Age of Fable or Beauties of Mythology
Page 38
Byron alludes to the oracle of Delphi where speaking of Rousseau, whose
writings he conceives did much to bring on the French revolution, he says, -
"For then he was inspired, and from him came,
As from the Pythian's mystic cave of yore,
Those oracles which set the world in flame,
Nor ceased to burn till kingdoms were no more."
Chapter XXXV: Origin Of Mythology
Statues Of Gods And Goddesses - Poets Of Mythology.
Origin Of Mythology.
Having reached the close of our series of stories of Pagan mythology, an inquiry
suggests itself. "Whence came these stories? Have they a foundation in truth, or are
they simply dreams of the imagination?" Philosophers have suggested various theories
on the subject; and (1) The Scriptural theory; according to which all mythological
legends are derived from the narratives of Scripture, though the real facts have been
disguised and altered. Thus Deucalion is only another name for Noah, Hercules for
Samson, Arion for Jonah, &c. Sir Walter Raleigh, in his History of the World, says,
"Jubal, Tubal, and Tubal-Cain were Mercury, Vulcan, and Apollo, inventors of
Pasturage, Smithing, and Music. The Dragon which kept the golden apples was the
serpent that beguiled Eve. Nimrod's tower was the attempt of the Giants against
Heaven." There are doubtless many curious coincidences like these, but the theory
cannot without extravagance be pushed so far as to account for any great proportion
of the stories.
(2) The Historical theory; according to which all the persons mentioned in
mythology were once real human beings, and the legends and fabulous traditions
relating to them are merely the additions and embellishments of later times. Thus the
story of Aeolus, the king and god of the winds, is supposed to have risen from the fact
that Aeolus was the ruler of some islands in the Tyrrhenian Sea, where he reigned as
a just and pious king, and taught the natives the use of sails for ships, and how to tell
from the signs of the atmosphere the changes of the weather and the winds. Cadmus,
who, the legend says, sowed the earth with dragon's teeth, from which sprang a crop
of armed men, was in fact an emigrant from Phoenicia, and brought with him into
Greece the knowledge of the letters of the alphabet, which he taught to the natives.
From these rudiments of learning sprung civilization, which the poets have always
been prone to describe as a deterioration of man's first estate, the Golden Age of
innocence and simplicity.
(3) The Allegorical theory supposes that all the myths of the ancients were
allegorical and symbolical, and contained some moral, religious, or philosophical truth
or historical fact, under the form of an allegory, but came in process of time to be
understood literally. Thus Saturn, who devours his own children, is the same power
whom the Greeks called Cronos, (Time,) which may truly be said to destroy whatever it
has brought into existence. The story of Io is interpreted in a similar manner. Io is the
moon, and Argus the starry sky, which, as it were, keeps sleepless watch over her.
The fabulous wanderings of Io represent the continual revolutions of the moon, which
also suggested to Milton the same idea.
"To behold the wandering moon
Riding near her highest noon,
Like one that had been led astray
In the heaven's wide, pathless way."
Il Penseroso
(4) The Physical theory; according to which the elements of air, fire, and water
were originally the objects of religious adoration, and the principal deities were
personifications of the powers of nature. The transition was easy from a personification
of the elements to the notion of supernatural beings presiding over and governing the
different objects of nature. The Greeks, whose imagination was lively, peopled all nature
with invisible beings, and supposed that every object, from the sun and sea to the
smallest fountain and rivulet, was under the care of some particular divinity. Wordsworth,
in his Excursion, has beautifully developed this view of Grecian mythology.
"In that fair clime the lonely herdsman, stretched
On the soft grass through half a summer's day,
With music lulled his indolent repose;
And, in some fit of weariness, if he,
When his own breath was silent, chanced to hear
A distant strain far sweeter than the sounds
Which his poor skill could make, his fancy fetched
Even from the blazing chariot of the Sun
A beardless youth who touched a golden lute,
And filled the illumined groves with ravishment.
The mighty hunter, lifting up his eyes
Toward the crescent Moon, with grateful heart
Called on the lovely Wanderer who bestowed
That timely light to share his joyous sport;
And hence a beaming goddess with her nymphs
Across the lawn and through the darksome grove
(Not unaccompanied with tuneful notes
By echo multiplied from rock or cave)
Swept in the storm of chase, as moon and stars
Glance rapidly along the clouded heaven
When winds are blowing strong. The Traveller slaked
His thirst from rill or gushing fount, and thanked
The Naiad. Sunbeams upon distant hills
Gliding apace with shadows in their train,
Might with small help from fancy, be transformed
Into fleet Oreads sporting visibly.
The Zephyrs, fanning, as they passed, their wings,
Lacked not for love fair objects whom they wooed
With gentle whisper. Withered boughs grotesque,
Stripped of their leaves and twigs by hoary age,
From depth of shaggy covert peeping forth
In the low vale, or on steep mountain side;
And sometimes intermixed with stirring horns
Of the live deer, or goat's depending beard;
These were the lurking Satyrs, a wild brood
Of gamesome deities; or Pan himself,
The simple shepherd's awe-inspiring god."
All the theories which have been mentioned are true to a certain extent. It would
therefore be more correct to say that the mythology of a nation has sprung from all these
sources combined than from any one in particular. We may add also that there are
many myths which have arisen from the desire of man to account for those natural
phenomena which he cannot understand; and not a few have had their rise from a
similar desire of giving a reason for the names of places and persons.
Statues Of The Gods.
To adequately represent to the eye the ideas intended to be conveyed to the
mind under the several names of deities, was a task which called into exercise the
highest powers of genius and art. Of the many attempts four have been most
celebrated, the first two known to us only by the descriptions of the ancients, the others
still extant and the acknowledged masterpieces of the sculptor's art.
The Olympian Jupiter.
The statue of the Olympian Jupiter by Phidias was considered the highest
achievement of this department of Grecian art. It was of colossal dimensions, and was
what the ancients called "chryselephantine;" that is, composed of ivory and gold; the
parts representing flesh being of ivory laid on a core of wood or sto
ne, while the drapery
and other ornaments were of gold. The height of the figure was forty feet, on a pedestal
twelve feet high. The god was represented seated on his throne. His brows were
crowned with a wreath of olive, and he held in his right hand a sceptre, and in his left a
statue of Victory. The throne was of cedar, adorned with gold and precious stones.
The idea which the artist essayed to imbody was that of the supreme deity of the
Hellenic (Grecian) nation, enthroned as a conqueror, in perfect majesty and repose, and
ruling with a nod the subject world. Phidias avowed that he took his idea from the
representation which Homer gives in the first book of the Iliad, in the passage thus
translated by Pope: -
"He spoke and awful bends his sable brows,
Shakes his ambrosial curls and gives the nod,
The stamp of fate and sanction of the god.
High heaven with reverence the dread signal took,
And all Olympus to the centre shook."*
Cowper's version is less elegant, but truer to the original. -
"He ceased, and under his dark brows the nod
Vouchsafed of confirmation. All around
The sovereign's everlasting head his curls
Ambrosial shook, and the huge mountain reeled"
The Minerva Of The Parthenon.
This was also the work of Phidias. It stood in the Parthenon, or temple of
Minerva at Athens. The goddess was represented standing. In one hand she held a
spear, in the other a statue of Victory. Her helmet, highly decorated, was surmounted by
a Sphinx. The statue was forty feet in height, and, like the Jupiter, composed of ivory
and gold. The eyes were of marble, and probably painted to represent the iris and pupil.
The Parthenon in which this statue stood was also constructed under the direction and
superintendence of Phidias. Its exterior was enriched with sculptures, many of them
from the hand of Phidias. The Elgin marbles now in the British Museum are a part of
them.
Both the Jupiter and Minerva of Phidias are lost, but there is good ground to
believe that we have, in several extant statues and busts, the artist's conceptions of the
countenances of both. They are characterized by grave and dignified beauty, and
freedom from any transient expression, which in the language of art is called repose.
It may interest our readers to see how this passage appears in another famous
version, that which was issued under the name of Tickell, contemporaneously with
Pope's, and which, being by many attributed to Addison, led to the quarrel which ensued
between Addison and Pope.
"This said, his kingly brow the sire inclined;
The large black curls fell awful from behind,
Thick shadowing the stern forehead of the god;
Olympus trembled at the almighty nod."
The Venus De' Medici.
The Venus of the Medici is so called from its having been in the possession of
the princes of that name in Rome when it first attracted attention, about two hundred
years ago An inscription on the base records it to be the work of Cleomenes, an
Athenian sculptor of 200 B.C., but the authenticity of the inscription is doubtful. There is
a story that the artist was employed by public authority to make a statue exhibiting the
perfection of female beauty, and to aid him in his task, the most perfect forms the city
could supply were furnished him for models. It is this which Thomson alludes to in his
Summer.
"So stands the statue that enchants the world;
So bending tries to veil the matchless boast,
The mingled beauties of exulting Greece."
Byron also alludes to this statue. Speaking of the Florence Museum, he says, -
"There too the goddess loves in stone, and fills
The air around with beauty;" &c.
And in the next stanza,
"Blood, pulse, and breast confirm the Dardan shepherd a prize.
See this last allusion explained in Chapter XXVII.
The Apollo Belvedere.
The most highly esteemed of all the remains of ancient sculpture is the statue of
Apollo, called the Belvedere, from the name of the apartment of the Pope's palace at
Rome in which it is placed. The artist is unknown. It is supposed to be a work of Roman
art, of about the first century of our era. It is a standing figure, in marble, more than
seven feet high, naked except for the cloak which is fastened around the neck and
hangs over the extended left arm. It is supposed to represent the god in the moment
when he has shot the arrow to destroy the monster Python. (See Chapter III.) The
victorious divinity is in the act of stepping forward. The left arm which seems to have
held the bow is outstretched, and the head is turned in the same direction. In attitude
and proportion the graceful majesty of the figure is unsurpassed. The effect is completed
by the countenance, where, on the perfection of youthful godlike beauty there dwells the
consciousness of triumphant power.
The Diana A La Biche.
The Diana of the Hind, in the palace of the Louvre, may be considered the
counterpart to the Apollo Belvedere. The attitude much resembles that of the Apollo, the
sizes correspond and also the style of execution. It is a work of the highest order,
though by no means equal to the Apollo. The attitude is that of hurried and eager
motion, the face that of a huntress in the excitement of the chase. The left hand is
extended over the forehead of the Hind which runs by her side, the right arm reaches
backward over the shoulder to draw an arrow from the quiver.
The Poets Of Mythology.
Homer, from whose poems of the Iliad and Odyssey we have taken the chief part
of our chapters of the Trojan war and the return of the Grecians, is almost as mythical a
personage as the heroes he celebrates. The traditionary story is that he was a
wandering minstrel, blind and old, who travelled from place to place singing his lays to
the music of his harp, in the courts of princes or the cottages of peasants, and
dependent upon the voluntary offerings of his hearers for support. Byron calls him "The
blind old man of Scio's rocky isle," and a well-known epigram, alluding to the uncertainty
of the fact of his birthplace, says, -
"Seven wealthy towns contend for Homer dead,
Through which the living Homer begged his bread."
These seven were Smyrna, Scio, Rhodes, Colophon, Salamis, Argos, and
Athens.
Modern scholars have doubted whether the Homeric poems are the work of any
single mind. This arises from the difficulty of believing that poems of such length could
have been committed to writing at so early an age as that usually assigned to these, an
age earlier than the date of any remaining inscriptions or coins, and when no materials,
capable of containing such long productions were yet introduced into use. On the other
hand it is asked how poems of such length could have been handed down from age to
age by means of the memory alone. This is answered by the statement that there was a
professional body of men, called Rhapsodists, who recited the poems of others, and
whose business it was to commit to memory and rehearse for pay the national and
patriotic legends.
The prevailing opinion of the learned, at this time, seems to be that the
/> framework and much of the structure of the poems belongs to Homer, but that there are
numerous interpolations and additions by other hands.
The date assigned to Homer, on the authority of Herodotus, is 850 B. C.
Virgil.
Virgil, called also by his surname Maro, from whose poem of the Aeneid we have
taken the story of Aeneas, was one of the great poets who made the reign of the Roman
emperor, Augustus, so celebrated, under the name of the Augustan age. Virgil was born
in Mantua in the year 70 B. C. His great poem is ranked next to those of Homer, in the
highest class of poetical composition, the Epic. Virgil is far inferior to Homer in originality
and invention, but superior to him in correctness and elegance. To critics of English
lineage Milton alone of modern poets seems worthy to be classed with these illustrious
ancients. His poem of Paradise Lost, from which we have borrowed so many
illustrations, is in many respects equal, in some superior to either of the great works of
antiquity. The following epigram of Dryden characterizes the three poets with as much
truth as it is usual to find in such pointed criticism: -
On Milton.
"Three poets in three different ages born,
Greece, Italy, and England did adorn.
The first in loftiness of soul surpassed,
The next in majesty, in both the last.
The force of nature could no further go;
To make a third she joined the other two."
From Cowper's Table Talk: -
"Ages elapsed ere Homer's lamp appeared,
And ages ere the Mantuan swan was heard.
To carry nature lengths unknown before,
To give a Milton birth, asked ages more.
Thus genius rose and set at ordered times,