The Douglas Kennedy Collection #2
Page 118
One psychologist interviewed on CBC Radio talked about how a guilty individual can live for weeks, months, even years, denying the fact that he is culpable for the heinous crime he committed, and then the moment arises when he has to confront himself face-on. “That’s when the urge to take your own life—to essentially become your own judge and executioner—becomes immense. The dawn of reality for a sociopath is the dawn either of self-destruction or of some sort of redemption. Sadly, in the case of George MacIntyre his confrontation with the enormity of what he had done proved too much to bear.”
A senior RCMP inspector held a news conference, in which the facts of MacIntyre’s suicide were officially recounted. He’d not been on twenty-four-hour suicide watch because, upon his arrest, he had none of the telltale signs of someone on the verge of killing himself. On the contrary, he’d been so adamant about his own innocence. “Having said that, we did follow all procedures and protocols when it came to ensuring his safety. Sadly these failed him—and I take full responsibility for that.”
Rare as it was to see someone in authority actually take responsibility for a catastrophe (and yes, George MacIntyre’s suicide was just that), I still couldn’t fathom how they could have missed what I saw so clearly in his eyes the first time I caught a glimpse of him on the television: the haunted features of a man who was in the throes of a downward spiral. He’d been accused of killing his child, for Christ’s sake . . . Did they really expect him to take all that on the chin? Who could withstand such torment? And why the hell didn’t they protect him against himself? (Because, no doubt, part of them believed he deserved the self-inflicted fate.)
I myself was in deep shock about all this. George MacIntyre had been my cause, a certain raison d’être. But without him to fight for . . .
Oh, will you listen to yourself, sounding like the truly disturbed and pathetic sad case that you are. You and your wacko theories. The evidence—though not watertight—still pointed to his supreme guilt. Accept it—and now get it behind you.
This line of argument was also put forward by officer Sheila Rivers, a direct, hard-edged member of the RCMP who stepped in for Sergeant Clark when it came to formally cautioning me.
After Geraldine Woods had received the call from Clark, telling him about MacIntyre’s suicide, he also informed her that I still had to report to the RCMP’s offices—and they would be expecting me in a half hour or “a warrant will be put out for her arrest.”
I was at their headquarters ten minutes later. The uniformed receptionist seemed to be expecting me. She hit a button and spoke into a phone, then told me: “Officer Rivers will be with you in a moment.”
Officer Sheila Rivers was in her late thirties: tall, angular, with short black hair and a rapid-fire way of speaking. She was dressed in a simple black pants suit and a white shirt. She could have passed for a businesswoman, had it not been for the holster and gun clearly visible beneath her suit coat.
“Jane Howard?”
I nodded and accepted her extended hand.
“We’ll do this downstairs,” she said, pointing toward a door across the lobby from the reception area. She punched in a code on the external keypad. We were in an IdentiKit version of the same room in which Sergeant Clark had interviewed me.
“This shouldn’t take too long,” she said. “As you have probably heard, it’s a crazy day around here.”
She opened my file—and explained that I could have legal counsel present for this “process.” I told her that wasn’t needed—and she gave me a document in which I waived my right to have such counsel present. I signed it. Then she formally said that it had been decided to place me under something called “Alternative Measures.” She explained that, under both provincial and federal law, these “measures” were not looked upon as a criminal charge; that, though it would remain in “the system,” it could “not be construed as a misdemeanor or felony—which means that if you travel outside of the country and are asked a question on a visa application about whether or not you have a criminal record the answer can be a definitive ‘No.’ ”
She then read through the “Alternative Measures”—in which it was explained that, having been “involved in activities that wasted police time and also hindered an ongoing criminal investigation,” I hereby was being cautioned that any further such actions on my behalf that were perceived to “involve police action” would result in charges being preferred against me. I also agreed to voluntarily enter a program of psychological counseling, to be administered by the Health Board of Alberta—to submit myself to all medical and psychological examinations demanded of me by the board, and to agree to whatever program of therapy they deemed appropriate for me.
I had a few objections about this clause.
“Say they decide I need electroshock therapy?” I asked.
“There is a small-print clause here saying you can refuse to accept said therapies if you consider them detrimental to you.”
“And I bet there’s also a small-print clause allowing them to override my objections.”
“In my experience, the province isn’t in the habit of letting people they classify as unstable roam the streets. They consider you nothing more than a nuisance—and one who can be helped through more conventional means. My advice to you, Ms. Howard, is to accept the terms of the Alternative Measures, see the psychiatrist for however long it is mandated, take the pills they give you, and get this behind you. I’ve read your file. You’re not a misfit and you are certainly no dummy. So cut yourself a break—and play by the rules of the Alternative Measures. MacIntyre is dead. The case is closed now. Move on from it.”
But that afternoon I was back at the internet café, watching all those newscasts online, reading every damn column inch that had been written on MacIntyre’s suicide. Halfway through this media binge, my cell phone rang. A woman introduced herself as Dr. Maeve Collins and said that she was the psychiatrist assigned to my case. She was wondering if I might be able to come in and see her tomorrow at three p.m.
“No problem,” I told her, and took down the address of her office in Kensington.
As soon as I hung up I returned to the CBC website and resumed watching their rolling twenty-four-hour news service. On screen the Rev. Larry Coursen was being interviewed. He was wearing an expression that could best be described as Piously Pained. He was pictured in front of his church, talking to a phalanx of reporters.
“This is a terrible time for Brenda and her dear son, Michael. First the loss of Ivy, now George. I can only hope that George is in a better place today and that the pain and anguish of his life have been replaced by eternal peace. I’ve been asked to speak for the family—and to ask that you respect their privacy at this moment of intense loss for them. Brenda will make a formal statement to the press in the coming days, but for the moment she just wanted me to express to you her infinite sorrow and her belief that George is with Jesus.”
One of the reporters asked: “Any thoughts, Reverend, on whether Ivy MacIntyre will now be found alive?”
“Tragically one must assume that she is dead. Why else would George MacIntyre take his life if she was, verily, alive?”
Hang on, you told me . . .
And I started racing through the files I always carted with me, the files with everything on the case, until I found my notes of my “interview” with him.
“She’s not dead,” he’d told me.
And I’d replied: “How can you be so sure?”
And he’d said: “I just am.”
Why were you so certain of that?
And now . . . was it only because MacIntyre killed himself that you changed your mind?
Another reporter tossed out a new question.
“The police have been very close-lipped on all this, but—presuming, as you said, that Ivy must now be considered dead—do you think MacIntyre left any clue as to where her body might be found?”
There was an involuntary moment when Coursen’s lips almost worked their way int
o a smile. He caught it before it was noticeable. But I noticed it—perhaps because I had the facility, courtesy of the internet and the stop/start feature attached to this broadcast, to replay the moment over and over again. The sides of his mouth began to curve outward—the hint of an inward grin wiped off his face before it could become discernible to anyone. Anyone, that is, but me. Then again, I was playing it back nonstop. Was the bastard laughing at us? Laughing because he knew . . . ?
I replayed that moment four times over.
“. . . do you think MacIntyre left any clue as to where her body might be found?” the journalist asked Coursen.
And then there was, unmistakably, that involuntary, one-eighth-of-a-second smile which crossed Coursen’s face . . . followed by his answer: “I’m certain he didn’t.”
How can you be so certain, mister? What gives you the right to make an incontestable statement like that? Why are you telling us it’s a foregone conclusion that he didn’t leave a hint where the body could be found? Because MacIntyre didn’t do it? And because you know who did do it?
The interview ended. The news broadcast rolled on. We were back in the CBC news studio. The talking head looked at the camera and said: “In other news, a terrible crash east of Dundas near Hamilton claimed the life of a family of six today . . .”
East of Dundas near Hamilton . . .
Why did the mention of those two placenames suddenly trigger a déjà-vu moment in my brain? Dundas . . . Hamilton . . . Dundas . . . Hamilton . . .
Got it.
I reopened the file and scanned again the notes of my interview with Coursen. When he’d asked me where I’d grown up, I’d said: “Dundas,” pulling the name out of nowhere. And his reply?
“Dundas! No kidding. I did some of my early pastoral work in Dundas! Do you know the Assemblies church on King and Sydenham . . . ?”
Of course he caught me out on that. But . . .
The Assemblies church in Dundas . . .
And Dundas is near Hamilton. And in my burgeoning file, there is . . .
A clipping from the Hamilton Daily Record about the disappearance four years ago of an eleven-year-old girl. Her name—I hadn’t noticed it before—was Kelly Franklin. And the Hamilton Daily Record article spoke about “police investigations” into her disappearance, and then, in a later article, about how a “trusted family counselor” had been investigated by the local police department. No charges, however, were brought against him. The girl, meanwhile, had been admitted to a psychiatric facility, suffering from post-traumatic stress.
Kelly Franklin, Kelly Franklin. I googled her name. Around two dozen stories surrounding her disappearance and mysterious return. Many police investigations. Suspicions about someone known to the family. And then this, in a later Toronto Star article, which I hadn’t bothered to open the first time around:
“Kelly’s parents, Michelle and Morgan Franklin, are devout Christians and say that their religious faith sustained them through the ten days when Kelly went missing. One-time members of the Assemblies of God church in Dundas, they are now stalwarts of the Life Tabernacle in Hamilton.”
The Assemblies of God church in Dundas. How’s that for happenstance. And why did they leave the church?
The article continued:
“In the wake of Kelly’s return, the Franklins and the police have remained very tight-lipped about what they know about her alleged abductor. Though rumors have been rife in both Dundas and Hamilton as to the name of this individual, there is another school of local thought that Kelly was so traumatized by what happened that she couldn’t identify her abductor, and/or that the Franklins have been paid a substantial sum for their silence.”
But who would pay them such a large sum? What organization would be willing to hand over a big settlement in order to keep their name out of the press—especially as their name would be linked to a child’s disappearance?
I googled Dundas Assemblies of God church. Up popped their website—all smiling faces and words of praise. I found the link for “Dundas Assemblies History”—and there, in their list of former pastors, was the Rev. Larry Coursen, with his dates of service: December 2002–May 2004. A short tenure. And when did Kelly Franklin go missing? April 2, 2004. And when did Larry Coursen get dispatched to Townsend? I dug back into my file and found this detail listed on a printout from the Townsend Assemblies website: June 2004.
So Coursen parted company with the Dundas Assemblies not long after Kelly Franklin went missing . . . or perhaps right after she showed up alive again. But then this wall of silence enveloped the case, during which time, Coursen was conveniently dispatched to a nowhere town in the Alberta badlands.
I typed in “Telephone Directory Information” for a Franklin, M. in Hamilton, Ontario. There were three. I scribbled down their numbers, then dug out my cell phone and started calling.
“Is this Kelly’s mom?” I asked on the first try.
“Wrong number,” the voice on the other end said—and hung up.
But the second number hit the jackpot.
“Is this Kelly’s mom?” I asked.
“Who’s this?”
The voice was loud, raspy.
“My name’s Nancy Lloyd. I’m a journalist with the Vancouver Sun.”
“I ain’t talking to no reporters. All that was years ago.”
“I’m aware of that—and I genuinely apologize for bothering you at home. It’s just . . . I’m certain you’ve read all about Ivy MacIntyre’s disappearance . . .”
“I’ve got nothing to say about all that either.”
“I understand. However, I do note that you and your family were once members of the Dundas Assemblies of God church. Did you know that Ivy MacIntyre’s family were members of an Assemblies of God church in Alberta, and that your former pastor—Larry Coursen—is now their pastor out here?”
“I’m not talking about him,” she said, sounding angry.
“Why not?”
“Because that was the deal.”
“What deal?”
“Now you’ve made me shoot my mouth off.”
“Did someone—some organization—do a deal with you to say nothing about Larry Coursen?”
“I ain’t answering no more of your questions.”
“How much did they pay for your silence?”
“That’s my business,” she said. The line went dead.
I sat there, my head reeling. Coursen had abducted Kelly Franklin. Then he either let her go or . . . might she have escaped his clutches? Then what? She’s so traumatized by whatever he did to her during those ten days that she can’t identify him? Or she identifies him and he has a solid alibi? Or she returns home and retreats into herself, to the point where she has to be institutionalized and can’t identify her captor? No, scratch that last idea. She must have been able to point the finger at Coursen. Perhaps when she told her parents, their first reaction was to phone the Assemblies of God big boys—who moved in quickly to dampen down the scandal and ensure that their pastor didn’t get his face on every front page in North America.
And was Kelly Franklin still institutionalized all these years later?
Another quick google and I came up with the following Hamilton Daily Record item: “Abducted Girl Falls Foul of the Law Again.”
It was dated September 23, 2007, and stated that Kelly Franklin, “the girl who was mysteriously abducted three years ago,” had been arrested at a local Woolworths for sniffing glue and becoming sick thereafter. The story recounted how Franklin, aged fourteen, already had a rap sheet for shoplifting, aggravated assault of a woman police officer, and vagrancy. When she walked into the Woolworths in Hamilton she found the aisle that sold epoxy glue, opened four tubes into a plastic bag, then proceeded to place the bag over her mouth and inhale deeply. She was at this for several minutes before staff found her, delirious and incoherent. The police were called, but she became violently ill and started to choke on her own vomit. Fortunately the assistant manager at Woolworths knew CP
R and managed to clear her esophagus and avoid asphyxiation. She was rushed to a local hospital, where she was reported to be in stable condition.
A subsequent article—dated six weeks after this one—noted a court hearing where Kelly Franklin was sentenced to be detained in an institution for young offenders “until it was determined that she was no longer a danger to the community or herself.”
There was nothing further on her after this, leading me to surmise that she was still incarcerated.
You son of a bitch, Coursen. You destroy that girl’s life and get your church to pay her family hush money. Then you get transferred out west and two girls go missing in the very town in which you operate and your church does nothing. Maybe because—as I quickly discovered through further use of a search engine—their families weren’t affiliated with Townsend Assemblies. Then, when Ivy MacIntyre goes missing, you frame her poor fool of a father, a man who couldn’t control his temper or his boozing, and therefore was an easy target. The perfect fall guy.
I gripped the sides of the computer table, trying to keep my rage and distress in check. I wanted to call Sergeant Clark and reveal everything I had just discovered. To do so, however, would be to risk getting picked up for breach of my Alternative Measures. Best to say nothing right now. Best to . . .
I checked my watch. It was just four p.m. I called the local car-rental place and asked them if they had any vehicles ready to be borrowed. They told me they could fix me up with a Corolla in fifteen minutes. I paid for the many hours I had spent online. I said goodbye to the slacker dude who was still absorbed in some goth website. As I headed toward the door his response to me was: “Happy trails.”
I doubted this trail would lead to anything happy.
Half an hour later I was edging my way through the usual rush-hour automotive crawl. The days were getting longer now, so I had light with me during the hour it took to edge my way out of all those endless subdevelopments and hit open country. I played the drive-time program on CBC Radio 2—and clicked the radio off when the hourly news rolled around at five and six p.m. I wanted to hear no more about the case. I just wanted to get to Townsend and then . . .