Book Read Free

Eye of the Beholder: Johannes Vermeer, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, and the Reinvention of Seeing

Page 47

by Laura J. Snyder


  323 But in Schoonhovius’s volume: On this point, see ibid., p. 64.

  324 Fifty years after Van Leeuwenhoek’s: Kant, “On the Question, What Is Enlightenment?” For more on the role of the Scientific Revolution in laying the groundwork for the Enlightenment, see Pagden, The Enlightenment.

  325 In the dark shadow: See Duparc and Wheelock, eds., Johannes Vermeer, p. 189n2.

  Bibliography

  Addison, Joseph. 1877. The Works of Joseph Addison. 4 vols. London: George Bell and Sons.

  Aglionby, William. 1671. The Present State of the United Provinces of the Low-Countries as to the Government, Laws, Forces, Riches, Manners, Customes, Revenue, and Territory of the Dutch, in Three Books. London: Printed for John Starkey.

  ———. 1719. Choice Observations upon the Art of Painting. London: Printed for R. King.

  Akkerman, Nadine, and Marguerite Corporaal. 2004. “Mad Science beyond Flattery: The Correspondence of Margaret Cavendish and Constantijn Huygens.” Early Modern Literary Studies, special issue, 14 (May): 1–21.

  Alberti, Leon Battista. [ca. 1435] 1956. On Painting. Translated and edited by John R. Spencer. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  Alpers, Svetlana. 1983. The Art of Describing: Dutch Art in the Seventeenth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  Andersen, Kirsti. 2007. The Geometry of an Art: The History of the Mathematical Theory of Perspective from Alberti to Monge. New York and London: Springer.

  Aristotle. 1942. Aristotle: Generation of Animals. Edited by A. L. Peck. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press.

  ———. 2011. Aristotle: Problems. Vol. 1, Books 1–19. Translated by Robert Mayhew. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

  Aubrey, John, 1957. Brief Lives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

  Bacon, Francis. 1870. The Works of Francis Bacon. Edited by James Spedding, Robert Leslie Ellis, and Douglas Denon Heath. 7 vols. London: Longmans.

  Bailey, Anthony. 2002. Vermeer: A View of Delft. New York: Henry Holt.

  ———. Velázquez and the Surrender of Breda. New York: Henry Holt.

  Ball, Philip. 2003. Bright Earth: Art and the Invention of Color. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  Bell, Julian. 2011. “The Mysterious Women of Vermeer.” Review of Vermeer’s Women: Secrets and Silence (exhibition catalog). New York Review of Books, 58 (20): 86.

  Berger, John. 1972. Ways of Seeing. London: BBC; Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.

  Berghof, Alice Crawford. 2010. “‘Nearest the Tangible Earth’: Rembrandt, Samuel van Hoogstraten, George Berkely, and the Optics of Touch.” In Hendrix and Carman, eds., Renaissance Theories of Vision, 187–211.

  Berkel, K. van. 1982. “Intellectuals against Leeuwenhoek.” In Palm and Snelders, eds., Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, 1632–1723, 187–209.

  Biesboer, Pieter. 1993. “Judith Leyster: Painter of ‘Modern Figures.’” In Welu and Biesboer, eds., Judith Leyster, 75–92.

  ———. 2001. Collections of Paintings in Haarlem, 1572–1745. Los Angeles: Getty Publications.

  Birch, Thomas. 1756. The History of the Royal Society of London for Improving of Natural Knowledge, from Its First Rise … 4 vols. London: Printed for A. Millar.

  Blanc, Jan. 2007. Review of The Visible World: Samuel Van Hoogstraten’s Art Theory and the Legitimization of Painting in the Dutch Golden Age, by Thijs Weststeijn. Simiolus: Netherlands Quarterly for the History of Art 33 (4): 276–82.

  Blankert, Albert. 1978. Vermeer of Delft: Complete Edition of the Paintings. Oxford: Phaidon.

  ———. 1995. “Vermeer’s Modern Themes and Their Traditions.” In Duparc and Wheelock, eds., Johannes Vermeer, 31–45.

  Bok, Marten Jan. 2001. “Society, Culture and Collecting in 17th Century Delft.” In Liedtke, Plomp, and Rüger, eds, Vermeer and the Delft School, 196–210.

  Boucher, Jocelyn. 2012. “Amsterdam’s Urban History.” Accessed Oct. 12, 2012. http://courses.umass.edu/latour/Netherlands/boucher/index.html.

  Boyle, Robert. 1663. Some Considerations Touching the Usefulness of Experimental Natural Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford Hall.

  ———. 1671. Tracts Written by the Honourable Robert Boyle about the Cosmicall Qualities of Things, Cosmical Suspitions, the Temperature of the Submarine Regions, the Temperature of the Subterraneall Regions, the Bottom of the Sea … Oxford: Printed by W. H. for Ric. Davis.

  Brewster, David. 1852. “On an Account of a Rock-Crystal Lens and Decomposed Glass Found at Nineveh.” Athenaeum no. 1298 (September 11): 979.

  Broersen, Ellen. 1993. “‘Judita Leystar’: A Painter of ‘Good, Keen, Sense.’” In Welu and Biesboer, eds., Judith Leyster, 15–38.

  Brook, Timothy. 2008. Vermeer’s Hat: The Seventeenth Century and the Dawn of the Global World. New York: Bloomsbury.

  Broos, Ben. 1995. “‘Un celebre peijntre nommé Verme[e]r.’” In Duparc and Wheelock, eds., Johannes Vermeer, 47–66.

  Brusati, Celeste. 1995. Artifice and Illusion: The Art and Writing of Samuel van Hoogstraten. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  ———. 2013. “Paradoxical Passages: The Work of Framing in the Art of Samuel van Hoogstraten.” In Weststeijn, ed., The Universal Art of Samuel van Hoogstraten (1627–1678), 53–76.

  Buchwald, Jed Z., and Mordechai Feingold. 2013. Newton and the Origin of Civilization. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

  Burnett, D. Graham. 2005. Descartes and the Hyperbolic Quest: Lens Making Machines and Their Significance in the Seventeenth Century. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.

  Camerota, Filippo. 2005. “Looking for an Artificial Eye: On the Borderline between Painting and Topography.” Early Science and Medicine 10 (2): 263–85.

  Cavendish, Margaret, Duchess of Newcastle. 1653. Poems and Fancies. Reprint, Menston: Scolar Press, 1970.

  ———. 1656. Nature’s Pictures Drawn by Fancie’s Pencil to the Life. London: J. Martin and J. Allestyre.

  ———. 1666. Observations upon Experimental Philosophy to Which Is Added the Description of a New Blazing World. London: Printed by A. Maxwell.

  Chen-Morris, Raz. 2013. “‘The Qualities of Nothing’: Shakespearean Mirrors and Kepler’s Visual Economy of Science.” In Science in the Age of the Baroque, edited by O. Gal and R. Chen-Morris, 99–118. Dordrecht: Springer.

  Cheselden, William. 1728. “An Account of Some Observations Made by a Young Gentleman, Who Was Born Blind.” Philosophical Transactions 35: 447–50.

  Clark, Stuart. 2007. Vanities of the Eye: Vision in Early Modern European Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Cobb, Matthew. 2002. “Malpighi, Swammerdam and the Colorful Silkworm: Replication and Visual Representation in Early Modern Science.” Annals of Science 59: 111–47.

  ———. 2006. Generation: The Seventeenth-Century Scientists Who Unraveled the Secrets of Sex, Life, and Growth. New York: Bloomsbury

  Cocquyt, Tiemen. 2007. “The Camera Obscura and the Availability of 17th Century Optics: Some Notes and an Account of a Test.” In Lefèvre, ed., Inside the Camera Obscura, 129–40.

  Cohen, Barnett. 1937. “On Leeuwenhoek’s Method of Seeing Bacteria.” Journal of Bacteriology 34 (3): 343–46.

  Cole, F. J. 1937. “Leeuwenhoek’s Zoological Researches Parts I and II.” Annals of Science 2: 1–46, 185–235.

  Cook, Harold J. 2007. Matters of Exchange: Commerce, Medicine, and Science in the Dutch Golden Age. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  Costaras, Nicola. 1998. “A Study of the Materials and Techniques of Johannes Vermeer.” In Gaskell and Jonker, eds., Vermeer Studies, 145–67.

  Crombie, A.C. 1967. “The Mechanistic Hypothesis and the Study of Vision: Some Optical Ideas as a Background of the Invention of the Microscope.” In Historical Aspects of Microscopy, edited by Savile Bradbury and Gerard L’Estrange Turner, 3–112. Cambridge: Heffer.

  Damsteegt, B. C. 1982. “Language and Leeuwenhoek.” In Palm and Snelders, eds., Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, 1632–1723, 13–28.

>   Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. 1992. “The Image of Objectivity.” Representations 40: 81–128.

  Daston, Lorraine, and Elizabeth Lunbeck. 2011. “Observation Observed.” In Daston and Lunbeck, eds., Histories of Scientific Observation, 1–9.

  ———, eds. 2011. Histories of Scientific Observation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  De Beer, Hans. 2004. “Observations on the History of Dutch Physical Stature from the Late-Middle Ages to the Present.” Economics and Human Biology 2: 45–55.

  Degenaar, Marjolein. 1996. Molyneux’s Problem: Three Centuries of Discussion on the Perception of Forms. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  Degenaar, Marjolein, and Gert-Jan Lokhorst. 2011. “Molyneux’s Problem.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. At http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/molyneux-problem/.

  Delsaute, Jean-Luc. 1998. “The Camera Obscura and Painting in the 16th and 17th Century.” In Gaskell and Jonker, eds., Vermeer Studies, 111–23.

  Dennis, Michael Aaron. 1989. “Graphical Understanding: Instruments and Interpretation in Robert Hooke’s Micrographia.” Science in Context 3: 309–64.

  Descargues, Pierre. 1966. Vermeer: Biographical and Critical Study. Geneva: Skira.

  Descartes, René. 1985. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Vol. 1. Edited by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  ———. 1991. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Vol. 3, The Correspondence. Edited by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, Dugald Murdoch and Anthony Kenny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  ———. 1998. The World and Other Writings. Edited by Stephen Gaukroger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  ———. 2001. Discourse on Method, Optics, Geometry, and Meteorology. Edited by Paul J. Olscamp. Indianapolis: Hackett.

  Dibon, Paul. 1984. “Sur la réception de l’oeuvre de F. Bacon en Hollande dans la première moitié du XVIIe siècle.” In Francis Bacon: Terminologia e fortuna nel XVII secolo, edited by Maria Fattori. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.

  Dillard, Annie. 1998. Pilgrim at Tinker Creek. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.

  Dobell, Clifford. 1932. Antony van Leeuwenhoek and His “Little Animals”: Being Some Account of the Father of Protozoology & Bacteriology and His Multifarious Discoveries in These Disciplines. Reprint, New York: Russell and Russell, 1958.

  Douglas-Ittu, Kevin von. “Website on Spinoza’s Optical Theories, Practices and Likely Experiences.” http://kvond.wordpress.com/spinozas-foci-articles-spinoza-optics-lens-grinding/.

  Dreiskämper, Petra. 1998. Redeloos, radeloos, reddeloos: De geschiedenis van het rampjaar 1672. Hilversum: Verloren.

  Duparc, Frederik J., and Arthur K. Wheelock, eds. 1995. Johannes Vermeer. Washington, D.C.: National Gallery of Art; The Hague: Royal Cabinet of Paintings Mauritshuis; New Haven: Yale University Press.

  Dupré, Sven. 2008. “Inside the Camera Obscura: Kepler’s Experiment and Theory of Optical Imagery.” Early Science and Medicine 13 (3): 219–44.

  Epstein, S. R. 1998. “Craft Guilds, Apprenticeship, and Technological Change in Pre-Industrial Europe.” Journal of Economic History 58: 684–713.

  Findlen, Paula, ed. 2004. Athanasius Kircher: The Last Man Who Knew Everything. New York: Routledge.

  Ford, Brian J. 1985. Single Lens: The Story of the Simple Microscope. New York: Harper and Row.

  ———. 1991. The Leeuwenhoek Legacy. Bristol: Biopress; London: Farrand Press.

  Ford, Charles. 2007. “Introduction.” In Lives of Rembrandt: Baldinucci and Houbraken, edited by Charles Ford, 7–26. London: Pallas Publications.

  Fournier, Marian. 1991. “The Fabric of Life: The Rise and Decline of Seventeenth-Century Microscopy.” Ph.D. diss., Twente University of Technology.

  Franits, Wayne E., ed. 1997. Looking at Seventeenth-Century Dutch Art: Realism Reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  ———, ed. 2001. The Cambridge Companion to Vermeer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  ———. 2004. Dutch Seventeenth-Century Genre Painting: Its Stylistic and Thematic Evolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  Freedberg, David. 2002. The Eye of the Lynx: Galileo, His Friends, and the Beginnings of Modern Natural History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  Galilei, Galileo. 1967. Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. Edited by Stillman Drake. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  ———. 1989. Sidereus Nuncius; or, The Sidereal Messenger. Edited by Albert Van Helden. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  Garber, Daniel. 1992. Descartes’ Metaphysical Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  Garrett, Don, ed. 1996. The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Gaskell, Ivan, and Michiel Jonker, eds. 1998. Vermeer Studies. Washington, D.C.: National Gallery of Art; New Haven: Yale University Press.

  Gaukroger, Stephen. 1995. Descartes: An Intellectual Biography. Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press.

  Gifford, Melanie. 1998. “Painting Light: Recent Observations on Vermeer’s Technique.” In Gaskell and Jonker, eds., Vermeer Studies, 185–99 .

  Ginzburg, Carlo. 1989. “The High and the Low: The Theme of Forbidden Knowledge in the 16th and 17th Centuries.” In Clues, Myths, and the Historical Method, edited by Carlo Ginzburg, 54–69. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  Glassie, John. 2012. A Man of Misconceptions: The Life of an Eccentric in an Age of Change. New York: Riverhead.

  Gombrich, E. H. 1961. Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.

  Goncourt, Edmond, and Jules Goncourt. 1989. Journal des Goncourt. 3 vols. Edited by Robert Ricatte. Paris: Laffant.

  Gorman, Michael John. 2007. “Projecting Nature in Early Modern Europe.” In Lefèvre, ed., Inside the Camera Obscura, 31–50.

  Gowing, Lawrence. 1997. Vermeer. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  Groen, Karin. 2007. “Painting Technique in the 17th Century in Holland and the Possible Use of the Camera Obscura by Vermeer.” In Lefèvre, ed., Inside the Camera Obscura, 195–210.

  Hacking, Ian. 1981. “Do We See through a Microscope?” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62: 305–22.

  ———. 1995. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Hall, A. R. 1989. “The Leeuwenhoek Lecture, 1988: Antoni van Leeuwenhoek 1632–1723,” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 43: 249–73.

  Hammond, John H. 1981. The Camera Obscura: A Chronicle. Bristol: Hilger.

  Hammond, Mary Sayer. 1986. “The Camera Obscura: A Chapter in the Pre-History of Photography.” Ph.D. diss., Ohio State University.

  Harkness, Deborah E. 2008. The Jewel House: Elizabethan London and the Scientific Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  Hattab, Helen. 2007. “Concurrence or Divergence? Reconciling Descartes’s Metaphysics with His Physics.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45: 49–78.

  Hendrix, John Shannon, and Charles H. Carman, eds. 2010. Renaissance Theories of Vision. Farnham, UK; Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate Publications.

  Hockney, David. 2006. Secret Knowledge: Rediscovering the Lost Techniques of the Old Masters. Expanded ed. New York: Studio.

  Hoffman, Donald D. 2000. Visual Intelligence: How We Create What We See. New York: W. W. Norton.

  Hooke, Robert. 1665. Micrographia; or, Some Physiological Descriptions of Minute Bodies Made by Magnifying Glasses, with Observations and Inquiries Thereupon. London: Royal Society.

  ———. 1678. Lectures and Collections: Cometa, Containing Observations of the Comet in April 1677 and Microscopium. London: J. Martyn.

  ———. 1726. “An Instrument to Take the Draught or Picture of a Thing.” In Philosophical Experiments and Observations of the Late Eminent Dr. Rober
t Hooke, S.R.S. and Geom. Prof. Gresh., and Other Eminent Virtuoso’s in His Time, edited by William Derham, 292–96. London: W. and J. Innys.

  Horn, Hendrik J. 2013. “Great Respect and Complete Bafflement: Arnold Houbraken’s Mixed Opinion of Samuel van Hoogstraten.” In Weststeijn, ed., The Universal Art of Samuel van Hoogstraten, 209–40.

  Houbraken, Arnold. 2007. “Rembrandt.” In Lives of Rembrandt, Baldinucci and Houbraken, edited by Charles Ford, 51–94. London: Pallas Publications.

  Howell, James. 1907. Epistolae Ho-Elianae: The Familiar Letters of James Howell. Edited by Agnes Repplier. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin.

  Huerta, Robert D. 2003. Giants of Delft: Johannes Vermeer and the Natural Philosophers: The Parallel Search for Knowledge during the Age of Discovery. Lewisburg, Pa.: Bucknell University Press; London: Associated University Presses.

  Inwood, Stephen. 2003. The Forgotten Genius: The Biography of Robert Hooke, 1635–1703. San Francisco: MacAdam/Cage Pub.

  Israel, Jonathan I. 1995. The Dutch Republic: Its Rise, Greatness and Fall, 1477–1806. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  ———. 2011. Democratic Enlightenment: Philosophy, Revolution, and Human Rights, 1750–1790. New York: Oxford University Press.

  James, William. 1956. The Will to Believe: And Other Essays in Popular Philosophy, [and] Human Immortality, Two Supposed Objections to the Doctrine. New York: Dover Publications.

  Jardine, Lisa. 2004. The Curious Life of Robert Hooke: The Man Who Measured London. New York: HarperCollins.

  ———. 2008. Going Dutch: How England Plundered Holland’s Glory. New York: Harper.

  ———. 2009. “The Correspondence between Constantijn Huygens and Dorothea van Dorp.” Lives and Letters 1 (1): 1–22.

  Joby, Christopher Richard. 2007. Calvinism and the Arts: A Re-Assessment. Leuven and Dudley, Mass.: Peeters.

  Jorink, Eric. 2010. Reading the Book of Nature in the Dutch Golden Age, 1575–1715. Leiden and Boston: Brill.

  ———. 2012. “In the Twilight Zone: Isaac Vossius and the Scientific Communities in France, England and the Dutch Republic.” In Isaac Vossius (1618–1689): Between Science and Scholarship, edited by Eric Jorink and Dirk van Miert, 119–56. London: Brill.

 

‹ Prev