bigger and bulkier than ever. He sighed his contentment.

  ‘We are finally on our way. These last few weeks have been tiresome, and I dislike being in a position where I do not know whom to trust. I did not approve of your friend from Holland, either. I think he might still be in love with you.’

  ‘I think I have successfully destroyed any lingering affection he might have held for me now,’ said Eaffrey, leaning against him. The wind was sharp, and made her eyes water. ‘When shall we marry?’

  ‘When we touch land in France. I am sure we will make each other happy.’

  Eaffrey nodded, although her eyes still watered furiously. ‘And you will forsake the Silences and the Maudes, and stay faithful to me? You have not forgotten the agreement you signed, which will see our marriage annulled to my advantage if you stray?’

  Behn waved an expansive hand. ‘They are nothing, a diversion. Did I tell you I paid that impecunious Wiseman five pounds to say you were dead when Holles shot at you? I had managed to spike one of the colonel’s dags, but I could not lay my hands on the second.’

  ‘Yes, you did mention it,’ said Eaffrey patiently. ‘Several times. You are very clever.’

  Behn preened at the praise. ‘I was terrified Heyden would catch on and tell everyone. He is too curious for his own good, and insisted on examining your “corpse”, even though I did my best to stop him. Still, you fooled him, because he has no idea you are still alive.’

  ‘Actually, Johan, he felt my neck for a pulse – and he has seen enough death to be aware that cadavers do not have one. He knows I am alive.’

  ‘No!’ whispered Behn, gloating triumph evaporating like a puff of steam. ‘What shall we do? Hire an assassin in France to deal with him? We cannot let him live, not if you want to be safe.’

  ‘Tom will not betray me,’ said Eaffrey softly.

  ‘How can you be sure?’ asked Behn worriedly.

  ‘Because I know him,’ replied Eaffrey. She turned slightly, and glanced at the elderly man who sat huddled in an old-fashioned woollen cloak nearby. It hid his bandaged shoulder. He shot her a brief smile, and then turned his pale eyes to the book he was reading: Musaeum Tradescantianum.

  Historical Note

  The quarrel between the Earl of Clarendon and George Digby, earl of Bristol was public and bitter. They had been allies in exile during the Commonwealth, but it did not take not long after the King’s Restoration in 1660 for their friendship to disintegrate. Their disparate personalities did not help. Bristol was gay, witty and fun-loving – a man of ‘irresponsible brilliance’; Clarendon was pompous, staid, respectable and something of a killjoy. They clashed when Clarendon dismissed Bristol from a post at the University of Oxford – in the distasteful bigotry of the time, Clarendon objected to a Catholic holding the position – and they disagreed violently about which European princess the King should marry. One of Clarendon’s most ardent supporters was his cousin, Sir Alan Brodrick. Brodrick was a Court debauchee, who never amounted to much, despite his kinsman’s patronage.

  Matters came to a head when the blustering Sir Richard Temple arrived on the scene in 1663. He offered to manipulate parliament on the King’s behalf, and allegedly recruited Bristol to help him. Fur flew once details of the plan emerged. The King was furious at the presumption, and ordered Temple to explain himself in the House of Commons. Temple lost his official posts, but survived to side against Clarendon in another dispute in the late 1660s. Bristol did not fare so well. He made a desperate attempt to have Clarendon impeached for treason in June 1663, but it failed miserably – mostly because the charges were manifestly false – and the incident left his reputation in tatters. The Commons claimed its time was being wasted, and the King ordered Bristol’s arrest. Bristol fled the country, and only emerged from hiding when Clarendon finally fell from grace in 1667. One of the charges of a later impeachment was that Clarendon had stolen black marble from St Paul’s Cathedral to use on the fabulous new Clarendon House in Piccadilly.

  The Middlesex County Records of 1663 tell of a case in which one Matthew Webb was stabbed in the chest with a rapier, and nine gentlemen of the parish of St Martin-in-the-Fields were accused of his murder. Of these, William Dillon, Thomas Sarsfeild (written as ‘Garsfield’ in some sources) and Richard Fanning were sentenced to hang; George Willis, Gregory Burne, Walter Fitz-Gerrard and Laurence Clarke produced a King’s Pardon; and Richard Fitz-Simons and Peter Terrell disappear from the records altogether.

  Shortly after his execution – with a silken noose, as was his prerogative as a gentleman – Dillon was dissected at a Public Anatomy demonstration at ‘Chyrurgeons’ Hall’. Samuel Pepys was among the audience, and professed himself very impressed with the lecture. He also enjoyed the dinner that followed, along with being given a private viewing of Dillon’s corpse, which he touched.

  Perhaps the most famous barber-surgeon of the 1660s was Richard Wiseman. He held a royal appointment, but was best known for raising the surgical profession to a level where it was considered equal to that of the physicians. He wrote significant academic tomes on his subject, and was elected Master of the Company of Barber-Surgeons in 1665. The Master in May 1663 was Thomas Lisle, who also held the post of King’s Barber. Francis Johnson was paid an annual salary of £10 as the Company’s beadle after 1659, and the clerk in 1658 (and possibly until 1685) was Richard Reynell.

  The Trulocke brothers – William, George and Edmund – were gunsmiths with business premises on St Martin’s Lane. William Leybourn was a mathematician–surveyor who drew maps of London after the Great Fire of 1666, and Adrian May was a Groom of the Privy Chamber. Thomas Greeting was a famous Court musician who made extra money from teaching – he gave Pepys’s wife lessons on the flageolet.

  John Thurloe was Oliver Cromwell’s Spymaster General and Secretary of State in the 1650s, but fell from power after the Restoration. He lived quietly in Lincoln’s Inn, where he was a bencher. A fellow bencher of this time was William Prynne, one of London’s most repellent fanatics. Prynne had lost his ears for writing unpalatable nonsense in the 1630s, although the punishment did nothing to make him more moderate in the future. He wrote about two hundred books and pamphlets, many of them deeply unpleasant. On 27 June 1663, Samuel Pepys visited Lincoln’s Inn, and wandered u
p and down the gardens that were in the process of being landscaped. The Inn’s archives for that year contain records that detail tree-felling and the levelling of uneven ground for the remodelling.

  Thomas Scot was one of Thurloe’s predecessors. He was appointed head of the intelligence services in 1649, but fell out of favour until 1660, when he took over from Thurloe. He did not keep the post for long. He was one of the fifty-nine men who had signed Charles I’s death warrant – as was Thomas Chaloner (1595–1661) – and was executed on 17 October 1660. Later, the running of intelligence matters fell to the clever Oxford academic Joseph Williamson.

  Scot had three children. Thomas Scot the younger played a role in the disastrous Castle Plot – an attempt to seize Dublin Castle and its lieutenant – but managed to save himself by making a deal with the Royalists whereby he would escape execution in exchange for naming his co-conspirators. He was kept in the Tower, and not pardoned until 1666. His sister, Alice Scot, married one of Cromwell’s wartime scoutmasters. And William Scot was perceived by the Royalist government as a dangerous dissident. He embarked on a torrid affair with another Restoration spy called Eaffrey Johnson, who later married a German merchant named Johan Behn. Eaffrey (or Aphra) Behn made a name for herself as a playwright, and some of her work enjoyed a twentieth-century revival – it had been discredited by the Victorians, who considered it too lewd.

  The affair between Aphra Behn and William Scot may have taken place partly in Surinam, where her remit was to seduce him and encourage him to work for Williamson. Lady spies were probably rare in Restoration England, although historians disagree about Aphra Behn’s effectiveness and importance. Some say she was clever enough to take on men in a man’s world, and others say she was not very good at it. Whatever the truth, she eventually returned to England – without Scot – and turned her attention to the stage.