Book Read Free

Lives in Writing

Page 22

by David Lodge


  The problem baffled me, and blocked the progress of my novel for some time, until I suddenly saw the answer. Because the Blands had dancing when they entertained large parties at Well Hall, Briggs had assumed that ‘our dance’ in Rosamund’s letter referred to such an occasion, but it was much more likely that it referred to a dance organised by the Fabian Nursery to which Jane and H.G. had been invited as members of the Executive. Rosamund was Secretary of the Nursery and would naturally refer to it as ‘our dance’ in her letter. I deduced that Jane had received from Rosamund a Nursery flyer advertising the lectures and an invitation to the dance, and that Jane had written to her asking if she could attend the lectures but saying that she and H.G. wouldn’t be able to attend the dance. Rosamund says in her letter that her sister Iris is staying with the family at Well Hall, convalescing from a difficult childbirth, and that she herself intends to go and stay with Iris for two months when she returns home. It seems very improbable that Edith and Hubert would host a dance at such a juncture, and Briggs had to speculate, without any evidence, that Rosamund changed her plans to stay with Iris, in order to place the ‘dirty weekend’ escapade between the writing of the letter and the commencement of Wells’s affair with Amber in the late spring of that year.

  Because the archive of the Fabian Nursery held at the London School of Economics doesn’t begin until 1910 it is impossible to verify that they held a dance on 20 March 1908, but Patricia Pugh’s history of the Fabian Society, Educate, Agitate, Organize, confirmed that the Nursery did indeed organise dances in their early years, which was good enough for me. I felt free to place the Paddington episode in the early summer of 1907, a much more plausible date for several other reasons. Rosamund’s letter to Jane nearly a year later has exactly the wistful tone of someone who would like to heal a breach with a former friend, regretting the missed opportunity ‘of talking to you a little bit’.

  Of course I could have ignored Julia Briggs’s dating of the Paddington incident when I first encountered it, and placed it earlier in time – very few readers would have challenged me. But that would have been to break the rule I set myself: to respect the known facts. When the different documentary sources I consulted gave conflicting versions of the same event I favoured the one that seemed most plausible to me as a novelist. In the Postscript to his autobiography, Wells describes his third visit to Russia, undertaken primarily to interview Stalin, in 1934. He asked Moura, who had lived independently in Europe since she parted company with Gorky in 1928, but was now in a steady relationship with H.G., to accompany him. She refused, saying she dared not return to Russia for fear of being arrested, and that she had to visit her children in Estonia, where they arranged to meet on his return journey. He took his son Gip with him to Russia as companion instead of her. Visiting Gorky in his dacha outside Moscow Wells was stunned to discover that Moura, unknown to him and contrary to her own accounts of her movements, had stayed with Gorky three times in the past year, most recently only a week before his own visit. Wells felt betrayed and described vividly how he was plunged into paroxysms of jealous rage. He set off alone for Tallinn, Estonia, determined to confront Moura with her deception.

  In H.G.Wells: Aspects of a Life Anthony West asserts, naming Gip as his source, that Wells and his son deduced between them that Moura must be a spy working for Russian intelligence, that she had been planted on him at the very beginning of their relationship in 1920 and had been reporting on him ever since. According to this account, when Wells accused Moura of this in Tallinn she admitted it, but told him that it was the only way she survived the revolution and that ‘as a biologist he had to know that survival was the first law of life’. In Anthony West’s opinion, although Wells patched up their relationship he never recovered from the disillusionment, and it was the underlying reason for the misanthropy of his last years.

  West’s version of the episode was repeated by John Gray in his book, The Immortalisation Commission, which was published not long before A Man of Parts, and serialised in the Guardian Review (8 January 2011). Without Gray’s end-note reference in his book, readers of that piece would have assumed that it came from Wells’s Postscript, mentioned by Gray. It does not. Wells gives a very detailed account there of his showdown with Moura in Tallinn – it is the only dialogue scene in my novel hardly a word of which I had to invent – and at no point in it, or anywhere else, does he accuse Moura of being a spy, only of being ‘a liar and cheat’. Anthony West’s book is a mine of information but he is not always reliable, and in this instance I have followed Wells’s account. If Anthony’s version were true, why would Wells give a false one in a work to be published after he and Moura were dead? I find it hard to believe – and I would have found it hard to render in my novel – that he received Moura’s frank admission in 1934 that she was a Russian spy who had all along exploited him out of self-interested motives, but that nevertheless he soon resumed a sexual relationship with her, begged her to marry him, and maintained that she was one of the few women he truly loved. Also her daughter Tania recalled in her memoir, A Little of All These, that Moura asked her in June 1936 to tell H.G. that she had been taken ill in Paris when in fact she had gone to Moscow to visit the terminally ill Gorky. Moura would surely not have bothered with this deception if two years earlier she had confessed to being a regular visitor to the USSR in the pay of OGPU.

  It would be surprising if Wells, knowing something of Moura’s life in revolutionary Russia, never suspected that she had been compromised into acting as an agent for Russian intelligence, but I took the view that he suppressed or was in denial of this as a possible explanation of her attachment to him, and in my novel it only surfaces towards the very end of his life. Admittedly, in this position it helps to make my narrative novel-shaped. Early in 1946, ill and confined to bed, he is troubled by doubts about Moura’s past. Is she, as Anthony believes, a spy? Has she been reporting on him to Russian intelligence ever since they first met? He resolves to challenge her when she next visits him, and then changes his mind because he cannot face the consequence should she admit that it is true – the end of their friendship. When she next visits him, bringing a bunch of daffodils which she arranges in a vase, to his horror he hears himself saying without premeditation, ‘“Are you a spy, Moura?”’ After a long pause, she replies:

  ‘Aigee . . . That is a silly question. Shall I tell you why? Because if you ask that question of someone and she is not a spy she will say “No.” But if she is a spy she will also say “No”. So there is no point in asking that question.’

  ‘No, of course not,’ he says. ‘Forget I ever asked it.’

  ‘I have forgotten it already,’ she says, with a smile, and removes the newspaper from the chair next to his bed to sit down beside him. ‘Would you like me to read you something from the Times?’

  ‘Yes, please,’ he says. ‘Read me the obituaries.’

  We know that Moura visited Wells in his last illness, and that she read to him from newspapers, but this dialogue is all imagined. I make no apology for that because I think the scene reflects the ambiguities of the relationship between these two people without pretending to resolve them. And for me it made an aesthetically satisfying ending to the last scene in the novel in which H.G. appears as a living person.

  * * *

  1 In judging Wells it is worth noting that these and similar sentiments did not offend the leading lights of the Fabian Society, such as George Bernard Shaw and Beatrice and Sidney Webb. On the contrary, reading Anticipations made them eager to recruit Wells to the society. A belief in eugenics as a solution to social problems was ‘politically correct’ in progressive circles in the early twentieth century.

  INDEX

  The page references in this index correspond to the printed edition from which this ebook was created. To find a specific word or phrase from the index, please use the search feature of your ebook reader.

  Allain, Marie-Françoise 4n, 16

  Althusser, Louis 125, 130

&nb
sp; Amis, Kingsley 22–49, 167, 172

  Amis, Martin 25, 26, 27, 29–30, 32, 33, 37, 38, 39, 40, 44

  Amis, Philip 32, 38, 40

  Amis, Sally 33, 37

  Aristotle 137

  Arnold, Gaynor 238

  Auden, W.H. 86

  Aymé, Marcel 220, 221–2

  Bainbridge, Beryl 51

  Bakhtin, Mikhail 188

  Banville, John 19

  Bardwell, Hilary (Hilly) 31–2, 33, 35, 36, 38, 39, 43

  Barnes, Julian 118

  Barthes, Roland 125, 145, 192

  Bates, Alan 122

  Bayley, John 129

  Beckett, Samuel 46, 115

  Beevor, Antony 233, 234, 235, 238, 242

  Bennett, Alan 77–94, 249

  Bergonzi, Bernard 154

  Bigsby, Christopher 181, 182

  Björk, Anita 7, 8

  Blackmur, R.P. 35

  Blair, Tony 195, 204

  Blake, George 114

  Bland, Edith see Nesbit, Edith

  Bland, Hubert 223, 227, 242–4, 245, 246, 249, 250, 251, 252

  Bland, Rosamund 227, 232, 244–5, 249–53

  Bloom, Harold 163

  Boorman, George 68

  Boorman, Ivy 68, 69, 70

  Boorman, John 66–76

  Bourke, Sean 114

  Bradbury, Dominic 166

  Bradbury, Elizabeth 166, 170, 173, 174, 178, 191

  Bradbury, Malcolm 165–93

  Bradbury, Matthew 174, 179

  Bradford, Richard 48–9

  Brennan, Maeve 34

  Briggs, Julia 224, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 250, 251–2, 253

  Bright, Laurence 129

  Brockbank, Philip 162

  Brontë sisters 202–3, 204

  Brookner, Anita 186

  Budberg, Baroness Moura 227–8, 232, 253, 254–6

  Burroughs, William 156

  Bush, George W. 144

  Byatt, A.S. 224–5

  Cage, John 156

  Camberg, Bernard (‘Barney’) 54, 55

  Camberg, Sarah (‘Cissy’) 54, 55

  Cecil, Lord David 33

  Charles, Prince 129, 196

  Chase, Richard 202, 203, 204

  Cloetta, Jacques 10

  Cloetta, Yvonne 4–5, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 18

  Coetzee, J.M. 186

  Cohen, Paula Marantz 237

  Columbus, Christopher 215

  Compton-Burnett, Ivy 51, 58

  Conquest, Robert 38, 48

  Conrad, Joseph 7, 50, 51, 148, 157, 237

  Cornwell, John 17, 18

  Coward, Noel 11

  Cromwell, Thomas 233, 241

  Culler, Jonathan 126

  Dalai Lama 102, 105

  Daniel, Yuli 14

  Davis, Anne 83–4, 85

  Dawkins, Richard 147, 148–9, 150–1, 206

  de la Mare, Walter 105

  de Man, Paul 126

  Dennett, Daniel 206

  Deresiewicz, William 142n

  Derrida, Jacques 125, 133, 138, 141, 163

  Descartes, René 190

  Diana, Princess of Wales 194–209

  Dickens, Charles 238

  Dickey, James 73–4

  Diderot, Denis 189–91

  Du Maurier, George 189, 224

  Duchamp, Marcel 156

  Duckett, Jim 169, 177

  Duran, Fr Leopoldo 18

  Eagleton, Terry 125–52

  Eliot, T.S. 2–3, 23, 60, 67, 98, 109

  Ellis, Alice Thomas 51

  Empson, William 136

  Euripides 148

  Fayed, Dodi 199, 203, 205

  Forster, E.M. 164

  Foucault, Michel 125, 128

  Fowles, John 189

  Freud, Sigmund 125, 237

  Frey, James 236, 237

  Fry, Stephen 114, 115

  Frye, Northrop 163

  Fukuyama, Francis 143

  Fussell, Betty 36

  Gaitskell, Hugh 16

  Galileo 215

  Games, Alexander 82, 84

  George VI, King 233

  Gibson, Alfred 238

  Glendinning, Victoria 218

  Glenville, Peter 12

  Gorbachev, Mikhail 15

  Gorky, Maxim 227, 253, 255

  Graves, Robert 11, 37

  Gray, Beryl 119–20

  Gray, John 254

  Gray, Piers 113

  Gray, Simon 107–24, 236

  Gray, Victoria 108, 119–20, 123

  Green, Henry 164

  Greene, Graham 1–21, 51, 52, 60, 61, 95–106, 175

  Greene, Vivien 7, 8

  Hall, H. John 217, 218

  Hamilton, Ian 110, 122

  Harrison, John 169, 177

  Harrison, Tony 17

  Hartman, Geoffrey 126

  Hazzard, Shirley 4, 5–6, 12

  Hensher, Philip 118

  Hitchens, Christopher 147, 148, 149

  Hoatson, Alice 227, 244

  Hoggart, Richard 162, 172–3, 180

  Holloway, John 154

  Homer 66, 234

  Hopkins, Gerard Manley 208

  Hough, Graham 162

  Howard, Elizabeth Jane 30, 37–9, 43, 44

  Hunt, Violet 227

  Hussein, Saddam 93

  Iyer, Hiroko 104, 105

  Iyer, Pico 95–106, 95n

  Iyer, Raghavan N. 100, 105

  Jackson, Peter 73

  Jacobs, Eric 26, 43

  Jacques, Martin 204

  James, Alice 237

  James, Henry ix–x, 39, 50, 51, 138, 168, 189, 214, 223, 224, 230, 231, 232–3, 237, 249

  James, Oliver 203

  James, William 102, 237

  Jameson, Frederic 126

  Jardine, Penelope 63

  Johnson, Barbara 126

  Jones, Monica 46, 47, 48

  Joseph, Michael 33

  Joyce, James 23, 51, 66, 127, 128, 157, 186, 235

  Kael, Pauline 75

  Kafka, Franz 157

  Kennedy, John F. 61, 170

  Kermode, Frank 52, 61, 64, 127, 128, 135, 153–64

  Kierkegaard, Søren 122, 140

  Kilmarnock, Alastair 39

  Kingsley, Charles 28

  Lacan, Jacques 125

  Larkin, Philip 23, 25, 27, 28, 29–30, 31, 32, 33–5, 43, 46, 47–9, 119, 168, 172

  Lawrence, D.H. 156, 162, 164

  Leader, Zachary 22–3, 26–7, 30, 32, 33, 34, 36, 37

  Leavis, F.R. 37, 109, 138, 163

  Lentricchia, Frank 128

  Lessing, Doris 58

  Lévi-Strauss, Claude 125

  Lodge, Mary 166, 173, 174, 175, 178, 195

  Lodge, Stephen 174, 175

  Lundkvist, Arthur 19

  MacCabe, Colin 127, 128

  Macherey, Pierre 130

  Madox Ford, Ford 50

  Malory, Thomas 67

  Mantel, Hilary 51, 233, 241–2

  Marvin, Lee 72, 73

  Marx, Karl/Marxism 31, 125, 128, 130, 137–8, 140, 204

  Matthews, Ronald 9

  Mayall, Rik 114

  McCabe, Herbert 129–30, 140–1, 150

  McDonnell, Vincent 19, 20

  McEwan, Ian 181, 192–3

  McGuire, Fr John 70–1

  McKellen, Ian 83

  Mehta, Nandini Nanak 100

  Mensonge, Henri 188

  Meyer, Michael 8

  Miller, J. Hillis 126

  Moore, Brian 192

  Mullen, Richard 212

  Murdoch, Iris 31

  Murdoch, Rupert 91, 187

  Nabokov, Vladimir 20, 171

  Nesbit, Edith (married name: Edith Bland) 223, 224, 225, 227, 231, 242–4, 245, 246, 247, 249, 251, 252

  Nichols, Peter 72

  Niven, Frances 55

  Nowottny, Winifred 153

  Ockrent, Mike 197

  Orwell, George 226

  Ozick, Cynthia 237

  Paul, Henri 205

  Philby, Kim 14, 15

  Pinochet, General 15r />
  Pinter, Harold 111, 112, 120, 122, 122n

  Plato 226

  Pound, Ezra 23

  Powys, John Cooper 67

  Pugh, Patricia 252

  Reeves, Amber 227, 232, 251, 252

  Richards, I.A. 135, 138

  Richardson, Dorothy 227

  Richardson, Samuel 235

  Roe, Thomas 11–12, 13

  Rosenthal, Tom 184, 185, 188

  Rushdie, Salman 185

  Said, Edward 126

  Saussure, Ferdinand de 125

  Schiff, Stephen 83

  Scott, Sir Walter 56, 235

  Shakespeare, William 35, 130, 153, 162, 164, 217, 234

  Sharpe, Tom 189

  Shaw, George Bernard 229n, 250

  Sherrin, Ned 177

  Sherry, Norman 1–2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14–18, 19, 20–1, 104

  Shields, David 235–7

  Sinyavsky, Andrei 14

  Skidelsky, William 233, 234, 235

  Snowdon, Lord 12

  Spacks, Barry 170

  Spark, Muriel 50–65, 164

  Spark, Philip 55

  Spark, Robin 58, 64

  Spark, Sydney Oswald ‘Ossie’ 57–8

  Spencer, Earl 197, 201–2, 205

  Spencer, Professor Terence 165, 180

  Spivak, Gayatri 126

  Stanford, Derek 53, 59, 60

  Stannard, Martin 51, 52–3, 54, 55, 57, 60–1, 62, 63, 64

 

‹ Prev