The Sign and the Seal

by Graham Hancock

  ‘What’s Tana Kirkos?’

  ‘It is another island … east of here. Quite far.’

  ‘Ask him to tell us more. What does he mean by something important?’

  Wondemu put the question again and translated the answer. ‘He says that the Ark of the Covenant is on Tana Kirkos. That is all he knows.’

  My first reaction to this astonishing piece of news was to roll my eyes heavenwards, tug distractedly at my hair, and kick the side of the launch. Meanwhile the monk, whom I wanted more information from, had hobbled back along the jetty and vanished into the banana grove.

  I looked at my watch. It was now almost noon. We had been out of Bahar Dar for six hours, or 300 dollars.

  ‘Is Tana Kirkos on our way back?’ I asked Wondemu.

  ‘No,’ he replied, ‘I have never been there. No one ever goes there. But I know it is more or less due east. Bahar Dar is south.’

  ‘I see. Any idea how long it will take us?’

  ‘No. I shall ask the captain.’

  Wondemu did that. It would take us about an hour and a half.

  ‘And after that, how long back to Bahar Dar?’

  ‘About three more hours.’

  I did some rapid calculations in my head. Say two hours on Tana Kirkos, plus an hour and a half to get there, plus three hours to Bahar Dar … that’s six and a half hours. Call it seven, plus the six we’ve already had. That’s, let’s see, thirteen hours. Thirteen bloody hours! At fifty bucks an hour. Six hundred and fifty dollars minimum. Christ!

  I fulminated inwardly for some time longer. Eventually, however – with a heart as heavy as my wallet was light – I made up my mind to go.

  Of course the Ark wouldn’t actually be on Tana Kirkos. I knew that. In fact the most likely scenario was that I would be given the run-around again, just as on Daga Stephanos. Money would be extracted from me in dribs and drabs until the point was reached where I was obviously not prepared to hand over any more. Then another tantalizing little hint would be dropped naming yet another island – and off I would go, banknotes at the ready, to enrich yet another community of needy anchorites.

  James Bruce, I remembered, had been to Tana in the eighteenth century. ‘There are forty-five inhabited islands in the lake,’ he had written, ‘if you believe the Abyssinians, who, in everything, are very great liars …’11

  Tana Kirkos

  I was not in a receptive frame of mind when we arrived at Tana Kirkos. Nevertheless, as I stood in the bows of the MV Dahlak scowling at the island ahead, I had to admit that it was a beautiful and unusual place. Completely covered in dense green shrubbery, flowering trees and tall cactus plants, it rose steeply from the water to a high peak on which I could just make out the thatched roof of a circular dwelling. Hummingbirds, kingfishers and bright blue starlings darted through the air. On the shore of a small sandy bay, on a makeshift jetty, stood a group of monks. Smiling.

  We dropped anchor and clambered out of the boat. Wondemu did the usual round of introductions and explanations. Hands were shaken. Lengthy greetings were exchanged. Finally we were led up a narrow, overgrown path cut out of the side of a grey cliff, through an archway at the top – again hewn out of the bare stone – and finally into a clearing containing three or four dilapidated buildings and a dozen ragged monks.

  Set back behind natural rock walls, the grassy space in which we stood was enclosed, silent and dark. The light that did penetrate, filtered as it was through the overarching trees and bushes, seemed muted and green. Against my better judgment, I began to suspect that there might be something worth seeing here after all. I could not have explained why, but Tana Kirkos felt ‘right’ in a way that Daga Stephanos had not.

  The senior priest now arrived and introduced himself, through Wondemu, as Memhir Fisseha. He was lean and smelled of incense. He did not ask for money, but he did ask whether or not we had security clearance.

  I was nonplussed by such a question, coming as it did from a traditional figure in clerical robes.

  ‘As a matter of fact,’ I said, ‘yes we do.’ I pulled from my pocket the permit we had obtained from the security police in Addis and gave this to Wondemu, who in turn passed it to Memhir Fisseha. The old man – were all priests in Ethiopia so old? – studied the document with an abstracted air and then handed it back to me. He seemed to be satisfied.

  Wondemu now explained that I wanted to ask some questions about Tana Kirkos and about the Ark of the Covenant. Would that be OK?

  ‘Yes,’ the priest replied, rather sadly I thought. He directed us to the doorway of what, from the blackened pots and pans lying inside, appeared to be a kitchen. Here, on a small stool, he sat down, indicating that we should join him.

  ‘Do you believe,’ I began, ‘that the Ark of the Covenant was brought from Jerusalem to Ethiopia by Emperor Menelik I?’

  ‘Yes,’ Wondemu translated.

  I heaved a sigh of relief. This was already much better than Daga Stephanos.

  ‘I have heard a story’, I continued, ‘that the Ark is now here – on the island of Tana Kirkos. Is that story true?’

  An anguished expression crossed Memhir Fisseha’s leathery face as he answered: ‘It was true.’

  Was true? What on earth did that signify? ‘Get him to elaborate,’ I barked at Wondemu in some agitation. ‘What does he mean by was true?’

  The priest’s response excited and distressed me in roughly equal measure: ‘It was true. But the Ark of the Covenant is not here any longer. It has been taken to Axum.’

  ‘Taken back to Axum!’ I exclaimed. ‘When? When did they take it?’

  An intense discussion followed in Amharic, with the main point obviously being clarified several times. Finally Wondemu translated: ‘The Ark was taken to Axum one thousand six hundred years ago, in the time of King Ezana. It was not taken back. It was simply taken there, and it has stayed there ever since.’

  I felt perplexed and frustrated. ‘Let me get this clear,’ I said after a moment’s thought. ‘He’s not telling us that the Ark was here recently and has now gone back to Axum, is he? He’s telling us that it went there a very long time ago.’

  ‘Exactly. One thousand six hundred years ago. That is what he says.’

  ‘OK, then ask him this. How did the Ark get here in the first place? Did it come here from Axum, and then go back there? Or was it here before it was ever taken to Axum? That seems to be what he means, but I want to be absolutely sure.’

  Slowly and painfully the story emerged. Extracting it was like extracting the stump of a rotten tooth from an inflamed gum. Several times consultation was required with the other monks and once a huge, leather-bound book written in ancient Ge’ez was referred to and a passage read out.

  In summary, what Memhir Fisseha told us was that the Ark had been stolen from the Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem by Menelik I and his companions. They had brought it out of Israel, he explained, and into Egypt. Then they had followed the Nile – first the Nile and afterwards its tributary the Takazze – until they had reached Ethiopia.

  This, of course, was the tradition of the theft of the Ark reported in the Kebra Nagast. What came next, however, was completely new.

  Looking for somewhere safe and appropriate where they might install the precious relic, the old priest continued, the travellers had come to Tana. At that time, he said, the entire lake was sacred. It was dear to God. A holy place. So they had come to Tana, to its eastern shore, and they had chosen this island, now called Kirkos, as the resting place for the Ark.

  ‘How long did it stay here?’ I asked.

  ‘For eight hundred years,’ came the reply. ‘It blessed us with its presence for eight hundred years.’

  ‘Was there a building? Was it put into some sort of temple?’

  ‘There was no building. The Holy Ark was placed inside a tent. And it stayed within that tent, here on Tana Kirkos, for eight hundred years. We were Jews then. Afterwards, when we became Christians, King Ezana took the Ark to Axum and place
d it in the great church in that city.’

  ‘And you say the Ark was taken to Axum one thousand six hundred years ago?’

  ‘Yes.’

  ‘So if it was on Tana Kirkos for eight hundred years before that, then – let’s see – it must have arrived here something like two thousand four hundred years ago. Is that right? Are you telling me it came here about four hundred years before the birth of Christ?’

  ‘Yes.’

  ‘You do know that 400 BC was a long time after Solomon – who was supposed to be Menelik’s father? In fact Solomon would have been dead for about five centuries by then. What do you say to that?’

  ‘I say nothing. I have told you our tradition as it is recorded in our sacred books and in our memory.’

  A remark that the priest had made a few moments earlier had interested me enormously, and I now picked him up on this: ‘You told me that you were Jews then? What did that mean? What kind of religion did you have?’

  ‘We were Jews. We performed sacrifice … the sacrificial lamb. And we continued with this practice until the Ark was taken from us to Axum. Then Abba Salama came and he taught us the Christian faith, and we built a church here.’

  Abba Salama, I knew, was the Ethiopic name for Frumentius, the Syrian bishop who had converted King Ezana and the entire Axumite kingdom to Christianity in the 330s AD. This meant that the periods of time that Memhir Fisseha had given me made sense – or at least were internally consistent. The only contradiction was the huge gap between the known dates for Solomon – mid 900s BC – and the date that the Ark had supposedly been brought to Tana Kirkos (which, if I subtracted eight hundred years from 330 AD, would have been 470 BC).

  I pressed on: ‘Before Abba Salama came and taught you Christianity you had no church here?’

  ‘No church. I told you. We were Jews. We performed sacrifice.’ He paused, then added: ‘The blood from the lamb was collected in a bowl … a gomer. Then it was scattered over some stones, some small stones. They are here still, up to this day.’

  ‘Sorry. Come again. What are here to this day?’

  ‘The stones that we used for sacrifice when we were Jews. Those stones are here. On the island. They are here now.’

  ‘Can we see them?’ I asked. I felt a tiny thrill of excitement. If what Memhir Fisseha had just said was true, then he was talking about physical evidence – real physical evidence to support the strange but curiously convincing story that he had told.

  ‘You can see them,’ he replied. He got to his feet. ‘Follow me. I will show you.’

  Scattering the blood

  The priest led us to a high point on the cliff edge near the summit of the island, overlooking Lake Tana. Here, on a raised plinth made of natural unhewn rock, he showed us three short stone pillars grouped closely together. The tallest of the three – perhaps a metre and a half high – was square in section, with a cup-shaped declivity hollowed out in its top. The remaining two were each about a metre high, circular in section, and as thick as a man’s thigh. At the top they also had been hollowed out to a depth of approximately 10 centimetres.

  Though copious quantities of green lichen grew on them I was able to establish that the three pillars were all monoliths, that they were freestanding, and that they had been carved from the same type of grey granite. They looked old, and I asked Richard for his opinion on this.

  ‘Of course,’ he replied, ‘I’m not an archaeologist. But I would say from the way they are cut, the style – particularly the square one … I would say they are at least from the Axumite period, if not earlier.’

  I asked Memhir Fisseha what the cup-shaped declivities were for.

  ‘To contain blood,’ was his answer. ‘After the sacrifice, some was scattered over the stones and some on to the tent that contained the Ark. The remainder was poured into these hollows.’

  ‘Can you show me how it was done?’

  The old priest beckoned one of the other monks and gave him an instruction in a low voice. He strode off and returned a few minutes later carrying a wide but shallow bowl so corroded and tarnished with age that I could not even guess of what metal it was made. This, we were told, was the gomer in which the sacrificial blood was first collected.

  ‘What exactly does gomer mean?’ I asked Wondemu.

  He shrugged: ‘I don’t know. It is not an Amharic word, nor Tigrigna. It does not sound like it belongs to any Ethiopian language.’

  I looked to Richard for enlightenment but he confessed that he was not familiar with the word either.

  Memhir Fisseha said simply that it was called a gomer and had always been called a gomer and that was all he knew. He then positioned himself next to the stones with the bowl in his left hand, dipped into it with his right forefinger, swept his right hand above the level of his head and commenced an up-and-down motion. ‘The blood was scattered in this way,’ he said, ‘over the stones and over the tent of the Ark. Afterwards, as I told you, what was left was poured thus.’ He then tipped the bowl sideways above the cup-shaped hollows in the tops of the pillars.

  I asked the priest if he knew where exactly on the island the Ark had been kept in its tent. All he would say, however, was ‘near here … somewhere near here’.

  I then sought clarification of our earlier discussion: ‘You told me that it was taken from Tana Kirkos to Axum one thousand six hundred years ago. Is that correct?’

  Wondemu translated the question. Memhir Fisseha nodded affirmatively.

  ‘OK,’ I continued. ‘Now what I want to know is this: has it ever been brought back here? At any time, for any reason, has the Ark ever come back to this island?’

  ‘No. It was taken to Axum and it stayed in Axum.’

  ‘And as far as you are aware it is still there to this day?’

  ‘Yes.’

  No further information seemed likely to be forthcoming, but I was more than satisfied with what I had got – particularly since the information given had at no point been bartered for money. Grateful for this I handed over a 100 birr note as a voluntary contribution to the monastery’s expenses. Then, with Memhir Fisseha’s permission, I set about photographing the sacrificial pillars from a variety of different angles.

  We were back in Bahar Dar shortly before eight that evening. We had been out and about on Lake Tana for more than fourteen hours and the final bill for the hire of the MV Dahlak came to 750 US dollars.

  36 The Blue Nile Falls near Lake Tana, Ethiopia.

  37 Papyrus-reed boat on Lake Tana.

  38 Hollowed stones on the island of Tana Kirkos, said to have been used to contain blood during sacrifices in the presence of the Ark of the Covenant. The monks claim that the Ark remained on their island for eight hundred years before being taken to Axum.

  39 Qemant High Priest, centre, in dark cloak.

  The Qemant, a pagan tribe whose religion nevertheless contains strong elements of Judaism, say that they came to Ethiopia ‘from the land of Canaan.’

  40 Falasha priest at the village of Anbober, near Gondar, photographed in 1990. A year later almost all of Ethiopia’s Falasha population had been airlifted to Israel.

  41 Falasha priest displaying a copy of the Torah witten in Ge’éz, the ancient liturgical language of Ethiopia. The illumination shows the prophet Moses holding the Ten Commandments.

  42 and 43 Christian priests at Gondar carrying Tabots on their heads during the Timkat ceremony.

  44 Christian priests performing the dance of David before the Ark during the Timkat ceremony at Gondar.

  45 Timkat reveller in traditional warrior’s head-dress.

  46 Ethiopian priests with sistra. Musical instruments exactly like these were used in religious ceremonies in Israel in Old Testament times.

  47 The medieval castle and baptismal pool that provide the focus for the climax of the Timkat ceremony in Gondar.

  It had been, by any standards, a costly day. I no longer begrudged the expense, however. Indeed, the doubts that had beset me so forcefully on Daga S
tephanos had been completely banished by Tana Kirkos and I felt that I could now continue the quest with a renewed sense of commitment and optimism.

  This positive mood received a further boost back in Addis Ababa. There, before I set out for the planned trip to Lake Zwai on Thursday 23 November, I had the opportunity to visit the University Library and examine a number of references concerning the use of sacrificial stones in Old Testament Judaism.

  What I discovered was that pillars similar to those that I had seen on Tana Kirkos had been associated with the very earliest phases of the religion – both in Sinai and in Palestine. Known as masseboth, they were set up as altars on high places and were used for cultic and sacrificial purposes.12

  I then looked in the Bible to see if I could find any specific details concerning the proper performance of sacrifices in Old Testament times. I did find such details and, as I read and re-read the relevant passages, I realized that what Memhir Fisseha had described to me on the island had been an authentic and very ancient ceremony. No doubt much had become muddled and confused in the memories of the tradition that had been handed down from generation to generation. When he had talked about the scattering of blood, however, he had been astonishingly close to the mark.

  In Chapter 4 of the book of Leviticus, for example, I came across this verse: ‘And the priest shall dip his finger in the blood, and sprinkle of the blood seven times before the Lord, before the veil of the sanctuary.’13 Likewise in Chapter 5 I read: ‘And he shall sprinkle of the blood of the sin offering upon the side of the altar; and the rest of the blood shall be wrung out at the bottom of the altar.’14

  It was not until I turned to the Mishnah, however, the compilation in written form of early oral Jewish law, that I realized just how authentic Memhir Fisseha’s account in fact had been. In the tractate known as Yoma, in the second division of the Mishnah, I found detailed descriptions of the sacrificial rituals carried out by the High Priest within Solomon’s Temple in front of the curtain that shielded the Ark of the Covenant from the gaze of the laity.