Book Read Free

Black Box Thinking

Page 37

by Matthew Syed


  9/11 attacks, 111–12, 117

  November Oscar incident, 239–49

  Novum Organum (Bacon), 134n, 279

  nozzle design, Unilever, 125–26, 128, 129, 137, 147, 286

  nurse unit administration, and blame, 226–27, 230–31

  Obama, Barack, 39

  observational statistics, 159, 160, 165

  Odean, Terence, 101

  Ofshe, Richard, 80

  Ogburn, William, 201

  Omphalos (Gosse), 42–43

  open loops, 14, 116, 180

  openness, 229–31, 234–35

  optimization, 189–91

  Ord, Toby, 148, 149, 177–78

  Orland, Ted, 140–41

  Osborn, Alex Faickney, 196–97

  Otero, Dr Henry, 50

  Owen, Jason, 236

  P.A.C.E. (Probe, Alert, Challenge, Emergency), 30

  Page, Larry, 199

  parole, 118–19

  Patient Safety Alerts, 49, 50, 51

  Pavlov, Ivan, 109

  perception, 6, 24–25, 28–29, 30

  perfectionism, 16–17, 140–41

  perseverance, 262–65

  Phillips, Charles, 278

  pilot schemes, 290–91

  Pixar, 207–10

  Plato, 278

  Poincaré, Henri, 201, 202

  politics/politicians, 141, 283, 284

  blame and, 234

  Iraq War and, 73–74, 90–94

  Popper, Karl, 41, 43–44, 103, 235, 267, 277, 280, 288

  Portal, Nicholas, 171

  practical knowledge, 212

  practice environments, 32–33, 45–46

  pre-closed loop behavior, 140

  pre-mortems, 291

  problem phase of innovation, 195–96, 195–200

  professionalism, 12

  progress, 7–8

  Pronovost, Peter J., 10, 52–53, 103–5, 106–7

  prospective hindsight, 291–92

  Pruchnicki, Shawn, 26, 31

  pseudoscience, 42–44

  psychotherapy, 43–44, 46–47, 288–89

  Putnam, Hilary, 282

  Pythagoras, 278

  quantitative easing, 94–96

  radio, wind-up, 195

  radiologists, 47–48

  radiology, 65–66

  random allocation, 156n

  randomized control trials (RCTs), 154–59, 285, 291

  African aid efficacy and, 175–78

  Capital One and, 185–86

  criminal justice system programs, lack of RCTs for, 158

  employment policy and, 187

  Google and, 184–85

  marginal gains theory and, 175, 176–77

  medicine and, 157–58

  morality of, 177

  of Scared Straight Program efficacy, 160, 162–64

  real-time data, 26

  Reason, James, 17, 58–59

  “Reasonable Choice of Disaster, The” (Lanir), 221

  religion, 111–12, 281–82

  Renquist, William, 84

  resources, 11, 31–32

  Ries, Eric, 142–43, 189

  Rivera, Juan, 64–65, 70–71, 82–83, 116, 120

  Robinson, Alan, 179

  Roosevelt, Eleanor, 25

  Rosberg, Nico, 183, 184

  Royal Aeronautical Society, 26

  Royal Navy, 56

  Rush, Dr. Benjamin, 13–14

  Russia, 108–10

  Sachs, Jeffrey, 174

  Saddam Hussein, 73, 91

  Safe Patients, Smart Hospitals (Pronovost), 53

  safety

  aviation and, 8–9, 19–20, 24, 26, 38–40

  health care and, 49

  system, 17, 18, 45

  Scalia, Antonin, 84n

  scapegoating, 12

  Scared Straight! 20 Years Later (documentary), 159

  Scared Straight program, 150–54, 159–67

  Campbell Corporation’s systematic review of, 164–65

  Finnckenauer’s randomized control trial (RCT) of, 160, 162–64

  Scheck, Barry, 67, 68, 70, 77, 78, 80, 82, 84, 85, 117

  Schulz, Kathryn, 78–79, 81

  Schumpeter, Joseph, 130

  science, 41–45, 48

  ancient Greeks and, 278–79

  Bacon’s criticism of medieval, 279–80, 283

  failure and, 266

  history of, 277–82

  Lysenko and, 108–10

  method and mindset of, 51–52

  scurvy, 56

  second victim, 239

  selection bias, 161–62

  self-esteem, 74, 75–76, 82, 90, 97, 98, 101, 274

  self-handicapping, 272–74

  self-justification, 18, 87, 88–89, 90, 97–99

  and Iraq War decisions, 92–93

  Shapiro, Arnold, 153, 166

  Shepherd-Barron, John, 196

  Shirley, Michael, 69

  Shoemaker, Paul, 102

  Shoesmith, Sharon, 236, 239

  signatures, 11, 18, 24, 52

  Simeone, Diego, 274

  Simons, Daniel, 117

  Sims, Peter, 139–40, 144

  Singer, Paul, 95

  Skiles, Jeffrey, 38, 39

  Slemmer, Mike, 138–40

  soccer, 135–36, 253–55, 274–76, 289–90

  social hierarchies, as inhibiting assertiveness, 28–29

  Social Science and Medical Journal, 89

  social tolerance, 285

  social workers, 236–38, 239

  social world, 283–87

  Socrates, 278

  software design, 138–40

  South Korean ferry disaster, 12

  Soyfer, Valery, 109

  speed-eating, 187–88

  Spelling Bees, 263

  Speziale, Angelo, 165–67

  sports, 132n, 135–36, 266, 289–90. See also cycling; Formula One; soccer

  Staker, Holly, 63, 64, 70, 82–83, 119, 120, 121

  Stalin, Joseph, 109

  Stanton, Andrew, 210, 212

  steam engine, 132

  Stern, Sam, 179

  Stewart, William Glen, 240, 241–42, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247–49

  stigmatization, 40, 97, 105

  stock market, 101, 264

  Stone, Jeff, 91

  stroller, collapsible, 195, 199

  structure of systems that learn from failure, 125–49

  cumulative selection/adaptation and, 128–29, 130, 292

  free markets systems and, 129–31, 284

  guided missile approach of success and, 146

  lean start-ups and, 141–45

  narrative fallacy and, 135–38, 147–49

  perfectionism, dangers of, 140–41

  software design and, 138–40

  technological change and, 131–35

  testing and, 128–31

  Unilever nozzle and, 125–26, 128, 129, 137, 147, 286

  success, 7, 15, 19, 266–67

  blind spot created by, 48

  failure and, 39–40

  Sullenberger, Chesley, 38, 39, 40–41

  Sun, 236

  Supreme Court, U.S., 84–85

  surgery, 3–6, 15–16, 18

  Swinmurn, Nick, 143

  Syria, 92

  systematic review, 164–65

  system safety, 17, 18, 45

  Taleb, Nassim Nicholas, 44–45, 133, 135

  Tavris, Carol, 75, 93

  Taylor, John, 95, 96

  TD-Gammon, 134–35

  Team Sky, 171–73, 179

  technolo
gy/technological change, 19, 39, 131–35

  bottom-up testing and learning and, 132–34

  linear model of, 131–33

  theory and, 133–34

  Tellis, Gerard J., 205

  temporal difference learning, 134–35

  testing, 128–49

  AIDS/HIV, strategies to combat, 147–49

  lean start-ups and, 141–45

  narrative fallacy as obstacle to, 135–38, 147–49

  perfectionism, dangers of, 140–41

  randomized control trials (RCTs) (See randomized control trials (RCTs))

  of Scared Straight program efficacy, 160–65

  software design and, 138–40

  technological change and, 131–35

  Tetlock, Philip, 99

  theory, 133–34, 212

  theory of relativity, 42, 133, 192, 195, 202

  thermodynamics, laws of, 132

  Think Like a Freak (Kobayashi), 187–88

  Thomas, Dorothy, 201

  Thompson, W. Leigh, 268

  Thomson, Donald, 115

  3M, 144

  Time, 39, 53

  time, perception of, 28–29, 30, 59

  Tour de France, 171–73

  Toyota Production System (TPS), 48–49, 51, 290

  Toy Story (film), 207

  Toy Story 2 (film), 207, 208–9

  training, 30–31, 47–48

  trial by jury, 118, 119

  Tyson, Neil deGrasse, 111–12, 113, 114, 117

  Uncontrolled (Manzi), 187

  Unilever, 125–26, 128, 137, 147

  unindicted co-ejaculator theory, 81

  United Airlines, 21–25

  United Airlines 173, 20, 27–31, 39, 40, 84

  United Kingdom

  criminal justice system reforms and, 117

  health care and, 10, 18, 54–55

  math proficiency in, 271

  United States of America

  DNA testing and, 84

  economics and, 94–97, 98

  entrepreneurship culture and, 270–71

  health care and, 9–10, 17, 32, 49–54, 55–56, 106

  math proficiency in, 271

  US Airways Flight 1549, 38, 39–40

  U.S. Army, 19, 261–63

  Vanier, Andre, 138–40

  variation, 286

  Vesalius, Andreas, 279

  Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 16

  Virginia Mason Health System, 48, 49–52, 53, 290

  Vowles, James, 180–81, 182, 183, 184

  Vries, Hugo de, 201

  Wald, Abraham, 33–37

  Wald, Martin, 33, 34

  Wallace, Alfred Russel, 201

  Wall Street Journal, 95

  war, 278

  Ward, Maria, 236

  Watt, James, 132

  weapons of mass destruction (WMD), 73–74, 74, 91–92, 93, 94

  West Point, 261–63

  When Prophecy Fails (Festiger), 71n, 72

  White Man’s Burden, The (Easterly), 174

  Why Smart Executives Fail: And What You Can Learn from Their Mistakes (Finkelstein), 100

  Wiggins, Bradley, 172

  Wilkinson, Stephan, 242, 245, 248–49

  Will and Vision (Tellis and Golder), 205

  Wilson, Kevin, 35

  Wimbledon High School, 267–68, 269

  wind-up radio, 195

  Wolff, Toto, 182

  World Health Organization, 11

  World War II, 33–37

  Wright brothers, 199

  wrongful convictions, 63–71, 77–85, 114–17

  Borchard’s compilation of, 67

  Bromgard case, 77–79, 116

  cognitive dissonance and, 79–83

  DNA evidence and, 68–71, 77, 79–83, 84, 120

  drive-bys and, 114

  exonerations through DNA testing, 69–70

  eyewitness identification and, 114–15

  false confessions and, 116

  finality doctrines and, 84

  hair analysis and, 116

  justice system’s initial refusal to learn from, 67–68

  as learning opportunity, 65

  lineups and, 115–16

  memory and, 114

  prosecutorial responses to exonerating DNA evidence, 78–83

  reform and, 115–17

  Rivera case, 63–65, 70–71, 82–83, 116, 119–21

  Supreme Court policy of reviewing cases involving procedural errors only, 84–8

  Xenophanes, 278

  Zappos, 143

  *All names of medical staff have been changed to protect anonymity.

  *Today the “black” boxes are actually bright orange in color, to improve visibility, and are often combined in a single unit.

  *The first proper clinical trial, according to many historians, was conducted by James Lind, a Scottish physician, in 1747. He was trying to find a cure for scurvy and conducted a test on the efficacy of citrus fruit during a long voyage with the East India Company.

  *It has been argued by some doctors that it makes sense to cover up mistakes. After all, if patients were to find out about the scale of medical error, they might refuse to accept any treatment at all, which might make the overall situation even worse. But this misses the point. The problem isn’t that patients aren’t finding out about mistakes; it’s that doctors aren’t finding out about them either, and are therefore unable to learn from them. Besides, concealing failure rates from patients undermines their ability to make rational choices; patients have a right to know about the appropriate risks before undergoing treatment.

  *Awareness of small errors has vital implications for companies, too. As Amy Edmondson, a professor at Harvard Business School, puts it: “Most large failures have multiple causes, and some of these causes are deeply embedded in organizations . . . Small failures are the early warning signs that are vital to avoiding catastrophic failure in the future.”

  *In many circumstances, task-focused behavior is actually an effective way of applying one’s effort. The problem is when this focus comes at the expense of the “bigger picture.” This is when excessive focus undermines performance and, in the case of aviation, safety.

  *We can see what this would look like in practice by applying it to a real-world event. This is what Jane, the head nurse, might have said if she had used this approach during the operation of Elaine Bromiley:

  PROBE—“Doctor, what other options are you considering if we can’t get the tube in?”

  ALERT—“Doctor, oxygen is 40 percent, and is still dropping, the tube is not going in, what about a tracheotomy kit?”

  CHALLENGE—“Doctor, we need to conduct a tracheotomy now or we will lose the patient.”

  EMERGENCY—“I’m alerting the resuscitation team to do the tracheotomy.”

  *“Black box” sometimes has the connotation of an unknown and possibly inscrutable process lying between some input and its result. Here we are using it in the slightly different but related sense of the data recorder in an accident investigation.

  *As a Parliamentary Select Committee report in the UK in 2015 put it: “Resources devoted to investigating and learning to improve clinical safety will save unnecessary expense by reducing avoidable harm to patients.”

  *The precise relationship between failure and progress in science is a complex topic. There is much debate about when scientists can or should create new theories and paradigms in the light of challenging data. The philosopher Thomas Kuhn has written extensively on this subject. But the basic point that scientific theories should be testable, and therefore vulnerable, is almost universally agreed upon. Self-correction is a central aspect of how science progresses.
>
  *In my 2010 book Bounce I explore this area in some detail. In this section, I do not rely on the ideas in Bounce. The point here is merely that extended practice seems to be a prerequisite for expertise in predictable environments.

  *The only thing that does change over time is not performance but confidence. In one survey, 25 percent of psychotherapists put themselves in the top 10 percent of performers and none placed themselves below average.

  *Daniel Kahneman illustrates this point by inviting us to think about how rapidly we learn to steer a car. The feedback is instant and objective. It takes far longer to learn how to steer a ship, because there are long delays between actions and noticeable outcomes.

  *This may also help to explain why mortality and morbidity conferences—recurring meetings among clinicians designed to improve patient care—have not made a significant dent on avoidable mistakes. These are held regularly by medical centers and are supposed to give practitioners an opportunity to learn from mistakes. Clinicians are often nervous about speaking up, or reporting on their colleagues. Perhaps even more important, there is little attempt to probe systemic problems.

  *In June 2015, it was reported that as many as 1,000 babies are dying before, during, or after birth each year due to avoidable mistakes in the NHS. One simple error of failing to monitor babies’ heart rates properly accounts for a quarter of negligence payouts.

  *In England and Wales, autopsies are ordered whenever the cause of death is officially unknown, or when the death occurred in suspicious circumstances. In 2013, nearly 20 percent of deaths required an autopsy.

  *The case material is based on the work of the Innocence Project, interviews with Juan Rivera, Rivera’s lawyers, and Barry Scheck, plus contemporaneous and archive newspaper and media reports, including an e-mail exchange with Andrew Martin, who wrote on the case for the New York Times.

  *Her real name was Dorothy Martin but, in order to protect her anonymity, Festinger changed the name in his seminal book When Prophecy Fails.

  *Justice Antonin Scalia has gone even further. In a case in 2009, he said: “This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a . . . court that he is ‘actually’ innocent.”

 

‹ Prev