Nathan J Gordon, William L Fleisher
Page 54
ticket counter personnel, El Al, 241
overview, 313
“ticking bomb” scenario, 227 228
physiological changes, 317
Tidwell v. Superior Court for Humboldt County, 250
polygraph, 313 314, 314f, 315f
tilting head, 114
Preliminary Credibility Assessment Screening
time limit, interview/interrogation, 33 34, 34b
System, 321, 322, 322f
Timm, H.W., 316
pupil dilation, 322
tongue, 120 121
thermal imaging, 320, 320f
torture
voice stress
debate over use of, 223 224, 225 226
difficulties involved, 317
defining, 225
overview, 314, 315, 317f
ethics, 230
studies of, 315 316, 317
false confessions, 228 230
truthful nonverbal behavior, interviewer, 33, 33b
KUBARK Intelligence Manual, 226 227
truthful persons
overview, 223
during interrogations, 274
post 9/11, 230 231
reaction to projective questions
“ticking bomb” scenario, 227 228
versus deceptive subjects, 97 98, 99, 99b
trial by, 3 4
example of, 100, 101, 102, 103
touching self, 124, 125f
in reinterview, 142 143
trial by combat, 2
truth verification instrumentation, 318 319, 318f
trial by jury, 4 5
turning head towards interviewer, 114
trial by ordeal, 2, 3
typing written statements, 282
trial by torture. See torture
trickery, using to obtain confession, 251 252
U
Tri Zone Comparison Technique, 303, 304
Um Yang concept, 285
truth
UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel,
See also forensic statement analysis; nonverbal
Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or
behavioral assessment; truth verification
Punishment, 225
instrumentation; truthful persons
unconditioned response (UCR), 23, 23f
acceptable lies, 12
unconditioned stimulus (UCS), 23, 23f
convincing suspect to tell, 274 276
Undeutsch, Udo, 59
defining, 12
Undeutsch Hypothesis, 59 60
ground zero, 167
unexpected complications during incident, in CBSA, 61
interviewer competence, 13, 14 15, 14f
University of Chicago, 108
offering persuasive arguments for telling, 260
University of South Africa (UNISA) study
overview, 11
accuracy rate, 168 169, 169t
in reaction to MITT, 43
cases solved, 167 168, 168t
role of perception in, 11 12
distribution of scores, 169 173, 171t
search for
overview, 167, 168t
overview, 1
predictability of determinations, 169 173, 171t
physiological changes, 4 6, 7, 7f
results of, 183, 184, 185 186, 186f, 187f
polygraph, 8 9, 8f
scores and assessments made, 169, 169t
INDEX
383
single issue suspect cases, 173, 173t, 174t
overview, 314, 315, 317f
weighted scoring system, 173 183, 176t, 180t,
studies of, 315 316, 317
182t, 183t, 184t
Vollmer, August, 297
unstructured production, in CBSA, 60
“volumetric glove”, 5
unusual details, in CBSA, 61
voluntary confessions. See confessions
Upchurch, M, 315
voluntary false confessions, 229
U.S. Customs Service, 242 244
voodoo death, 21
V
W
vacuum gestures, 292
waiving rights, 250
validation of FAINT
Waln, R.F., 316
case study 1, 187 190
Walter, Richard, 271
case study 2, 190 194
Wang, S., 316
case study 3, 194 198
warehouse theft case study
case study 4, 198 201
analysis of, 195 198
case study 5, 201 205
overview, 194 198
case study 6, 205 208
warning signs, preattack, 294 295
overview, 186
Warren, Chief Justice, 249 250
UNISA study
Watanabe, S., 317
accuracy rate, 168 169, 169t
waterboarding, 230 231, 231f
cases solved, 167 168, 168t
Webb, Andrea, 322
distribution of scores, 169 173, 171t
Webster Doyle, Terrence, 284 285
overview, 167, 168t
WeCU Technologies, 244
predictability of determinations, 169 173, 171t
weighted scoring system, FAINT, 173 183, 176t,
results of, 183, 184, 185 186, 186f, 187f
180t, 182t, 183t, 184t
scores and assessments made, 169, 169t
white lies, 12
single issue suspect cases, 173, 173t, 174t
whitened face, 123, 129
weighted scoring system, 173 183, 176t, 180t, 182t,
whites, of eyes, 118, 119f
183t, 184t
witch hunts, 4
van Raab, William, 243
witness psychology, 59
vasoconstriction, 19 20
word choice, in questions, 90 91
venting anger, 288. See also aggression
written confessions, 281 282
Veraguth, S., 6
written statement, scoring, 141
verbal assessment, 97
verbal cues. See projective questions
X
verbal dominance, in interview/interrogation,
Xianglin, She, 228
28, 29
verbal interviewer influence, 210 211
Y
videotape recordings. See recordings
Yarborough v. Alverado, 251
Vidocq Society, 271 272
yawning, 121, 129
VIEW Questionnaire, 75
yes no questions, 213
Visual Constructed eye cue, 132, 132f
Yin Yang concept, 285
visual processing mode, 131
“You Phase” polygraph test, 303
Visual Remembered eye cue, 132f, 134
Yourick, D.L., 316
voice, of report, 219 220
voice stress
Z
difficulties involved, 317
“Zero Hypothesis”, 67
Document Outline
Cover
Front Matter
Copyright
Foreword
Preface A Note about Gender
About the Authors
Acknowledgments
Companion Web Site
The Search for Truth Summary
References
Truth and Lies Summary
Reference
Psychophysiological Basis of the Forensic Assessment Summary
References
Preparation for the Interview/Interrogation Summary
Reference
Morgan Interview Theme Technique (MITT) MITT Suspect 1
MITT Suspect 2
MITT Suspect 3
MITT Suspect 4
Summary
References
Forensic Statement Analysis Summary Acknowledgment
References
Question Formulation: Irrelevant, Relevant, and Comparison Questions Irrelevant questions
Relevant questions
<
br /> Comparison questions
Summary
References
Projective Analysis of Unwitting Verbal Cues Summary Acknowledgment
References
Nonverbal Behavioral Assessment General posture
Head and face Eyes
Mouth
Nose
Arms and hands
Feet and legs
Grooming behaviors
Thinking gestures
Involuntary biological signs
Paralinguistic behaviors
Neurolinguistics Neurolinguistic Eye Cues
Nonverbal behavior during the interrogation; surrender
Summary
References
Traditional Scoring of the FAINT Interview Case study 1 Suspect A
Case study 2 Suspect B
Suspect A
Suspect B
Case study 3: multiple suspects Employee 1 Posture/Demeanor
MITT
Employee 2 Posture/Demeanor
MITT
Employee 3 Posture/Demeanor
MITT
Employee 4 Posture/Demeanor
MITT
Summary
The Validation of the Forensic Assessment Interview (FAINT) Case study 1 Analysis of Case Study 1
Case study 2 Analysis of Case Study 2
Case study 3 Analysis of Case Study 3
Case study 4 Analysis of Case Study 4
Case study 5 Analysis of Case Study 5
Case study 6 Analysis of Case Study 6
Summary
References
Interviewing Children and the Mentally Challenged Summary
References
Report Writing Summary
Torture and False Confessions: The Ethics of a Post-9/11 World Summary
References
Pre-employment Interviewing Summary
References
Passenger Screening with Verbal and Nonverbal Cues Summary
References
Legal Considerations Summary
References
The Integrated Interrogation Technique Make a forceful assertion that the suspect is guilty
Do not allow the suspect to deny the act
Offer a series of possibilities of how and why this may have happened
Undermine the person's self-confidence
Offer persuasive arguments for telling the truth
Offer solutions, where possible, to alleviate the person's fear
Compliment the person
Use alternative and leading questions
Watch for thè`buy´śigns
Move in close and press for the confession
Summary
Reference
Statements, Recordings, and Videos Summary
References
Understanding Aggressive Behavior and Dealing with Angry People Intention movements of attack
Vacuum gestures
Redirection gestures
Preattack warning signs
Summary
The Instrumental Detection of Deception: Polygraph Summary
References
The Search for Truth: Future Instrumentation Summary
References
Forensic Assessment Interview
Weighted FAINT Form: Forensic Assessment Interview
Pre-employment Booklet (Keystone Intelligence Network, Inc.)
Questionnaire
Index A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z