Henry Sidgwick- Eye of the Universe
Page 155
political science, ; versus analytical or
Howlett, W. F., aesthetical sybaritism of,
deductive method in political economy, S
Howorth, H. J., S’s meeting with,
on, –; S’s, and influence on
Hugel, Baron von: and Synthetic Society,
Marshall, Keynes, –; S, EP and,
; S to, on his ideal,
–, –; Seeley and, ,
Hume, David: S differs from, ; S and, on
–; see also analytical method;
commonsense morality, ; contemplative
political economy; political science
utilitarianism of, ; S and skepticism of,
Hobbes, Thomas: on the good, ME on, ;
; S on personal identity and, ; and
and egoism, S on, ; Frankena on S and,
egoism, S on, ; Frankena on S, ethical
–; versus S on limits of egoism, ;
dualism and, –; Green on
Shaver rejects arguments for egoism of,
utilitarianism of, ; Green’s critique of,
–; S criticizes argument of,
; S, Russell on, –; Green puts in
–; and universalizability, –;
philosophical canon, –; on suicide,
egoism of, and EP, –; see also
egoism
Hunt, L., on S and Davies,
Hobsbawm, Eric: on Victorian fear of
Hurka, Thomas: on S on right and good,
democracy, , , ; on working class,
versus Moore, –; on S, Irwin and
racism, ; on jingoism of s,
perfectionism, –; on agent-relative
Hodgson, Richard: W. James on, ;
goodness, ; and perfectionism in S,
investigates Theosophy, –;
Moore, and Rashdall, ; on S, Moore
background of, and S, ; Myers on value
and agent-relative goodness, ; on
of his work on Theosophy, , ;
Moore’s unoriginality, ; on S, Moore,
investigates Palladino, –; as
and intrinsic value, ; on S, Moore, and
stumped by Piper case, –; sudden
non-naturalism, ; defense of Rashdall,
death of,
–
Holland, John, and birth of S Group,
Hutcheson, Frances: S and noncognitivism
–
of, ; Darwall on S and, ; Frankena
Home, Daniel Douglas,
on S, ethical dualism and, –
P: GCV
ind.xml
CY/Schultz
February ,
:
Index
Hutton, R. H.: S on, –; S defends
Gurney’s studies, ; theosophy on,
Goethe against, –; and Synthetic
–; S’s doubts concerning, ; and
Society,
the Great Either-Or, ; S versus Parfit
Huxley, Aldous,
on, –; Green on, –, –,
Huxley, T. H.: as academic liberal, ; and
–; S on Kantian conception of,
Victorian materialism, ,
–; and Jamesian psychology,
Hyndman, H. M., S on,
–; and Symonds’s trance states, ,
hypocrisy, ; S’s obsession with, , ; and
–; S to Noel on Locke, Kant and,
Church of England, –; and
, ; S versus Noel on, –; and
subscription, S on, –; and
Myers’s work on the subliminal self,
subscription, Maurice on, –; S to
–; and Cowell’s Alpine Club, ;
Dakyns about England’s, ; S’s
see also deepest problems of human life;
admiration of Clough’s hatred of, –;
psychical research; Schultz, Bart
S’s fear of egoistic, ; new mask of, with
impartiality, see ethical theory; justice;
Symonds, ; and S’s reformism,
universalizability
–; and S’s psychical research, ;
Imperial Federation League, ; Ensor on,
and friendship, ; Green’s, ; and
Goethe, Winckelmann, ; S and
imperialism, British: and danger of neglecting
casuistry of, ; Symonds, Vaughan affair
S’s politics, ; and S’s friends and
and, , –; S and Symonds on,
colleagues, ; as ignored in previous
; Noel to S on, ; S’s concern with,
reception of S, ; and India, ; S on
–; S, EP on party politics and,
need for colonial expansion, J. S. Mill’s
–; and S’s utilitarian politics, ,
population theory, –; and S on
–, –; and Apostolic secrecy,
population question, –; and
–; and S’s handling of Symonds’s
Government House utilitarianism,
posthumous reputation, –; see also
–; and Walker’s feminist critique of
casuistry; truth; Victorian worldview
S, –; and S Group, ; and Green
hypothetical imperatives, see Kant/Kantism;
and academic liberals, ; and professional
reason/reasonableness
philosophy, ; and S’s educational
reformism, –; and interpretation of
Ibsen, Henrik, Pearson admires,
S, ; in politics of S and Green, –;
idealism, ; Bryce on S and, ; and
S’s reticence about, ; Seeley and,
imperialism, ; Skorupski on Green’s,
–; Seeley on India and, –;
; S on circularity of ethics of, –;
realities of, ; Woodcock on Seeley and,
and S’s reconciliaton project, –;
; Ensor on Seeley and, –;
theosophy as, ; S’s personal, ; S’s
Shannon on Seeley and, ; Maine and
engagement with, –; as rooted in
British rule in India, Sterling on, ; and
Kantism, ; Green’s metaphysics as,
/>
Viswanathan on Maine and India, ; and
–; S’s critique of Bradley’s,
increased federation, –; S to Lytton
–; S’s critique of Green’s, –,
on international morality and, –; in
–, ; James’s critique of, –;
S’s letter to Lytton, –; S mostly
and practical ethics, ; and religious
addresses in EP, ; and S on duty to
orthodoxy, –; and Kantian
spread civilization, ; and S, EP on
conception of self, –; W. James on
colonization as duty, –; and S on
appeal of, –; Rorty on degeneration
colonization and relations with
of, ; Symonds and, ; S and W. James
“uncivilized” peoples, –; Balfour
versus, –; Noel on, ; see also
and, –; T. Roosevelt and, ;
Bradley, F. H.; Green, T. H.
Shannon on, ; Kiernan on education
identity, national: S to Lytton on, –;
for, –; and S and Boer War,
and egoism, –; and late Victorian
–; Dakyns on Morley and Uranian,
era,
–; and identity in late Victorian era,
identity, personal: and S’s defense of egoism
; see also politics; race/racism
in ME, –; Parfit on S and, –;
impotence: S’s, , ; and Victorians,
S raises issue of, in ME, –; and
Strachey on,
P: GCV
ind.xml
CY/Schultz
February ,
:
Index
indefinable concepts, see basic moral notion
–, ; ME on perceptional/
independence of moral theory, see ethical
ultra/aesthetic, ; S and Aristotle on
theory; metaethics; Rawls/Rawlsianism
logical priority and, –; meaning of
India: the Mills and, ; Maine and,
philosophical, ; Korsgaard on J. S. Mill
–; influence of Maine on, ;
and, –; Schneewind on S’s, versus
Seeley on British rule in, –; and
innateness, ; S and history of, –;
realities of British imperialism, ;
S’s four conditions for self-evidence in ME
Stocking on Maine and, ; Viswanathan
and, –; S’s ME focused on
on Maine and, ; Lytton and, –
Cartesian criterion, –; S’s list of
Indian civil service: S and, , ;
self-evident principles in ME and,
Trevelyan and,
–; S’s often misinterpreted, ;
individualism: and S’s epistemology, ; and
Schneewind on S, Clarke and, –;
S on direction of civilization, ; versus
Crisp’s defense of S’s, –; Brink’s
S’s social epistemology, –; S on
critique of S’s, –, ; Shaver’s
principle of laissez faire and, –; S on
account of S’s, –; and precise
orthodox political economy and, –,
versus simplified statements of dualism,
–; S, PPE on demoralizing effect of,
–; and changes to editions of ME,
–; and principle of nonpaternalism
–, –; and S’s defense of
in EP, –; analogue of in
egoism in ME, ; Shaver’s
international morality, , –,
reconstruction of S’s, ; Schneewind
–; S on Spencer on, –
versus Shaver on S, dualism and, –;
inequality, see equality/egalitarianism
and self-evidence of egoism, –;
Initial Society: S’s instructions to, ;
Butler and, S on, –; revival of,
members of, –; and cultural reform,
–; Donagan’s Whewellism and, ;
; and Cloughian reserve, ; and
and S’s social epistemology, –;
introspection, ; exchanges of, about
versus Kantian approaches, , ; and
women, marriage, –; exchanges of,
Idealism, –; and S’s feminism, ;
about political equality for women,
and S, ME on sexual purity, –; and
–; and style of S’s major works,
S, ME on suicide, –; EP on political
–; and S on suicide,
common sense and, –; S’s later
integrity, ; S raises as issue for utilitarianism,
work on, in PSR, LPK, –; S, PSR
–; and S’s reformism, –; S
on theism and, –; S on proof of
versus Williams on, ; EMS as vision of,
theism and, –; see also epistemology;
; and S’s midlife crisis, Symonds,
ethical theory; metaethics; reason/
–; and S’s life review, ; see also
reasonableness
hypocrisy; truth; utilitarianism
Ireland, see Home Rule
intention/intentional, J. S. Mill and S on,
Ireland, John, adapts Symonds’s homoerotic
verse for socialist anthem,
internalism/externalism, see
Irwin, Terence: on G. Grote, ; on meaning
externalism/internalism
of “sophist,” ; on circularity of Green’s
international law, see law and legislation
perfectionism, –; Hurka on
intuition/intuitionism: philosophical or
perfectionism, S and, –; on S and
rational, ; Whewell’s dogmatic, , ,
demand for clarity,
–; S’s complex, ; Kloppenberg
Islam: S’s projected study of, ; S compares
ignores subtleties of, ; and self-sacrifice, S
to Judaism, ; see also orientalism;
on, ; S to Dakyns about self-sacrifice
religion
and, –; paper to Grote Club on,
Ives, George, and Wilde case, order of
–;
and S’s early Millianism, ,
Chaeronea,
; moral, versus experience, ; and
hedonism versus perfectionism in ME,
Jackson, Henry: Cambridge academic
–; S on Whewell, Aristotle and,
reformer, ; on S’s financial schemes for
–; S versus Moore’s, Hurka on,
Cambridge,
–; S’s minimal, in ME, ; as a
James, Henry, to Gosse on Symonds and the
method, –; S on Whewell’s,
public,
P: GCV
ind.xml
CY/Schultz
February ,
:
Index
James, William: as theorist of the
compares to EMS, , ; Balliol of,
twin-souled, ; feels anxieties of modern
compared to Newnham, –; S shares
liberalism, ; and psychical research, ;
concerns of, , ; Shannon on training
S resembles on religious problem, ; and
of imperial statesmen and, ; see also
Mill, on religion, –; as member of
academic liberals; education; imperialism;
American SPR, ; friend of Gurney’s,
Oxford University
; on S and EMS as pure intellect, ;
Judaism, S’s projected study of,
on fraud and psychical research, –,
judgment: S on irrationality and, ; S on
; Gurney to, about personal knowledge
balancing moral/material in, ; S on
and evidence for telepathy, ; on
balancing moral/aesthetic in, , ; see
Bradley’s idealism, –; conception of
also ethical theory
unconscious, personal identity, –;
justice: Rawls on S and, ; S urges fostering
and Symonds, , , ; invited S to
spirit of, ; in Whewellian ethics,
Harvard, ; on Symonds as case of
–; and S’s axioms, –; S,
cosmic consciousness, –; interest in
Hare, and Kantian principle of, ; and
Symonds, ; S compared to, ; on
publicity, Rawls and Kant on, –; S,
investigation of Piper case, –; and S