Book Read Free

Brain-Training-with-Buddha_3P.indd

Page 25

by Eric Harrison


  Brain-Training-with-Buddha_3P.indd 226

  10/24/19 15:35

  person, a superficial person.” Rajneesh may in fact have been consciously paraphrasing Ecclesiastes. Many religious

  teachers know little beyond the scriptures of their sects, but

  Rajneesh had an encyclopedic knowledge of the world’s spir-

  itual literature.

  The literary critic Harold Bloom makes the bold claim in

  his 1998 book that Shakespeare invented the modern human

  mind. In act 4, scene 3, of Macbeth, Shakespeare vividly

  expresses our modern, post-Stoic, non-Buddhist sensibilities.

  When the nobleman MacDuff is told, “Your wife and babes

  are savagely slaughtered,” he is struck dumb. When encour-

  aged to speak, his tenderness floods out: “All my pretty ones?

  Did you say all? What, all my pretty chickens and their dam

  at one fell swoop?”

  Macbeth’s challenger, Malcolm, trots out the standard

  Stoic line, “Dispute it like a man,” and MacDuff responds:

  “I shall do so; / But I must also feel it as a man. I cannot but

  remember such things were that were most precious to me.”

  Malcolm then encourages MacDuff: “Be this the whetstone of

  your sword. Let grief convert to anger; blunt not the heart,

  enrage it.” Soon afterward MacDuff takes his revenge, kills

  Macbeth, and restores peace to Scotland, all through the

  driving forces of love, grief, and anger. He chooses to be a

  man of feeling rather than a Stoic, and is nobler for it.

  EMOTION AND CULTURE

  Stories and plays like Macbeth give us approximate guidelines

  for social behavior. As Aristotle understood, these dramas

  enable us to experience and try out for size a huge range of

  emotions in a contained “virtual” way. Stories explore nearly

  O P T I M I Z I N G E M O T I O N | 2 2 7

  Brain-Training-with-Buddha_3P.indd 227

  10/24/19 15:35

  every emotionally charged situation, but love, power, and death are particularly appealing. Many great nations have a

  foundation myth of warfare and would not be nations without

  it. For the Greeks, the foundation story was the Iliad, which

  starts on the very first page with the wounded pride and rage

  of Achilles. Any educated Greek boy of twenty-five hundred

  years ago would know how to act well in war because of his

  knowledge of the legends.

  A child brought up on stories is doing a simulated explo-

  ration of emotions he or she will face in later life. The Greek

  and Indian myths, the biblical histories, the Grimm Broth-

  ers’ fairy tales—all are educational as well as entertaining.

  In Victorian England, the novels of writers such as Charles

  Dickens were felt to be so edifying for the masses that they

  could largely replace the moral strictures of moribund Chris-

  tianity. The millions who wept over the fate of Little Nell in

  The Old Curiosity Shop were learning how to weep and what

  to say as they wept, according to the culture of the day. These

  are good Christian virtues of empathy and caring, but taught

  and refined through fiction. (Oscar Wilde famously provided

  the intellectual counterview: “One must have a heart of stone

  to read the death of Little Nell without laughing.”)

  We love stories, movies, novels, and histories so much

  because they are literally mind-expanding. We can explore

  whole psychic universes via the rocket fuel of simulated emo-

  tion. But perhaps the finest training in emotion comes from

  music. The love songs that we hear in our teenage years often

  shape us for life.

  I had a strange but fortunate musical upbringing. When

  I was ten I came across a huge cache of classical records that

  2 2 8 | B R A I N T R A I N I N G W I T H T H E B U D D H A

  Brain-Training-with-Buddha_3P.indd 228

  10/24/19 15:35

  I was free to borrow. My parents had just bought a record player, and I was able to stumble my way through Stravinsky, Bartok, Mahler, Schoenberg, Strauss, and Bach. As a kid I

  loved bizarre rhythms, loud noise, vivid color, and over-the-

  top emotionality. I had the luxury of entering the mind of

  a Russian aristocrat in Paris (Stravinsky), and the mind of a

  Bohemian Jew in Vienna (Mahler). I would never have devel-

  oped that range of human sympathy through sitting alone

  and meditating.

  Music also inoculated me against Buddhism. When I

  signed up for my first Vipassana retreat, I had a flash of

  insight. I thought: “If I find out that there is no place for Jimi

  Hendrix in this system, it’s not for me.” Hendrix at that time

  was my symbol of the god-intoxicated musician.

  And of course, there isn’t. The Buddha hated all sensory

  pleasures. He would also have told Aristotle, Galileo, Shake-

  speare, Newton, Bach, Beethoven, Darwin, Einstein, Joyce,

  and Picasso to stop wasting their lives in trivial pursuits.

  Nor did he have any sense, as the Jesuit poet Gerard Manley

  Hopkins did, that “the world is charged with the grandeur of

  God.” It is perhaps anachronistic to expect the Buddha to see

  Nature as a source of wonder and delight, but many people

  in antiquity did. He said nothing to encourage any kind of

  engagement with the world or with aesthetic beauty. His val-

  ues were utterly alien to mine. His arguments were sound, but

  I knew his conclusions were wrong.

  EMOTION AND VALUES

  An emotion is essentially a deep, intuitive value judgment

  about something. Emotions are the source of nearly all our

  O P T I M I Z I N G E M O T I O N | 2 2 9

  Brain-Training-with-Buddha_3P.indd 229

  10/24/19 15:35

  personal values, and yet we hardly ever consider them in isolation or even know what they are. Emotions tend to be sub-

  liminal, automatic, habitual, and instinctive. Although they

  drive our behavior, we are far more likely to give our available

  attention to the actions they initiate.

  To be mindful of an emotion means holding it in mind

  distinct from what usually surrounds it. To stop and look

  at an emotion typically puts the brakes on it, which is a

  desirable outcome both for the Buddha and for most

  psychologists. However, seeing an emotion clearly can also

  tell us how much we value something and why. When we do

  this, the sati-sampajjana formula kicks in. The clear percep-

  tion of something ( sati) leads to a more accurate evaluation

  ( sampajjana) and a better outcome.

  Since the purpose of emotion is to drive behavior, we

  can uncover our core values by looking at how we choose to

  spend our time and energy. These are the biological equiva-

  lents of hard cash. They tell us how much we think something

  is worth. We can reverse engineer from our actions back to

  the emotions behind them.

  So how many hours a week do you spend on the following:

  Work? Social relationships? Entertainment? Exercise? Infor-

  mation gathering? Deliberate learning? Eating? Distraction?

  Rest? Does the balance feel right, or at least good enough?

  Once you know how you spend your time and energy, y
ou

  can then look at the emotion and valence and ask, “Why?”

  In each case, it could be any one or combination of the

  following emotions and motivators: pleasure, fear, love, ambi-

  tion, desire, excitement, duty, shame, empathy, escapism, fan-

  tasy, self-pity, pride, habit, guilt, boredom, or fatigue. Once we

  2 3 0 | B R A I N T R A I N I N G W I T H T H E B U D D H A

  Brain-Training-with-Buddha_3P.indd 230

  10/24/19 15:35

  can hold a particular emotion in mind ( sati), the evaluation ( sampajjana) is bound to arise: “Is this optimal? Is this too

  much or too little? Should I give this more energy or less?” We

  could scale it down or scale it up, or shift it sideways to include

  another emotion, or target it for a more rewarding outcome.

  It is not at all easy to isolate, hold, and evaluate an emotion

  ( sati-sampajjana), but it can be very satisfying when we do.

  To summarize, the Buddha and many mindfulness writers

  tend to pathologize emotion in pursuit of a tranquil mind.

  They attempt to minimize emotion—in contrast to Aristotle,

  who preferred to optimize it. They seek to control and reduce

  it rather than develop it.

  In fact, there are many good reasons for cultivating emo-

  tion. These include the following: (1) Emotion is essential for

  rationality and good judgment. (2) Emotion powers all our

  actions for good or bad. Every emotion can be adaptive if

  expressed optimally at the right time. (3) Emotions and their

  valences are the source of our core personal and social values.

  (4) Emotional intelligence is essential for free and satisfying

  social intercourse. (6) Emotion as expressed through story

  and music trains us in cultural sophistication and empathy

  with others. We can use mindfulness to cultivate all of these

  aspects of our humanity, but the results will not look partic-

  ularly Buddhist.

  O P T I M I Z I N G E M O T I O N | 2 3 1

  Brain-Training-with-Buddha_3P.indd 231

  10/24/19 15:35

  20

  Embodied Thought

  Meditation is commonly seen and promoted as a way of

  escaping the tyranny of runaway thought. Many mind-

  fulness writers go further and seem to regard cognition itself,

  like emotion, as a kind of pathology. They certainly feel it is

  antagonistic to meditation, and hardly ever have a good word

  to say about it. As Paul R. Fulton and Ronald D. Siegel write

  in the anthology Mindfulness and Psychotherapy, “Mindful-

  ness meditation is distinguished from other [psychotherapeu-

  tic]) traditions by its near total abandonment of thinking. . . .

  When we are hijacked by discursive thinking about the past or

  future, we have left the domain of mindfulness.”1

  Mindfulness writers often attack thoughts by denying

  their reality. For instance, in their bestselling book Mind-

  fulness: An Eight-Week Plan for Finding Peace in a Frantic

  World, Mark Williams and Danny Penman say, “Mindfulness

  meditation teaches you to recognize memories and damag-

  ing thoughts as they arise. . . . They are like propaganda. They

  are not real . They are not you.”2 And in another essay from Brain-Training-with-Buddha_3P.indd 232

  10/24/19 15:35

  Mindfulness and Psychotherapy, Paul Fulton suggests, “By learning to see thoughts as events with no special reality, we

  come to appreciate our mind’s incessant tendency to build

  imaginary scenarios that we inhabit as if they are real.”3

  As Kabat-Zinn has said, “Our thoughts may have a degree

  of relevance and accuracy at times, but often they are at least

  somewhat distorted by our self-centered and self-serving

  inclinations.”4 Elsewhere he argues that while we meditate we

  should deliberately note our thoughts one by one, and return

  to the breath as quickly as possible. “During meditation, we

  intentionally treat all our thoughts as if they are of equal

  value . . . we intentionally practice letting go of each thought

  that attracts our attention, whether it seems important and

  insightful or unimportant and trivial.”5 To see all thoughts as

  “of equal value,” whatever their contents, and to let them all

  go, implies that they are all worthless.

  Psychologists and mindfulness writers like to appear

  calm and objective, but you can feel the invective behind

  the words they use to describe thinking: discursive, unreal,

  biased, hijacked, transient, propaganda, deceptive, distorted,

  self-centered, self-serving, imaginary, incessant, trivial, and

  so on. These terms would be often appropriate, but the total

  absence of any positive descriptors is telling. I assume these

  writers do know the value of cognition, but they obviously

  regard it as antagonistic to the mindful state itself. They seem

  to feel that thinking should only occur before or after being mindful, but never during it.

  These writers seem to be taking their inspiration from Zen,

  and in particular Dogen, whom you might remember from

  chapter 8. Dogen said of the practice of shikantaza: “Sit firmly, E M B O D I E D T H O U G H T | 2 3 3

  Brain-Training-with-Buddha_3P.indd 233

  10/24/19 15:35

  and think of not-thinking. How you think of not think-

  ing? By not thinking! This is the essence of zazen.” In the

  “Fukanzazengi,” Dogen instructs: “Cast aside all involve-

  ments and cease all affairs. Do not think good or bad. Do

  not administer pros and cons. Cease all the movements of

  the conscious mind, gauging of all thoughts and views.”6

  Earlierin the same text, he recommends: “Cease from

  practice based on intellectual understanding, pursuing

  words and following after speech, and learn the backward

  step that turns your light inward.”7 Elsewhere he says,

  “Non-thinking must become the eye through which you

  view phenomena.”8

  This mystical, antithought tendency runs deep in Bud-

  dhism, but, strange to say, it doesn’t come from the Buddha!

  The Modern Mindfulness movement is frequently criticized

  by orthodox Buddhist authorities, teachers, and scholars for

  so blithely dismissing the philosophic aspects of the tradition.

  The Buddha himself valued analytic, goal-directed

  thought very highly indeed. The four training disciplines of

  the Sutta all converge on mindfulness of thought, which is

  the apex of the mind-training pyramid. The purpose of the

  training is to develop a mind capable of sustained, penetrat-

  ing insight ( vipassana) into the nature of reality itself. Or to

  put it more simply, the purpose of mindfulness according

  to the Buddha is productive, goal-directed thought, not the

  absence of thought.

  Buddhism is the most philosophically structured of all

  great religions. The doctrine is presented as a series of ratio-

  nal, step-by-step arguments that converge on the truth from

  different angles. If you accept its premises, it presents a

  2 3 4 | B R A I N T R A I N I N G W I T H T H E B U D D H A

  Brain-Training-with-Buddha_3P.indd 234

  10/24/19 15:35
/>   logical and coherent analysis of suffering, its causes, and the ultimate escape from suffering and rebirth.

  Every Buddhist school has a tradition of philosophy

  around this cluster of arguments, which is usually regarded

  as the peak of the spiritual path. None of these traditions is

  truly philosophic in the Western sense of open-ended dialectic

  and skeptical enquiry. Nor are they scientific or empirical as is

  frequently claimed by modern enthusiasts. They still require

  a high degree of unquestioning faith, and they all focus nar-

  rowly on their own hypotheses. However, they do present

  alternative modes of thought that we can usefully apply today.

  Nor is there just one approach. Each of the three major

  forms of Buddhism dominant in the West has its own in-house

  style. We can call them “embodied thought” (the Buddha’s

  original formula); “contemplative thought” (in Tibetan Bud-

  dhism); and “intuitive thought” (in Zen).

  CONTEMPLATIVE THOUGHT

  Let’s start with contemplative thought. Most religions have

  practices in which we are asked to contemplate various spiri-

  tual and moral ideas. In the Dalai Lama’s lineage, the “Lamrim”

  is the equivalent of the Catholic catechism, but much larger. It

  is a training discipline with a long list of themes that the monk

  or keen practitioner was encouraged to meditate on for years.

  These themes are regarded as the summation of the whole

  teaching according to Tibetan Buddhism. Studying formally,

  the practitioner would spend days or weeks on each one, com-

  plete with visualizations, prayers, purification rituals, and a

  rote learning of all the arguments, and he may repeat this

  cycle indefinitely throughout his life.

  E M B O D I E D T H O U G H T | 2 3 5

  Brain-Training-with-Buddha_3P.indd 235

  10/24/19 15:35

  The Lamrim includes themes such as the imminence of

  death; the dangers of material existence; the danger of falling

  into lower rebirths; the horrors of the hell realms; the peer-

  less value of the teaching; the great good fortune of having

  a guru; overcoming “self-cherishing” and attachment to self;

  taking refuge in the Buddha, in the dogma, and in the clergy;

  the moral mechanics of karma; suffering and the end of suf-

  fering; the aspiration for enlightenment; cultivating univer-

 

‹ Prev