Ethnic Apocalypse

by Guillaume Faye

  The grave analytical mistake made by Montbrial is that of referring to a ‘clannish’ rebellion — in which clans and gangs of thugs unite — against the police and the French state’s ‘institutions’, in harmony with a purely criminal and delinquent sort of logic. Not at all. It is actually a racist or rather ethno-tribal revolt not against the French state and its institutions, but against France itself, its identity, and its history. Not against policemen regarded as a mere rival gang! The setting which Montbrial proposes is that of a societal and security-based clash, when, in actual fact, it is a political and historical conflict characterised, above all else, by an ethnic and, of course, racial dimension.

  Are Our Law Enforcement Forces Being Progressively Infiltrated?

  There is yet another very disturbing matter: the growing presence in, or perhaps even premeditated and deliberate infiltration into the ranks of our police forces and army by Black African and Maghrebian Muslims, just like in the rest of our society! In a display of reckless unawareness and irresponsibility, and as dictated by the delusion of diversity and the stupid dream of our living-together, one recruits into our law enforcement forces and army young people that are likely to become our worst foes, if, of course, they are not already our secret enemies. The wolf is simply brought into the sheepfold, right? In the event of an outbreak of insurrectional and racial riots in the suburbs, there is an ever-increasing risk that those people will end up embracing insubordination, conniving with their co-religionists and fellow rioters and perhaps even openly fraternising with them, and provoking ethnic conflicts even within the ranks of our police and military forces. Such a scenario would be the worst possible one, as it would paralyse our national defence forces in the face of potentially severe guerrilla warfare. For centuries on end, the most basic ploy resorted to by those who long to spark off a civil war has been to infiltrate the enemy camp and cause its implosion.

  Within the finest troops of the French army, the idea of an ethno-religious civil war between our French natives and the masses of hostile and vindictive populations of Arab-Afro-Muslim origin is rather widespread. Indeed, the scenario of a civil war seems not only consistent with what we have been witnessing but also with basic common sense; the very same common sense that 90% of our French elites and intellectuals are completely devoid of.

  I have discussed this prospect with a young non-commissioned officer serving in an elite regiment of a prestigious army. What he told me is quite frightening and does not bode well. In his view, there will undoubtedly be a major, far-reaching and highly violent confrontation with those Afro-Maghrebian Muslim populations, and by extension, within the army itself, many incidents involving the already numerous recruits from both Africa and the Near/Middle East, who will choose to side against France. The same dramatic development shall take place in the law enforcement sphere, our police forces and our gendarmerie, whose use shall thus find itself severely limited. Have our brilliant intelligence services given the matter proper consideration? Do they even have the right to mention it internally?

  Chapter X:

  Race and Racism — At the Heart of the Coming Clashes

  In a most reluctant fashion, sociologist and polemologist Thibault de Montbrial speaks of a ‘racialisation of tensions’, using the taboo and explosive term ‘race’ precisely because of its censored relevance (for if there is a word-bomb, RACE would definitely be the one).

  It is not an anecdotal or peripheral element, but a central dimension of what is now brewing. Characterised by its anti-racist ideology and repression (despite the fact that our constitutional law, ever imbued with schizophrenia, officially denies the existence of human races), our appalling multiracial society has actually become a multi-racist society. What this indicates, unfortunately, is that the civil war which may break out in France and Western Europe will not only have an ethnic, cultural and religious dimension, but also a racial one, which, throughout history, has always been a factor contributing to the greatest possible conflict between two sides.

  The Great Racialist Paradox

  It must be understood that the vast majority of young Black-African Muslims, and even those that are not born Muslim at all (especially if they happen to be black), consider Islam to be the natural religion and identity of non-Whites.134

  This fact is completely at odds with all the memorised thought patterns permeating our official, well-meaning catechism. What a painful realisation this must be for the Left’s thinkers, despite their constant propaganda in the opposite direction. Ideological and moral antiracism has not stupefied people’s conscience and racial passions, but has, on the contrary, only succeeded in exacerbating them. The more one attempts to eradicate people’s natural state of being, the more pronounced it becomes. In the minds of young immigrants, being French is only a matter of documentation and administrative facilities, and it seems obvious to them that since they are neither white nor Muslim, they could never be genuinely French. It is out of the question for them to integrate into our society, much less to assimilate. Their attitude epitomises the utter failure of the abstract and republicanist conception of France, one that has been prevalent since the Revolution and the days of Renan and embodied a default value in the absence of mass immigration within the French hexagon’s comfortable ethnic homogeneity. What has thus failed is a basically utopian and rather stupid conception which de Gaulle did not share, one which perceives France as an alleged spiritual coalescence, a philosophico-political project consolidated by a common history and language, instead of actually being cemented by a carnal unity fraught with a twofold cultural and biological dimension — i.e. the presence of a people, of course!

  And here is the paradox: just like those young immigrants that act as their enemies, European identitarian movements also espouse a racialist conception of both nations and the world. They perceive those immigrants just as the latter perceive themselves, namely as aliens with a radical ethnic consciousness (not to mention the cultural and biological aspect), and not at all as individuals or ‘French citizens’, thus completely contradicting the republican, anti-racist, egalitarian and cosmopolitan prevailing ideology. There can be no alliance between these two worlds. Those we are facing have managed to understand this well before us and do not hesitate to inflict pain on our people in a display of innovative horror!

  The Rotten Lives of Whites

  We are currently experiencing a phase of explosive tensions and localised dress rehearsals that herald the great conflagration — that of a racial ethnic civil war. The latter will assume an extremely violent form, particularly through the involvement of ever-aggressive and ruthless Islam, in combination with various biological identification markers. The warning signs of a coming ethno-racial civil war are many, but the prospect of its outbreak has been removed from our leaders’ minds and the work records of our ENA graduates to such an extent that the governing authorities do not wish to see these signs nor to envisage the possibility that official hostilities could actually be initiated by our native French population.

  In all areas of our everyday social life — as part of a process that is now increasingly impacting our once preserved small towns and rural areas — the tremendous migrational pressure and its corollary, Islamisation, are creating a very tense and highly charged atmosphere pervaded by constant conflict. Although implicit and generally unmentioned, the racial factor is ubiquitous and heightens religious tensions (among other things). On both sides, people state and repeat to themselves a fact that they all experience in their lives — there is us and there is them.

  Indeed, throughout France, a phenomenon never experienced or, worse still, unsuspected by the Parisian elites has imposed its presence: that of ethnic division amidst endless conflict, hostility and permanent insecurity (with the latter only affecting one of the two sides). In certain regions, particularly in the south and the north, as well as the suburbs of our major conurbations, the situation of our French natives — and def
initely not that of immigrants — has reached dramatic and utterly unmanageable proportions for everyone.

  Maliciously targeted by Le Monde, Libération, Mediapart, Télérama, and France Culture, these ‘petty Whites’, i.e. our people and indigenous lower classes, have been forced to embrace ethnic coexistence, an artificial living-together that our leaders themselves do not even practice. This fool’s bargain also implies a blatant disregard for democracy at the hands of this shitty republic’s governments — a republic that has, since 1974, been resorting to decrees to impose an immigrational invasion upon the French people (through family reunification, mass naturalisation, regularisation, various subsidies, foreign preference, the impossibility to expel newcomers), going against the latter’s wishes and corrupting their dreams of tranquillity.

  In addition to their cultural dispossession and the transformation of their living environment in a manner preventing them from feeling at home in their own country, our lower-class French natives have been suffering greatly from the polymorphous delinquency of immigrants, who are corrupting their lives and reinforcing their nostalgia for the 1950s and 1960s, when life was pleasant quite simply because those immigrants were not yet here. My fellow citizens must reclaim their own destiny — they no longer have any other choice. WE no longer have any other choice.

  Statal Racism? Absolutely,

  but One That Advantages Foreigners

  The incessant anti-racist propaganda that advocates our living-together both on TV and elsewhere is entirely worthless in the face of our daily experiences of robberies, rape, street or home invasion assaults, rioting, excessive noise levels, insults, school and hospital violence, vehicle arson, etc. And somehow, those responsible for such behaviour always happen to be of the same origin. By contrast, the latter are never aggressed by their usual victims. Isn’t thug life cool?

  Indeed, what our indigenous Frenchmen have been subjected to at the hands of third-world immigrants (including their descendants, who are often minors and already violent) and are presently being made to endure by those sacrosanct migrants has not been a two-way street. The Whites have been the only ones aggressed and excluded. No one else has. The often-unpunished, self-victimising and privileged foreign criminals and troublemakers are never aggressed, nor even challenged by our natives, i.e. by those ‘petty Whites’ whose lives they have been corrupting and whose territory they henceforth proudly occupy.

  On the contrary, those foreigners are not only the state’s very own darlings, but also those of our administrations and large groups (those active in the field of market distribution, for instance), all of whom are under civic obligation to hire such people before anyone else, all in the name of diversity. The very same conditions apply when it comes to the allocation of social housing: regardless of whether it is a matter of offering discounts on household services or free transport, ethno-racially allogeneic people always enjoy blatant favouritism when compared to indigenous Europeans, due to allegedly social reasons. All of this is, in fact, done in the name of one’s race, without, of course, anyone ever daring to utter this explosive word. The state is clearly imposing social diversity upon the working class (how commendably well-intentioned!) — a diversity that should instead be understood as racial diversity.

  This situation, which is very demanding for our exasperated natives to experience, may turn out to be a source of provocation and drive them to take sudden and violent action. This, in my opinion, shall indeed be the case in many of our republic’s lost territories.

  The Psycho-Pathology of Anti-Racism

  ‘Anti-racism has become our century’s own civil religion’, says Pascal Bruckner, who authored a scandalous and exhilarating book entitled An Imaginary Racism. Because of this opinion (among other things), Bruckner has found himself ostracised, just like Finkielkraut, and is now on bad terms with our right-thinking intelligentsia, since he too now stands accused of Islamophobia, obviously.

  For the dominant ideology, criticising anti-racism is immediately synonymous with being racist — a supreme abomination, as previously stated. This anti-racist ideology, which is completely contradictory as a result of its bias and tendency to overvalue ‘coloured people’ to the detriment of Whites, contributes to the profound racialisation of our society and will certainly prove to be an aggravating factor in an ethnic civil war characterised by its racial and racist dimensions.

  Although Islam is a religion with a universal sort of mission, the fact remains that it relates, as already stated, to the ‘Arab’ race, because the majority of its followers are coloured, which explains why Islamophobia and racism are correlated, or sometimes even confused, and why Pascal Bruckner has immediately been labelled Islamophobic for simply criticising anti-racism! Anti-racism is a doctrinal creation stemming from both Whites and left-wing Jews that define themselves as Westerners but have all surrendered to self-loathing, i.e. to ethno-masochism. The harshest censorship or prosecution is thus directed against any Whites accused of racism. Why does this happen to Whites in particular, and much less to other races?

  Because nowadays, racism is, I would say, regarded as an almost metaphysical curse that can only originate from Whites, with others considered exempt from it by nature. This is why anti-White racism is never — or hardly ever — prosecuted, and neither is the anti-Semitism of Muslims. Non-Europeans, and especially Muslims, are seen as intrinsic victims and are therefore blameless and untouchable.

  In the French Constitution, all references to the notion of race have been abolished, with the word itself having suddenly been removed, as if by some sort of exorcism, and the very notion apparently declared scientifically inexistent (despite the fact that all current scientific tendencies espouse the opposite interpretation, but never mind). This does not, of course, prevent them from punishing the ‘racism’ of writers and speakers ever more severely, on the basis of an object which, both officially and legally, does not even exist. We have thus reached a point where although the very inexistence of fish has been decreed, one is still forbidden to indulge in fishing…

  In actual fact, this anti-racist obsession is but a racial one which, by means of a heterotelic effect, spreads throughout society and impacts everyone, regardless of their origin.

  The Increased Obviousness of Racial Antagonism

  Which is precisely why, in the event of an outbreak of civil war, the ethnic (i.e. religious, cultural, linguistic, traditional, etc.) dimension will be combined with another, much more serious aspect — that of a racial conflict. In this regard, it would seem that the vindictive and militant organisation known as CRAN (Representative Council of Black Associations) will play a very significant role. Indeed, CRAN is the very first overtly racial and racist association tolerated by the authorities and will take charge of various activities targeting both our native French population and law enforcement forces the moment obvious hostilities break out.

  This racialisation of conflicts is already encountered at the discreet level of sociological observation and can, likewise, be conclusively perceived through the simple use of one’s common sense: a simple enumeration of all irregularities, riots, arsons, assaults, daily incidents, and individual and collective Muslim attacks clearly reveals the presence of two distinct populations: on the one hand, the Afro-Maghrebian one and, on the other, our own natives, who, it must be said, are not all French but often include integrated and peaceful European immigrants and mixed-raced individuals who suffer as much as the others. None of this has evaded our genuine population’s attention, and, despite its rather high sophistication, the official anti-racist, deracialising and propagandic discourse is no longer accepted. The latter will not be able to defuse the bomb of an acknowledged and experienced logic, namely that of a brewing racial conflict! There can be no mistake on either side: our jerseys are truly not of the same colour.135

  Anti-White Racism Presented as Anti-Racism

  Let us mention, once again, the benevolence and impunity enjoyed
by Les Indigènes de la République, whose very own source of inspiration and a textbook case of ‘racist anti-racism’, Houria Bouteldja, never misses one single opportunity to lash out at what she hates compulsively, namely Whites and France. These abject people organise ‘racised’136 summer camps, i.e. camps reserved exclusively for coloured participants and off-limits to Whites, who are all defined as oppressive by nature. We welcome them in France, and this is how they repay us.

  At this level, one can readily assess the extent to which these mentally complexed allogeneous individuals — all of whom are ill at ease in their own skin, in the throes of a biological sort of resentment and mediocre good-for-nothings — have been stricken with schizophrenia.

  Although anti-racism is a hazy ideology, it is simultaneously seen as an imperious and chic creed by the snobbish, mundane and social-climbing elites that propagate it. For the supposed racist is, in their eyes, not only despicable, but also an old-fashioned hick; a white one, of course, and one that becomes the focus of their derision (as seen in Yves Boisset’s propaganda film Dupont Lajoie).137 The invading Islamic forces have taken full advantage of their adversaries’ disabling discrepancy, in which the latter’s dogmatic antiracism is combined with a pathological sort of guilt relating to their own nature and history. Islam, along with its minions, generals and collaborators, thus makes the most of things to present itself as a victim, as being stigmatised by a certain form of racism, before tearfully launching its ruthless conquest. Its deceptive song and dance is, however, something that an ever-increasing number of people are now familiar with.