by Nancy Lieder
cytomegalovirus infections have been indirectly linked to autism; maternal factors --maternal
antibodies in autism were detected; (e ) major histocompatibility association -- autism displays
genetic linkage with immunogenetic factors located on chromosome six; and immune activation.
All rights reserved: [email protected]
http://www.zetatalk2.com/beinghum/b90.htm[2/5/2012 1:27:12 PM]
ZetaTalk: Psychosis
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Psychosis
Note: written on Sep 15, 1995
The brain is intrinsically physical, and subject to thousands of influences including injury, chemicals manufactured
within the body, chemicals invading or inserted into the body, and the effects of aging. One has only to visit mental
wards, nursing homes, and back alleys to see humans out of touch and apparently in another world. Even primitive
man suffered these problems, becoming psychotic with grief or fear or even born psychotic, and discovering to their
horror or pleasure that certain foods did more than fill their bellies. Is psychosis and senility intrinsic to man, and does it have a purpose? Yes on both counts, though it often seems a purposeless affliction to those intent on keeping the
gears of society running smoothly.
As with fainting, psychosis and senility allows the human animal to disconnect with reality. Catatonic or autistic
individuals are, chemically, in a place where they are not feeling anxiety. The world does not exist for them. Delusions
serve the same purpose, as the individual can build a world about them that meets their needs. How much different are
delusions from the games people play with themselves to make themselves more secure, more attractive, or more
valued in their own eyes than they are in the eyes of others. Depression serves a purpose in causing the individual to
retract and withdraw from a world that is causing injury. Time to reflect and plot a new course. Senility, outside of the genetic disease which is Alzheimer's, is greatest in those who have the least to live for. Activity and involvement
actually prevents senility. Senility blunts the awareness of the aged, so they can reminisce about happier days when
they were younger.
Human society sees psychosis as a problem because it is a disruption, but mostly because of the apparent pain the
afflicted are in. Is the autistic child not frozen in fear? Is the chronic depressive not missing out on life? Is the paranoid schizophrenic not constantly on the alert and never at rest? What is not taken into the equation is what the world of the individual is like without psychosis - where pain is born quietly but is more intense. Psychosis is noisy and noticeable, where the pre-psychotic individual is usually quiet and well behaved. Then is psychosis not a problem? Of course it is,
as it is the signal flag of misery.
Infants born psychotic are thus because the genetic throw of the dice gave them an ultra sensitive nature, and they are
doomed to live in the sheltered world they live in. Depressives recover when they change the life situation that is
distressing them, sometimes with dramatic swiftness. That so many depressives do not recover but mask their
unhappiness with antidepressants does not point to the illness as being intractable so much as it points to the rigidity of society. Schizophrenics react to the same stresses as other humans, but with a stronger and quicker reaction. This is
widely recognized in giving schizophrenics a more sheltered environment, but as the press is for society to reabsorb
the individual, any respite from the chemical surges is short lived. Anti-psychotic drugs simply mask the raging surges,
as though the fire hose were perpetually turned on the blaze so that one can say that the fire is out. The problem here is not so much that a psychosis ensues due to life stresses as that society has rigid expectation for all its citizens.
Does psychosis occur in the animal kingdom, outside of the human animal? Most certainly, a fact that veterinarians
will be the first to attest to. Psychotic pets, however, are usually given the life changes that are indicated, and recover.
Human society is not so kind to the human animal, who is generally drugged and told to struggle on, in place.
All rights reserved: [email protected]
http://www.zetatalk2.com/beinghum/b45.htm[2/5/2012 1:27:13 PM]
ZetaTalk: Anxiety
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Anxiety
Note: written during the April 20, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session.
In the early days of ZetaTalk, it was a curiosity to most, and for those with personal visions similar to what was being
reported, a touchstone. Contactees, who had learned through their visits of the coming cataclysms, were gripped by the
correlations. Others, serious thinkers and students of prior earth changes, found the net of logic encompassing the holes in human theories. Those who knew that ZetaTalk had a factual basis, those with MJ12 connections, were horrified
that a message they understood was to be completely suppressed and debunked was getting out. Thus, in the early
days, ZetaTalk had friends and enemies, both highly emotional, with the majority of the audience curious. Few were
willing or thought it necessary to make major changes in their lives, given that the message had a clear end date of
May 15, 2003 [Note: see 2003 Date explanation] or shortly thereafter, and had many predictions leading up to that date that either would or would not be validated. The questions flowing into the ZetaTalk Question Queue in the early days revolved
around human nature, existing UFOlogy legends, with the minority revolving around the possibility of a pole shift and
life afterwards. Nancy, today, still gets requests that encompassed the preponderance of the Question Queue in the
early days of ZetaTalk, 1995 and on, but the weight of the requests for Zeta input now surround the pole shift and life
afterwards issue.
Given that the final year could see changes that would require the audience to act, many are now looking for certainty.
What types of issues are envisioned, that the Question Queue is now being hammered with requests for signs that
would satisfy certainty?
1. Earthquakes could devastate areas, beyond what the insurance companies could compensate for, requiring
decisions on the spot as to relocation or life changes.
2. Storms, clusters of tornadoes or mega-hurricanes would likewise wipe out more than a suburb or small town, but
whole cities, creating a similar instant need for life change decisions.
3. Rising seas, and erratic tides, could make the coastlines a risky place to live, to say nothing of wiping out
commercial or residential establishments along the coasts, likewise requiring a decision on a life change.
4. The deepening worldwide economic depression, called now only a recession, will increasingly cause families to
find themselves without hope in their home area, with decision time once again on the table.
5. Toward the end of 2002, as the inbound planet can no longer be denied by any but NASA and the major media,
talked about by almost every other element spreading news, those aware of the coming shift, if only in theory,
will feel anxious even if secure otherwise.
6. The economic crash predicted to occur when the tenuous banking system and Stock Market, based on false
values, crumbles, will create a need in the otherwise comfortable to made changes, and once again they will be
faced with choices that include or not the pole shift possibility.
All rights reserved: [email protected]
http://www.zetatalk2.com/beinghum/b85.htm[2/5/2012 1:27:14 PM]
ZetaTalk: Den
ial
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Denial
Note: writen during the September 21, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session
As matters heat up, the earth changes becoming obvious, affecting jobs and hitting the nightly news increasingly after
a long period of being suppressed, many who mulled over the issues and debated them logically will cease to do so.
This is a matter of being personally overwhelmed, of being unable to see a route to safety, of being unable to imagine
life after the expected impact. The mind boggles into a state of panic, and the only route is continued panic or denial.
Denial is used extensively in human society, more than the average human would expect.
An employee desperately needing the job will not notice any threatening signs that their performance is under
par, or the company may institute a layoff. Thus, the layoff comes as a shock, when it hits, but at least the
employee is able to work during this time, and thus better his changes if the layoff did not occur. Thus, is it a survival mechanism.
The primitive tribe, in the woods and hunting, gathering nuts or tubers, cannot constantly think about an
impending attack by a carnivore, else would be debilitated and unable to function. Thus, they deny that such an
attack could occur at any moment, bustle about the day, gathering and hunting and cooking, and function. When
the attack by a carnivore occurs, it is a shock, some die but not all, and the tribe regroups. The outcome is hardly
different, except that with denial, they functioned, and if frozen in fear, would die of hunger instead. Thus, denial should not be seen as a weakness so much as a survival mechanism inherent in the human, engaged when
matters become overwhelming.
Just as some humans will go into denial when matters heat up, others will come forth. There are those who are in the
background, mulling over the issues, who will find their voice and courage when the issues become pressing. The hero, emerging.
All rights reserved: [email protected]
http://www.zetatalk2.com/beinghum/b96.htm[2/5/2012 1:27:14 PM]
ZetaTalk: Bad News
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Bad News
Note: writen during the August 3, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session
We have stated that the coming times are great opportunities, as life will not be slow and steady, with decisions put off, but the opposite. Many will find themselves in situations where they fear for their own lives, but their neighbors
and family needing a helping hand. Should they stay, and help others, or run? Heroes born or illusions dashed, the
need for action will reveal much. Many have loved ones, or those they feel responsible for or who rely upon them,
which they can either desert or remain in place to care for. Should the husband run for the hill, leaving his crippled
wife? Should he stay and hold her hand, while the waters rise to engulf them, reassuring her that drowning is not
painful or perhaps rocking her in his arms so she cannot see what is coming, or tell himself that her panic does not
matter, being short lived?
Knowing that such horrific times are coming, many move beyond the decision of when to place themselves up for
ridicule, telling their family in no uncertain terms that they take the pending pole shift theory seriously, to who to tell.
Timing of such announcements will resolve itself, as when the planet is increasingly visible, first called a comet or
nova or some such and then called a comet with red outgassing, none will deny that something is approaching. Where it is relatively easy to explain to a healthy father, of a healthy family, in a good location, that he should take his family camping when rotation slows noticeable, and distill their drinking water during the aftertime, what to tell the cancer
patient? What to tell the person who cannot live without insulin, or who can hardly walk much less eat if others do not
bring foot to the table? What to tell those who live in places such as India where escape is not possible, the population held in place by immigration refusal, and lack of options. What to tell those in cities, who have grown soft and have no
idea how food is even grown, much less the skills to feed themselves if out in the wild.
Should one explain the situation fully, or pad the truth with sweet lies or omissions? One can see the different
approaches in channeled works, where the coming times are talked about in kind terms sounding almost like a trip to
the fair. There will be changes, but not to worry, life will be kind and pleasant. The changes are not explained, the dates put off, possibilities of mankind changing matters if they become determined and change their ways - all manner
of smoothing the rough edges of what is to come. Is this helping you? What is the alternative, which we espouse. We tell the truth, and let those affected make their decisions. Those who decide to allow death to overtake them, or who will be in this position in any case, can make their peace, settle their affairs, and enjoy their last days fully, giving emphasis to things that matter like loving one another.
How is this different from the ill patient, who is either told of their likely end time or not? If the doctor and family
lies, they have hope repeatedly dashed, and one day are frantic as they realize the truth. They die, without saying
good-bye as they had hoped, having repeatedly been raised up and dashed down during the process of their disease.
Alternatively, the truth told, they weep, embrace their loved ones, and the last moments are precious, lived fully. We
suggest, therefore, no white lies, no softening the truth, and no avoidance. Those who cannot deal with it, will deny, and are most likely doing this in their lives at present on many fronts. Those who can, will find their peace more
quickly, and in the end thank you for your frankness.
All rights reserved: [email protected]
http://www.zetatalk2.com/beinghum/b95.htm[2/5/2012 1:27:15 PM]
ZetaTalk: Certainty
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Certainty
Note: written during the April 20, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session.
Thus, many cast about for certainty, to assist them in their decisions, which are of great import in their lives. Who can they look to, for answers?
1. The church, which preaches Armageddon, but does not give a date, and states that clinging to the doctrine and
being one of the faithful will save the faithful in a rapture. However, even firm believers feel nervous about this,
though they admit this little.
2. The governments, which will become increasingly tight-lipped as this year passes, doors shut, no comment, and
can be expected only to follow their current line of revelation, which is close to nil.
3. Scientists, who argue among themselves in any case, and deal with contradictions to the current theory by
shouting the contradiction down and refusing to put the contradicting parts together. If they cannot resolve the
arguments about Global Warming, they can hardly be expected to resolve, in 2002, the arguments pro and con a
possible pole shift.
4. Major Media, which may surprise mankind in coming forth with real documentaries and exposés that would lead
the common man to at least consider the possibilities, in the context of discussing "mysteries" or "possibilities"
and having talk shows. But in that major media are owned by few, and tightly controlled in the main, this can
turn either way, occurring or not, depending upon human motives and decisions, being in the hands of man.
Thus, there is only one source of stunningly accurate predictions related to the current changes - ZetaTalk. Having
predicted the current weather changes,
the current increase in volcanism and earthquakes, the current economic and
crop shortage problems, to say nothing of the location of the inbound planet - ZetaTalk stands out as a source of certainty, or so it is hoped.
All rights reserved: [email protected]
http://www.zetatalk2.com/beinghum/b86.htm[2/5/2012 1:27:16 PM]
ZetaTalk: Answers
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Answers
Note: written during the April 20, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session.
Thus, when seeking certainty, the anxious hammer at Nancy, as the only source listening and responding. Can she
provide more certainty than she is doing today? No, as the factors in place from the beginning of ZetaTalk are still
there today.
1. We, as the source of this information, can only respond to questions considered to be The Call, and cannot for
instance give warnings of coming storms or quakes, though we can address in general the likely earth changes.
To do otherwise, as we have explained, is to interfere with the free will of man, which the Rule of Non-
Interference limits. The pole shift, and all change leading up to it, are considered a normal terrestrial occurrence
not unlike tornadoes or cancer or droughts. You, as mankind, are to help each other, learn how to do so, during
these tribulations.
2. We, and Nancy, cannot force the governments of the world to issue forth information, or force those thinking
just of themselves to suddenly become caring. If you don't like the current level of truthfulness from your
governments or scientists, then address your frustration to them, not ourselves or Nancy.
3. Nancy is working to the extent she can as an aging woman, of retirement age and with many health problems
not even considered by her audience, without funds, without physical assistance, and simply cannot become
mama to the anxious world! Few of those hammering on her for certainty, or to do more, would deal with her
situation for an instant. Beyond the unreasonableness of their demands, there is the physical impossibility of her