Raul Hilberg

Home > Other > Raul Hilberg > Page 56


  shootings. For many, undoubtedly, the task became just another job, to

  be done correctly and mechanically, i.e., the men made some sort of

  “adjustment” to the situation. However, every once in a while a man

  did have a nervous breakdown,174 and in several units the use of alcohol

  172. RSHA IV-A-l. Operational Report USSR No. 124 (48 copies), October 25,

  1941, NO-3160.

  173. RSHA IV-A-l, Operational Report USSR No. 88 (48 copies), September 19,

  1941, NO-3149. It was in this action that the children were shot by Ukrainian militia men.

  174. Stahlecker Report to October 15, 1941, L-180.

  175. Affidavit by Ohlendorf. April 24, 1947, NO-2890.

  176. Affidavit by Hauptscharfiihrer Robert Barth (Einsatzgruppe D), September

  12,1947, NO-4992.

  331

  MOBILE KILLING OPERATIONS

  became routine.1” At the same time, indoctrination was continued, and

  occasionally

  commanders

  made

  speeches

  before

  major

  operations.'™

  Once, in mid-August, 1941, Himmler himself visited Minsk. He

  asked Einsatzgruppe B Commander Nebe to shoot a batch of a hundred people, so that he could see what one of these ‘'liquidations''

  really looked like. Nebe obliged. All except two of the victims were

  men. Himmler spotted in the group a youth of about twenty who had

  blue eyes and blond hair. Just before the firing was to begin, Himmler

  walked up to the doomed man and put a few questions to him.

  Are you a Jew?

  Yes.

  Are both of your parents Jews?

  Yes.

  Do you have any ancestors who were not Jews?

  No.

  Then I can't help you!

  As the firing started, Himmler was even more nervous. During

  every volley he looked to the ground. When the two women could not

  die, Himmler yelled to the police sergeant not to torture them.

  When the shooting was over, Himmler and a fellow spectator engaged in conversation. The other witness was Obergruppenführer von dem Bach-Zelewski, the same man who was later delivered to a hospital. Von dem Bach addressed Himmler:

  Reichsfiihrer, those were only a hundred.

  What do you mean by that?

  Look at the eyes of the men in this Kommando, how deeply shaken

  they are! These men are finished [fertig] for the rest of their lives. What

  kind of followers are we training here? Either neurotics or savages!

  Himmler was visibly moved and decided to make a speech to all

  who

  were

  assembled

  there.

  He

  pointed

  out

  that

  the Einsatzgruppe

  were called upon to fulfill a repulsive (widerliche) duty. He would not

  like it if Germans did such a thing gladly. But their conscience was in

  no way impaired, for they were soldiers who had to carry out every

  order unconditionally. He alone had responsibility before God and Hitler for everything that was happening. They had undoubtedly noticed that he hated this bloody business (dass ihm das blutige Handwerk

  zuwider wäre) and that he had been aroused to the depth of his soul. 177 178

  177. Report by Generalmajor Lahoosen, November I, 1941, NOKW-Î146.

  178. Affidavit by Barlh, September 12, 1947, NO-4992.

  332

  THE FIRST SWEEP

  But he too was obeying the highest law by doing his duty, and he was

  acting from a deep understanding of the necessity for this operation.

  Himmler told the men to look at nature. There was combat

  everywhere, not only among men but also in the world of animals and

  plants. Whoever was too tired to fight must go under (zugrunde gehen).

  The most primitive man says that the horse is good and the bedbug is

  bad, or wheat is good and the thistle is bad. The human being consequently designates what is useful to him as good and what is harmful as bad. Didn't bedbugs and rats have a life purpose also? Yes, but this has

  never meant that man could not defend himself against vermin.

  After the speech Himmler, Nebe, von dem Bach, and the chief of

  Himmler's Personal Staff, Wolff, inspected an insane asylum. Himmler

  ordered Nebe to end the suffering of these people as soon as possible.

  At the same time, Himmler asked Nebe “to turn over in his mind”

  various other killing methods more humane than shooting. Nebe asked

  for permission to try out dynamite on the mentally ill people. Von dem

  Bach and Wolff protested that the sick people were not guinea pigs, but

  Himmler decided in favor of the attempt. Much later, Nebe confided to

  von dem Bach that the dynamite had been tried on the inmates with

  woeful results.1”

  The eventual answer to Himmler’s request was the gas van. The

  RSHA's technical branch (II-D) reconstructed a truck chassis in such a

  way that the carbon monoxide of the exhaust could be conducted

  through a hose to the van’s interior.1“ This invention lent itself to

  stationary killings in Poland and Serbia. By early 1942, two or three

  vans were sent to each of the Einsatzgruppen as well.179 180 181 Throughout

  179. The story of the Himmler visit, as told by von dem Bach, was printed in

  Aufbau (New York), August 23, 1946, pp. 1-2. See also statements by other witnesses in

  Case Wolff, 10a Js 39/60, particularly Z-Prot II/vol. 2. The approximate date may be

  ascertained from vol. I of von dem Bach’s diary, Zentrale Stelle der Landesjustizverwal-

  tungen, Ludwigsburg. Volume 1, a doctored version of the original, was given by von

  dem Bach to the German Federal Archive in 1953. Archive (signed Kinder) to Zentrale

  Stelle, enclosing the copy. November 18. 1966.

  180. Wilhelm in Krausnick and Wilhelm, Die Truppe des Wellanschauungskrieges,

  pp. 543-51. Vehicles equipped with bottled, chemically pure carbon monoxide had already been used in 1940 for gassing East Prussian mental patients in Soldau. a camp located in the former Polish corridor. Indictment of Wilhelm Koppe by prosecutor in

  Bonn, 8 Js 52/60 (1964), pp. 174-89. See also Adalbert ROckerl, NS-Verrichtungslager

  (Munich, 1977), pp. 258-59.

  181. See UStuf. Dr. Becker (in Kiev) to OStubaf. Rauff(ll.D). May 16. 1942. and

  subsequent correspondence in document PS-501. Each vehicle could hold sixty to seventy victims standing tightly pressed together. Interrogation of Obersekret&r Josef Ruis of the Criminal Police by Soviet authorities. Institut fur Zeitgeschichte, Munich, Fb 82/2.

  Ruis was stationed in Minsk, where two of the vans were employed in 1942. During

  killing operations, each van could make four or five daily trips.

  333

  MOBILE KILLING OPERATIONS

  that time the vans were being tested for proper operation in the

  Kriminaltechnisches

  Institut

  (RSHA

  V-D)

  of

  Sturmbannführer

  Oberregierungsrat Dr. Heess and his assistant for biology and chemistry,

  Obersturmführer Dr. Widmann. The young Obersturmführer had been

  in Minsk, where he had blown up the mental patients. He had been

  under the impression that the vans would be used only for the killing of

  the insane. When he found out about their application in the east, he

  complained to Heess that one could not, after all, employ this device

  again
st normal people. Dr. Heess addressed him in a familiar tone:

  “But you see, it is done anyway. Do you want to quit by any chance?

  [Du siehst, es geht doch, willst Du etwa abspringen?}"'a Dr. Widmann

  remained at his post and was promoted to Hauptsturmführer.10

  There were many technical and psychological problems with the

  gas vans in the field. Some of the vehicles broke down in rainy

  weather; after repeated use they were no longer tightly sealed. Members of Kommandos who unloaded the vans suffered from headaches.

  If a driver stepped too hard on the accelerator, the bodies removed

  from the van had distorted faces and were covered with excrement.'**

  Clearly, alcohol, speeches, and gas vans did not eliminate the psychological problems generated by the killings. Yet there was no breakdown in the operations as a whole. To the contrary, the men of the Einsatzgruppen were given additional tasks, one of which was the

  killing of prisoners of war in German army camps.

  T H E K I L L I N G O F T H E

  P R I S O N E R S O F W A R

  More

  than

  5,700,000

  Soviet

  soldiers

  surrendered

  to

  German

  forces

  during the war, and more than 40 percent of these men died in captivity.

  Some 3,350,000 had been taken prisoner by the end of 1941, and during

  that winter deaths from exposure and starvation occurred en masse.' It

  182. Wilhelm, quoting from Stuttgart court judgment against Dr. Albert Widmann,

  September IS, 1967, in Die Thtppe des Weltansckauungskrieges, pp. 549-52.

  183. Organization chart of the RSHA, October I, 1943, L-219.

  184. Becker to Rauff, May 16, 1942, PS-501. Testimony by Ohlendorf, in Trial of

  the Major War Criminals, IV, 322-23, 332-34. Naumann (Einsatzgruppe B) asserts that

  he did not avail himself of vans. See Naumann's affidavit, June 24, 1947, NO-4150.

  Einsatzgruppe A, on the other hand, asked for another one. HStuf. TKihe (BdS Ostland/

  1-T) to Pradel (RSHA Il-D-3-a), June 15, 1942, PS-501.

  I.

  See recapitulation in OKW report covering June 22, 1941. to May I. 1944,

  NOKW-2125, and the major study by Christian Streit, Heine Kameraden (Stuttgart,

  1978), pp. 244-49.

  334

  THE KILLING OF THE PRISONERS OF WAR

  is in this context that a relatively small but insistent undertaking was

  pursued to kill a particular segment of the Soviet prisoners. On July 16,

  1941, barely four weeks after the opening of the eastern campaign,

  Heydrich concluded an agreement with the chief of the General Armed

  Forces

  Office

  (Allgemeines

  Wehrmachtsamt),

  General

  Reinecke,

  the

  text of which provided that the Wehrmacht was to “free itself” from all

  Soviet prisoners of war who were carriers of Bolshevism.2 3 The central

  administrators of that program are listed in Table 7-7.J

  The two partners came to an understanding that the situation required “special measures,” which were to be carried out in a spirit free from bureaucratic controls. On the next day, Heydrich alerted his regional machinery to prepare for the selection (Aussonderung) of all

  “professional revolutionaries,” Red Army political officers, “fanatical”

  T A B L E 7-7

  CENTRAL ADMINISTRATORS FOR KILLING PRISONERS OF WAR

  Army

  RSHA

  Directly Concerned Interested

  OGruf. Heydrich General Reinecke Admiral Canaris

  I

  I

  (deputized by

  Generalmajor

  Lahousen)

  RSHA IV

  Gruf. Muller

  Chief of PW Camps

  Oberst Breyer

  (succeeded by

  Generalmajor

  von Graevenitz)

  RSHA IV-A Obf. Panzinger

  RSHA IV-A-1 Stubaf. Vogt

  (succeeded by

  Stubaf. Lindow)

  RSHA IV-A-l-c HStuf. Königshaus

  2. Operational Order No. 8 (signed Heydrich) (530 copies), July 17.1941, NO-3414.

  3. Affidavit by Kurt Lindow (RSHA IV-A-1), September 30, 1945, PS-2545.

  Affidavit by Lindow, July 29, 1947, NO-5481. Affidavit by Lahousen, April 17,1947, NO-

  2894.

  335

  MOBILE KILLING OPERATIONS

  T A B L E 7-8

  REGIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR KILLING PRISONERS OF WAR

  Screening Teams

  SS-Liaison

  C,

  Einsatzgruppen

  Army Prisoner

  Collecting Points

 
  sammelstellen)

  and TVansit Camps

  {Durchgangslager, or

  Dulag) in newly

  occupied territories

  BdS Kraköw

  Kriminalkommissar

  Generalgouvernement

  Raschwitz (succeeded

  by Stubaf. Liska)

  attached to Generalleutnant Herrgott,

  commander of GG camps

  Gestapo offices

  Kriminalrat Schiffer

  Permanent PW camps

  in Reich

  (succeeded by

  {Stammlager, or Stalag)

  Kriminalkommissar Walter)

  in Reich

  attached to Generalmajor

  von Hindenburg,

  commander of PW camps

  in East Prussia

  Communists, and "all Jews.’’* Since Soviet prisoners of war were already pouring through the transit camps into the Generalgouvernement and the Reich, Heydrich had to set up screening teams in the newly

  occupied territories, in Poland, and in Germany. The plan consequently

  called for a three-pronged operation, as shown in Table 7-8. The bulk of

  the work was to be done by the Einsatzgruppen, because the Gestapo

  offices at home were already understaffed.’

  While the screening teams were in the process of formation, military authorities began to segregate and exploit their Jewish prisoners.

  The Second Army ordered that Jewish prisoners and “Asiatics” be

  retained by the army for labor before their transport to Dulags in the

  Army Group Rear Area.* The XXIX Corps (Sixth Army) at Kiev or-

  4.

  Operational Order No. 8. July 17, 1941, NO-3414. See also earlier draft referring

  to "all Jews” by RSHA IV-A-l, June 28, 1941, PS-78.

  J. Operational Order No. 8, July 17,1941, NO-3414.

  6.

  Second Army OQu/Qu 2 to Commander of Rear Army Area, Corps Commands,

  Army tc. Army tVa, and Army IVb (54 copies), August 5, 1941, NOKW-2145.

  336

  THE KILLING OF THE PRISONERS OF WAR

  dered that Jews from Dulags in the area be employed in dangerous

  mine-clearing operations.’In Dulag 160 at Khorol, the Jewish prisoners

  were marked with a star. Since the Khorol camp had no latrines, the

  marked men had to pick up the dirt with their hands and drop it into

  barrels.* In Army District XX (Danzig), one impatient Stalag commander ordered his own men to kill Communist and Jewish prisoners at once. Three hundred were shot.’

  The

  screening

  teams

  entered

  the

  prisoner-of-war

  camps

  without

  difficulty, since camp commanders were notified in advance by their

  superiors.10 One of these notifications will suffice to point once more to
/>   the choice of language in documents: “During the examination of prisoners, the SD is to be allowed to participate in order to sift out given appropriate elements [Bei der Sichtung der Gefangenen ist der SD zu

  beteiligen,

  um

  gegebenenfalls

  entsprechende

  Elemente

  auszusondern].""

  The teams were relatively small, comprising one officer and four to

  six men." The SS men therefore had to rely on the preparatory work by

  the army, the cooperation of the counterintelligence officer (AO) in the

  Dulag or Stalag, and their own “ingenuity.”"

  On the whole, the army was cooperative. The commander at Boris-

  pol, for instance, invited Sonderkommando 4a to dispatch a screening

  team to his camp. In two separate actions the team shot 1,109 Jewish

  prisoners. Among the victims were seventy-eight wounded men who

  had been handed over by the camp physician.1* Other reports were

  similarly matter of fact. Einsatzgruppe A reported on August 28 that it

  had screened prisoners of war on two occasions; the results were

  “satisfying” ( zufriedenstellend).'s From the prisoner-collecting point 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

  7. XXIX Corps la/lc to Divisions in Corps. September 22, 1941, NOKW-1323. The

  coips commander was General der Infanterie Obstfelder. ·

  8. Affidavit by Henrik Schaechter, October 21, 1947, NO-5510. Affiant, a Jewish

  Red Army man captured at Kharkov, did not step forward during the selection.

  9. Affidavit by Generalleutnant von Österreich, December 28, 1945, USSR-151.

  The shooting had been ordered by one of his subordinates, Oberstleutant Dulnig, commander of Stalag XX-C. One SS unit did not even bother to deliver its Jewish prisoners to the rear. The Jews were shot on the spot. OStubaf. Zschoppe, Deputy Commander of

  8th SS Infantry Reg. (mot.), to XVII Corps. August 20. 1941, NOKW-1350.

  10. Affidavit by Oberst Hadrian Ried (PW commander, Brest-Litovsk), October 22,

  1947, NO-5523.

  11. Order by General von Roques (Commander, Southern Army Group Rear Area),

  August 24, 1941, NOKW-2595.

  12. Operational Order No. 8, July 17, 1941, NO-3414.

  13. Preliminary order by RSHA IV, June 28, 1941, PS-69.

  14. RSHA IV-A-1, Operational Report USSR No. 132, November 12, 1941, NO-

  2830.

  15. RSHA IV-A-1, Operational Report USSR No. 71 (48 copies), September 2,

  1941, NO-2843.

  337

  MOBILE KILLING OPERATIONS

  (Armeegefangenensammelstelle) of the Eleventh Army, Jewish soldiers were handed over every month, around the clock. A sample of the monthly prisoner-of-war reports from that army reads as follows:1*

 

‹ Prev