ZetaTalk: Science
Page 5
Like magnetism, gravity flows are not universal about a body, but have a field. This is not widely noted, as it is slight, but has been noted recently in the discovery by mankind’s probes that the Earth's middle would seem to be fatter,
gravity wise, though no shape has changed. This hit the scientific news, a fact reported by the probes which no human
scientist had any explanation for. It was a change in the core of the Earth, which parts of the core are moving, and in
what directions, and this motion creating disruptions in the gravity field around the Earth. This is all to say that the
Auroras moving toward the Equator, should not be surprising, as the gravity flow back toward the Equator are
obviously increasing. The field has switched, more pull in at the Equator, so the light bending toward the gravity flow
is seen more toward the Equator.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s06.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:49 AM]
ZetaTalk: Planetary Magnetism
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Planetary Magnetism
Note: written on Feb 15, 1996. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.
Planets act as magnets in accordance with their composition and liquidity. In this regard the Earth is a magnet, as it
has a high concentration of iron in both its core and crust, and its core is fluid. The strongest magnets are produced
from softened or melted ore, as the atoms are free to line up end to end. The core of the Earth is perpetually in this
state, and thus it acts like a huge magnet, as large as the globe itself. Magnetic influences between planets are greater than humans imagine, because they use as their frame of reference objects on the surface. The Earth's crust is
magnetically diffuse, representing many different pole alliances over the eons, as magma hardened after volcanic
eruptions during pole shifts. The Earth's thick crust acts as a shield in this way, so that only sensitive needles on
compasses, floating freely, jiggle into alignment with the Earth's core.
A planet's magnetic influence is not encapsulated by its crust, but reaches beyond this even to the ends of the solar
system. Like the shields that men stood behind to watch an atomic blast, they may have avoided the radiation, but the
landscape behind them was devastated. The Earth's magnetism oozes around the various crustal plates acting as shields
to recreate its essential alignment out in space, considering any confusion the crust may have presented as no more
than an annoyance. A resonance is involved, so that the magnetic field can reestablish itself, filling in any blanks.
Thus, when magnetized planets encounter each other, such as when the 12th Planet passes near the Earth, the strength
of their reaction to each other is much greater than man might imagine.
Mankind's tiny magnets are but specks on the surface of thick crusts acting as shields. Below the surface, in the liquid
core of the Earth, and in resonance high above the surface, is where the real magnetic drama occurs.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s56.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:49 AM]
ZetaTalk: Gaseous Planets
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Gaseous Planets
Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates.
Gaseous planets work on the same principles driving their rotation, but due to the lack of a solid crust their cores and
atmospheres merge, where the rotation patterns on the surface of a planet with a solid crust is altered by the form and
shape that crust takes. In rotation within a liquid or mobile core, the rotation rate differs for the various parts of the
core. Rotation, as we have explained, is driven by parts of the core moving toward or away from elements outside of
the planet. Like runners in a race, some parts move faster and others more slowly, depending upon the strength of the
attraction or repulsion that is driving their motion within the core. There are also differences in mass, so that some
parts of the core float closer to the surface, and others fall to the center of the core. What does all this do to the
rotation of a gaseous planet, where the drama of rotation in the core expresses itself on the surface of the gaseous
giant?
Just as the oceans of the Earth pool about her Equator, due to being slung there by the motion of rotation, just so the
lighter elements in a gaseous planet pool about its equator, with the heavier elements lining up in bands toward the
poles. Motion in a liquid or gaseous core, once started, is driven also by the very motion itself. Around the equator, the
lighter elements rush to the surface, and there find they cannot leave due to the gravity pull of the planet, but also are
being pushed from behind by more of the same element rushing to the surface. What happens in a fast flowing river, to
the water along the banks which are being slung away from the pressure at the center? Eddy current occur, where the
pull of the flow at the center creates a relative vacuum in that there is a difference in water pressure along the fast
flow, so that water slung to the sides of the flow circle back into those spots of lesser water pressure. Likewise, eddy
currents occur in a gaseous planet’s latitude bands, so that the motion of rotation apparent on the surface appears to be
alternating bands with an east-west motion. The heaviest elements in such a planet pool at the core, and due to the
motion of rotation which slings the lighter elements toward the surface of the planet, these heavy elements also creep
up toward the poles. All else, the lighter elements, have left for the surface, and been pulled based on their relative
weight toward the equator of the planet. The poles, thus, reflect the overall rotation direction of the gaseous planet.
On Earth, these same patterns exist, but due to the buffering action of the crust the atmosphere operates independently.
Where the Earth moves under the atmosphere, the drag is from east to west, and as the atmosphere is not so inclined,
eddy currents, the prevailing westerlies, are created. Storms on Earth, created due to unequal pressure of air masses
and their relative humidity, last only as long as equalizing the factors takes - a matter of days. Storms on a gaseous
planet, noted by NASA in July, 2001 from recent images taken by a fly-by probe, seem to last for long periods. This is
because they are not driven simply by a thin and highly mobile air mass, but by elements disbursed in the entire core of
the planet. Equalization is not in a thin layer, but as deep as the planet itself, so the drama takes longer to resolve.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s115.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:50 AM]
ZetaTalk: Opposition
Mail this Page to a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Opposition
Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.
Children playing with magnets soon discover that magnets brought in close proximity to each other want to snap
together, north pole to south pole, and can be positioned north pole to north pole only under force. Lined up side by
side, as long as a certain distance is maintained and friction against a table top or other surface is present, they can
coexist with without polar symmetry, however. Why the pressure to snap together and align when poles approach,
where not so in a side by side arrangement? An analysis of magnetic particle flow in magnets placed end to end show
the particles flow moving through the entire length of the linkup of magnets, creating
a longer and larger field before the
particles return to the shared south pole at the end of the lineup. But what of the particle flow when magnets are
positioned side by side? The key here is the strength of the fields, and the closeness of the magnets.
If the magnets are of a strength and closeness to each other such that a returning particle finds itself fighting the
flow to do anything but go to the far edge of the overall mega-magnetic field created by the group, the magnets
will line up with their poles in the same direction.
If any of the magnets are of a significant strength, but the magnets are not so close that returning particles are
perforce forced to the outside of the overall mega-magnetic field created by the group, the returning particles will
take the path of least resistance and return via a magnet in opposition. In fact, this magnet will be in opposition in the grouping not because of its original orientation but because the returning flow creates a south pole handy to
the flow, establishing the magnetic orientation. This happens, not surprisingly, in gaseous planets as they have the
greatest mobility in their composition and the least resistance to change.
If the magnet in a side by side arrangement are at the greatest distance from the dominant magnet in the group,
they will align in orientation with that magnet as the overall flow of particles is such at the perimeter of the mega-
magnetic field such that the return south is sweeping like eddy currents at the very outside of all the magnets in
the group. There peripheral magnets thus align in the same direction as the dominant magnet.
When this path of least resistance is established in a gaseous planet, the magnetic particle flow takes a short cut to the
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s122.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:50 AM]
ZetaTalk: Opposition
south pole of the Sun, the dominant magnetic influence in the area. Those particles flowing through such a gaseous
magnet do not return to the south pole of the planet they have just passed through, but move along to the south pole of
the Sun. Magnetic fields are measured by man not by the flow of particles, but by the direction of the flow, as the
orientation is determined by which way a magnet swings under the influence of this flow. Thus, probes sent to measure
the magnetic field of a gaseous planet find their test magnets swinging into alignment, both the south pole of the
gaseous planet and the test magnet lined up to act as a conduit for the intense flow of magnetic particles on the move.
The fact that there is no actual field about the gaseous planet, no return from the north pole of the gaseous magnet to its south pole, is not noted.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s122.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:50 AM]
ZetaTalk: Earthquake Predictions
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Earthquake Predictions
Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.
We are not allowed to forewarn Earthlings of impending earthquakes to the extent they would like us to. The rules are
simple in this regard. For humans, on Earth at this time in the 3rd Density, earthquakes are a fact of nature, one that
creates many opportunities for them to sort out their spiritual orientation. Just watch how the populace responds after
an earthquake. Some people risk their lives dashing into shaky building to rescue others, and other people sit and
moan, waiting to be rescued. Many and great opportunities. However, lest some deem we, the Service-to-Other Zetas,
to be cold-hearted and cruel, be aware that this is not our rule, but a firm rule we must abide by as visitors to your
planet. No interference. Should we break this rule, we would no longer be allowed to be visitors.
With that in mind, we will tell you what we can. We cannot warn you ahead of time, saying, for instance, on such a
day, in such a place, at such a time, an earthquake of magnitude such will occur. However, we ourselves are able to
come close to this type of accuracy. Here's how we do it.
The Earth, as just about everyone knows, is covered by plates that move about and grind against each other. This
grinding action is described variously as a head-to-head push, a sliding under or over, or a gliding along the edge on
the way to someplace else. A place where this is occurring is called a fault line, as being a faulty place in the surface
of the Earth, one would assume. Now, where humans spend a lot of time sticking probes into the Earth, and trying to
guess at the tension deep underground and thus the probability of a near term earthquake, they would do better to place
the plate personalities into a computer and let the computer tell you where the next bust is going to be. How would this
be done? Humans have a pretty good handle on what the plates are, and where their boundaries are. Put that into the
computer. Humans also have a pretty good handle on the direction the plates are moving in, as they are staring at the
results after every earthquake. What they don't know is the degree of pressure, and how to restate this pressure after a
quake, which eases the tension in the surrounding rock.
This can be done mathematically, if one takes into consideration the following factors:
The size of the plate, as measured in a directly proportional way, i.e. as the surface area.
The thickness at the edge of the plate, as measured by instruments that gauge the depth of the bedrock, which we
deem fairly accurate as done by humans today, and, again, given a directly proportional weight.
The frequency of what is termed emergent electrostatic Screeches, a sound which can be detected by sensitive
humans, and much more accurately by sensitive instruments. We are speaking here of bursts of electrical energy,
which is invariably accompanied by other types of energy so that any number of them can be measured. This
should be weighted in a bell curve manner, so that every increase in frequency weighs in more and more
severely.
Tinker with this a bit. Test it against actual earthquake Data, which arrives daily from around the world. Try
prognosticating a bit, and get a reputation for accuracy. Whatever you do, don't just sit there doing nothing!
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s09.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:51 AM]
ZetaTalk: EQ Clouds
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: EQ Clouds
written Sep 21, 2004
What do the Zetas say about EQ clouds? Here are photos from Tokachi last Sep 26, 2003 when there was an
8.0 EQ. and another this Sep 4, 2004 when there was a 7.4 EQ.
Clouds certainly indicate what is going on in the atmosphere, and clearly indicate tornado potential when cloud layers are
moving in different directions overhead. Would clouds give indication of what is going on underground? It has been
reported that radios pick up static in the vicinity of a pending quake, due to the pressure the rock is under creating
particle flow bursts, electromagnetic in nature, thus static. Wave action in nature is the result of pressure buildup being
released in bursts, with a void following until another buildup occurs. Where normally clouds represent water vapor that
is being blown about by wind, when over land where particle bursts are coming out of the ground this wind is not merely
flowing over the land, but is affected by vertical bursts from the ground. All this is invisible to man, who cannot see the
air the bird is floating upon either. Animals who give heed to what they sense from the ground, unlike man who is asked
&nb
sp; to deny his senses and hunches, know these particle flows are exploding in bursts ahead of quakes, and in those cultures
where common sense prevails, this is acknowledged to mean that pending quakes or certainly the likelihood of quakes as
the ground is under pressure, exists. Earthquake clouds, showing what cannot be seen in these particle flows, are visually
showing what these animals sense.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta158.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:52 AM]
ZetaTalk: Tunguska Explosion
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Tunguska Explosion
Note: written on Feb 15, 1996.
A source of endless speculation is the wide area of flattened trees, spread outward in a circle, the result of an apparent
explosion that occurred just after the turn of the century in Siberia. No witnesses, radioactivity, or meteor remains
seem to exist as pieces toward solving this puzzle. Nuclear power was not yet in mankind's hands. What occurred? The
Tunguska trees are devastated by an explosion that occurred close to the ground, as evidenced by the butterfly pattern
of trees knocked sideways. It was a huge cloud of well mixed methane and air, equivalent to all the natural gas being
piped about in the US at any given time, and the burn spread around this cloud or that, under and over and around,
until a particular pocket of well mixed methane and air had no where to go with its heat since the burn was all around.
Itself burning, the heat ramped the combustion up to the explosion level.
Methane gas occurs naturally, a result of the decomposition of organic materials. Landfills must vent this or experience
explosions. Some humans know they can light and briefly burn their farts. Humus or accidentally buried organic
material is a source of methane gas, and if not vented, this attempts to rise, being light, and will pool if trapped.
Siberia was once lush, a fact the carcasses of mastodons reveal, as their bellies are full of grass. Flash frozen and