Book Read Free

Skeptoid 4: Astronauts, Aliens, and Ape-Men

Page 17

by Brian Dunning


  The Air Force personnel Samblebe referred to were probably four RAAF investigators who showed up on April 9, three days after the event, to look at what was said to be the landing site. A number of enthusiasts from various UFO groups accompanied them, but apparently nothing interesting was found, because nothing was documented from this visit. The newspaper interviewed one student who said she thought the tall grass looked merely like the wind had flattened it. Indeed the flattened circles were apparently so vague that witnesses couldn’t agree whether it was one or three. Some reports say the RAAF men burned the area to hide the evidence, but according to the farmer who owned the land, he burned it himself to stop people from trampling onto his property. Today’s expanded accounts often include much deeper military involvement, such as police and military “swarming” around the school and cordoning off the “landing site”, and the circles appearing to be “scorched”, but I didn’t find a single record from 1966 to substantiate this.

  Something else that’s grown over the years has been the number of witnesses at the school. The Dandenong Journal reported at that time that only one teacher and “several” students saw the object, but by now that number has grown to 200. This number is probably artificially inflated by what behavioral psychologists call the bandwagon effect. When all of your friends say they saw something, you tend to say you saw it too, whether you really did or not, simply because you don’t want to be left out or be considered inferior. Most of the witnesses were high school students, and that’s an age when we tend to be highly conscious of our image and social conformity. Nobody wants to be the one who couldn’t see the object. Some of the students most likely did see something, but it’s fairly certain that at least some of the witnesses simply went along with the crowd in accordance with the bandwagon effect.

  This introduces a serious problem. The descriptions of what was actually seen have now become diluted with made-up descriptions by an unknown number of students who didn’t see anything, and there’s no way to know which is which. Police investigators are keenly aware of this potential complication, and often have to account for it. In practice, this usually means finding commonalities among the accounts of witnesses who were in the best positions, and discounting aberrant reports, usually from those who were not in as good a position, and especially from those who come forward later after the general facts have become publicly known.

  Employing this strategy, we can bring what probably happened at Westall into better focus. The commonalities of the reports from the witnesses in the best position all state that the craft was a great distance away, beyond the trees. This is probably what happened. Aberrant reports from a few students, such as those who report that it flew over the school, or that it landed in the schoolyard, or the one girl who said she touched the craft as it lifted off, are much less reliable and probably safely discarded. Such reports are sensational and most likely to make headlines, but to the investigator who knows his business, there is good reason to dismiss them. We can say with pretty good certainty that whatever the object was, it was too far away to easily judge its actual size. The best indicator we have of scale is of its second appearance, after it rose from behind the trees, when Andrew Greenwood reported it played cat and mouse with the light aircraft: Small and thin, and shorter than a light aircraft.

  So what can we conclude about the Westall UFO? Not very much. The weather balloon is a likely explanation for the first half of the event, and the drogue is at least one very reasonable possibility for the second half. There’s good reason to doubt that many of the story elements, like the military conspiracy and the craft having landed, ever happened at all. The story certainly has no holes in it that can only be filled with extraterrestrial aliens, and indeed no credible reason to suggest anything unusual. “I don’t know” does not mean “I do know, and it was a spaceship”, so for now, the Westall ‘66 UFO remains one of many question marks in the books, just not a very bold or especially intriguing one.

  REFERENCES & FURTHER READING

  Anderson, P. Mustangs of the RAAF and RNZAF. Sydney: A. H. & A. W. Reed, 1975.

  Anonymous. “Mystery Solution?” The Dandenong Journal. 28 Apr. 1966, Letters to the Editor: 21.

  Beaufort. “The Story Of The Commonwealth Aircraft Corporation.” Beaufort Restoration. The Beaufort Restoration Group, 2 Sep. 2007. Web. 29 May. 2010.

  Bell, D. The Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum Directory of Airplanes, Their Designers and Manufacturers. Washington, D.C.: Stackpole Books, 2002.

  Boeing. “Boeing Australia.” Boeing. The Boeing Company, 7 Feb. 2006. Web. 27 May. 2010.

  Damian. “Around Clayton.” The Dandenong Journal. 5 May 1966, Editorial.

  Editors. “Who Were 5 Pilots?” The Dandenong Journal. 21 Apr. 1966, Volume 105, Number 30: 1-2.

  Editors. “Object Perhaps Balloon.” The Age. 7 Apr. 1966, Newspaper: 6.

  26. THE LOST SHIP OF THE DESERT

  The facts behind tall tales from the American southwest of ships found in the middle of the desert.

  It was 1933, and Myrtle Botts was traveling with her husband, enjoying the famous annual wildflower bloom in what’s now Anza-Borrego State Park, in the Colorado Desert of inland southern California. They met an old prospector who swore he’d seen the remains of a Viking longship protruding from the side of an arroyo, well enough preserved that the distinctive round shields were still mounted along its sides. He wrote directions for Myrtle on how to find it. A paper, purporting to be those original directions, is preserved at the Julian Pioneer Museum in Julian, California.

  Following the directions, Myrtle went and found the ship. She returned to fetch her husband along, but before they could get there, an earthquake brought down the wall of the arroyo, access was blocked, and the ship has not been seen since. Erosion in the arroyo has since washed away whatever the directions may once have led to.

  How could a Viking ship end up in the deserts of the American southwest? Coastal mountain ranges eliminate the possibility that it came from the Pacific Ocean. There is, however, one route into the desert, via the Colorado River, which feeds into the Gulf of California, also known as the Sea of Cortez, between Baja California and Mexico. Historically, this was largely a navigable river for shallow-draft boats, and it would have been possible to sail from the ocean up through what’s now Yuma, AZ right on the border with California. Today, however, that river no longer exists, at least not in a very meaningful way. By the time the river gets to Yuma, it’s gone through a number of dams and been channeled into numerous agricultural canals. Feeding the dry southwest leaves little water in the Colorado’s bed, and in most places between Yuma and the Gulf, the bed is dry.

  But before agriculture, it was a mighty channel, so big that it occasionally overflowed its banks and flooded the desert. Most notably, this happened in 1905 when the river burst its banks in Mexico, and flowed northwards in two separate channels for more than two years. The entire Colorado River poured into the Salton Sink in California, filling it to become what’s now called the Salton Sea. These two rivers still run today, draining the town of Mexicali into the Salton Sea.

  Myrtle Botts’ prospector told her the Viking ship was in the badlands west of Mexicali. The land about there is either flat desert or hard rock mountain ranges, except for the Carrizo Badlands. If the Viking ship was in the Carrizo Badlands, it would have had to climb at least 200 meters in elevation. The arroyos, or canyons, in the Carrizo Badlands don’t flow toward Mexicali, however. On the rare events when they contain water, they flow north as well, downhill into the Salton Sink.

  So it appears that the Salton Sea is the key to any ancient ship traffic that may have left a shipwreck in the southwest. But even this is problematic. We do have good paleohydrology on the Salton Sink. Many times, since about the year 700, the Salton Sink has filled when the Colorado River
overflowed into it. The largest was in about 1500, when Lake Cahuilla (as it was then called) was 26 times the size of today’s Salton Sea, and its shoreline is still visible on the surrounding hillsides. These overflows happened when the Colorado River silted up its normal path to the Gulf, and naturally diverted itself. At its highest, Lake Cahuilla actually covered what’s now Indio, California to Yuma, Arizona, and was contiguous with the Gulf of California. During these events, shallow-draft ships could indeed have traveled inland as far as the outskirts of the Carrizo Badlands.

  But historically, this was quite rare, and was unknown to any Europeans who left records. The first known Europeans to the region were led by Melchior Diaz in 1540. He traveled up-river from the Gulf, and then sent expeditions overland to Lake Cahuilla, so we know there was no water connection. By 1604, New Mexico had a Spanish governor, Don Juan de Ornate, and we know from his explorations of the Colorado River that it was not connected to Lake Cahuilla at that time either. 100 years later, the Colorado silted up again, blocking access from the sea, and refilling Lake Cahuilla. But by 1774, the diversion had corrected itself and Lake Cahuilla was dry again, as reported by explorer Juan Bautista de Anza.

  This casts doubt on stories of Spanish galleons found high and dry in the desert, but it does leave the door open to other earlier explorers who did not necessarily leave records. Candidates we have for this are the Chinese and the Vikings. In the 1400’s, Chinese explorer Zheng He traveled west from China to Africa, but no reliable accounts show him ever venturing east across the Pacific toward America. One map turned up several years ago, purporting to show that Zheng He had visited and mapped America, but it’s been shown to be a fake.

  Vikings were well known for their wide-ranging exploits launched from Scandinavia, even going so far as northern Africa. They also made several attempts to colonize North America along its eastern coast, but they never ventured anywhere near the Pacific Ocean, so far as we know. Stories have persisted for almost two centuries of blond Eskimos, generally thought to be the descendants of Inuit who intermarried with Vikings along Canada’s northern coast. If Vikings had made it that far, we might hypothesize that they could have continued south through the Bering Strait and eventually reached Mexico. But we strike at least two stumbling blocks. First, there is no archaeological evidence of Vikings anywhere along the American west coast, which would necessarily exist; and second, DNA testing of the European-looking Cambridge Bay Inuit with Norse descendants from Iceland proved no genetic link. These combine to make the story of a Viking longship in the Colorado Desert highly unlikely.

  But of course, it could be some other kind of boat that Myrtle Botts’ prospector mistook for a Viking longship. There are other stories of ships in the desert. One holds that a Spanish galleon was washed out of the river during a flood in 1862 where it became beached some 60 kilometers north of Yuma, but this is probably just a tall tale. It’s unlikely that anything as large as a galleon was ever able to navigate up the Colorado. If it was a smaller boat, it’s a perfectly reasonable story, as there are floodplains in that part of the river where a boat could quite easily get stuck at high water. But it would not be a terribly remarkable event, and there isn’t anywhere around there where a boat could be washed more than a couple hundred meters from the channel.

  In the V formed by the south-flowing Colorado and the north-flowing channels into which the Colorado has spilled into the Salton Sink is some high ground with sand dunes called the Sand Hills, and somewhere in these dunes has been reported a Spanish pearl ship. The story goes that a tidal bore pushed the small ship over the shallow delta in 1615, when Lake Cahuilla was so high that the whole area was underwater and the lake was contiguous with the Gulf. It’s reasonably plausible that a small ship could have made it there and become stranded, but the Sand Hills are too high and too far from Lake Cahuilla’s maximum level. Once the water receded the ship would have been well out in the open and easily found.

  That’s the case with the plausible version of all these stories. If boats did indeed get stuck in what’s now desert, they would have been on the surface, out on the flats, and quite obvious. We can say with pretty good certainty that no ship within the past few thousand years could have become buried in such a way that a more recent canyon could have exposed them. We have a thorough understanding of the geological history of the Carrizo Badlands. The top layers, where any embedded boats might be found, consist of layers of alluvium, from several different formations, laid down during the Pliocene and Miocene epochs. The newest deposits are at least 2.5 million years old, and they get much older from there. So there’s really no chance that any kind of boat or other human construction might be found protruding from the wall of a canyon in this region.

  We should also keep in mind that the southwest is traveled today much heavier than it was in the 1800’s, plus we have the benefit of two centuries of exploration since then. In all that time, we’ve never had anything better than tall tales; nobody’s yet presented evidence of a Viking ship, Spanish galleon, or any other unexpected ancient boats turning up in the southwest where they shouldn’t be. If they do, it’s likely going to be from a small boat where we would expect such a craft to have been stranded or abandoned in a place where high water is known to have been. Paleohydrology shows us that may indeed be a great distance from any existing shoreline. What will get me excited will be a Viking ship, anything galleon sized, or anything where it shouldn’t be. That will be a great day to in search of the lost ship of the desert.

  REFERENCES & FURTHER READING

  American Geographical Society: Approximate Status of 1933. “Map of the Colorado Delta Region.” SDSU Center for Inland Waters. San Diego State University, 1 Jan. 1936. Web. 4 Jun. 2010.

  Bishop, G., Marinacci, M., Oesterle, J., Moran, M. Weird California: Your Travel Guide to California’s Local Legends and Best Kept Secrets. New York: Sterling Publishing Company, 2009. 64.

  CBC. “DNA tests debunk blond Inuit legend.” CBC News. CBC/Radio-Canada, 28 Oct. 2003. Web. 3 Jun. 2010.

  Lovgren, S. “‘Chinese Columbus’ Map Likely Fake, Experts Say.” National Geographic News. National Geographic Society, 23 Jan. 2006. Web. 3 Jun. 2010.

 

  Reheis, M., Hershler, R., Miller, D. Late Cenozoic Drainage History of the Southwestern Great Basin and Lower Colorado River Region: Geologic and Biotic Perspectives. Boulder: The Geological Society of America, 2008. 368.

  SSA. “Historical Chronology.” Salton Sea Restoration: 13 Years of Progress. Salton Sea Authority, 1 Jan. 2000. Web. 2 Jun. 2010.

  Weight, H. Lost Ship of the Desert: A Legend of the Southwest. Twentynine Palms: The Calico Press, 1959.

  27. THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION

  Are the United States, Canada, and Mexico planning to merge into a single huge police state?

  In this chapter, we’re going to put on our cheap suits, stick earpieces in, and join the legions of multinational Secret Service agents flowing out among the populace of Canada, the United States, and Mexico; as the borders disappear and we round up a unified population into forced socialism under martial law in our gigantic new pancontinental police state. Some believers say this takeover is actually already underway; others reckon the plans are still being laid, but few believers doubt that it’s in the works. The ultimate goal, according to the rumors, is for the few elite in the new government to enjoy unprecedented power, control, and profit over a new supermassive megastate, at the expense of half a billion workers forced into socialized labor. This new police megastate will be called the North American Union, or NAU.

  One common theme in the conspiracy rumor is that anytime something bad happens for real, it’s generally viewed by the believers as a deliberate attack by the American government upon its own people, as part of thi
s active, ongoing process. 9/11 is the most obvious example; the conspiracy community believes nearly absolutely that 9/11 was perpetrated by the government, in part as an excuse to increase domestic control in preparation for the NAU takeover. When Hurricane Katrina killed over 1,800 people in 2005, some in the conspiracy community took it as an actual practice exercise by FEMA to round up thousands of young men and execute them in the swamp. Even the 2010 explosion of the oil rig Deepwater Horizon and subsequent oil spill was described by some as a deliberate attack, with the dual goals of damaging the local economies and reaping huge profits for the government insiders through stock manipulation.

  One piece of evidence the believers claim proves that the NAU takeover is underway is a new monetary unit to replace the dollar, called the amero (obviously patterned after the euro used in the European Union). It should be stressed at this point that all known examples of actual amero bills or coins have been proven to be hoaxes; there is no such thing (so far as we know) as actual amero currency. But conspiracy theorists can be well excused for suspecting that an amero is in the works. After all, the euro certainly became a reality in Europe; therefore the amero might well happen here, so they reason.

  However, comparisons between the amero and the euro, or the North American Union and the European Union, do not hold much water. The euro was first planned as a solution to a number of problems unique to Europe, where there were many small countries that necessarily had to do large amounts of business among one another; but with all their own separately fluctuating currencies, there were all sorts of problems. Foreign investment was unnecessarily complicated and troublesome, exchange was inefficient and costly, interest rates were unpredictable, and various inflation rates made every transaction a shot in the dark. When the euro was introduced, participating countries had to meet certain requirements of stability. Since its introduction, studies have found that it was tremendously successful in addressing the problems. As of 2006, the European Central Bank estimated that the euro increased trade among member nations by 5-10%, and later estimates show that this trend has only continued to improve.

 

‹ Prev