Babel Inc

by Kerry Bolton

  It can be noted that while PAK refers to the strategic importance of Trepca and its wide economic ramifications, the determination remains to privatise. The report goes on to say that Trepca has been operating at a loss, averaging 10 per cent of what it has produced. The aim is to liquidate Trepca and to ‘Invite foreign direct investment from international mining groups with global reach . . . as the country’s largest investment opportunity.’[25] Such is the reality of the war on Serbia, where ‘Islamist’ terrorists suddenly became ‘freedom fighters,’ backed by U.S. and NATO arms. The same situation transpired in Libya against Gadaffi, and in Syria against Assad as this is written.

  Manipulation of Islam

  The globalists and U.S. policy-makers are playing a duplicitous game in regard to Islam: The so-called ‘Jihadists’ or ‘Islamists,’ are paraded as the universal bogeymen that justify the ‘global war on terrorism’; the ‘Arab Spring’ (another batch of well-planned and funded ‘spontaneous’ ‘colour revolutions’)[26] and the invasion and occupation of ‘rejectionist’ states. On the other hand, funding from globalist organisations and agencies of the U.S. government have supported ‘Islamists’ such as the Mujahideen when ‘Islamists’ were used to dislodge the Russians from Afghanistan, and similar organisations in Libya, Albanian Muslim terrorists in Serbia and the same types presently in Syria. These ‘Islamists’ can be called ‘terrorists’ or ‘freedom fighters’ as requirements dictate. The Kosovo Liberation Army had been designated originally by the U.S. State Department as terrorists and gangsters, but were armed to topple the Yugoslav state. The globalists have been playing the same game in supporting Muslim terrorism against Russia in Chechnya.

  Today’s ‘Islamists’ are a product of U.S. Cold War policy against Russia. Graham Fuller, when Deputy Director of the CIA’s National Council on Intelligence, spawned the Mujahideen during the 1980s, recruiting fundamentalist Muslims for training in guerrilla insurgency against Soviet forces in Afghanistan. One of these trainees was Osama bin Laden. Al Qaeda was the product. Fuller, worked at the Pentagon, and at the RAND Corporation globalist think tank. Swiss journalist and author Richard Labévière cited a 1999 memo of Fuller as a basis for U.S. policy:

  The policy of guiding the evolution of Islam and of helping them against our adversaries worked marvelously well in Afghanistan against [the Russians]. The same doctrines can still be used to destabilize what remains of Russian power, and especially to counter the Chinese[27] influence in Central Asia.[28]

  Russia’s main pipeline route out of the Caspian Sea basin transits through Chechnya and Dagestan. The 1994–1996 Chechen war, instigated by the main rebel movements against Moscow, served to undermine secular state institutions. The adoption of Islamic law in the largely secular Muslim societies of the former Soviet Union serves U.S. strategic interests in the region, as a means of destabilisation. Elsewhere, conversely, U.S./globalist policy pursues secularisation against Islam and all other traditional religions, as explained by Ralph Peters. The Soros networks are particularly assiduous in funding movements and individuals against traditional cultural, ethnic and national principles. ‘Feminism’ including so-called ‘reproductive’ rights’ (abortion), is especially promoted by such globalist NGOs. ‘Feminism’ next to multiculturalism, is one of the most useful tools for globalist subversion in subverting traditional national and cultural structures.[29]

  One of the numerous subversive organisations established to encourage ‘regime change’ in ‘rejectionist’ regimes is the American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus (ACPC), originally founded as the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya. This is a project of Freedom House, one of the primary globalist NGOs promoting ‘regime change’ around the world, in tandem with the Soros ‘Open Society’ network, USAID, the National Endowment for Democracy, ad infinitum.[30] ACPC, which is based at Freedom House, states of itself:

  Founded in 1999 to advocate for a political solution to the conflict in Chechnya that erupted into a war for independence with Russia in 1994, ACPC was at the helm of international NGO efforts to galvanize the U.S. and international policymaking community on the implications of the conflict for human rights in Chechnya. As violence spread into other republics in the North Caucasus—Ingushetia, Dagestan, Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachay-Cherkessia and North Ossetia—ACPC concentrated its efforts on supporting human rights and rule of law, monitoring the trajectory of violence in the region, and advocating for peace and stability in the North Caucasus.[31]

  The rhetoric about ‘human rights’ follows exactly the same agenda as the myriad of other NGOs, think tanks, and funds etc., in targeting any ‘rejectionist’ regime, from apartheid South Africa, to Milosevic’s Serbia, to Assad’s Syria to Putin’s Russia. Whenever a state or statesman hinders some globalist objective, a sudden hue and cry goes up about ‘human rights.’ The formula does not change. The purpose is to undermine Russian policy in a patchwork of multiethnic republics by appeals to ‘human rights,’ ‘civil society, and ‘democracy.’ Hence in Dagestan, plagued by Muslim militancy, ACPC concluded in 2011:

  Magomedov’s appointment signalled the Kremlin’s renewed reliance on clan politics as an instrument of control. His inability to launch a meaningful dialogue with adherents of Salafi Islam underscore the pitfalls of his limited mandate, made accountable to the federal centre as opposed to the Dagestani population. In the Russian political landscape, any attempts at changes by North Caucasus leaders will go awry without the Kremlin support, which suggests that the central government continues to favor ironfisted policies as opposed to reconciliation and aborts local efforts at practicing alternative approaches.[32]

  After the bombing at the Boston marathon in 2013 allegedly by two Chechnyan ‘Islamists,’ the anti-Russia campaign of the ACPC received some criticism for portraying Russia as a villain in the region, and for spurning Russian warnings about Chechnyan terrorism. William Kristol, a seminal spokesman in favour of U.S. global hegemony, and a member of ACPC,[33] stated that although the Russian authorities had offered the United States ‘a pretty detailed dossier of [bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev’s] contacts,’ he stated that the Russians were ‘trying to get us to be suspicious of every Chechen who came to the U.S., especially of everyone who came as a political refugee.’[34] That is a dilemma of multiculturalism even for its chief backer, the United States: the chickens come home to roost. Many of those on the Chechnya-aiding ACPC, such as William Kristol, were also founders of the Project for a New American Century,[35] which drew up the blueprints for ‘regime change’ throughout the Middle East, a plan which is still unfolding. They were also enthusiasts for war against Serbia.[36]

  However, there is another major factor in regard to globalisation and Islam. The globalists are manipulating Islam by different and in several respects, contradictory, means; which is to say, they are pursuing a dialectical strategy:

  As we have seen, a certain type of Muslim, the ‘Islamists’ or ‘Jihadists’ have been created by the globalists via their American proxies, to produce a controlled crises—the ‘war on terrorism’—to justify globalist intervention in states that are regarded as ‘rejectionist,’ such as Iran, Iraq, Libya, and Syria.

  Conversely, those states that were or are fighting ‘Islamists,’ namely Serbia, Libya, Iraq, and Syria, and Russia vis-à-vis Chechnya, are targeted by the globalists as tyrannical for trying to suppress or contain their own Muslim militants, who receive globalist support.

  Muslim migrants,[37] especially to Europe, are used to establish ethnic enclaves and break down any remnants of European pride, while justifying increasingly oppressive measures against the European populations through ‘human rights’ laws and mass re-education of the young to discard the ‘xenophobia’ of their elders and embrace ‘multiculturalism’ as the exciting new wave of the future.

  Having considered the first two points, we shall now turn our attention to a specifi
c example of the globalist plan to destroy a European cultural and national identity by pushing multiculturalism in France via the use of Muslim migrants and their offspring.

  [1] The ‘free trade’ war aims were enunciated in both Wilson’s ‘Fourteen Points’ and Roosevelt’s ‘Atlantic Charter.’

  [2] Chris Bird, ‘Kosovan Serbs Under Siege,’ The Guardian, 18 August 1999, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/1999/aug/18/balkans1.

  [3] Ibid.

  [4] ‘Minorities Leaving Yugoslav Province Dominated by Albanian,’ Associated Press, 17 October 1981.

  [5] New York Times, 1 November 1987.

  [6] Tony Blair, Newsweek, 19 April 1999.

  [7] Susan Estrich, April 1999, cited by Dr. William Pierce, ‘The New World Order,’ Free Speech, vol. 5, no. 4, April 1999, http://cdn.preterhuman.net/texts/unsorted/fs994d.html.

  [8] Wesley Clark, CNN interview, 25 April 1999.

  [9] Justin Raimondo, ‘No Rest for the Wicked,’ Behind the Headlines: Antiwar.com, 23 June 1999, http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j062399.html.

  [10] ‘Israel Black Hole in Kosovo,’ Haaretz, 12 August 2011, http://www.haaretz.com/weekend/magazine/israeli-black-hole-in-kosovo-1.378338.

  [11] Rambouillet Agreement: Interim Agreement for Peace and Self-Government in Kosovo, Chapter 1: Constitution, http://www.state.gov/www/regions/eur/ksvo_rambouillet_text.html.

  [12] Ibid., see Article VII: ‘National Communities,’ 1–7.

  [13] Richard Becker, ‘Rambouillet a declaration of war disguised as a peace agreement,’ June 10, 2000 International Tribunal for U.S./NATO war crimes in Yugoslavia, http://www.iacenter.org/warcrime/rbecker.htm.

  [14] Rambouillet Agreement, op. cit., Chapter Four, ‘Economic Issues,’ Article II (1).

  [15] Neil Clark, ‘The Spoils of Another War,’ The Guardian, 21 September 2004, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/21/kosovo.comment.

  [16] Ibid.

  [17] Ibid.

  [18] Ibid.

  [19] Privatisation Agency of Kosovo, http://www.pak-ks.org/?page=2,4.

  [20] FAQ: What is PAK Selling?, http://www.pak-ks.org/?page=2,5.

  [21] ‘Why Kosovo?,’ http://www.pak-ks.org/?page=2,35.

  [22] ‘The challenges facing the Privatisation Agency of Kosovo are considerable,’ Information to Stakeholders, August 2011, p. 5.

  [23] Special Chamber of the Supreme Court.

  [24] ‘The challenges . . . ,’ op. cit., p. 11.

  [25] Ibid., ‘New Law on Reorganisation of Certain Enterprise,’ p. 21.

  [26] K. R. Bolton, Revolution from Above, ‘The Global Democratic Revolution,’ op. loc.

  [27] In this writer’s opinion, the United States will not act against China. The two have symbiotic economies and the globalists headed up by Rockefeller, Soros and Goldman Sachs interests are profiting well from the Chinese status quo. Russia under Putin remains the primary globalist irritant. See Bolton, Geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific, op. cit.

  [28] Richard Labévière, Dollars for Terror: The United States and Islam (New York: Algora Publishing, 2000), 5–6.

  [29] K. R. Bolton, ‘Feminism,’ in Revolution from Above.

  [30] Ibid., 218–33.

  [31] ‘About ACPC,’ http://www.peaceinthecaucasus.org/about.

  [32] Dagestan at Tipping Point, American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus, 2011, http://www.peaceinthecaucasus.org/sites/default/files/pdf/ACPC_paper_Dagestan.pdf.

  [33] ACPC, members, http://www.peaceinchechnya.org/about_members.htm.

  [34] David Weigel, ‘We Are All Russians Now,’ Skate, 22 April 2013, http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/04/russia_warned_the_fbi_about_tamerlan_tsarnaev_how_american_neocons_originally.html.

  [35] Project for a New American Century, ‘Statement of Principles,’ 3 June 1997, http://web.archive.org/web/20070810113753/www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm.

  [36] Project for a New American Century, ‘Balkans/Caucasus,’ http://www.newamericancentury.org/balkans.htm.

  [37] Asians in New Zealand and Australia, Hispanics in the United States, etc., serve the same purposes.

  Target: France

  During 19–22 October 2010, Charles Rivkin, U.S. Ambassador to France, invited a 29-member delegation from the Pacific Council on International Policy (PCIP) to a conference in France, the stated purpose of which was to discuss Arab and Islamic relations in the country.[1] The meeting was part of a far-reaching subversive agenda to transform that entire character of France and in particular the consciousness of French youth. This programme focuses on the use of France’s Muslim youth in a typically manipulative strategy behind the façade of ‘human rights’ and ‘equality.’

  The PCIP report stated of the conference:

  . . . The delegation further focused on three key themes. First, the group examined Franco-Muslim issues in France through exchanges with Dr Bassma Kodmani, Director of the Arab Reform Institute, and Ms Rachida Dati, the first female French cabinet member of North African origin and current Mayor of the 7th Arrondissement in Paris. A trip to the Grand Mosque of Paris and a meeting with the Director of Theology and the Rector there provided additional insight. Second, meetings with Mr Jean-Noel Poirier, the Vice President of External Affairs at AREVA (a highly innovative French energy company), and with Mr Brice Lalonde, climate negotiator and former Minister of the Environment, highlighted energy and nuclear policy issues and the differences between U.S. and French policies in these arenas. And finally, the delegation explored the connections between media and culture in California (Hollywood) and France in meetings at the Louvre, the Musée D’Orsay, and at FRANCE 24—the Paris-based international news and current affairs channel.[2]

  The primary purpose was obviously on matters of a multicultural nature, including not only Arab and Islamic relations in France, but also importantly, a discussion on the impact of Hollywood ‘culture’ on the French; i.e. a major part of the ‘culturally lethal’ virus that Ralph Peters described as the most pervasive and subversive element of globalisation. Obama appointed Rivkin due to his role as a major fund-raiser for the President. His career has been in business, becoming head of two entertainment companies and gaining ‘powerful friends’ in Hollywood.[3]

  The PCIP, of which Rivkin is a member, was founded in 1995 as a regional appendage of the omnipresent globalist think tank, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).[4] It is headquartered in Los Angeles, ‘with members and activities throughout the West Coast of the United States and internationally.’ Corporate funding comes from, among others: Carnegie Corporation of New York, Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, City National Bank, The Ford Foundation, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund, The Rockefeller Foundation, United States Institute of Peace.[5] The PCIP is therefore yet another big player in the globalist network comprising hundreds of interconnected organisations, lobbies, ‘civil society’ groups, NGOs, and think tanks, associated with the U.S. Government, and with banks and other corporations.

  Early into his appointment as Ambassador, The Los Angeles Times described Rivkin as a ‘48-year-old Yale alum and Harvard Business School graduate with Russian Jewish parents,’ who aims to promote American-style multiculturalism among France’s bellicose banlieues[6] as the way of the future.[7] Prior to his appointment as Ambassador, Rivkin was California finance co-chair of the Obama Presidential campaign, raising $500,000—in a campaign that was heavily funded by the United States’ oligarchy.[8] He had run an entertainment company, Wildbrain, and prior to that the Jim Hens
on Company,[9] and has stated that ‘I do feel I understand the power of media.’[10]

  Why France?

  France has long been a thorn in the side of U.S. globalism because of its frequent (although not invariable) adherence to French interests around the world, rather than those of the manufactured ‘world community.’ France has followed the dictum of President Charles de Gaulle that they ‘don’t have friends, but only interests.’ France is one of the few states left in Western Europe with the remnant of a national consciousness. She is therefore regarded as ‘xenophobic’ and in need of change. The best way of destroying any such sentiment is to weaken ethno-national consciousness and identity by means of ‘multiculturalism.’ Was it only a coincidence that the 1968 student revolt, sparked by the most puerile of reasons, occurred at a time both when the CIA was very active in funding student groups around the world, and when President de Gaulle was giving the United States a lot of trouble? De Gaulle did little to play along with American’s post-war plans. He withdrew France from NATO military command. Even during World War II as leader of the Free French, he was distrusted by the United States.[11] Of particular concern would have been De Gaulle’s advocacy of a united Europe to counteract U.S. hegemony,[12] especially as de Gaulle’s vision of a united Europe included the Soviet Union. In 1959 he stated at Strasbourg: ‘Yes, it is Europe, from the Atlantic to the Urals, it is the whole of Europe, that will decide the destiny of the world.’ The expression implied détente between a future neutralist Europe and the USSR. In 1967 he declared an arms embargo on Israel and cultivated the Arab world. This is the type of statesmanship that globalists fear. With constant tension among disaffected Muslim youth, a backlash could see an intransigently anti-globalist, ‘xenophobic’ regime come to power, such as that of the Front National.