Dead Wrong: Straight Facts on the Country's Most Controversial Cover-Ups

by David Wayne

  •Both were very strong-willed, highly intelligent, and dedicated professionals, with no inclination toward suicide;

  •Both died under extremely suspicious circumstances, with mountains of conflicting evidence, in “official” suicides that had all the characteristics of murder;

  •Both cases still have a plethora of unanswered and even unad- dressed—questions.

  At a certain point, there are so many anomalies that they begin to take a major role in determining what actually took place. That is clearly the case with the death of David Kelly.

  However, with every great mystery, there is often one thing that holds the key to deciphering it: A matrix which, when applied over the evidence, correctly matches up all the factors in the equation which had previously not added up correctly.

  In the case of the JFK assassination, that realization comes by asking the question What if there were two conspiracies?—One that killed the President and another that, for whatever reason, covered up the crime. Then the previously anomalous actions of the players suddenly are easily explainable. Then we understand how Attorney General Robert Kennedy acted in the aftermath, covering the tracks of the crime even though he obviously didn’t participate in the crime itself. Then we know the right question to ask: What could cause him to act in such a manner? And when we look under that microscope it all fits—the disclosure of Oswald’s name, which RFK immediately recognized from the anti- Castro black ops, seriously compromised U.S. Intelligence; and the secondary intent of the assassination was to force an invasion of Cuba, which the cover-up subverted. Then the contradictions disappear and darkness is illuminated.

  This leads us to what is overwhelmingly the most commonly proposed explanation of what actually took place in the death of Dr. Kelly. Because it’s the one matrix with which all the different variables of the puzzle suddenly fit precisely together and the many anomalies suddenly sing in harmony.

  POSSIBLE SCENARIOS

  One scenario illuminatingly explains the death of David Kelly, and it turns out to be the one that they don’t want us to talk about: politically-based assassination. If Dr. Kelly was murdered, the crime scene staged as a suicide and those facts covered up by the government, then all the anomalies are magically explained:

  •It would explain the inability to track Dr. Kelly’s location via cell phone technology, and the complete absence of information regarding what should have been those attempts, as well as the absence of information on attempts to call him on his cellphone which would have been the first logical thing to do;

  •It would explain the inability to locate Dr. Kelly’s body with heat- seeking technology which was conducted over a wide area via helicopter searches with hi-tech equipment—because the body wasn’t there at the time;

  •It would explain the presence of the huge 110-foot communications towers placed in the yard of Dr. Kelly’s home (there was no earthly reason for them to be there except to communicate with someone who was airborne, as PM Tony Blair was at the time);

  •It would explain all the contradictory witness reports;

  •It would explain the fact that he left his house without his jacket, yet it was found next to his body in the woods.

  It should be noted that the term political assassination encompasses several possibilities:

  •Assassination (sometimes referred to as “extermination”) by an intelligence agency of one’s own nation (in this case, MI5 or MI6);

  •Assassination that is farmed out (brokered) through another nation’s security force or through private resources such as the Mafia;

  •Enemy action: in this case, a Mid-eastern security force (Kelly was on Saddam Hussein’s official “hit list”) or China (he was also reportedly on the hit list of CSIC, Chinese Secret Intelligence Service.

  One has to be very cautious about forming simplistic conclusions in the complex world of Intelligence. At first glance, Western Intelligence agencies (MI5, MI6 & CIA) seem to at blame for covering up the true facts concerning the death of Dr. Kelly. But just as with the JFK assassination, those who cover up a crime aren’t necessarily those who committed it.

  We checked with some intel sources, and it turns out it’s a bit more complicated. We found out that MI6 (SIS, the Secret Intelligence Service of James Bond lore) was actively attempting to protect Dr. Kelly from known threats at the time of his death. For example, it was known that Kelly was on the notorious “hit list” of Saddam Hussein and also on the hit list of the lesser known but even more sophisticated CSIS . Kelly reportedly sought low-profile protection so as not to draw unwanted attention about the matter.550

  It should also be noted that Dr. Kelly’s death occurred against the backdrop of many other very mysterious deaths of microbiologists, in much the same time frame.

  IRAQI HIT SQUAD

  After a year and one half of work, Norman Baker’s systematic research had eliminated the potential suspects of South Africa, Israel, and Russia as being not responsible for the death of David Kelly. For a time, he examined the possibility the Blair or Bush Administrations were behind the murder, but settled on the conclusion that Kelly was murdered by a London-based anti-Saddam Hussein group; one of the opposition groups that was created and funded by the West, in much the same manner as anti-Castro Cubans were trained and funded during the 1960s.

  He then theorizes that the group’s links to a murder of Dr. Kelly was unacceptable politically for the Blair government, because it would create even greater focus on Dr. Kelly’s views, which were that there was no case for war, from the standpoint of a weapons inspector. Those realizations made a cover-up necessary and, it was decided, to make the death out to be suicide.551

  The counter to that argument, however, would be what purpose would there have been for his killers to take the extra time and risk to kill him in such a surreptitious manner?; especially due to the fact that it was known that Dr. Kelly was under the protection from MI5 because there were threats on his life (it was even suggested that he live in a “safe house,” but Kelly refused); and that anyone planning to try to kill him would therefore assume that their window of opportunity would be a very tight one indeed. So why would they not simply shoot him and run? Why would they kidnap him and hold him for seven- to-twelve hours with the logical assumption that every security team within a thousand miles would be looking for them?

  The key to solving these puzzles is in asking the right questions through a process of logical deduction. So if an Iraqi opposition group in London was seriously planning to attempt to assassinate a high-profile asset like Dr. Kelly, they would certainly have to operate on the assumption that their time-window of opportunity would be a very narrow one. Under those circumstances, why would they kidnap him and detain him, kill him in a surreptitious manner, and go to all the trouble of carting his body off to a remote part of Harrowdown Hill, all the time risking failure. Wouldn’t it make a lot more sense just to have shot him and disappeared? And here’s an even more pertinent question: Why would they have been able to?

  The above reasons may, by the process of elimination, lead one back to looking at Western intelligence agencies as being responsible for his death.

  WESTERN INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES (OR “ROGUE OPERATIVES” FROM SAME)

  We have seen that the Bush and Tony Blair Administrations were both very keenly making a case for an illegal invasion of Iraq based on entirely fraudulent data. Dr. Kelly was in the process of exposing the weaknesses in their data, and became, officially or otherwise, an enemy of the State.

  However, we have also seen how the U.S. and British governments were extremely adept at putting their spin on the news. Therefore, in the context of contemporaneous events, if they had been able to hold up any evidence of the fact that Iraq was in any way to blame for Dr. Kelly’s death, logic demands that they would have done so. They certainly did so with the minimal evidence of Iraq’s alleged possession of WMD and the manufactured evidence, falsely reported, that Iraq had sought enriched uranium from A
frica. The fact that they did not seize upon such a golden opportunity is highly indicative that they couldn’t.

  However, Norman Baker points out, there may exist a very good reason why they couldn’t. If the killers came from the opposition group in London that was supported by the West, he argues that the blame would look bad and cause unacceptable political damage.

  That argument could also be countered, however, by the observation that going to all of the trouble for a faked suicide and a cover-up is probably a lot more work than simply diverting blame from one Iraqi group to another Iraqi group via media spin, which certainly became a specialty of both the Blair and Bush Administrations in their false claims to justify and launch an invasion that was clearly in violation of accepted international law.

  Dr. Kelly was what is known in Intelligence as a “high-value target” and, furthermore, everyone was well aware of that fact. At one point, just prior to his death, it was even recommended that he stay at a “safe house”—Kelly declined. But that means that he certainly should have been under surveillance for his own protection, and no one would be more aware of that need than MI5, the British equivalent of the FBI.

  So where was his protection on the day that he went missing? Are we really expected to believe that MI5, under the circumstances of known death threats against a high-value target who is a national priority with the most top-secret intelligence of bioweapons research imaginable—just let Dr. Kelly wander off into the woods, all by himself, no protection, no surveillance? It doesn’t seem very likely. And we know that the intelligence mission to protect Dr. Kelly, Operation Mason, went operational thirty minutes before he even left his house on that fateful afternoon. Whoever did pick up Dr. Kelly that afternoon would have been very hard-pressed to do it, unless some of his would-be protectors had been looking the other way.

  Yet the last person to officially see Dr. Kelly alive testified that he was totally alone; unaccompanied, unobserved, unarmed, and completely vulnerable. Why?

  Michael Shrimpton is a national security expert and prominent attorney in the U.K. with strong ties to MI5 and MI6. Shrimpton was informed, and apparently believes, that Kelly was injected in a high-tech, very professional assassination. His contacts informed him that the shoddy job at wrist-slashing was actually a technique to ensure they covered all traces of the needle mark where Dr. Kelly was injected.552

  But wait— there’s still one more suspect.

  INTERNATIONAL BIOWARFARE MAFIA

  Another theory on Dr. Kelly’s death is that he was murdered by an international mafia operating in biochemical weapons. Though complicated, there is a great deal of evidence suggesting that such a network exists. Furthermore, the murder of Dr. Kelly by this network may have politically necessitated the cover-up and the suicide staging, in much the same way that the assassination of JFK necessitated a government cover-up for security purposes.

  The reader is directed to an excellent documentary, Anthrax War, accessible on YouTube, as well as the book of the same name: http://www.anthraxwar. com/1/?page_id=132

  In any event, last word on the topic rightfully goes to House of Commons veteran Norman Baker MP:

  “I am convinced beyond a reasonable doubt— more than that, in fact— that David Kelly was murdered.”553

  —Norman Baker, MP

  BIBLIOGRAPHY:

  “The Hutton Report”, 2003; http://www.the-hutton-inquiry.org.uk/content/report The Strange Death of David Kelly, Norman Baker MP, 2007

  “Dr David Kelly’s Death ‘was NOT caused by an overdose’: Drugs Expert Dismisses Theory on Weapons Inspector”, Miles Goslett, October 31, 2010, Daily Mail. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1325024/Dr-David-Kelly-s-death-NOT-caused-overdose.html

  “Doubts Grow in Whistle-blower Suicide”, Alex Newman, June 30, 2010, The New American. http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/world-mainmenu-26/ europe-mainmenu-35/3905-doubts-grow-in-whistle-blower-suicide

  “Three Doctors Dispute How David Kelly Died: Letters Forwarded to National British Newspapers”, David Halpin, MB, BS, FRCS, Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgeon ͆ Dr C Stephen Frost, BSc, MB, ChB, Specialist in Diagnostic Radiology (Stockholm, Sweden)͆ Dr Searle Sennett, BSc, MBChB, FFARCS, Specialist Anaesthesiologist, January 27, 2004. http://www.propagandamatrix.com/260104doctorsdispute.html

  ͆#8220;Why I͆#8217;m certain my friend Dr Kelly was murdered͆#8221;, Andrew Malone, 3 August 2010, Daily Mail. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1293568/Why-Im-certain- friend-Dr-Kelly-murdered.html

  ͆#8220;Our Doubts About Dr Kelly͆#8217;s Suicide͆#8221;, David Halpin, Specialist in trauma and orthopaedic surgery ͆ C Stephen Frost, Specialist in diagnostic radiology ͆ Searle Sennett Specialist in anaesthesiology, The Guardian, January 27, 2004. http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2004/jan/27/guardianletters4

  ͆#8220;Dr. Kelly͆#8217;s Final Email to a Friend: Dark Actors Playing Games͆#8221;, Jamie Macaskill, July 20, 2003, The Sunday Mail. http://www.rense.com/general39/kellyy.htm

  ͆#8220;Kelly Death Paramedics Query Verdict”, Antony Barnett, December 12, 2004, The Observer. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2004/dec/12/politics.davidkelly

  “Manipulating Pathologic Evidence: The David Kelly Story: Turning Murder into Suicide”, Rowena Thursby, November 28, 2003. http://globalresearch.ca/articles/ THU311A. html

  “Dr Kelly’s Final Hours Did Not Indicate Suicide”, The Scoop Editor, July 21, 2003 Scoop. co.nz.http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0307/S00165.htm

  “The Murder of Dr. David Kelly, Part One & Part Two”, Jim Rarey, October 19, 2003, Medium Rare. http://www.rense.com/general43/kelly.htm and http://www.rense.com/general43/helly2.htm

  “Iraq Mobile Labs Nothing to do with Germ Warfare, Report Finds”, Peter Beaumont, Observer, June 15, 2003

  “Dr. Kelly and Victoria’s Secret”, November 12, 2003, Jim Rarey, Medium Rare. http://www.rense.com/general44/jelly.htm

  “‘Kelly was Murdered’ Says UK Intelligence Insider”, Simon Aronowitz, February 24, 2004, ThoughtCrimeNews.com/PrisonPlanet.com. http://www.prisonplanet. com/022304kellywasmurdered.html

  “Kelly ‘Taken Out’ By Assassination Team Says British National Security Lawyer”, Alex Jones, February 24, 2004, The Alex Jones Show. http://www.rense.com/general49/ kelll.htm

  “Alex Jones Interviews Michael Shrimpton: The Murder of Dr. David Kelly-Transcript”, Alex Jones, February 24, 2004, The Alex Jones Show. http://www.prisonplanet.com/022504shrimptontranscript.html

  “David Kelly’s Closest Female Confidante On Why He COULDN’T Have Killed Himself”, Sharon Churcher, August 31, 2008, Daily Mail. http://www.dailymail. co.uk/news/article-1050919/David-Kellys-closest-female-confidante-COULDNT- killed-himself.html

  “Did Two Hired Assassins Snatch Weapons Inspector David Kelly?”, Norman Baker, October 22, 2007, Daily Mail. http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=vi ewArticle&code=BAK20071022&articleId=7155

  “Police admit they could not find trace of fingerprints on Dr David Kelly’s glasses after ‘suicide’”, Miles Goslett, March 14, 2011. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ article-1366301/David-Kelly-inquest-Police-admit-fingerprints-DNA-glasses.html

  “Dr David Kelly Post-Mortem Ordered Buried for 70 Years”, January 24, 2010, Daily Mail.

  “Anthrax War”, Bob Coen & Eric Nadler, 2009

  “Did MI5 Kill Dr David Kelly?”, Sue Reid, July 27, 2009, Daily Mail. http://www. dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1200004/Did-MI5-kill-Dr-David-Kelly-Another-crazy-conspiracy-theory-amid-claims-wrote-tell-book-vanished-death.

  “Police ‘Ignored’ Dr David Kelly’s Mobile Phone Records: Police investigating the death of the Government weapons inspector Dr David Kelly ignored mobile phone records which could have shed light on his movements before he died, it has been claimed”; Andy Bloxham, January 7, 2011, The Telegraph

  “Mystery Helicopter Claim Over Dr David Kelly Death: Police have refused to comment on reports that a helicopter mysteriously landed at the scene of weapons expert Dr David Kelly’s death shortly aft
er his body was discovered”; May 25, 2011, The Telegraph.

  * * *

  500 Norman Baker, The Strange Death of David Kelly (London: Methuen, 2007).

  501 Baker, The Strange Death of David Kelly

  502 “Letter forwarded to national British newspapers,” Dr. David Halpin, MB, BS, FRCS & Dr. C. Stephen Frost BsC, MBChB & Dr. Searle Sennett, BSc, MBchB, FFARCS, in Rowena Thursby, “Our doubts about Dr. Kelly’s suicide,” theguardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2004/jan/27/guardianletters4

  503 “Letter forwarded,” Dr. Halpin, et al.

  504 “Letter forwarded,” Dr. Halpin, et al.

  505 “Letter forwarded,” Dr. Halpin, et al.

  506 “Letter forwarded,” Dr. Halpin, et al.

  507 “Letter forwarded,” Dr. Halpin, et al.

  508 “Letter forwarded,” Dr. Halpin, et al.

  509 Glen Owen & Miles Goslett, “Thirteen doctors demand inquest into Dr. David Kelly’s death,” 13 July, 2009, dailymail, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1199109/13-doctors-demand-inquest-Dr-David-Kellys-death.html

  510 Baker, Strange Death of David Kelly

  511 Baker, Strange Death of David Kelly

  512 Miles Goslett, “Police admit they could not find trace of fingerprints on Dr. David Kelly’s glasses after