Ghosts & Gallows

by Paul Adams

  The exorcist expertly drew a chalk circle on the floor of the Bashir’s house in which, for the next eight days, Kousar Bashir was imprisoned, deprived of both food and sleep. Bashir’s initial approach was to literally smoke out the jinn using burning mustard oil, the fumes from which the young woman was made to inhale, as well as being regularly force fed with a cocktail of chilli powder. When it became plain to the two men that the invading entity was not giving up its hold, the screaming and crying woman was systematically beaten with a walking stick, a glass ashtray and Bashir’s fists. All the time her distraught parents were assured that it was the jinn which was protesting and crying, not their daughter, and that in order to defeat the supernatural creature, extreme measures were necessary. When police and an ambulance team were eventually called to the house they found Kousar Bashir’s bruised and bloody body lying within the same chalk circle – she had been beaten to death. A post-mortem revealed a horrific catalogue of violent physical abuse including cuts and extensive bruising to the young woman’s head, arms and legs, slashes between her breasts, a fractured sternum and sixteen broken ribs, one of which had penetrated through into a lung and resulted in fatal internal haemorrhaging. Nurani Sayeed and Muhammad Bashir were quickly arrested and charged with murder. At Manchester Crown Court in April 1992, Imam Bashir was found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment; Sayeed was given five years for plotting to cause grievous bodily harm. The Manchester jury were unimpressed with the defence case citing the two cleric’s genuine belief in the existence of supernatural forces inhabiting the body of the young and troubled twenty-year-old Asian woman, against which the two ‘holy men’ had resorted to such outrageous violence. That the two priests had continually addressed the jinn as ‘John Wayne’ during the course of the week-long ritual and under this name had repeatedly demanded the ‘entity’ to leave the body of Kousar Bashir, no doubt exemplified and reinforced a grotesque and medieval thinking that belonged to the pages of history rather than the modern world of fax machines, computing and international communication.

  The grim events of 1991 were to cast long shadows over the Bashir family and provide a tragic postscript to an already unhappy story. In the years following his daughter’s death, Muhammad Bashir lived what would seem a haunted life plagued with depression, heavy drinking and mobility problems. In March 2005, his wife was admitted to the Royal Oldham Hospital suffering from leukaemia, where she died the following month. A few days later, Bashir invited some female relatives, including his younger sister, to his St Thomas Street North home, where they read traditional prayers for the dead woman and recited passages from the Qur’an. Unbeknown to the family, earlier in the morning Bashir had asked some children to fill up a nine-litre jerry can of petrol. Around half past three in the afternoon of 28 April, emergency services attending a call to the house found Muhammad Bashir with almost 100 per cent burns to his body in the back garden, as well as the half-empty petrol can and a cigarette lighter. He was taken to Oldham hospital and died later the same day, admitting to dousing himself with the fuel and lighting it. At an inquest the following year it was ruled that Bashir had taken his own life while in a state of depression, a tragedy that had its routes in the events that had taken place fourteen years before.

  In modern times the Bashir case is not without precedent where other religious faiths are concerned. In 1966, a young Swiss girl who claimed to be possessed by a devil was beaten to death during an exorcism ceremony, while ten years later, in July 1976, the parents of Annaliese Michel, together with two local priests, were all found guilty of causing ‘death by negligence’ after the German girl’s emaciated body was discovered dead from a circulatory disease after she had been entrusted into the priests’ care to rid her of an evil spirit. In 1991, the same year that Kousar Bashir was confined within the chalk circle in Oldham, the American ABC television network broadcast a live exorcism of a young Catholic girl who had been receiving medical treatment for a psychiatric condition. An audience expecting to see Exorcist-style effects were disappointed and, after the ceremony had been concluded, the girl continued to receive medical counselling, the exorcism having proved ineffective. It would seem that in this respect she was one of the lucky ones. The case of Kousar Bashir perhaps defines more aptly than anything that we have looked at during the course of this book the reality of true crime and the paranormal.

  CHAPTER 16

  THE HAUNTING MURDERERS

  1910-PRESENT

  A glance through the published literature of hauntings and haunted places, such as London newspaperman Jack Hallam’s 1977 paranormal dictionary The Ghosts’ Who’s Who, quickly shows that where crime-related legends and stories – as well as well-documented cases involving eyewitness accounts and reliable testimony – that feature some form of supernormal phenomena or haunting are concerned, it is most often the ghost of the unfortunate victim rather than the perpetrator that predominates. As the ghostly or psychic phenomena described in the featured cases in this book follow this trend and have mostly concerned the victims of murder, I felt our survey might end with a brief discussion of some reported ghosts and hauntings associated specifically with the murderers themselves. For this I have limited the selection to four noted, and for the criminologist as well as the psychical researcher, interesting cases from the twentieth century.

  Before it was reduced to rubble by enemy bombing during the Second World War, number 39 Hilldrop Crescent in London’s Kentish Town was the most noted murder house in the capital. It was there at the beginning of February 1910 that American-born Hawley Harvey ‘Peter’ Crippen, a graduate of the Hospital College of Cleveland, Ohio, committed the wife murder that has made him one of the most infamous names in the annals of British crime. His story is well known but remains a fascinating one. Crippen had arrived in England in 1900 but, when his qualifications were not recognised for him to practice medicine; he was forced to take a lesser career working for the Munyon Patent Medicine Company, while his wife took in paying guests. Mrs Crippen, whose real name was Kunigunde Mackamotzki, an aspiring but unsuccessful stage artist, went under a number of aliases including Cora Turner and Belle Elmore. She was a forceful, dominant woman who ruled the Crippens’ home at Hilldrop Crescent with a firm hand. Her seemingly mild-mannered husband did much of the housework and, perhaps unsurprisingly, eventually elevated his secretary, twenty-seven-year-old Ethel Le Neve, to the status of mistress.

  Mrs Crippen, who was treasurer of the Music Hall Ladies Guild, was last seen alive on 31 January 1910, when she and her husband invited two retired stage performers, Mr and Mrs Martinetti, to dinner. Two days later, the Ladies Guild received Cora Crippen’s resignation – due to her need to return to American to nurse a sick relative – and Dr Crippen quickly moved Ethel Le Neve into 39 Hilldrop Crescent, where she was soon openly wearing Mrs Crippen’s jewellery. Not long after, Crippen was breaking the news to friends and relatives that his wife had died of pneumonia in California. Most were convinced by the little doctor’s story, but a friend of his late wife was unhappy enough to take her suspicions to the police, with the result that Chief Inspector Walter Dew of Scotland Yard paid Crippen a visit. Dew found nothing untoward at Hilldrop Crescent and seemed satisfied with the doctor’s explanations, but the experience was enough to convince Crippen and his lover that it was too dangerous to remain in London. Crippen shaved off his moustache, dressed Ethel Le Neve as a boy, and the couple fled the country to Antwerp, where they boarded the SS Montrose bound for Quebec. News of Crippen’s flight reached Walter Dew at Scotland Yard and he returned to Hilldrop Cresent. In the cellar, officers unearthed parts of a human body wrapped in a woman’s underclothes and part of a pyjama jacket. Dr Bernard Spilsbury, on his first major case, found traces of hyoscine, a narcotic poison, in the remains as well as scar tissue that corresponded with an abdominal operation Mrs Crippen was known to have undergone. This, together with the fact that the underwear and pyjamas belonged to Cora Crippen and her husband respectively, made
the identity of the body obvious, despite the fact that the head, limbs and entire skeleton were missing. All ports were notified and an arrest warrant was issued for the ‘London cellar murderer’ and his mistress. On board the SS Montrose just over a week later, the suspicions of the ship’s Captain Kendall that the fugitives appeared to be on board his vessel famously resulted in the wireless telegraph being used for the first time in a murder investigation. Walter Dew was alerted and boarded a faster ship for Quebec. On 31 July, six months after the disappearance of Mrs Cora Crippen, her husband, who had written a suicide note during the voyage, was promptly arrested as he and his disguised mistress disembarked at Father Port. Dr Crippen’s trial for murder began at the Old Bailey on 18 October and lasted four days. Found guilty he was hanged at Pentonville Prison at six o’clock on the morning of 23 November 1910; he was fifty years of age. Ethel Le Neve, who was tried separately as an accessory after the fact, was acquitted and later moved to Australia.

  A traditional cyclical haunting is associated with the Crippen case, although it may in fact stem from a single incident that is said to have taken place in the immediate aftermath of the trial and execution. The Hilldrop Crescent that the Crippens knew has undergone extensive changes in the hundred years since that time and the Victorian villa where Cora Crippen lived and died, together with the houses either side, were demolished by post-war developers and subsequently replaced by the Margaret Bondfield House, a modern block of flats. Close by number 32 was a plot of wasteground and a pond which have now also disappeared. It was here that the troubled doctor was known to have spent time walking at night in the weeks leading up to the dramatic events of 1910, and it is this particular location that developed a reputation as the place where his ghost returned on the night of 31 January, the anniversary of the likely date of the murder. The haunting, which comprises a re-enactment of the disposal of the missing parts of Cora Crippen’s body, is said to have been witnessed by an unnamed psychical researcher during the week following Crippen’s execution. During the course of several night-time vigils, the first just before midnight on the day that Crippen walked to the gallows, a vague shadowy form accompanied by a sensation of intense coldness was seen moving across the wasteground adjoining Hilldrop Crescent. This developed into an apparition with staring eyes and a drooping moustache that resembled the cellar murderer and which carried a large, bulky paper parcel under one arm. The figure, surrounded by a palpable aura of sadness, moved into the shadows in the direction of the pond for a short time, after which it was seen returning, having seemingly left the parcel somewhere in the darkness. It passed on and was observed for a few more seconds before suddenly vanishing. With the name of the witness lost to history, the ghost of Hilldrop Crescent is sadly rather unsatisfactory, like the similar appearance of the apparition of William Corder at Polstead. The haunting was first brought to light many years after the alleged event by Peter Underwood in his Haunted London (1973); Underwood, a crime buff as well as a paranormalist, knew Fred Cavill, Crippen’s jailor at Bow Street Police Court, who described him as ‘a quiet, monkey-faced little man who never spoke except to ask the time, which he did twenty times a day’. Whether Crippen did dispose of the missing parts of his wife’s body in this way will never be known. That nothing has come to light over the years, during which time extensive building work has transformed the original Hilldrop Crescent, makes it unlikely, but not impossible: in 2010, a human skull discovered in Richmond, Surrey by contractor’s digging foundations for an extension to the house of the well-known naturalist Sir David Attenborough, was identified as being that of Mrs Julia Thomas, who was murdered in 1879 by her servant, thirty-year-old Irishwoman Kate Webster. Webster had disposed of parts of the body in the River Thames and it was alleged she had also sold jars of human dripping in a local public house, but her victim’s head was never recovered. It was long believed she had kept it for a time in a black bag that she carried around with her.

  If the haunting associated with such a noted case as that of Dr Crippen is unsatisfactory, then another slightly better, but nonetheless anecdotal, account is that of another poisoner, forty-three-year-old Ethel Lillie Major, who was tried at Lincoln Assizes in November 1934 for the murder of her husband. When Arthur Major, a lorry driver, married Ethel in 1918, he was unaware that his wife’s two-year-old sister Auriel was in fact her illegitimate daughter, who was being raised by Ethel’s parents as their own; Ethel had had an affair and fallen pregnant when she was twenty-four. In 1929, by which time the couple were living at Kirkby-on-Bain and had a child of their own, Arthur learnt through local gossip the truth about his real relationship to his young sister-in-law. When Ethel refused to name Auriel’s father he became violent and she suffered for several years, until 1934, from his increasingly quarrelsome and abusive behaviour. The Majors’ problems became well known in the local area, as did the fact that Arthur Major himself had taken a mistress, something that his wife found out about when love letters from the other woman started arriving at their house. On 22 May 1934, Arthur Major became violently ill with food poisoning after his wife made him a meal of corned beef; he died two days later. A local doctor certified the death as being due to ‘status epilepticus’ and Ethel Major began arranging the funeral, unaware that leftovers from her husband’s fatal meal had been given to a neighbour’s dog, which had also died. Soon the police received an anonymous letter that the animal’s death was due to strychnine poisoning and the police intervened, halting the funeral in order to carry out a full post-mortem. When it was found that Arthur Major’s body also contained strychnine his wife was questioned, and made the deadly mistake of implicating herself by denying any knowledge of strychnine as a cause of death before the subject was mentioned. The police found that her father, a gamekeeper, owned a box of the poison to which his daughter had access, and Mrs Major was arrested. The jury found her guilty of murder but their recommendation for clemency was ignored and a sentence of death was passed. When Ethel Major, a tragic figure, stepped onto the gallows on 19 December 1934, despite a last hour appeal by telegram to the King by the Lord Mayor, she became the last person to be executed at Hull Prison, as well as the first woman that the well-known executioner Albert Pierrepoint had the experience of hanging – on this occasion he was assisting his uncle, Thomas Pierrepoint.

  Perhaps some aspect of the unhappiness of Mrs Major’s last years, as well as the final days she spent in the condemned cell, have resulted in her ghost being seen in Hull Prison on a number of occasions in the years following her execution. The haunting is well known and despite there being no documented evidence, it was confirmed to me by Rob Nicholson, the prison historian at HMP Hull, that various prisoners have claimed to have seen Ethel Major in their cell at various times and had subsequently requested a transfer to another part of the prison. As well as prison inmates, a former Prison Officer at one time reported sick after allegedly seeing her apparition.

  Another woman, also a poisoner, who is said to haunt the prison where she was hanged is the former Blackpool housekeeper Louisa May Merrifield, who was executed at Manchester’s Strangeways Prison in 1953 for the murder of her elderly employer, seventy-nine-year-old Sarah Ann Ricketts, an eccentric widow whose two previous husbands had both gassed themselves to death. Louisa, in her mid-forties, was a scheming woman of dubious character. Recently married to her third husband, Alfred Merrifield, who was nearly thirty years her senior, she had already served a prison sentence for ration book fraud when, on 12 March 1953, the couple were taken on by Mrs Ricketts as live-in housekeepers and companions at her bungalow in Devonshire Road, Blackpool. A month later, Mrs Merrifield met a friend, a Mrs Brewer, and told her that they had moved in with an old lady who had since died and left them her property, worth £3,000. Sarah Ricketts had indeed altered her will in the Merrifields’ favour, but at that particular point in time she was very much alive. She obliged the couple by passing away three days later, on 14 April. Louisa attempted to get an undertaker to organise an
immediate cremation but she was unsuccessful as Mrs Brewer had seen the notice – and the date – of Mrs Ricketts’ death in a local newspaper and, remembering the housekeeper’s boastful conversation, contacted the police. A post-mortem showed that the old lady had died from poisoning by yellow phosphorous, a substance contained in a type of rat poison that Louisa Merrifield was known to have recently purchased. The couple were arrested and appeared at the Manchester Assizes in July 1953 charged with murder. Despite the police being unable to find traces of poison at Mrs Rickett’s bungalow, as well as the evidence of one of the defence’s expert witnesses, Professor (formerly Dr) James Webster, who carried out the post-mortem on the body of Mona Tinsley in 1937, that Mrs Ricketts had died from natural causes, Louisa was found guilty. The jury was, however, unable to reach a verdict concerning her husband and the judge ordered a retrial at the next session of Assizes. When the Attorney-General issued a fiat of nolle prosequi (unwilling to prosecute) he was released to inherit his half-share in Mrs Ricketts’ bungalow. He died in 1962 aged eighty, while his wife was hanged by Albert Pierrepoint and Robert ‘Jock’ Stewart on 18 September 1953.