Reading the Bible again for the First Time
Page 33
Click Here to Return
27. Abraham Heschel, The Prophets, 2nd ed. (New York: Harper & Row, 1969), vol. 1, p. x.
Click Here to Return
28. Amos 7.10–17. This is one of the most dramatic confrontation scenes between a prophet and the domination system. The priest Amaziah delivers the king’s command in 7.12–13.
Click Here to Return
29. Jer. 20.1–6, 26.1–24 (note that a prophet contemporary with Jeremiah is executed by the king), Jer. 36, 37.11–21, 38.1–13 (which also reports his rescue from the cistern).
Click Here to Return
30. Heschel, The Prophets, vol. 1, pp. 4, 10, 26 (italics in original).
Click Here to Return
31. In the ancient world, there were only two limits on economic exploitation of peasants by the elites: subsistence was not to become starvation, and desperation was not to become so great as to incite revolt. Otherwise, the elites had a free hand.
Click Here to Return
32. I owe this way of putting it to Walter Brueggemann, Prophetic Imagination, (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1978), chap. 2. Brueggemann also says that Solomon in effect had become a new pharaoh. Note that this is not a comment on Solomon’s personal morality or immorality; it is a comment about the system that emerged under him.
Click Here to Return
33. I Sam. 8.4–22, 10.17–19.
Click Here to Return
34. I Sam. 8.11–18.
Click Here to Return
35. I Sam. 9.1–10.16.
Click Here to Return
36. II Sam. 7.1–17, esp. vv. 12–16. See also Ps. 2, one of the “royal psalms” (so named because it was most likely used as a liturgy for the coronation of a new king). The king, called “son of God” and “anointed one” (messiah), is promised that God will establish his throne forever.
Click Here to Return
37. Brueggemann, The Prophetic Imagination, chap. 1.
Click Here to Return
38. Isa. 40–55. “Deutero” is Greek for “second.” In the Bible itself, there is of course no I Isaiah and II Isaiah (as there is a I Samuel and II Samuel).
Click Here to Return
39. Ps. 137.1–4. The last three verses of the psalm express the anger of exile, beseeching God to avenge the Israelites and blessing those who will smash the children of their enemies against a rock. The psalms were traditionally attributed to King David, just as the Pentateuch was attributed to Moses. However, the Psalms as a collection of hymns, prayers, and liturgies were written over many centuries, including the postexilic period. Other psalms that most likely reflect the experience of exile are 42–44, 74, 77, 80, 85, and 126.
Click Here to Return
40. Lam. 1.1–2, 11–12.
Click Here to Return
41. Lam. 5.1–5, 11–15, 18.
Click Here to Return
42. Isa. 40.1–2, the opening verses of Second Isaiah.
Click Here to Return
43. Isa. 40.3–4.
Click Here to Return
44. Isa. 40.27.
Click Here to Return
45. Isa. 43.1, 4–5.
Click Here to Return
46. Isa. 43.5–6.
Click Here to Return
47. Isa. 49.14–15.
Click Here to Return
48. Isa. 40.27–31.
Click Here to Return
49. Isa. 40.11.
Click Here to Return
50. Isa. 42.9.
Click Here to Return
51. Isa. 43.15–19.
Click Here to Return
52. Echoing Isa. 55.11, and quoting 55.12.
Click Here to Return
53. I owe this wonderful phrase to Verna Dozier, The Dream of God (Cambridge, MA: Cowley. 1991).
Click Here to Return
54. Mic. 4.3–4. The full oracle in Mic. 4.1–4 is almost exactly paralleled in Isa. 2.2–4, suggesting that it was widely known in prophetic circles.
Click Here to Return
55. In the contemporary United States, we see this in the naming of high taxes as a (and perhaps the) primary political issue. The anti-tax sentiment of our society is fueled and financed primarily by the wealthy. Can anybody seriously believe that the anti-tax movement serves the interest of the society as a whole, and not simply the narrow self-interest of the wealthy? Unfortunately, many do; elites know how to shape public opinion (and thus the system as a whole).
Click Here to Return
56. “Pharaoh’s household” is a metaphor for those who derive benefits from the domination system without being primarily responsible for it or even in favor of it.
Click Here to Return
1. The most accessible introduction to Israel’s wisdom literature is Kathleen M. O’Connor, The Wisdom Literature (Wilmington: Michael Glazier, 1988). Other books I have found especially helpful are James Crenshaw, Old Testament Wisdom: An Introduction, rev. ed. (Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1998); Roland Murphy, The Tree of Life: An Exploration of Biblical Wisdom Literature, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1996); Roland Murphy and Elizabeth Huwiler, New International Biblical Commentary: Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1999); Leo Perdue, Wisdom and Creation: The Theology of Wisdom Literature (Nashville: Abingdon, 1994).
Click Here to Return
2. For a persuasive argument that Israel’s wisdom tradition is centered in God as creator, see Leo Perdue, Wisdom and Creation (Nashville: Abingdon, 1994).
Click Here to Return
3. Usually abbreviated as either “Sir.” or “Ecclus.” Note how close the latter is to the common abbreviation of Ecclesiastes: “Eccles.”
Click Here to Return
4. Prov. 1.7.
Click Here to Return
5. Prov. 3.13–18. She is first introduced in 1.20–33, where she speaks like a prophet.
Click Here to Return
6. Prov. 8.22–23. The poem, which continues through v. 31, stresses Wisdom/Sophia’s presence with God at the creation: “When there were no depths, I was brought forth. . . . Before the mountains had been shaped . . . when God established the heavens, I was there,” and so forth.
Click Here to Return
7. Prov. 9.4–6; the banquet passage begins in 9.1.
Click Here to Return
8. Other primary texts in the Jewish wisdom tradition: Sir. 24; Wisd. of Sol. 7.7–8.16, esp. 7.22–8.1, and chap. 10.
Click Here to Return
9. For my chapter-length treatment of Sophia imagery and its application to Jesus, see Meeting Jesus Again for the First Time (San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1994), chap. 5.
Click Here to Return
10. See the seduction scenario in Prov. 7.6–23. Other relevant texts: 2.16–19, 5.3–14.
Click Here to Return
11. For her banquet, see Prov. 9.13–18; the invitation is in 9.16.
Click Here to Return
12. Prov. 8.35–36.
Click Here to Return
13. Prov. 7.25–27. See also 2.16–19, 5.3–14, 9.18.
Click Here to Return
14. The first unambiguously clear affirmation of an afterlife is in Daniel (see chap. 12), a book commonly dated around 165 BCE.
Click Here to Return
15. For a masterful exposition of how this proverb works, see John Dominic Crossan, In Fragments: The Aphorisms of Jesus (San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1983), pp. 12–13.
Click Here to Return
16. Notably Prov. 22.17–24.22, a collection that borrows freely from an Egyptian wisdom text known as the Instruction of Amenemope.
Click Here to Return
17. Prov. 31.10–31. An acrostic poem is one in which each line begins with a successive letter of the alphabet (in this case, of course, the Hebrew alphabet).
Click Here to Return
18. Matt. 25.31–46. The major point of the parable: whatever is done “for the least of these” (the hungry, thirsty, strangers, naked, sick
, imprisoned) is done to Jesus.
Click Here to Return
19. Eccles. 1.2, immediately following the superscription of the book; 12.8, ending Qoheleth’s words and preceding the brief epilogue probably added by an editor.
Click Here to Return
20. Eccles. 1.12–2.26.
Click Here to Return
21. Eccles. 1.14, 17; 2.1, 11, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 26.
Click Here to Return
22. Eccles. 7.15, 8.14, 9.11.
Click Here to Return
23. Eccles. 4.1.
Click Here to Return
24. Eccles. 4.2–3.
Click Here to Return
25. Eccles. 3.19–20.
Click Here to Return
26. Eccles. 9.12. See also 8.8: “No one has power over the day of death.”
Click Here to Return
27. Eccles. 2.14–17.
Click Here to Return
28. Eccles. 9.1–3.
Click Here to Return
29. Echoing Eccles. 1.15. Elizabeth Huwiler, New International Biblical Commentary: Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1999), p. 159, comments that for Qoheleth, human experience is not “meaningful, controllable or predictable.” She adds, as I also will, that for Qoheleth human well-being and enjoyment are nevertheless possible.
Click Here to Return
30. Eccles. 2.24, 3.12–13, 9.7–10. White garments and the act of anointing one’s head with oil are associated with festive meals. See also 3.22, 5.18–20, and 8.15.
Click Here to Return
31. Eccles. 9.10.
Click Here to Return
32. Eccles. 3.1–8.
Click Here to Return
33. Eccles. 7.2, 4.
Click Here to Return
34. Eccles. 12.1–8. Though the first verse is commonly translated “Remember your Creator in the days of your youth,” several commentators note that the Hebrew word translated as “creator” more likely means “grave” or “cistern” (as a metaphor for “grave”).
Click Here to Return
35. Eccles. 9.7–10.
Click Here to Return
36. Thus I hear Qoheleth’s wisdom as positive and not as unrelieved pessimism. For an equally positive reading, see Kathleen O’Connor, The Wisdom Literature (Wilmington: Micahel Glazier, 1988), pp. 114–33; see her note 6 on p. 123 for a citation of negative readings.
Click Here to Return
37. Cited by Samuel Terrien in The Interpreter’s Bible (New York: Abingdon, 1954), vol. 3, p. 877.
Click Here to Return
38. Job 1.6–12. Quoted passage is v8.
Click Here to Return
39. Job 1.9–10.
Click Here to Return
40. Job 1.11.
Click Here to Return
41. The first calamities are narrated in Job 1.13–22. Quoted words are from 1.21.
Click Here to Return
42. The second stage is described in 2.1–10. Quoted words are from vv. 7, 10.
Click Here to Return
43. James 5.11.
Click Here to Return
44. His first speech is in chap. 3. Quoted passages are from vv. 3–4, 6–7, 11, 16, 24.
Click Here to Return
45. From Job’s second speech, chaps. 6–7. Quoted passages are from 7.4, 13–16, 19–20.
Click Here to Return
46. From Job’s third speech, chaps. 9–10. Quoted passages are from 9.21–23, 10.7–8.
Click Here to Return
47. From Eliphaz’s first speech, chaps. 4–5. Quoted passages are from 4.7–8; 5.8, 11, 17, 27.
Click Here to Return
48. From Bildad’s first speech, chap. 8. Quoted passages are from vv. 5–6, 20.
Click Here to Return
49. From Zophar’s first speech, chap. 11. Quoted words are from 11.2–6; subsequent section on repentance and the reversal of fortune it will bring is from vv. 13–21.
Click Here to Return
50. Job 13.4, 16.2, 13.12.
Click Here to Return
51. Explicitly in Job 42.7.
Click Here to Return
52. Job 38.1–41.34. The display is interrupted by a brief dialogue between God and Job in 40.1–5; then it resumes.
Click Here to Return
53. Job 40.4–5.
Click Here to Return
54. Job 42.5.
Click Here to Return
55. Explicitly affirmed in chap. 29, esp. vv. 18–20.
Click Here to Return
56. Job 42.6. English translations commonly read “I despise myself” instead of “I melt into nothingness.” But the latter phrase better expresses the meaning. The meaning of the final line, “I repent in dust and ashes,” is difficult to express. It does not mean that Job finally realized he was guilty of great sins after all; minimally, it means that the experience changed Job.
Click Here to Return
1. The word “Christian” does occur, but only three times: I Pet. 4.16 and Acts 11.26 and 26.28. Formed from the Greek or Latin word for “messiah,” in this early usage it meant a follower of Jesus as the Jewish messiah. Thus it did not yet mean a member of a new religion. See Michael J. Wilkins, “Christian,” The Anchor Bible Dictionary, ed. David Noel Freedman (New York: Doubleday, 1992), vol. 1, pp. 925–26.
Click Here to Return
2. The phrase “the parting of the ways” echoes the title of a fine book by James D. G. Dunn, The Partings of the Ways: Between Christianity and Judaism and Their Significance for the Character of Christianity (Philadelphia: Trinity Press International, 1991).
Click Here to Return
3. Rodney Stark, The Rise of Christianity (San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1997), chap. 3.
Click Here to Return
4. Alan Segal, Rebecca’s Children: Judaism and Christianity in the Roman World (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1986).
Click Here to Return
5. Stark, The Rise of Christianity, p. 57.
Click Here to Return
6. Typically dated to the early second century are I and II Timothy, Titus, and II Peter, with the last commonly seen as the latest book of the New Testament.
Click Here to Return
7. Stark, The Rise of Christianity, chap. 1.
Click Here to Return
8. The two shortest documents are Philemon and Jude.
Click Here to Return
9. See the illuminating comments of Eugene Boring, Revelation (Louisville: Knox, 1989), p. 6.
Click Here to Return
10. Excellent accessible introductions to the gospels include Mark Allan Powell, Introduction to the Gospels (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1998), and W. Barnes Tatum, In Search of Jesus, rev. ed. (Nashville: Abingdon, 1999).
Click Here to Return
11. We are virtually certain that none was written by any of the twelve disciples or other eyewitnesses. There is a strong scholarly consensus that Matthew and John were not written by disciples named Matthew and John. With Mark and Luke, a reasonable (though not decisive) case can be made that they were written by people named Mark and Luke, in part because there was no particularly good reason for second-century Christians to name the gospels after these men if they were not the authors. Neither Mark nor Luke was among the twelve disciples, nor was either an eyewitness to the public activity of Jesus.
Click Here to Return
12. Moreover, most mainline scholars see the birth stories and the story of Jesus at age twelve as metaphorical narratives. Historically speaking, they are thus legendary, even though as metaphorical narratives they make significant affirmations about Jesus.