Gilda Trillim
Page 2
Trillim was born in 1936 in Burley Idaho, the daughter of Heber LeRoy Trillim, a potato farmer, and Margaret (Maggie) Kimball Trillim, a former librarian from Boston. In high school, her English teacher entered some of her work in a state writing contest. When she won first place, many realized that she had significant talent. Her experimental style quickly earned her accolades and a scholarship to Radcliffe College. After graduating she erupted onto the literary scene with her first book, the slim Cattle Memories. Her second book, A Slouch in the Shoulders of Deity, shook the literary world to its core, or at least those who were paying attention. It challenged previously held assumptions about what constituted literature and the ways it should be read. Her work’s unusual style and challenging form have been often imitated but seldom equaled. Her final efforts in mastering the controversial style in which she wrote, i.e., constructing fictional works as strange lists, reached its peak after a yearlong study in what was then the Soviet Union.
It might be prudent at this point to give a lomtick of her writing, to ground you a bit in her style and in order to cast into relief some of the events that structured her later life. A chapter from her book, Breathless Triangles, is short enough to be included in its entirety.
Chapter 21. Wherein Pettiness is Laundered.
Objects: Cloud, figurine, lighter fluid, rat, helmet, paper cup, Post Office, translator, icterids, stories, fifteenth century, flat, municipality, lecture, blouse, angleworm, refugee, comet, quilt, holiday, porch, finger, saw, trout, penny, haystack, guitar, loom, shadow, rain, laundry bin, caterpillar, piston, soil, hen, nematode, steeple, mountain pass, Nancy, muskrat, ankle, Romanian, perfume, vessel, avenue, moat, pedestrian, brandy, suggestion, fairies, swamp, flax, soup, pocket watch, yam, baby powder, lentil, music box, plus sign, braid, wishing well, door knocker, toy soldier, dirt clod.
Action: flee, escape, canter, coalesce, inform, delete, bicker, saunter, deliberate, slouch, press, prostrate, hurdle, wander, peddle, fixate, blast, stare, destroy, argue, bless, forsake, delineate, hope, sit, flip, seek, slip, orchestrate, belittle, bounce, stomp, flicker.
Attribute: green, bright, overt, spritely, comely, glowing, dark, heavy, sanguine, overt, lazy, gray, gifted, mysterious, great, eager, obedient, quaint, clumsy, melodic, panicky, steep, obnoxious, high, witty, hollow, victorious, glamorous, purple.
In the manner of: swift, careful, vigorous, doubtful, loud, eager, calm, glee, fond, just, acidic, quirky, playful, shrill, late.
As you can see this is not easy literature. Early attempts to understand it revolved around creating standard English texts using the words provided. These efforts were especially popular in French circles2 but it was vigorously argued by most scholars that this was not her intent and the text was to be taken as given—not reconstructed or folded into a more interpretable work. This reading was largely settled upon as a result of a debate between scholars at Edinburgh and Chicago. While both groups noticed that neither conjunctions nor articles were provided, each came to very different conclusions as to what that meant. The Edinburgh school prevailed with some stunning work by Susan Levant and Malinda Gregson, who showed that textual reconstructions were never Trillim’s intent.3
Current trends have viewed her work as possibility generating literature—trends especially apparent in the copious writings of Ethiopian Orthodox theological seminaries and theology schools. The Reverend Hierodeacon Rellime Amada has been offering some especially compelling interpretations. He holds that Trillim should be taken as is, that the addition or withdrawal of a single word changes the possibility of the text and therefore its entire meaning. To reclaim the given possible, one must open oneself to how what can be constructed rests in the given; to the grace embedded in the text, and how that grace then operates in a person’s life. Grace is said to thus release the virtual hidden into the actual. To wish for another word, or to redact what has been put forward, is to limit the possibility of the text. Only in the ‘what is given’ is the offered potential of the text opened and the meaning allowed to unfold. Amada believes she was writing a kind of redemption in which the ‘saving’ comes from embracing both the strange format and the words offered.
Trillim moved to Moab, Utah and the nearby La Sal Mountains in the late 1970s with her dear friend Babs Lake. It was there that she did some of her most important work. However, she felt slighted by her people, who never came to see her writing as worthy of being labeled ‘Mormon literature.’ In a letter to her sister she wrote:
“It makes me sad when I think about the way I was treated by some of the faculty. At my last reading they snorted and jeered. One even rudely remarked ‘Poppycock’ and walked out of the lecture hall. I don’t think they want to remember me as Mormon or claim me as one of their own.”
I believe this might have been at Brigham Young University. It is clear she was right. If you search for her work in the Mormon Literature Database she does not appear and her books, now largely out of print, cannot be found in any library in Utah. However, she remained true to the faith (as she understood it) her entire life and claimed to be a Mormon wherever she went. However, her take on Mormonism was unorthodox to say the least.
Toward the end of her life, her work took a strange turn. First the section ‘In the manner of’ disappeared, then the ‘Attribute’ section got shorter and shorter until it too vanished. Her work became stark—cold lists of nouns that took a darker cast. Words like ‘chain,’ ‘pit,’ and ‘abyss’ are representative. Most of the light playfulness she was known for disappeared, and a seriousness and intensity enveloped her work. Her books now came out more slowly, sometimes with years between volumes. Her last work can be repeated here in its entirety. It was called Hammered Pliers and it consisted of a single chapter:
Chapter 1: The framing dissolves in strong acid.
Objects: Moonlight.
She died shortly after its publication. I found a copy of this slim volume in a small English used bookshop on Jomo Kenyatta Avenue in Addis Ababa. Strangely the title page was inscribed: “To my friend David O./ The bravest man I know.”
I would like to think that perhaps this was once owned by David O. McKay, ninth President of the Mormon Church (1951–1970), and I am tempted to imagine that he found her work as intriguing as I do. I hope that the Mormon scholars in the humanities will revive the reputation of this astonishing woman of Mormon letters whose name and work deserve to come out of obscurity.
Vignette 1: Gilda Trillim’s Maternal Great-Grandfather Arnfinnur Skáldskapur.
As is traditional when one explores a life, it is not out of order to make a brief stop to examine Gilda’s roots. I would like to look at one ancestor in particular to better situate and frame her unusual vivacity. Her maternal great-grandfather I believe captures Gilda’s spirit more than any other of her progenitors. It is not that others are unimportant—certainly not—but rather this one stands out in a way that portends Trillim’s adventures. The others are largely of that hardy pioneer stock that many of the Mormon faithful will recognize and appreciate: hard working; determined, undaunted by hardship and discouragement. Legends every one of them, but heroes and heroines of a recognizable type and manner and as such need little introduction or elaboration. Her maternal great-grandfather is different.1
Interestingly, her great-grandfather’s name was first introduced to me in a page from my grandmother’s journal long before the name Gilda Trillim meant anything to me at all. On the page, she makes a passing comment, “Oh that I were as lucky as Skáldskapur.”
Arnfinnur Skáldskapur was an Icelandic sea captain who joined the Mormon Church while his ship was being refitted in Liverpool, England. He had a reputation for being something of an explorer-philosopher, yet he tended toward the fantastic. For example, he kept a journal of encounters with what he believed were mermaids. They were always sighted at some distance, so it is easy to disregard the accounts from our modern perspective, which has no place for such creatures. However, Arn (as he was called) would not
be dissuaded. One of his grandsons wrote in a letter to his sister from fin de siècle Paris, “Gramps Arny showed us his journal of sea people sightings when I was just a little tyke. I tried to tell him there weren’t any such beasts as sea people but he would have non [sic.] of it. So I’m not surprised you cannot get him to take his medicine if he thinks it’s been tampered with. Once something is in his head there is no talking him out of it.”
After joining the Mormon Church in March 1866, he immediately resigned his captain’s commission and left on the ship Arkwright with 450 other Saints under the direction of Justin Wixom. However, upon landing in the US in early July, he felt inspired to stay in New York and learn the art of daguerreotype photography and during the next five years became a well-known photographer of stage actors and actresses. In 1871, he took the Overland Route train to Salt Lake City, where he set up a photography business adjacent to a bank on the corner of Beech and Laurel streets. Soon after his arrival to Utah, he joined a gentlemen’s club known as the Redbearded Horseshoers who met regularly to study the life and writings of Joseph Smith. He soon became the leader of the group. One of the few remaining pamphlets written by Arn contained the following paragraph:
“The Prophet Joseph Smith was a prophet and seer, but more than that he could wrestle the past into the future and vice-versa. I have it from John Taylor himself that when Brother Joseph found a treasure in the ground, the spirits that guarded it would try to pull it back deeper into the earth. But Joseph was more powerful than they all and he would lay hold upon it and with a yank heave it from the hands of those spirits. President Taylor said, “Now when he went to lay hold upon the gold plates those forces that make all things slippery tried to pull it down, but Joseph grabbed it by the rings and pulled, but he not only pulled up the plates he pulled the whole history of the Nephites into the world lock, stock and barrel. He made it real. Where once there was ordinary history he pulled into the universe sacred history.”“
Arn began to teach that history was flexible and could be manipulated from the present moment just as much as it could influence the future. And through his photography Arn began to try to rewrite the past. He thought that through subtle manipulations he could do as he thought Joseph Smith had done to pull up new things into the past by a combination of faith and power.
He started his history manipulation experiments with small attempts at changing the past. He would photograph women in variously colored dresses. He would then hand-color the dress in the black and white photo a variant shade other than the one of which he had taken a picture. He would then save the hand-colored photo and approach the woman years later and show her the photo. When they disagreed on the original color, he would have her pull out the dress and examine it. His journal records years of failure, but as time passed, a series of successes began to appear. The blue dresses he was coloring red would be found in the possession of the woman, often after long storage in a cedar chest, actually turned to red. It seemed that the more recent past was harder to change (but not impossible). He reports that as his successes mounted he decided to try bolder manipulations of the past and would color the yellow dresses with, say, red and blue stripes. The discovery of the first red and blue striped dress stored by a widow named Rathbone sent shock waves through the Redbearded Horseshoers.2 There was talk of deception. However, the final proof came when a pale blue dress he had colored with white and red gingham turned up for which he clearly had no access. The dress had been taken by a woman and her husband down to the Mexican territories right after being photographed. Several of the more skeptical Horseshoers wrote to the woman, named Tantamount Lee, and asked her the state of her dress. She replied with the following:
“‘Tis a strange thing. I had not seen that dress but a couple of times in the five years we’ve lived here, for after bearing (due to the good Lord’s grace) three children in the same, I had not worn it for many years as the children had done much to rearrange my figure. I remember as clear as day that it was light blue in color. It had been in my daughter’s hope chest for those five hard years and upon receipt of your letter, I dug through the chest until I found it near the bottom. Now, you will think me soft minded, but my memory of a blue dress must be set aside in light of what I found, for it was a red and white gingham dress. So I dug out the picture taken those many years ago and to my surprise it has always been a gingham dress (though the colors are hidden in the colorless original) for the pattern is as clear as day.”
It was shortly after that that Arnfinnur Skáldskapur sold his photography business and became the man you are no doubt familiar with if you know any Salt Lake History at all. He became quite adept at things like finding Spanish treasure, or in having bank accounts he had never mentioned suddenly becoming available and holding thousands of dollars. Even things like people in places as far away as Chicago and New York leaving him vast sums of money in their wills. The Salt Lake Tribune called him “The Luckiest Man Alive.”
Of course, as you know, that luck was not to hold. After being named as one of the Apostles, he was gunned down just after the century turned new. The man arrested was 77 years old and claimed Skáldskapur had stolen his wife, 45 years ago. Arnfinnur’s wife had been engaged to this man apparently, yet they had never actually been married, so the shooter was thought to be mad.
His ideas on the present influencing the past are interesting. Science demands that I dismiss them, of course, but as Jorge Luis Borges says, “Reality is not always probable, or likely.”3
Vignette 2: Letter to Babs Lake—On Winning the Uber Cup, May 1957
I found the following fascinating letter in the Trillim Archives in Beijing during my last research trip. Her speculations are perhaps a little too bold, but do seem to portend certain trends in Mormon theology we see today. It was written to Babs Lake and dated May 19, 1957. It is intriguing to me because she draws on the work of Henri Bergson, the French/Polish philosopher whose work fascinated me during my time at the Claremont School of Theology. Bergson would have been much more well known in 1957 than he is today, but her tying his work to Mormon thought and theology reflects an extraordinarily deep understanding of contemporaneous evolutionary philosophy.
This work was highlighted in the 2010 Beijing Conference of the Gilda Trillim Society, and published in The Gilda Trillim Quarterly.1 I cannot tell you how exciting I find these developments.
I’ve transcribed the whole letter, which was written in Trillim’s rather bold, sloppy cursive. It took a bit of work to decipher. Some words I just could not make out (guesses are noted below in italics). She is also an abysmal speller, for which I have deep and abiding sympathies.
Dear Babs,
I must tell you about the mornings. At first light a strident rooster floods my dreams with his urgent boasts and slowly, very slowly, I slide into the realities of this new world. The air is heavy and thick and graced with a first-light temptation to pull the sheets back over my head to reprimand the dawn for its disturbance, but the bright glow shining through the jalousie carries with it the humid smells of breakfast fires, the river’s stench of human wastes, and the essence of an odd foreignness, which drives my bare feet to the wood slats of the floor. I sit up panting in a slight panic because I have trouble remembering where I am and what I’m doing amid such strangeness. Then I fall back into the bed. I lie for a while running through the metaphors that I will use to describe this place to you. The rattle of a cart is like … the rattle of a cart. The voice of the woman in the street berating her husband resembles … the voice of a woman berating her husband. I think I am thwarted in my literary attempts because the otherness of this place is too new. Too striking. My mind finds it is all too novel to make the connections between these fresh sensual experiences and mere words. In short, everything is like nothing. I arise each morning on the edge of a horizon over which I’ve never peered. No wonder delight seems my constant companion.
Well, it’s time to give you the tale in full. You’ve received postcard
after postcard from me promising that I will give you the details in the elusive ‘soon.’ How weary you must be at my promises and lack of delivery! Well, settle back in your chair and prepare to have unleashed upon your beautiful head more details than you could possibly ever want. You poor dear. With friends like me, it’s either feast or famine on the news front I’m afraid.
As you heard, we demolished the Danish in the final match of the Uber Cup. It was glorious. It was a first-class smashing. I’ll have to say this without pussyfooting rococo hubris, because it is a fact that I was brilliant. I had a move that
After the tournament, at a banquet honoring our American victory, a British fellow and an Indian filmmaker approached me about helping others learn my trick. How could I turn down a trip to Pune, India the birthplace of our sport? My novel is wellstuck and I was doubting my ability to pull it off by the publisher’s deadline (soft, self-imposed, not a fixed point) so thought why not? I knew that you would yet be busy helping your family with the