Book Read Free

Richard L Epstein

Page 38

by Critical Thinking (3rd Edition) (pdf)


  Maria has asked all but three of the thirty-six people in her class whether they've ever

  used heroin. Only two said "yes." So she concluded that almost no one in the class has

  used heroin.

  Generalization (state it; if none, say so): Almost no one in Maria's class has

  used heroin.

  Sample: The thirty-three people Maria asked.

  Sample is representative? Yes.

  Sample is big enough? Yes.

  Sample is studied well? Yes.

  Additional premises needed:

  Good generalization? Yes.

  Do you really thinkeveryone who's used heroin is going to admit it to a stranger? The

  sample isn't studied well—you'd need anonymous responses at least. So the

  generalization isn't good.

  Evaluate Exercises 12-30 by answering the following.

  Generalization (state it; if none, say so):

  Sample:

  Sample is representative? (yes or no)

  Sample is big enough? (yes or no)

  Sample is studied well? (yes or no)

  Additional premises needed:

  Good generalization?

  EXERCISES for Chapter 14 295

  12. It's incredible how much information they can put on a CD. I just bought one that

  contains a whole encyclopedia.

  13. Socialized medicine in Canada isn't working. I heard of a man who had colon cancer

  and needed surgery. By the time doctors operated six months later, the man was nearly

  dead and died two days later.

  14. Lee: Every rich person I've met invested heavily in the stock market. So I'll invest in

  the stockmarket, too.

  15. Don't take a course from Dr. E. I know three people who failed his course last term.

  16. Everyone I've met at this school is either on one of the athletic teams or has a boyfriend

  or girlfriend on one of the athletic teams. Gosh, I guess just about everyone at this

  school is involved in sports.

  17. Dick: Hold the steering wheel.

  Zoe: What are you doing? Stop! Are you crazy?

  Dick: I' m just taking my sweater off.

  Zoe: I can't believe you did that. It's so dangerous.

  Dick: Don't be silly. I've done it a thousand times before.

  18. Manuel to Maria: Lanolin is great for your hands—you ought to try it. It's what's on

  sheep wool naturally. How many shepherds have you seen with dry, chapped hands?

  19. Lee: When I went in to the health service, I read some women's magazine that had the

  results of a survey they'd done on women's attitudes towards men with beards. They

  said that they received over 10,000 responses from their readers to the question in their

  last issue, and 78% say they think that men with beards are really sexy! I'm definitely

  going to grow a beard now.

  20. My grandmother was diagnosed with cancer seven years ago. She refused any treatment

  that was offered to her over the years. She's perfectly healthy and doing great. The

  treatments for cancer are just a scam to get people's money.

  21. Tom: Can you pick up that pro basketball player who's coming to the rally today?

  Dick: I can't. Zoe's got the car. Why not ask Suzy?

  Tom: She's got a Yoda hatchback. They're too small for someone over six foot tall.

  22. (Overheard at a doctor's office) I won't have high blood pressure today because I got

  enough sleep last night. The last two times you've taken my blood pressure I've rested

  well the night before and both times it was normal.

  23. Suzy: I've been studying this astrology book seriously. I think you should definitely go

  into science.

  Lee: I've been thinking of that, but what's astrology got to do with it?

  Suzy: I remember your birthday is in late January, so you're an Aquarius?

  Lee: Yeah, January 28.

  Suzy: Well, Aquarians are generally scientific but eccentric.

  Lee: C'mon. That can't be right.

  Suzy: Sure it is. Copernicus, Galileo, and Thomas Edison were all Aquarians.

  296 CHAPTER 14 Generalizing

  24. Give the baby his pacifier so he'll stop crying. Every time I give him the pacifier he

  stops crying.

  25. We will be late for church because we have to wait for Gina. She's always late. She's

  been late seven Sundays in a row.

  26. Every time I or anyone else has looked into my refrigerator, the light is on. Therefore,

  the light is always on in my refrigerator.

  27. Every time I or anyone I know has seen a tree fall in the forest, it makes a sound.

  Therefore, anytime a tree falls in the forest it makes a sound.

  28. Biology breeds grumpy old men

  Men lose brain tissue at almost three times the rate of women, curbing their memory,

  concentration and reasoning power—and perhaps turning them into "grumpy old men"

  —a researcher said Wednesday.

  "Even in the age range of 18 to 45, you can see a steady decline in the ability to

  perform such (attention-oriented) tasks in men," said Ruben C. Gur, a professor of

  psychology at the University of Pennsylvania.

  Gur said shrinking brains may make men grumpier because some of the tissue loss is

  in the left frontal region of the brain, which seems to be connected to depression.

  "Grumpy old men may be biological," said Gur, who is continuing to study whether

  there is a connection.

  However, one researcher not affiliated with the study said Wednesday that other

  recent studies contradict Gur's findings on shrinkage.

  The findings, which augment earlier research published by Gur and colleagues, are

  the result of his studies of the brain functions of 24 women and 37 men over the past

  decade. He measured the brain volume with an MRI machine and studied metabolism

  rates. From young adulthood to middle age, men lose 15% of their frontal lobe volume,

  8.5% of temporal lobe, he said. Women, while they have "very mild" shrinkage, lose

  tissue in neither lobe. For the brain overall, men lose tissue three times faster.

  Gur found that the most dramatic loss was in men's frontal lobes, which control

  attention, abstract reasoning, mental flexibility and inhibition of impulses, and the

  temporal lobe [which] governs memory.

  Associated Press, April, 1996

  29. Sex, lies, and HIV

  Reducing the risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission among sexually

  active teenagers and young adults is a major public health concern [reference supplied].

  Young people are advised to select potential sexual partners from groups at lower risk

  for HIV [reference supplied], in part by asking about partners' risk histories [reference

  supplied]. Unfortunately, this advice overlooks the possibility that people may lie about

  their risk history [reference supplied].

  In a sample of 18-to-25-year-old students attending colleges in southern California

  (n = 665), we found strong evidence that undermines faith in questioning partners as an

  effective primary strategy of risk reduction. The young adults, of whom 442 were

  sexually active, completed anonymous 18-page questionnaires assessing sexual

  behavior, HIV-related risk reduction, and their experiences with deception when dating.

  EXERCISES for Chapter 14 297

  Variable

  Men Women

  ( N = 1 9 6 ) (N = 226)

  History of disclosure

  percent

  Has told a lie in order to have sex

  34 10*

  Li
ed about ejaculatory control or likelihood of pregnancy

  38 14

  Sexually active with more than one person

  32 23$

  Partner did not know

  68 59

  Experience of being lied to

  Has been lied to for purposes of sex

  47 60**

  Partner lied about ejaculatory control or likelihood of pregnancy 34 46

  Willingness to deceive***

  Would lie about having negative HIV-antibody test

  20 4*

  Would lie about ejaculatory control or likelihood of pregnancy

  29 2*

  Would understate number of previous partners

  47 42

  Would disclose existence of other partner to new partner

  Never

  22 10*

  After a while, when safe to do so

  34 28*

  Only if asked

  31 33*

  Yes

  13 29*

  Would disclose a single episode of sexual infidelity

  Never

  43 3 4 *

  After a while, when safe to do so

  21 20$

  Only if asked

  14 11*

  Yes

  22 3 5 *

  * P < .001 by chi-square test % P < .05 by chi-square test ** P < .01 by chi-square test

  *** Hypothetical scenarios were described in which honesty would threaten either the

  opportunity to have sex or the maintenance of a sexually active relationship.

  We found that sizable percentages of the 196 men and 226 women who were

  sexually experienced reported having told a lie in order to have sex. Men reported

  telling lies significantly more frequently than women (Table). Women more often

  reported that they had been lied to by a dating partner. When asked what they would do

  in hypothetical situations, both men and women frequently reported that they would

  actively or passively deceive a dating partner, although again, men were significantly

  more likely than women to indicate a willingness to do so.

  Although we cannot be certain that our subjects were fully forthcoming in their

  responses (e.g., they reported more frequent dishonesty from others than they admitted

  to themselves), one can probably assume that their reports of their own dishonesty

  underestimate rather than overestimate the problem. The implications of our findings

  are clear. In counseling patients, particularly young adults, physicians need to consider

  realistically the patients' capacity for assessing the risk of HIV in sexual partners

  through questioning them [reference]. Patients should be cautioned that safe-sex

  strategies are always advisable [references], despite arguments to the contrary from

  partners. This is particularly important for heterosexuals in urban centers where

  298 CHAPTER 14 Generalizing

  distinctions between people at low risk and those at high risk may be less obvious

  because of higher rates of experimentation with sex and the use of intravenous drugs and

  undisclosed histories of high-risk behavior. Susan D Cochran and Vickie M. Mays,

  Letter to the Editor,

  New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 322, pp. 774-775, © 1990,

  Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.

  30. Sex unlikely to cause heart attacks

  Sexual intercourse is unlikely to trigger a heart attack, even among people who have

  already survived one, according to a study that is the first to examine this widespread

  fear.

  Only 1 percent of heart attacks were triggered by sexual activity in a nationwide

  sample of nearly 900 heart attack survivors who said they were sexually active.

  The odds of suffering a heart attack after engaging in sex are only about 2 in a

  million, the study found—about twice as high as the average hourly risk of heart attack

  among 50-year-old Americans with no overt sign of coronary artery disease.

  "It's easy to get the message from movies, and even from Shakespeare, that sexual

  activity can trigger heart attacks," said Dr. James Muller of New England Deaconess

  Hospital in Boston, who led the study. "It's part of the mythology, and it's certainly in

  the minds of many cardiac patients and their spouses."

  "What has been lacking in the past are actual numbers. Now the numbers are

  available, and the risk is quite, quite low."

  Furthermore, regular exercise can substantially reduce the risk of a sex-triggered

  heart attack.

  Patients who never engaged in heavy physical exertion, or got vigorous exercise

  only once a week, had a threefold risk of heart attack in the two hours after sexual

  activity. But the relative risk dropped to twofold among patients who exercise twice a

  week, and only 1.2 fold among those who exercised three or more times weekly.

  The new figures, which appear in this week's Journal of the American Medical

  Association, suggest that sexual activity triggers 15,000 of the 1.5 million heart attacks

  that occur in this nation annually.

  "Although sexual activity doubles the risk" of heart attack, the researchers noted, the

  effect on annual risk "is negligible because the absolute risk difference is small, the risk

  is transient and the activity is relatively infrequent."

  For instance, for an individual without cardiac disease, weekly sexual activity would

  increase the annual risk of a heart attack from 1 percent to 1.01 percent.

  Richard Knox, Boston Globe, May, 1996

  31. Would you try this new procedure? Explain.

  Chili peppers a red hot cure for surgical pain

  When burning pain lingers months after surgery, doctors say there is a red-hot cure: chili

  peppers. In a study, an ointment made with capsaicin, the stuff that makes chili peppers

  hot, brought relief to patients with tender surgical scars, apparently by short-circuiting

  the pain.

  Patients undergoing major cancer surgery, such as mastectomies or lung operations,

  are sometimes beset by sharp, burning pain in their surgical scars that lasts for months,

  EXERCISES for Chapter 14 299

  even years. Sometimes the misery is so bad that sufferers cannot even stand the weight

  of clothing on their scar, even though it is fully healed.

  The condition, seen in about 5 percent or fewer of all cases, results from damage to

  the nerves during surgery. Ordinary pain killers don't work, and the standard treatment

  is antidepressant drugs.

  However, these powerful drugs have side effects. So in search of a better

  alternative, doctors tested a cream made with capsaicin on 99 patients who typically

  had suffered painful surgical scars at least six months.

  Patients preferred capsaicin over a dummy cream by 3-to-l.

  "The therapy clearly worked," said Dr. Charles L. Loprinzi, head of medical

  oncology at the Mayo Clinic. He released his data Monday at the annual meeting of the

  American Society for Clinical Oncology.

  Capsaicin is believed to work by blocking substance P, a natural chemical that

  carries pain impulses between nerve cells. That same blocking effect may explain why

  people who eat hot peppers all the time develop a tolerance to the burn.

  Dr. Alan Lyss of Missouri Baptist Medical Center in St. Louis called it "a creative,

  new and very inexpensive way to take care of some kinds of cancer pain."

  Capsaicin is sold in drug stores without a prescription, and a tube that lasts a month

 
; costs about $ 1 6 . . . .

  In the study, the patients were randomly assigned to capsaicin cream or the look-

  alike placebo four times a day for eight-week intervals. Until the study was over, no one

  knew which was which.

  Patients kept score of their pain. It went down 53 percent while using capsaicin but

  only 17 percent while on the placebo. About 10 percent said their pain disappeared

  completely.

  The doctors followed the patients for two months after they stopped using capsaicin

  and found that pain did not come back. Longer follow-up will be necessary to see if the

  treatment relieves the pain permanently. Associated Press, May 21, 1996

  For Exercises 32-34 identify the analogy and explain how a generalization is required.

  32. Dick: What do you think about getting one of those Blauspot rice cookers?

  Zoe: It's not a good idea. Remember, Maria got one and she had to return it twice to

  get it fixed.

  33. Of chimpanzees fed one pound of chocolate per day in addition to their usual diet,

  72% became obese within two months. Therefore, it is likely that most humans who eat

  2% of their body weight in chocolate daily will become obese within two months.

  34. Zoe: Suzy invited us over to dinner tonight. We've got to be there at 6 p.m.

  Dick: I'm not going over there. The last time we went she served some concoction

  she'd read about in a cookbook, and I had the runs for two days.

  F u r t h e r Study Courses on statistics explain the nature of sampling and generalizing.

  A course on inductive logic in a philosophy department will study more fully the

  topics of this chapter and the next. A course on philosophy of science will study the

  300 CHAPTER 14 Generalizing

  role of generalizations in science, which you can also read about in my Five Ways of

  Saying "Therefore." Many disciplines, such as sociology, marketing, or the health

  sciences give courses on the use of sampling and generalizing that are specific to

  their subject.

  Two books about statistics in reasoning with lots of examples are Flaws and

  Fallacies in Statistical Thinking, by Stephen K. Campbell and How to Lie with

  Statistics, by Darrell Huff.

  15 Cause

  and Effect

  A. What is the Cause?

  1. Causes and effects 302

  2. The normal conditions 303

  3. Particular causes, generalizations, and general causes 303

  •Exercises for Sections A. 1-A.3 304

  4. The cause precedes the effect 305

 

‹ Prev