Age of Fable or Beauties of Mythology
Page 39
And shot a dayspring into distant climes,
Ennobling every region that he chose;
He sunk in Greece, in Italy he rose,
And, tedious years of Gothic darkness past,
Emerged all splendor in our isle at last.
Thus lovely Halcyons dive into the main,
Then show far off their shining plumes again."
Ovid.
Often alluded to in poetry by his other name of Naso, was born in the year 43 B.
C. He was educated for public life and held some offices of considerable dignity, but
poetry was his delight, and he early resolved to devote himself to it. He accordingly
sought the society of the contemporary poets, and was acquainted with Horace and saw
Virgil, though the latter died when Ovid was yet too young and undistinguished to have
formed his acquaintance. Ovid spent an easy life at Rome in the enjoyment of a
competent income. He was intimate with the family of Augustus, the emperor, and it is
supposed that some serious offence given to some member of that family was the cause
of an event which reversed the poet's happy circumstances and clouded all the latter
portion of his life. At the age of fifty he was banished from Rome, and ordered to betake
himself to Tomi, on the borders of the Black Sea. Here, among the barbarous people
and in a severe climate, the poet, who had been accustomed to all the pleasures of a
luxurious capital and the society of his most distinguished contemporaries, spent the last
ten years of his life, worn out with grief and anxiety. His only consolation in exile was to
address his wife and absent friends, and his letters were all poetical. Though these
poems (the Tristia and Letters from Pontus) have no other topic than the poet's sorrows,
his exquisite taste and fruitful invention have redeemed them from the charge of being
tedious, and they are read with pleasure and even with sympathy.
The two great works of Ovid are his Metamorphoses and his Fasti. They are
both mythological poems, and from the former we have taken most of our stories of
Grecian and Roman mythology. A late writer thus characterizes these poems: -
"The rich mythology of Greece furnished Ovid, as it may still furnish the poet, the
painter, and the sculptor, with materials for his art. With exquisite taste, simplicity, and
pathos he has narrated the fabulous traditions of early ages, and given to them that
appearance of reality which only a master-hand could impart. His pictures of nature are
striking and true; he selects with care that which is appropriate; he rejects the
superfluous; and when he has completed his work, it is neither defective nor redundant.
The Metamorphoses are read with pleasure by youth, and are re-read in more advanced
age with still greater delight. The poet ventured to predict that his poem would survive
him, and be read wherever the Roman name was known."
The prediction above alluded to is contained in the closing lines of the
Metamorphoses, of which we give a literal translation below: -
"And now I close my work, which not the ire
Of Jove, nor tooth of time, nor sword, nor fire
Shall bring to nought. Come when it will that day
Which o'er the body, not the mind, has sway,
And snatch the remnant of my life away,
My better part above the stars shall soar,
And my renown endure forevermore.
Where'er the Roman arms and arts shall spread,
There by the people shall my book be read;
And, if aught true in poet's visions be,
My name and fame have immortality."
Chapter XXXVI: Modern Monsters
The Phoenix - Basilisk - Unicorn - Salamander.
Modern Monsters.
There is a set of imaginary beings which seem to have been the successors of
the "Gorgons, Hydras, and Chimeras dire" of the old superstitions, and, having no
connection with the false gods of Paganism, to have continued to enjoy an existence in
the popular belief after Paganism was superseded by Christianity. They are
mentioned perhaps by the classical writers, but their chief popularity and currency
seem to have been in more modern times. We seek our accounts of them not so
much in the poetry of the ancients, as in the old natural history books and narrations of
travellers. The accounts which we are about to give are taken chiefly from the Penny
Cyclopedia.
The Phoenix.
Ovid tells the story of the Phoenix as follows. "Most beings spring from other
individuals; but there is a certain kind which reproduces itself. The Assyrians call it the
Phoenix. It does not live on fruit or flowers, but on frankincense and odoriferous gums.
When it has lived five hundred years, it builds itself a nest in the branches of an oak, or
on the top of a palm tree. In this it collects cinnamon, and spikenard, and myrrh, and of
these materials builds a pile on which it deposits itself, and dying, breathes out its last
breath amidst odors. From the body of the parent bird, a young Phoenix issues forth,
destined to live as long a life as its predecessor. When this has grown up and gained
sufficient strength, it lifts its nest from the tree, (its own cradle and its parent's
sepulchre,) and carries it to the city of Heliopolis in Egypt, and deposits it in the temple
of the Sun."
Such is the account given by a poet. Now let us see that of a philosophic
historian. Tacitus says, "In the consulship of Paulus Fabius, (A. D. 34,) the miraculous
bird known to the world by the name of the Phoenix, after disappearing for a series of
ages, revisited Egypt. It was attended in its flight by a group of various birds, all
attracted by the novelty, and gazing with wonder at so beautiful an appearance." He
then gives an account of the bird, not varying materially from the preceding, but adding
some details. "The first care of the young bird as soon as fledged, and able to trust to
his wings, is, to perform the obsequies of his father. But this duty is not undertaken
rashly. He collects a quantity of myrrh, and to try his strength makes frequent
excursions with a load on his back. When he has gained sufficient confidence in his
own vigor, he takes up the body of his father and flies with it to the altar of the Sun,
where he leaves it to be consumed in flames of fragrance." Other writers add a few
particulars. The myrrh is compacted in the form of an egg, in which the dead Phoenix
is enclosed. From the mouldering flesh of the dead bird a worm springs, and this
worm, when grown large, is transformed into a bird. Herodotus describes the bird,
though he says, "I have not seen it myself, except in a picture. Part of his plumage is
gold- colored, and part crimson; and he is for the most part very much like an eagle in
outline and bulk."
The first writer who disclaimed a belief in the existence of the Phoenix, was Sir
Thomas Browne, in his "Vulgar Errors," published in 1646. He was replied to a few
years later by Alexander Ross, who says, in answer to the objection of the Phoenix so
seldom making his appearance, "His instinct teaches him to keep out of the way of the
tyrant of the creation, man, for if he were to be got at, some wealthy glutton would
surely devour him, though there were no more in the world."
Dryden in one of his early poems has this allusion to the Phoenix: -
"
So when the new-born Phoenix first is seen
Her feathered subjects all adore their queen,
And while she makes her progress through the East,
From every grove her numerous train's increased;
Each poet of the air her glory sings,
And round him the pleased audience clap their wings."
Milton, in Paradise Lost, Book V., compares the angel Raphael descending to
earth to a Phoenix: -
". . . Down thither, prone in flight
He speeds, and through the vast ethereal sky
Sails between worlds and worlds, with steady wing,
Now on the polar winds, then with quick fan
Winnows the buxom air; till within soar
Of towering eagles, to all the fowls he seems
A Phoenix, gazed by all; as that sole bird
When, to enshrine his relics in the sun's
Bright temple, to Egyptian Thebes he flies."
The Cockatrice, Or Basilisk.
This animal was called the king of the serpents. In confirmation of his royalty, he
was said to be endowed with a crest, or comb upon the head, constituting a crown. He
was supposed to be produced from the egg of a cock hatched under toads or serpents.
There were several species of this animal. One species burned up whatever they
approached; a second were a kind of wandering Medusa's heads, and their look caused
an instant horror which was immediately followed by death. In Shakespeare's play of
Richard the Third, Lady Anne, in answer to Richard's compliment on her eyes, says,
"Would they were basilisk's, to strike thee dead!"
The basilisks were called kings of serpents because all other serpents and
snakes, behaving like good subjects, and wisely not wishing to be burned up or struck
dead, fled, the moment they heard the distant hiss of their king, although they might be
in full feed upon the most delicious prey, leaving the sole enjoyment of the banquet to
the royal monster.
The Roman naturalist Pliny thus describes him. "He does not impel his body, like
other serpents, by a multiplied flexion, but advances lofty and upright. He kills the
shrubs, not only by contact but by breathing on them, and splits the rocks, such power of
evil is there in him." It was formerly believed that if killed by a spear from on horseback
the power of the poison conducted through the weapon killed not only the rider, but the
horse also. To this Lucan alludes in these lines: -
"What though the Moor the basilisk hath slain,
And pinned him lifeless to the sandy plain,
Up through the spear the subtle venom flies,
The hand imbibes it, and the victor dies."
Such a prodigy was not likely to be passed over in the legends of the saints.
Accordingly we find it recorded that a certain holy man going to a fountain in the desert
suddenly beheld a basilisk. He immediately raised his eyes to heaven, and with a pious
appeal to the Deity, laid the monster dead at his feet.
These wonderful powers of the basilisk are attested by a host of learned persons,
such as Galen, Avicenna, Scaliger, and others. Occasionally one would demur to some
part of the tale while he admitted the rest. Jonston, a learned physician, sagely remarks,
"I would scarcely believe that it kills with its look, for who could have seen it and lived to
tell the story?" The worthy sage was not aware that those who went to hunt the basilisk
of this sort, took with them a mirror, which reflected back the deadly glare upon its
author, and by a kind of poetical justice slew the basilisk with his own weapon.
But what was to attack this terrible and unapproachable monster? There is an old
saying that "every thing has its enemy," - and the cockatrice quailed before the weasel.
The basilisk might look daggers, the weasel cared not, but advanced boldly to the
conflict. When bitten, the weasel retired for a moment to eat some rue, which was the
only plant the basilisks could not wither, returned with renewed strength and soundness
to the charge, and never left the enemy till he was stretched dead on the plain. The
monster, too, as if conscious of the irregular way in which he came into the world, was
supposed to have a great antipathy to a cock; and well he might, for as soon as he
heard the cock crow he expired.
The basilisk was of some use after death. Thus we read that its carcass was
suspended in the temple of Apollo, and in private houses, as a sovereign remedy
against spiders, and that it was also hung up in the temple of Diana, for which reason no
swallow ever dared enter the sacred place.
The reader will, we apprehend, by this time have had enough of absurdities, but
still we can imagine his anxiety to know what a cockatrice was like. The following is from
Aldrovandus, a celebrated naturalist of the sixteenth century, whose work on natural
history, in thirteen folio volumes, contains with much that is valuable a large proportion of
fables and inutilities. In particular he is so ample on the subject of the cock and the bull,
that from his practice, all rambling, gossiping tales of doubtful credibility are called cock
and bull stories. The above print is entitled "The Basilisk which lives in the African
desert. It will be seen that
"What seemed its head
The likeness of a kingly crown had on."
Shelley, in his Ode to Naples, full of the enthusiasm excited by the intelligence of
the proclamation of a Constitutional Government at Naples, in 1820, thus uses an
allusion to the basilisk: -
What though Cimmerian anarchs dare blaspheme
Freedom and thee? a new Actaeon's error
Shall theirs have been, - devoured by their own hounds!
Be thou like the imperial basilisk,
Killing thy foe with unapparent wounds!
Gaze on oppression, till at that dread risk,
Aghast she pass from the earth's disk.
Fear not, but gaze, - for freemen mightier grow,
And slaves more feeble, gazing on their foe."
The Unicorn.
Pliny, the Roman naturalist, out of whose account of the unicorn most of the
modern unicorns have been described and figured, records it as "a very ferocious beast,
similar in the rest of its body to a horse, with the head of a deer, the feet of an elephant,
the tail of a boar, a deep bellowing voice, and a single black horn, two cubits in length,
standing out in the middle of its forehead." He adds that "it cannot be taken alive;" and
some such excuse may have been necessary in those days for not producing the living
animal upon the arena of the amphitheatre.
The unicorn seems to have been a sad puzzle to the hunters, who hardly knew
how to come at so valuable a piece of game. Some described the horn as movable at
the will of the animal, a kind of small sword in short, with which no hunter who was not
exceedingly cunning in fence could have a chance. Others maintained that all the
animal's strength lay in its horn, and that when hard pressed in pursuit, it would throw
itself from the pinnacle of the highest rocks horn foremost, so as to pitch upon it, and
then quietly march off not a whit the worse for its fall.
But it seems they found out how to circumvent the poor unicorn at last. They
discovered that it was a great lover of purity and innocence, so they took the field with a
young virgin, who was pl
aced in the unsuspecting admirer's way. When the unicorn
spied her, he approached with all reverence, couched beside her, and laying his head in
her lap, fell asleep. The treacherous virgin then gave a signal, and the hunters made in
and captured the simple beast.
Modern zoologists, disgusted as they well may be with such fables as these,
disbelieve generally the existence of the unicorn. Yet there are animals bearing on their
heads a bony protuberance more or less like a horn, which may have given rise to the
story. The rhinoceros horn, as it is called, is such a protuberance, though it does not
exceed a few inches in height, and is far from agreeing with the descriptions of the horn
of the unicorn. The nearest approach to a horn in the middle of the forehead is exhibited
in the bony protuberance on the forehead of the giraffe; but this also is short and blunt,
and is not the only horn of the animal, but a third horn, standing in front of the two
others. In fine, though it would be presumptuous to deny the existence of a one-horned
quadruped other than the rhinoceros, it may be safely stated that the insertion of a long
and solid horn in the living forehead of a horse-like or deer-like animal, is as near an
impossibility as any thing can be.
The Salamander.
The following is from the Life of Benvenuto Cellini an Italian artist of the sixteenth
century, written by him self. "When I was about five years of age, my father happening
to be in a little room in which they had been washing, and where there was a good fire of
oak burning, looked into the flames and saw a little animal resembling a lizard, which
could live in the hottest part of that element. Instantly perceiving what it was he called
for my sister and me, and after he had shown us the creature, he gave me a box on the
ear. I fell a crying, while he, soothing me with caresses, spoke these words: 'My dear