Book Read Free

A Companion to the American Short Story

Page 82

by Alfred Bendixen


  own bigotry. In what follows, however, most attention will be given to a comparative

  reading of the use of space and how it relates to the sequencing of scenes in the two

  stories.

  Intertextual Spaces

  Though some of Carver ’ s stories have important outdoor settings, e.g., “ So Much

  Water, So Close to Home, ” “ Tell the Women We ’ re Going, ” and “ The Cabin, ” more

  often than not his characters are portrayed in domestic spaces, and the “ action ” of a

  story frequently takes place in the kitchens, living rooms, bathrooms, and/or bedrooms

  of suburban America. Or, to put it in the words of Carver critic Hilary Siebert, who

  has examined the poetics of space in Carver ’ s fi ction, “ the home, for Carver ’ s charac-

  ters, is always a vital space ” (131). Such is the case with “ Cathedral, ” as its central

  scenes are in the living room of the couple ’ s home, with the kitchen and the upstairs

  rooms as supporting architecture for the movements of the plot. In “ The Blind Man ”

  the poles of the plot that parallel the tension between characters are stretched out into

  the rural space of a farm, with its stable and main house containing the major scenes.

  Thus Carver ’ s late twentieth - century suburbia, complete with mixed drinks, mari-

  juana, and television, and Lawrence ’ s early twentieth - century countryside, complete

  with farm workers and teeming animal life, are the defi ning spatial coordinates of

  their respective stories.

  These coordinates become inextricably bound to the plot sequences in the stories.

  There are three main sequences in Carver ’ s story (and sub - sequences within these):

  the wait for the visitor Robert ’ s arrival during which the husband - narrator fi lls us in

  with exposition concerning the details of his wife ’ s earlier acquaintance with this blind

  man; Robert ’ s arrival and the dinner scene; and, fi nally, the long scene in the living

  room that culminates with the two men watching television and drawing a cathedral

  together (while the wife sleeps on the couch). The narrator never leaves the house

  during the story, and neither do the other two characters once they have arrived from

  the station.

  Sequences in Lawrence ’ s story shift between the house (which is the main setting)

  and the farm, especially two scenes in the stable, the fi rst in which the wife is alone

  with the husband, the second in which the two men are alone together. These separate

  spatial scenes provide the story with an intricate architecture that builds up to the

  fi nal scene in which all three are back in the house; both the wife Isabel Pervin and

  the visitor Bertie Reid have had a frightening experience when alone with the blind

  husband Maurice Pervin in the stable. Mrs. Pervin, in the dark of the stable, suddenly

  experiences the world as if she too were blind: “ How near he was and how invisible!

  … While he was so utterly invisible she was afraid of him ” (353 – 4). Later, the blind

  husband Maurice Pervin believes he has achieved an intimate friendship with the

  visitor Bertie Reid during their moment of touching in the stable; Bertie, however,

  376

  Sandra Lee Kleppe

  is aghast at the possibility of such a transgression of his personal space, underlined in

  the story ’ s closing spatial image: “ He was like a mollusc [ sic ] whose shell is broken ”

  (365).

  Spatial imagery, according to the philosopher Gaston Bachelard , is fundamental to

  human development and thus also plays a crucial role in literature. In The Poetics of

  Space, Bachelard examines how our earliest memories, indeed most of our memories,

  are connected to space, especially to the houses we have abided in. The space of Law-

  rence ’ s story underlines the separateness of the characters: Mr. Pervin spending time

  alone in the stable, Mrs. Pervin and her friend Bertie paying visits to him there, all

  three isolated in emotional and spatial ways, even as they are together on the farm.

  Hilary Siebert ’ s reading of Carver ’ s fi ction in spatial terms brings out the rich lyrical

  imagery of Carver ’ s spaces, 20 and the possibilities these spaces bring for the develop-

  ment of the characters in and beyond their physical surroundings: “ Most characters,

  as in ‘ Cathedral, ’ don ’ t see the serious limitations of their ‘ housing ’ until they are

  released from it through no intention of their own, due to an event that alters or calls

  to attention the circumstances of their lives ” (Siebert 132).

  The altering event in both “ Cathedral ” and “ The Blind Man ” is the visit of the

  wife ’ s friend whose physical contact with the husband changes the balance of the

  triangular relationship. Carver ’ s story, however, reverses the conclusion of “ The Blind

  Man. ” Whereas Lawrence concludes his tale with the revelation (to the reader) that

  the husband ’ s epiphany when the visitor touched him in the stable means the opposite

  to the visitor (i.e., they are not friends after all), Carver concludes by joining the two

  men physically and emotionally, followed by an image that transcends space. Compare

  the two endings:

  He [Bertie] could not bear it that he had been touched by the blind man, his insane

  reserve broken in. He was like a mollusc whose shell is broken. (Lawrence 365)

  I was in my house. I knew that. But I didn ’ t feel like I was inside anything. ‘ It ’ s really

  something, ’ I said. (Carver, “ Cathedral ” 228)

  Here we reach another uncanny coincidence, for, as Siebert points out in his reading

  of “ Cathedral, ” “ The image Bachelard uses to defi ne the inside and outside of phe-

  nomenological existence is the mollusk, living in its shell ” (136). The image of the

  mollusk, however, is in Lawrence ’ s text, not Carver ’ s. But the archaic notion of inti-

  mate space is the same: in Lawrence ’ s story, the character Bertie cannot bear the

  invasion of his private space and it crushes him; in Carver ’ s story the character - narrator

  is released from the confi nement of private space and experiences both intimacy and

  transcendence. The intertext (the shared reference) in both stories, then, is double:

  the ancient literary trope of the blind leading the sighted (for in both stories it is the

  touch of the blind man that brings on the revelation – whether positive or negative

  – of the conclusion), and the archaic image of mollusk/house as a protective yet con-

  fi ning space.

  Raymond

  Carver

  377

  Conclusion

  Some short story theorists suggest that the lyrical quality of short fi ction is one of its

  defi ning traits and even that the short story as genre has more in common with poetry

  than with the novel. Charles May, for example, believes that the twentieth - century

  short story has moved “ away from the linearity of prose toward the spatiality of poetry

  – either by using the metaphoric and plurasignative language of the poem or by radi-

  cally limiting its selection of the presented event ” (214). In May ’ s interpetation, it is

  Chekhov, with his lyrical style, who paved the way for this development for Carver and

  other contemporary writers. Carver never completed the manuscript of his novel, but

  he did consider
himself as much a poet as a short story writer, publishing six volumes

  of verse in his lifetime. Carver ’ s name has also begun to appear in all kinds of contexts

  and in tandem with the major writers of contemporary fi ction, including Hemingway,

  Joyce, O ’ Connor, Cheever, and others, and there is no doubt that he is considered a

  master of the short fi ction genre. This can be observed not only in his use of lyricism

  and imagistic detail, but also in his honing of narrative technique, his careful attention

  to structure and story sequences, his transposition of American idioms into artistic

  gems, as well as his humor 21 and empathy in broaching the quirks of human behavior

  (i.e., characterization) and situation. “ Cathedral ” is illustrative of all of these techniques

  (as well as of his late expansive style), but most of these traits can also be seen in any

  of his stories from the major collections Will You Please Be Quiet, Please (1976), What

  We Talk About When We Talk About Love (1981), Cathedral (1983), and Where I ’ m

  Calling From (1988) . By comparing any of these with the formative stories Carver wrote

  in his youth (gathered in No Heroics, Please ), his development from an aspiring writer

  to a story craftsman is evident. Much work remains to be done as we compare all of his

  existing texts with his manuscripts and his posthumously published works, promising

  continued revelations about Carver well into the twenty - fi rst century.

  Notes

  1

  Interest in Carver ’ s parallel poetry career has

  4

  Some examples are Marshall B. Gentry ’ s

  also grown signifi cantly since the posthu-

  “

  Women

  ’

  s Voices in Stories by Raymond

  mous publication of his collected poems, All

  Carver ” ( CEA - Critic 56.1 [Fall 1993]: 86 – 95),

  of Us, in 1996 . This chapter treats mainly the

  and Pamela Demory ’ s “ ‘ It ’ s About Seeing … ’ :

  story career.

  Representations of the Female Body in Robert

  2

  Posthumous volumes edited by William L.

  Altman ’ s ‘ Short Cuts ’ and Raymond Carver ’ s

  Stull et al. include No Heroics, Please: Uncol-

  Stories ” ( Pacifi c Coast Philology 39.1 [1999]:

  lected Writings (1991), Call If You Need Me: The

  96 – 105), and Chris J. Bullock ’ s “ From Castle

  Uncollected Fiction and Other Prose (2000), and

  to Cathedral: The Architecture of Masculinity

  Tell It All (poems, plays, and recollections,

  in Raymond Carver ’ s ‘ Cathedral ’ ” ( Journal of

  2005).

  Men ’ s Studies [May 1994]: 343 – 51).

  3 Raymond Carver Review

  1 (Spring 2007). 5

  A recent issue of the Raymond Carver Review

  < http://dept.kent.edu/english/RCR/issues/

  is a special issue on “ Carver and Feminism ”

  01/index.html > .

  (2 [Autumn 2008/Winter 2009]).

  378

  Sandra Lee Kleppe

  6

  For a more substantial discussion of male

  14

  The concept of intertextuality as developed

  bonding in such stories, see Libe Garc ì a Zar-

  by European literary theorists in the twenti-

  ranz ’ s essay “ Passionate Fictions: Raymond

  eth century, especially by Julia Kristeva,

  Carver and feminist Theory ” in the Raymond

  is one which had been translated precisely

  Carver Review 2 (2009): 20 – 39.

  from Mikhail Bakhtin ’ s cultural and literary

  7

  Many of these are listed in the bibliography

  theories.

  of the International Raymond Carver Society

  15

  See Claire Fabre - Clark, “ The Poetics of the

  < www.internationalraymondcarversociety.

  Banal in Elephant and Other Stories ” (Kleppe

  org/bib.html > .

  and Miltner, eds.

  New Paths to Raymond

  8

  For treatments of Carver ’ s work in the context

  Carver 173 – 86).

  of medicine see, for example, P. W. Graham,

  16

  In his poetry collections Carver also includes

  “ Metapathography: Three Unruly Texts ”

  verbatim passages from many writers, includ-

  ( Literature and Medicine 16.1 [1997]: 70 – 87),

  ing Chekhov, presenting these extracts as

  or S. L. Kleppe,

  “

  Medical Humanism in

  “ found poems. ”

  the Poetry of Raymond Carver

  ” ( Journal of

  17 Quoted in Cushman (166, fn. 1). Source: Jim

  Medical Humanities

  27.1 [Spring 2006]:

  Naughton, “ Carver: The Master ’ s Touch ”

  39 – 56).

  ( Washington Post [August 4, 1988]: C1, C6).

  9

  See, for example, the course syllabus for

  I am indebted to Cushman ’ s reading of the

  “ Disability Studies/English 340 ” at Miami

  stories for my own analysis.

  University,

  Ohio.

  < www.units.muohio.

  18

  For more information on the genesis of

  edu/disabilitystudies/DS%20Poetics%20

  “ Cathedral ” see Cushman ’ s article, Tess Gal-

  Narrative.htm > .

  lagher ’ s essay “ Carver Country ” in Adelman

  10

  For critical articles on Short Cuts , consult the

  and Gallagher,

  Carver Country

  , and Carol

  bibliography of the International Raymond

  Sklenicka ’ s biography (2009) . Sklenicka has

  Carver Society.

  also presented a paper on the genesis and

  11

  In Carver ’ s late poem “ Gravy, ” the speaker

  intertextual elements at the International

  refl ects that

  “

  No other word will do. For

  Conference on D. H. Lawrence, Santa Fe,

  that ’ s what it was. Gravy. / Gravy, these past

  NM, 2005:

  “

  The Building of Raymond

  ten years ” ( All of Us 292).

  Carver ’ s ‘ Cathedral. ’ ”

  12 Many, though not all, of the individual arti-

  19

  There are two marvelous photographs of

  cles on “ Cathedral ” are listed in the bibliog-

  Mr. Carriveau in

  Carver Country , 119 –

  raphy of the International Raymond Carver

  120.

  Society:

  Cathedral

  , ed. Wendy Perkins 20

  Though I have studied Bachelard ’ s works

  (Wadsworth

  ’

  s Casebook Series for Reading,

  independently, I am indebted to Siebert

  ’

  s

  Research and Writing; Belmont, CA:

  reading for insights into how Bachelard

  ’

  s

  Wadsworth, 2003).

  ideas apply specifi cally to “ Cathedral ” and

  13 For an excellent article on Carver from the

  other Carver stories.

  perspective of theories of photography, see 21

  For an assessment of Carver ’ s understudied

  Ayala Amir, “ ‘ I do
n ’ t do motion shots ’ :

  humor, see Paul Benedict Grant, “ Laughter ’ s

  Photography, Movement, and Change in

  Creature: the Humor of Raymond Carver

  ”

  Raymond Carver ’ s Stories ” ( Raymond Carver

  (Kleppe and Miltner, eds.

  New Paths to

  Review 1 [2008] : 33 – 52).

  Raymond Carver 154 – 72).

  References and Further Reading

  Adelman , Bob , and Tess Gallagher . Carver Country:

  Bachelard ,

  Gaston .

  The Poetics of Space .

  The World of Raymond Carver . New York : Scrib-

  Trans. Maria Jolas.

  Boston

  :

  Beacon Press

  ,

  ner , 1990 .

  1994 .

  Raymond

  Carver

  379

  Bakhtin , Mikhail . The Dialogic Imagination . Ed.

  Jarrell , Donna , and Ira Sukrungruang , eds. What

  Michael Holquist . Trans. Caryl Emerson and

  Are You Looking At? The First Fat Fiction Anthol-

  Michael Holquist. Austin : University of Texas

  ogy . San Diego : Harcourt/Harvest Books , 2003 .

  Press , 1981 .

  Kleppe , Sandra Lee , and Robert Miltner , eds. New

  Bethea , Arthur . Technique and Sensibility in the

  Paths to Raymond Carver: Critical Essays on His

  Fiction and Poetry of Raymond Carver . New York :

  Life, Fiction, and Poetry . Columbia : University of

  Routledge , 2001 .

  South Carolina Press , 2008 .

  Bloom , Harold , ed. Bloom

  ’

  s Major Short Story Lainsbury , Greg . The Carver Chronotope: Inside the

  Writers: Raymond Carver . Bromall, PA : Chelsea

  Life - World of Raymond Carver ’ s Fiction . New

  House , 2002 .

  York : Routledge , 2004 .

  Campbell , James . “ What a Carve - up . ” Saturday

  Lawrence , D. H. “ The Blind Man . ” The Complete

  Guardian (December 1, 2007 ): 21 .

  Stories of D. H. Lawrence . Vol. II . New York :

  Carroll , Maureen P. , and William L. Stull . Remem-

  Viking Press , 1961 . 347 – 65 .

  bering Ray: A Composite Biography of Raymond Max , D. T. “ The Carver Chronicles . ” New York

  Carver . Santa Barbara, CA : Capra Press , 1993 .

  Times Magazine (August 9, 1998 ): 34ff .

  Carver , Maryann Burk . What It Used to Be Like: A

  May , Charles E. “ Chekhov and the Modern Short

  Portrait of My Marriage to Raymond Carver . New

  Story . ” The New Short Story Theories . Ed. Charles

 

‹ Prev