Book Read Free

China and Japan

Page 20

by Ezra F. Vogel


  bility for the defeat, committed suicide. The Japa nese, who knew of the ad-

  miral’s reputation, admired him for taking responsibility in the manner of

  a proper defeated samurai. The Japa nese allowed his body to be carried away

  on a Chinese ship, and as the ship passed, the Japa nese lowered their flags

  in an expression of re spect.

  Sarah Paine, in her study of the Sino- Japanese War, concludes that

  Japan’s remarkable military successes, winning every impor tant battle without

  losing a single ship, did not result from the superiority of its ships or its

  weapons. The Chinese had purchased a number of excellent warships and

  had a large supply of rifles. One major factor in Japan’s victory was that

  China was not sufficiently unified to bring all its forces to bear in the key

  battles. China’s southern fleet did not even take part in the fighting. Also,

  regional dialects and loyalties rendered coordination among China’s vari ous

  units difficult. Japan, with its standardized weaponry, could manage weapon

  replacements better than China and could ensure the availability of appro-

  priate ammunition. Japan’s superior information about the enemy also gave

  it an advantage as it devised strategies for attack. And Japa nese troops were

  better trained, more disciplined, and better or ga nized. New rural recruits to

  the military during the Meiji period might not have understood the routines

  for hygiene, punctuality, and orderliness required by the military, but such

  military discipline was instilled in them through basic training. Some of

  China’s leading military officers had been chosen because of their skills in

  the traditional essay examinations for selecting government officials, not for

  their military skills. And although some Chinese troops fought valiantly,

  others, less imbued with patriotism, quickly abandoned their posts when

  they were attacked. Thus, the forces of the smaller nation surprised, out-

  maneuvered, and decisively defeated the forces of the larger nation.

  In 1894, on the eve of the war, Japan had signed a commercial treaty with

  Great Britain that ended the unequal treaties. For years Japan had been

  building up its court system, enacting laws, and training lawyers to meet

  international standards. Foreign Minister Mutsu Munemitsu and Prime

  Minister Ito Hirobumi, widely respected by foreign diplomats, had been

  actively involved in the negotiations with Great Britain. According to the

  new treaty, which was to go into effect five years later, Japan would have the

  . 122 .

  Rivalry in Korea and the Sino- Japanese War, 1882–1895

  right to try foreigners in Japa nese courts. In contrast, while the Chinese had

  also long complained about the unequal treaties, the foreign powers, not

  yet confident of the professionalism of Chinese courts, would not abandon

  them until 1946. Among the unequal treaties that were fi nally ended in 1946

  was the one unequal treaty that had been forced on China by a non- Western

  country, the Treaty of Shimonoseki, which Japan had imposed on China at

  the end of the Sino- Japanese War.

  The Treaty of Shimonoseki, 1895

  By January 1895, the devastating Chinese defeat and the continued presence

  of Japa nese troops in China where they could easily attack Beijing gave the

  Japa nese victors the power to impose a treaty that brought great pain to

  China. Within China, a small number of officials realized how little bar-

  gaining power they had, but some Chinese officials and citizens harbored

  illusions of Chinese leverage that was out of keeping with what the Japa-

  nese, confident of their position on the battlefield, would accept. Within

  Japan, there was a triumphant mood, a sense that Japan had arrived as a

  world power, that the Japa nese could humiliate the Chinese, who had acted

  so arrogantly in the previous centuries, and that they could impose a victor’s

  justice. They took as a model the conditions that Prus sia had imposed on

  France in the Treaty of Frankfurt following its victory in the 1871 Franco-

  Prussian War, a treaty that included large grants of territory and imposed

  heavy costs on France.

  While the fighting continued during the Sino- Japanese War, the

  Chinese had sought on several occasions to negotiate a peace treaty. On

  November 26, 1894, just after the Japa nese took Port Arthur, Li Hongzhang

  gave a letter to Gustav Detring, commissioner of customs in Tianjin, to pass

  on to Prime Minister Ito. Japa nese officials, aware that China was not yet

  prepared to make what they considered an acceptable agreement, replied

  that Detring was not properly accredited. On January 10, 1895, as Japa nese

  troops in Manchuria marched toward Dalian, the Chinese government re-

  quested a ceasefire, but the Japa nese did not grant it. On February 1, two

  Chinese officials arrived in Hiroshima for discussions with Prime Minister

  Ito. One of the men had recently served in Taiwan, where he had offered

  bounties to those who delivered the heads of slain Japa nese citizens. The

  . 123 .

  china and japan

  two, as midlevel officials, were not empowered to make decisions, and yet

  shortly after their arrival they asked when they would meet the emperor.

  In Japa nese eyes, this showed that the Chinese were still not treating Japan

  with the proper re spect and were still unprepared to make concessions.

  Prime Minister Ito reminded the two officials that in the past, Chinese rep-

  resentatives had made agreements and then later refused to affix their

  seals. He explained that Emperor Meiji was prepared to carry on negotia-

  tions only with Chinese negotiators who had the power to conclude agree-

  ments and affix their seals. The two Chinese representatives were sent back

  to China empty- handed.

  Six weeks later, after the Japa nese had destroyed China’s fleet at Wei-

  haiwei and were poised to attack Beijing, the Chinese, in some haste, of-

  fered to send an envoy who had the power to affix seals to an agreement.

  The Japa nese responded that they would accept as negotiators only Prince

  Gong or Li Hongzhang, both of whom could affix a seal. The top officials

  in Beijing, all Manchus, worried that if a Manchu, such as Prince Gong, were

  to sign a treaty that was certain to require unpop u lar concessions, it would

  strengthen the already widespread anti- Manchu sentiment in China. Better

  to have a Han Chinese representative, Li Hongzhang, make the unpleasant

  concessions and then be blamed for the difficulties.

  The concessions Japan demanded were indeed onerous. The Imperial

  Japa nese Army, concerned about the growing Rus sian presence in north-

  east Asia from the newly built Trans- Siberian Railway, demanded that it

  be given control over the Liaodong Peninsula, including Port Arthur and

  Dalian, which would deny the Rus sians a warm- water port in northeast

  Asia. Japan’s Imperial Navy wanted control over Taiwan to strengthen its

  position in the western Pacific. And Japan’s financial leaders sought a large

  indemnity to finance the costs of heavy industrialization. The Japa nese were

  confident that they could impose all of these demands, even though they<
br />
  knew that the Western powers would not accept Japan’s control over large

  amounts of territory on the Chinese mainland.

  On March 19, Li Hongzhang and 100 other officials arrived in Shimono-

  seki, a port at the southwest corner of Honshu, Japan’s main island. Shi-

  monoseki was in Yamaguchi prefecture, which had formerly belonged to the

  Choshu domain where Ito Hirobumi had grown up. Prime Minister Ito,

  who spoke quite good En glish, spoke with Li Hongzhang in En glish. Al-

  . 124 .

  Rivalry in Korea and the Sino- Japanese War, 1882–1895

  though Li Hongzhang was able to speak some En glish, he spoke in Chi-

  nese and negotiated through a Chinese- English interpreter. At the time of

  the meeting, Japa nese forces were within marching distance of Beijing. Ito

  started with a proposal that China would certainly refuse. He proposed

  Japa nese occupation of Tianjin, Dagu (the military base guarding Beijing),

  and Shanhaiguan, the pass separating Manchuria from the rest of China;

  Japa nese control over China’s major railway; and Chinese funds to support

  the Japa nese occupation. As expected, Li said he could not accept those con-

  ditions, so the negotiations continued. Li Hongzhang had negotiated with

  Ito before, and the two understood that their prob lems were not personal,

  that they were representing their countries. Li made a personal appeal, how-

  ever, describing— very accurately, it turned out— how he would be seen

  within China for accepting such conditions.

  On March 24, when Li Hongzhang was on his way back to his lodging

  from the building where the negotiations were being conducted, a young

  Japa nese firebrand attempted to assassinate him. Before the police could ap-

  prehend him, the youth fired one shot that lodged in Li Hongzhang’s

  cheek, just below his eye. Though it was painful, Li chose not to have the

  bullet removed.

  Japa nese officials and the Japa nese press, thoroughly embarrassed and

  aware how this would damage Japan’s international reputation, were full of

  apologies both at home and abroad. Japa nese public spokesmen were very

  solicitous of Li Hongzhang’s welfare, and the Japa nese government sought

  to atone for what was considered a hideous act. Emperor Meiji issued an

  apology to the Chinese nation and offered to have his own physician treat

  Li. Li received a large number of letters of apology from the Japa nese public,

  and the emperor offered China a three- week armistice.

  Meanwhile, Li Hongzhang’s blood nephew whom he had adopted as his

  son, Lord Li Jingfang, continued the negotiations with Prime Minister Ito.

  Following the shooting, the Japa nese slightly lessened their demands, but

  their conditions remained harsh. Six days after the assassination attempt,

  an armistice agreement was signed. The treaty handed over Taiwan and the

  Pescadores Islands to Japan; a large indemnity, equivalent to three- fourths

  of China’s annual bud get, was to be paid to Japan over four and a half years;

  and Chinese suzerainty over Korea and China’s tributary relationship with

  Korea were to be terminated. Korea was to be completely in de pen dent; a

  . 125 .

  china and japan

  large portion of mainland territory that included the Liaodong Peninsula

  was to be handed over to Japan; Japan was to enjoy the same commercial

  privileges in China that the Eu ro pean powers enjoyed; Japa nese traders

  would no longer pay the lijin (transit tax) on goods passing through toll

  gates as they were transported within China; Chinese offensive military op-

  erations were to end; seven key Chinese cities were to be opened to Japa-

  nese residents and businesses; and more inland markets were to be opened.

  As expected, once the terms of the treaty were made known in China,

  the Chinese people were furious. Li Hongzhang was denounced for ac-

  cepting the imposition of such conditions. Thousands of Chinese officials

  wrote memorials to their emperor denouncing the treaty. But the Chinese

  emperor knew that if China did not sign the treaty, Beijing and Shenyang

  would soon be devastated and the Ming tombs might be destroyed. On

  May 8, in Yantai (Chefu), Shandong, near where Confucius was born on

  the Bohai coast, the treaty was signed in the presence of warships from

  Rus sia, the United States, England, France, Germany, and Italy.

  Having no choice but to sign the treaty, the Manchu court did what it

  could to pass down blame for accepting the harsh conditions. Empress Cixi

  passed responsibility on to the Guangxu emperor. By selecting Li Hong-

  zhang to carry out the negotiations, the Manchu rulers could blame a Han

  Chinese for agreeing to the terms. In fact, although Li Hongzhang had been

  trying to strengthen China for several de cades, his efforts had not been fully

  supported by conservative officials. As he told Ito Hirobumi when the treaty

  negotiations began, he had been attempting to do in China what Ito had

  accomplished in Japan. The assassination attempt slightly softened the Chi-

  nese reaction to Li Hongzhang, as it had slightly softened the Japa nese

  demands, but on his return Li was stripped of all his titles except that of

  grand secretary. For generations, among Chinese patriots Li Hongzhang

  would be the scapegoat for agreeing to the Treaty of Shimonoseki, signed

  following China’s defeat because of weaknesses he had dedicated his life to

  overcoming.

  In earlier times the Japa nese had felt humiliated by the way the Chi-

  nese had treated them, as if they were supplicants facing their superiors.

  Elaborate protocols, or “rites,” for meetings had made clear their status. The

  Chinese were at the top and the Japa nese were subordinate. Even in 1895

  when Japan had won on the battlefield, the Chinese initially treated the

  . 126 .

  Rivalry in Korea and the Sino- Japanese War, 1882–1895

  Japa nese as inferiors, and only when their capital was in grave danger did

  they yield. Now the Japa nese had an opportunity to return the humiliation.

  One territory that Japan had demanded was the area around Shenyang,

  which had no great strategic significance, but it was the location of the orig-

  inal Manchu capital and of the imperial tombs. Thus the Manchu, rulers

  of China for three centuries, were thoroughly humiliated. Anti- Manchu

  sentiment became widespread, and sixteen years later the dynasty was

  overthrown.

  In their meetings, Ito Hirobumi had reminded Li Hongzhang that when

  they had met in 1886, Li had threatened Ito that if he did not agree to Chi-

  na’s proposal to quiet things down in Korea, China might be forced to

  fight Japan. At the time, Li could not have imagined that one day Japan

  would be the victor. In 1886 Ito had said that China should do more to mod-

  ernize. Li admitted that this assessment by Ito had been correct and that

  he had personally tried to pursue modernization, but those who believed

  in modernization could not overcome the re sis tance against it. Li asked Ito

  what he would have done differently if he were in Li’s place. Ito admitted

  that he could not have done as well as Li. Although Li Hongzhang was im-

&n
bsp; pressed with Japa nese achievements, it was reported that Li was so upset

  by the harsh conditions of the Treaty of Shimonoseki that he vowed never

  again to set foot on Japa nese soil. The next year a ship on which he was trav-

  eling docked at Yokohama, but he refused to go ashore.

  The Triple Intervention

  Throughout the war the Japa nese had made great efforts to reduce the

  chance that the Western nations might assist the Chinese in their war

  against Japan. Japan refrained from attacking Chinese ships in the Shanghai

  area to avoid disturbing the foreign settlements and took pains to assure

  the Western countries that it would not invade their settlements. Japan told

  Japa nese residents in the United States to avoid displays of patriotism that

  could upset the Americans, who might then urge their government to act

  against Japan.

  Before the war, key Western leaders had developed positive feelings

  toward Japan. They saw Japan as a modern country and found China to be

  a country that was not only poor, dirty, and chaotic, but also one that did

  . 127 .

  china and japan

  less to abide by the legal practices of “civilized countries.” But as the Japa-

  nese victories overwhelmed China, other countries, especially Rus sia,

  began to show concern about Japan’s future territorial ambitions.

  Six days after the signing of the Treaty of Shimonoseki, the ministers

  of Rus sia, Germany, and France who were stationed in Japan called on the

  Japa nese Ministry of Foreign Affairs to offer “friendly advice.” They told the

  Japa nese that the Liaodong Peninsula (where Port Arthur and Dalian were

  located), which, according to the Treaty of Shimonoseki, was to be handed

  over to Japan, should remain in Chinese hands. They pointed out that if

  Japan were to occupy the Liaodong Peninsula, not far from Beijing, it would

  cause the Chinese undo worry, it would be considered a threat by Korea,

  and it would be an obstacle to peace in East Asia. It was clear to the Japa-

  nese that if they did not follow this friendly advice, the foreign powers were

  prepared to use force to intervene, and they knew that the Japa nese mili-

  tary was no match for the combined Western forces. On November 7, 1895,

  six months after ratification of the treaty that gave Liaodong to Japan, a new

  treaty was signed that returned Liaodong to China.

 

‹ Prev